{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]],"date-time":"2025-06-19T05:04:39Z","timestamp":1750309479914,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,12]],"date-time":"2024-07-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1720742400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,31]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>We consider the problem of finding a system with the best primary performance measure among a finite number of simulated systems in the presence of subjective stochastic constraints on secondary performance measures. When no feasible system exists, the decision maker may be willing to relax some constraint thresholds. We take multiple threshold values for each constraint as a user\u2019s input and propose indifference-zone procedures that perform the phases of feasibility check and selection-of-the-best sequentially or simultaneously. Given that there is no change in the underlying simulated systems, our procedures recycle simulation observations to conduct feasibility checks across all potential thresholds. We prove that the proposed procedures yield the best system in the most desirable feasible region possible with at least a pre-specified probability. Our experimental results show that our procedures perform well with respect to the number of observations required to make a decision, as compared with straight-forward procedures that repeatedly solve the problem for each set of constraint thresholds, and that our simultaneously-running procedure provides the best overall performance.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3664814","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,11]],"date-time":"2024-05-11T11:09:53Z","timestamp":1715425793000},"page":"1-60","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Selection of the Best in the Presence of Subjective Stochastic Constraints"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"34","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1266-7200","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yuwei","family":"Zhou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5763-0199","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sigr\u00fan","family":"Andrad\u00f3ttir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9536-5755","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Seong-Hee","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,12]]},"reference":[{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","DOI":"10.1002\/nav.20408"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2020.10.021"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","DOI":"10.1145\/1842713.1842716"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.47.6.800.9812"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","DOI":"10.1109\/WSC.2015.7408520"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3129130"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","DOI":"10.1287\/ijoc.2019.0920"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","DOI":"10.1145\/2567921"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2012.08.012"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4939-1384-8_2"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","DOI":"10.1287\/ijoc.1120.0519"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","DOI":"10.1145\/502109.502111"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","first-page":"501","volume-title":"Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science","author":"Kim Seong-Hee","year":"2006","unstructured":"Seong-Hee Kim and Barry L. Nelson. 2006. Selecting the best system: Simulation. In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Shane G. Henderson and Barry L. Nelson (Eds.). Elsevier, 501\u2013534."},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","DOI":"10.1080\/03610918508812467"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","volume-title":"Simulation Modeling and Analysis (third ed.)","author":"Law Averill M.","year":"2000","unstructured":"Averill M. Law and David M. Kelton. 2000. Simulation Modeling and Analysis (third ed.). Academic Press."},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","DOI":"10.1080\/07408171003705367"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","DOI":"10.1109\/TAC.2012.2195931"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/2630066","article-title":"Stochastically constrained ranking and selection via SCORE","volume":"25","author":"Pasupathy Raghu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Raghu Pasupathy, Susan R. Hunter, Nugroho A. Pujowidianto, Loo Hay Lee, and Chun-Hung Chen. 2014. Stochastically constrained ranking and selection via SCORE. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 25, 1(2014), Article 1 , 26 pages.","journal-title":"ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_20_2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2004.12.010"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_21_2","DOI":"10.1080\/03610927708827466"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_22_2","DOI":"10.1287\/opre.2013.1207"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_23_2","DOI":"10.1287\/ijoc.2022.1227"}],"container-title":["ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3664814","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3664814","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]],"date-time":"2025-06-19T01:17:29Z","timestamp":1750295849000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3664814"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,12]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,31]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3664814"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3664814","relation":{},"ISSN":["1049-3301","1558-1195"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1049-3301"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1558-1195"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2023-03-29","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-04-30","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2024-07-12","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}