{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,10]],"date-time":"2026-01-10T19:34:32Z","timestamp":1768073672222,"version":"3.49.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":43,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]],"date-time":"2025-04-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745280000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13039\/100000001","name":"NSF (National Science Foundation)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["CCF 2200256"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["CCF 2200256"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13039\/100000001","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3696410.3714935","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]],"date-time":"2025-04-22T22:52:18Z","timestamp":1745362338000},"page":"560-575","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["In-Group Love, Out-Group Hate: A Framework to Measure Affective Polarization via Contentious Online Discussions"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6070-892X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Buddhika","family":"Nettasinghe","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8751-3076","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ashwin","family":"Rao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Computer Science, USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, California, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8552-2681","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bohan","family":"Jiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0847-5284","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Allon G.","family":"Percus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5071-0575","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kristina","family":"Lerman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Computer Science, USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, California, USA"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","volume-title":"Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks. Nature communications","author":"Alipourfard Nazanin","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nazanin Alipourfard, Buddhika Nettasinghe, Andr\u00e9s Abeliuk, Vikram Krishnamurthy, and Kristina Lerman. 2020. Friendship paradox biases perceptions in directed networks. Nature communications, Vol. 11, 1 (2020), 707."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1","volume-title":"Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political analysis","author":"Barber\u00e1 Pablo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pablo Barber\u00e1. 2015. Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political analysis, Vol. 23, 1 (2015), 76--91."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.124.048301"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3357384.3357977"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Emily Chen Kristina Lerman Emilio Ferrara et al. 2020. Tracking social media discourse about the covid-19 pandemic: Development of a public coronavirus twitter data set. JMIR public health and surveillance Vol. 6 2 (2020) e19273.","DOI":"10.2196\/19273"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","volume-title":"Those on ideological right favor fewer COVID-19 restrictions in most advanced economies","author":"Connaughton Aidan","unstructured":"Aidan Connaughton. 2021. Those on ideological right favor fewer COVID-19 restrictions in most advanced economies. Pew Research Center. Available at: https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/lockdown-continues-across-sydney-as-nsw-continues-to-record-new-covid-19-cases\/. Accessed: 2024-04--11."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1974.10480137"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","volume-title":"Workshops at the twenty-seventh AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.","author":"Dredze Mark","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mark Dredze, Michael J Paul, Shane Bergsma, and Hieu Tran. 2013. Carmen: A twitter geolocation system with applications to public health. In Workshops at the twenty-seventh AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"James Druckman Samara Klar Yanna Kkrupnikov Matthew Levendusky and John Barry Ryan. 2020. The political impact of affective polarization: how partisan animus shapes COVID-19 attitudes. (2020).","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/ztgpn"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","volume-title":"What do we measure when we measure affective polarization? Public opinion quarterly","author":"Druckman James N","year":"2019","unstructured":"James N Druckman and Matthew S Levendusky. 2019. What do we measure when we measure affective polarization? Public opinion quarterly, Vol. 83, 1 (2019), 114--122."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_11_1","volume-title":"Affective polarization in the American public. Handbook on politics and public opinion","author":"Druckman James N","year":"2022","unstructured":"James N Druckman and Jeremy Levy. 2022a. 18. Affective polarization in the American public. Handbook on politics and public opinion (2022), 257."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1","volume-title":"Handbook on politics and public opinion","author":"Druckman James N","unstructured":"James N Druckman and Jeremy Levy. 2022b. Affective polarization in the American public. In Handbook on politics and public opinion. Edward Elgar Publishing, 257--270."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","volume-title":"Science","volume":"370","author":"Finkel Eli J","year":"2020","unstructured":"Eli J Finkel, Christopher A Bail, Mina Cikara, Peter H Ditto, Shanto Iyengar, Samara Klar, Lilliana Mason, Mary C McGrath, Brendan Nyhan, David G Rand, et al. 2020. Political sectarianism in America. Science, Vol. 370, 6516 (2020), 533--536."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","volume-title":"Unpacking polarization: Antagonism and alignment in signed networks of online interaction. PNAS Nexus","author":"Fraxanet Emma","year":"2024","unstructured":"Emma Fraxanet, Max Pellert, Simon Schweighofer, Vicen\u00e7 G\u00f3mez, and David Garcia. 2024. Unpacking polarization: Antagonism and alignment in signed networks of online interaction. PNAS Nexus (2024), pgae276."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3140565"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-47167-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2021.acl-long.127"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_18_1","volume-title":"Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature human behaviour","author":"Gollwitzer Anton","year":"2020","unstructured":"Anton Gollwitzer, Cameron Martel, William J Brady, Philip P\u00e4rnamets, Isaac G Freedman, Eric D Knowles, and Jay J Van Bavel. 2020. Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature human behaviour, Vol. 4, 11 (2020), 1186--1197."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_19_1","volume-title":"Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. Science advances","author":"Green Jon","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jon Green, Jared Edgerton, Daniel Naftel, Kelsey Shoub, and Skyler J Cranmer. 2020. Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. Science advances, Vol. 6, 28 (2020), eabc2717."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2007835117"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_21_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media","volume":"7","author":"Hodas Nathan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nathan Hodas, Farshad Kooti, and Kristina Lerman. 2013. Friendship paradox redux: Your friends are more interesting than you. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 7. 225--233."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/icwsm.v3i1.13939"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_23_1","volume-title":"Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685","author":"Hu Edward J","year":"2021","unstructured":"Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2021. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685 (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_24_1","volume-title":"The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual review of political science","author":"Iyengar Shanto","year":"2019","unstructured":"Shanto Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes, Matthew Levendusky, Neil Malhotra, and Sean J Westwood. 2019. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual review of political science, Vol. 22 (2019), 129--146."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_25_1","volume-title":"not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public opinion quarterly","author":"Iyengar Shanto","year":"2012","unstructured":"Shanto Iyengar, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public opinion quarterly, Vol. 76, 3 (2012), 405--431."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_26_1","volume-title":"Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American journal of political science","author":"Iyengar Shanto","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shanto Iyengar and Sean J Westwood. 2015. Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American journal of political science, Vol. 59, 3 (2015), 690--707."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/hbe2.202"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0250817"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_29_1","volume-title":"Affective polarization and dynamics of information spread in online networks. npj Complexity","author":"Lerman Kristina","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kristina Lerman, Dan Feldman, Zihao He, and Ashwin Rao. 2024. Affective polarization and dynamics of information spread in online networks. npj Complexity, Vol. 1, 1 (2024), 8."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_30_1","volume-title":"Learning to discover social circles in ego networks. Advances in neural information processing systems","author":"Leskovec Jure","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jure Leskovec and Julian Mcauley. 2012. Learning to discover social circles in ego networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 25 (2012)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/693987"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3167\/fpcs.2011.290307"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.51685\/jqd.2023.021"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_34_1","volume-title":"Estimating Exposure to Information on Social Networks. ACM transactions on social computing","author":"Nettasinghe Buddhika","year":"2024","unstructured":"Buddhika Nettasinghe, Kowe Kadoma, Mor Naaman, and Vikram Krishnamurthy. 2024a. Estimating Exposure to Information on Social Networks. ACM transactions on social computing, Vol. 7, 1--4 (2024), 1--24."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_35_1","volume-title":"What Do Your Friends Think?'': Efficient Polling Methods for Networks Using Friendship Paradox","author":"Nettasinghe Buddhika","year":"2021","unstructured":"Buddhika Nettasinghe and Vikram Krishnamurthy. 2021a. '' What Do Your Friends Think?'': Efficient Polling Methods for Networks Using Friendship Paradox. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, Vol. 33, 3 (2021), 1291--1305."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_36_1","volume-title":"Maximum likelihood estimation of power-law degree distributions via friendship paradox-based sampling. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD)","author":"Nettasinghe Buddhika","year":"2021","unstructured":"Buddhika Nettasinghe and Vikram Krishnamurthy. 2021b. Maximum likelihood estimation of power-law degree distributions via friendship paradox-based sampling. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), Vol. 15, 6 (2021), 1--28."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_37_1","volume-title":"Dynamics of Affective Polarization: From Consensus to Partisan Divides. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16940","author":"Nettasinghe Buddhika","year":"2024","unstructured":"Buddhika Nettasinghe, Allon G Percus, and Kristina Lerman. 2024b. Dynamics of Affective Polarization: From Consensus to Partisan Divides. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16940 (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_38_1","volume-title":"Pandemic Culture Wars: Partisan Differences in the Moral Language of COVID-19 Discussions. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData). IEEE, 413--422","author":"Rao Ashwin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ashwin Rao, Siyi Guo, Sze Yuh Nina Wang, Fred Morstatter, and Kristina Lerman. 2023. Pandemic Culture Wars: Partisan Differences in the Moral Language of COVID-19 Discussions. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData). IEEE, 413--422."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/26692"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_40_1","unstructured":"Rick Rojas. 2020. Masks Become a Flash Point in the Virus Culture Wars. New York Times. Available at: https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/05\/03\/us\/coronavirus-masks-protests.html. Accessed: 2024-04--11."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1137\/22M1542325"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2207159119"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_43_1","volume-title":"Testing the robustness of the ANES feeling thermometer indicators of affective polarization. American Political Science Review","author":"Tyler Matthew","year":"2023","unstructured":"Matthew Tyler and Shanto Iyengar. 2023. Testing the robustness of the ANES feeling thermometer indicators of affective polarization. American Political Science Review (2023), 1--7."}],"event":{"name":"WWW '25: The ACM Web Conference 2025","location":"Sydney NSW Australia","acronym":"WWW '25","sponsor":["SIGWEB ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3696410.3714935","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3696410.3714935","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]],"date-time":"2025-06-19T01:18:54Z","timestamp":1750295934000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3696410.3714935"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]]},"references-count":43,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3696410.3714935","10.1145\/3696410"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3696410.3714935","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-04-22","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}