{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,23]],"date-time":"2026-06-23T22:14:03Z","timestamp":1782252843229,"version":"3.54.5"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":36,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,3]],"date-time":"2025-03-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1740960000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Deutsche Telekom Stiftung","award":["GENIUS"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["GENIUS"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,3]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3706468.3706494","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T14:04:11Z","timestamp":1740146651000},"page":"831-836","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Feedback from Generative AI: Correlates of Student Engagement in Text Revision from 655 Classes from Primary and Secondary School"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9714-6505","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thorben","family":"Jansen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-3680-3304","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrea","family":"Horbach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5714-3198","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jennifer","family":"Meyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","volume-title":"The National Council on Measurement in Education. April 12\u201316 2004, San Diego, USA","author":"Attali Yigal","year":"2004","unstructured":"Yigal Attali. 2004. Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion. In The National Council on Measurement in Education. April 12\u201316 2004, San Diego, USA."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"J.\u00a0Luca Bahr Lars H\u00f6ft Jennifer Meyer and Thorben Jansen. 2024. Receptivity to instructional computer-based feedback (RIF): A multistudy validation of a German RIF Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment (2024). 10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000841Advance online publication.","DOI":"10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000841"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","volume-title":"The psychology of written composition","author":"Bereiter Carl","year":"1987","unstructured":"Carl Bereiter and Marlene Scardamalia. 1987. The psychology of written composition. Routledge."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"David Boud and Elizabeth Molloy. 2013. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38 6 (2013) 698\u2013712. 10.1080\/02602938.2012.691462","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2012.691462"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carol Chapelle Elena Cotos and Jooyoung Lee. 2015. Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation. Language Testing 32 3 (2015) 385\u2013405. 10.1177\/0265532214565386","DOI":"10.1177\/0265532214565386"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wei Dai Yi-Shan Tsai Jionghao Lin Ahmad Aldino Hua Jin Tongguang Li Dragan Ga\u0161evi\u0107 and Guanliang Chen. 2024. Assessing the proficiency of large language models in automatic feedback generation: An evaluation study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 7 (2024) 100299. 10.1016\/j.caeai.2024.100299","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeai.2024.100299"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jill Fitzgerald and Lynda\u00a0R. Markham. 1987. Teaching Children About Revision in Writing. Cognition and Instruction 4 1 (1987) 3\u201324. 10.1207\/s1532690xci0401_1","DOI":"10.1207\/s1532690xci0401_1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Johanna Fleckenstein Lucas\u00a0W. Liebenow and Jennifer Meyer. 2023. Automated feedback and writing: A multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students\u2019 performance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 6 (2023) 1162454. 10.3389\/frai.2023.1162454","DOI":"10.3389\/frai.2023.1162454"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Steve Graham Alyson\u00a0A. Collins and Stephen Ciullo. 2024. Evidence-based recommendations for teaching writing. Education 3-13 52 7 (2024) 979\u2013992. 10.1080\/03004279.2024.2357893","DOI":"10.1080\/03004279.2024.2357893"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","first-page":"187","volume-title":"Handbook of writing research","author":"Graham Steve","year":"2006","unstructured":"Steve Graham and Karen\u00a0R. Harris. 2006. Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing. In Handbook of writing research. Vol.\u00a05. Guilford Press, 187\u2013207."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1163\/9789004270480_003"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"John Hattie and Helen Timperley. 2007. The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 1 (2007) 81\u2013112. 10.3102\/003465430298487","DOI":"10.3102\/003465430298487"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-25112-3_2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thorben Jansen Jennifer Meyer Johanna Fleckenstein Andrea Horbach Stefan Keller and Jens M\u00f6ller. 2024. Individualizing goal-setting interventions using automated writing evaluation to support secondary school students\u2019 text revisions. Learning and Instruction 89 (2024) 101847. 10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2023.101847","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2023.101847"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Avraham\u00a0N. Kluger and Angelo DeNisi. 1996. The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review a Meta-analysis and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin 119 2 (1996) 254\u2013284. 10.1037\/0033-2909.119.2.254","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.119.2.254"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Svetlana Koltovskaia. 2020. Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing 44 (2020) 100450. 10.1016\/j.asw.2020.100450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2020.100450"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Xiaoxuan Lv Wei Ren and Yue Xie. 2021. The Effects of Online Feedback on ESL\/EFL Writing: A Meta-Analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 30 6 (2021) 643\u2013653. 10.1007\/s40299-021-00594-6","DOI":"10.1007\/s40299-021-00594-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jennifer Meyer Thorben Jansen Ronja Schiller Lucas\u00a0W. Liebenow Marlene Steinbach Andrea Horbach and Johanna Fleckenstein. 2024. Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students\u2019 text revision motivation and positive emotions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 6 (2024) 100199. 10.1016\/j.caeai.2023.100199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeai.2023.100199"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohammed\u00a0A. Mohsen. 2022. Computer-Mediated Corrective Feedback to Improve L2 Writing Skills: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research 60 5 (2022) 1253\u20131276. 10.1177\/07356331211064066","DOI":"10.1177\/07356331211064066"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thuy T.-N. Ngo Howard H.-J. Chen and Kyle K.-W. Lai. 2022. The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation in EFL\/ESL writing: a three-level meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments (2022) 1\u201318. 10.1080\/10494820.2022.2096642","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2022.2096642"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ernesto Panadero. 2023. Toward a paradigm shift in feedback research: Five further steps influenced by self-regulated learning theory. Educational Psychologist 58 3 (2023) 193\u2013204. 10.1080\/00461520.2023.2223642","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2023.2223642"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Margaret Price Karen Handley and Jill Millar. 2011. Feedback: focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education 36 8 (2011) 879\u2013896. 10.1080\/03075079.2010.483513","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2010.483513"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Julie Schroeder Bonnie Grohe and Rene Pogue. 2008. The Impact of Criterion Writing Evaluation Technology on Criminal Justice Student Writing Skills. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 19 3 (2008) 432\u2013445. 10.1080\/10511250802476269","DOI":"10.1080\/10511250802476269"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Meade\u00a0MacKay Steve\u00a0Graham Sharlene A.\u00a0Kiuhara. 2020. The Effects of Writing on Learning in Science Social Studies and Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research (2020) 0034654320914744. 10.3102\/0034654320914744","DOI":"10.3102\/0034654320914744"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","volume-title":"UNESCO and education: Everyone has the right to education","year":"2011","unstructured":"UNESCO. 2011. UNESCO and education: Everyone has the right to education. UNESCO. https:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/ark:\/48223\/pf0000212715"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Elaine\u00a0Lin Wang Lindsay\u00a0C. Matsumura Richard Correnti Diane Litman Haoran Zhang Emily Howe Ahmed Magooda and Rafael Quintana. 2020. eRevis(ing): Students\u2019 revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system. Assessing Writing 44 (2020) 100449. 10.1016\/j.asw.2020.100449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2020.100449"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mark Warschauer and Douglas Grimes. 2008. Automated Writing Assessment in the Classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal 3 1 (2008) 22\u201336. 10.1080\/15544800701771580","DOI":"10.1080\/15544800701771580"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Khaled El Ebyaryand\u00a0Scott Windeatt. 2010. The impact of computer-based feedback on students\u2019 written work. International Journal of English Studies 10 2 (2010) 121. 10.6018\/ijes\/2010\/2\/119231","DOI":"10.6018\/ijes\/2010\/2\/119231"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Naomi\u00a0E. Winstone and Robert\u00a0A. Nash. 2023. Toward a cohesive psychological science of effective feedback. Educational Psychologist 58 3 (2023) 111\u2013129. 10.1080\/00461520.2023.2224444","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2023.2224444"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Naomi\u00a0E. Winstone Robert\u00a0A. Nash Michael Parker and James Rowntree. 2017. Supporting Learners\u2019 Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educational Psychologist 52 1 (2017) 17\u201337. 10.1080\/00461520.2016.1207538","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2016.1207538"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Benedikt Wisniewski Klaus Zierer and John Hattie. 2020. The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2020) 3087. 10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.03087","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.03087"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yong Wu and Christian\u00a0D. Schunn. 2020. When peers agree do students listen? The central role of feedback quality and feedback frequency in determining uptake of feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology 62 (2020) 101897. 10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2020.101897","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2020.101897"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Na Zhai and Xiaomei Ma. 2022. The Effectiveness of Automated Writing Evaluation on Writing Quality: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research (2022) 073563312211273. 10.1177\/07356331221127300","DOI":"10.1177\/07356331221127300"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhe\u00a0Victor Zhang and Ken Hyland. 2018. Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing 36 (2018) 90\u2013102. 10.1016\/j.asw.2018.02.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2018.02.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Steffen Zitzmann Christoph Lindner Claudia Leucht and Stefan Leucht. 2024. Taking uncertainty in the assessment of response into account: An advanced guideline for computing responder rates in clinical trials. European Neuropsychopharmacology: the Journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology 85 (2024) 3\u20134. 10.1016\/j.euroneuro.2024.03.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euroneuro.2024.03.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Steffen Zitzmann Nils Machts Nicolas H\u00fcbner Stefan Schauber Jens M\u00f6ller and Christoph Lindner. 2023. The Yet Underestimated Importance of Communicating Findings from Educational Trials to Teachers Schools School Authorities or Policy Makers (Comment on Brady et al. (2023)). Educational Psychology Review 35 (2023) 65. 10.1007\/s10648-023-09776-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s10648-023-09776-8"}],"event":{"name":"LAK '25: The 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","location":"Dublin Ireland","acronym":"LAK 2025"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3706468.3706494","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3706468.3706494","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,19]],"date-time":"2025-06-19T01:56:50Z","timestamp":1750298210000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3706468.3706494"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,3]]},"references-count":36,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3706468.3706494","10.1145\/3706468"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3706468.3706494","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-03-03","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}