{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,18]],"date-time":"2026-07-18T16:34:24Z","timestamp":1784392464294,"version":"3.55.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":67,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]],"date-time":"2025-04-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745539200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001821","name":"Vienna Science and Technology Fund","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["10.47379\/ICT20065"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["10.47379\/ICT20065"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001821","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,26]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713413","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,24]],"date-time":"2025-04-24T03:20:47Z","timestamp":1745464847000},"page":"1-17","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["The Gulf of Interpretation: From Chart to Message and Back Again"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6560-4273","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christian","family":"Knoll","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Computer Science, Doctoral School Computer Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1192-0710","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Torsten","family":"M\u00f6ller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Computer Science, Data Science @ Uni Vienna, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5475-8632","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kathleen","family":"Gregory","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4110-1759","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Laura","family":"Koesten","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Computer Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5117\/9789462989511ch27"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581168"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jeremy Boy Ronald\u00a0A. Rensink Enrico Bertini and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2014. A Principled Way of Assessing Visualization Literacy. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20 12 (2014) 1963\u20131972. 10.1109\/TVCG.2014.2346984","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2014.2346984"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581524"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/BELIV51497.2020.00010"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Katy B\u00f6rner Andreas Bueckle and Michael Ginda. 2019. Data visualization literacy: Definitions conceptual frameworks exercises and assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 6 (2019) 1857\u20131864. 10.1073\/pnas.1807180116","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1807180116"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Katy B\u00f6rner Adam Maltese Russell\u00a0Nelson Balliet and Joe Heimlich. 2016. Investigating aspects of data visualization literacy using 20 information visualizations and 273 science museum visitors. Information Visualization 15 3 (2016) 198\u2013213. 10.1177\/1473871615594652","DOI":"10.1177\/1473871615594652"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Remco Chang Caroline Ziemkiewicz Tera\u00a0Marie Green and William Ribarsky. 2009. Defining Insight for Visual Analytics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 29 2 (2009) 14\u201317. 10.1109\/MCG.2009.22","DOI":"10.1109\/MCG.2009.22"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","unstructured":"Jian Chen Petra Isenberg Robert\u00a0S. Laramee Tobias Isenberg Michael Sedlmair Torsten M\u00f6ller and Han-Wei Shen. 2022. Not As Easy As You Think \u2013 Experiences and Lessons Learnt from Trying to Create a Bottom-Up Visualization Image Typology. arxiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2209.07533\u00a0[cs.GR]"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"William\u00a0S. Cleveland and Robert McGill. 1984. Graphical Perception: Theory Experimentation and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 79 387 (1984) 531\u2013554. 10.1080\/01621459.1984.10478080","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1984.10478080"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aritra Dasgupta Jorge Poco Yaxing Wei Robert Cook Enrico Bertini and Claudio\u00a0T. Silva. 2015. Bridging Theory with Practice: An Exploratory Study of Visualization Use and Design for Climate Model Comparison. IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics 21 09 (2015) 996\u20131014. 10.1109\/TVCG.2015.2413774","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2015.2413774"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Evanthia Dimara and Charles Perin. 2020. What is Interaction for Data Visualization? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26 1 (2020) 119\u2013129. 10.1109\/TVCG.2019.2934283","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2019.2934283"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctvzgb8c7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Steven\u00a0L. Franconeri Lace\u00a0M. Padilla Priti Shah Jeffrey\u00a0M. Zacks and Jessica Hullman. 2021. The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 22 3 (2021) 110\u2013161. 10.1177\/15291006211051956","DOI":"10.1177\/15291006211051956"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581406"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/REW53955.2021.00047"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Helen\u00a0Ai He Jagoda Walny Sonja Thoma Sheelagh Carpendale and Wesley Willett. 2024. Enthusiastic and Grounded Avoidant and Cautious: Understanding Public Receptivity to Data and Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 30 1 (2024) 1435\u20131445. 10.1109\/TVCG.2023.3326917","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2023.3326917"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1753326.1753357"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Joseph Henrich Steven\u00a0J. Heine and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 2\u20133 (2010) 61\u201383. 10.1017\/S0140525X0999152X","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X0999152X"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hsiu-Fang Hsieh and Sarah\u00a0E. Shannon. 2005. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 9 (2005) 1277\u20131288. 10.1177\/1049732305276687","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732305276687"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jessica Hullman and Nick Diakopoulos. 2011. Visualization Rhetoric: Framing Effects in Narrative Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17 12 (2011) 2231\u20132240. 10.1109\/TVCG.2011.255","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2011.255"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Indratmo Lee Howorko Joyce\u00a0Maria Boedianto and Ben Daniel. 2018. The efficacy of stacked bar charts in supporting single-attribute and overall-attribute comparisons. Visual Informatics 2 3 (2018) 155\u2013165. 10.1016\/j.visinf.2018.09.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.visinf.2018.09.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Amit Jena Matthew Butler Tim Dwyer Kirsten Ellis Ulrich Engelke Reuben Kirkham Kim Marriott Cecile Paris and Venkatesh Rajamanickam. 2021. The Next Billion Users of Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 41 2 (2021) 8\u201316. 10.1109\/MCG.2020.3044071","DOI":"10.1109\/MCG.2020.3044071"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"B. Karer I. Scheler H. Hagen and H. Leitte. 2020. ConceptGraph: A Formal Model for Interpretation and Reasoning During Visual Analysis. Computer Graphics Forum 39 6 (2020) 5\u201318. 10.1111\/cgf.13899","DOI":"10.1111\/cgf.13899"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Helen Kennedy Rosemary\u00a0Lucy Hill William Allen and Andy Kirk. 2016. Engaging with (big) data visualizations: Factors that affect engagement and resulting new definitions of effectiveness. First Monday 21 11 (2016). 10.5210\/fm.v21i11.6389","DOI":"10.5210\/fm.v21i11.6389"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ethan Kerzner Sarah Goodwin Jason Dykes Sara Jones and Miriah Meyer. 2019. A Framework for Creative Visualization-Opportunities Workshops. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25 1 (2019) 748\u2013758. 10.1109\/TVCG.2018.2865241","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2018.2865241"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/BELIV51497.2020.00017"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_29_2","unstructured":"Laura Koesten Kathleen Gregory Regina Schuster Christian Knoll Sarah Davies and Torsten M\u00f6ller. 2023. What is the message? Perspectives on Visual Data Communication. arxiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2304.10544\u00a0[cs.HC]"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Heidi Lam Enrico Bertini Petra Isenberg Catherine Plaisant and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2012. Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18 9 (2012) 1520\u20131536. 10.1109\/TVCG.2011.279","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2011.279"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Xingyu Lan Yanqiu Wu and Nan Cao. 2024. Affective Visualization Design: Leveraging the Emotional Impact of Data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 30 1 (2024) 1\u201311. 10.1109\/TVCG.2023.3327385","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2023.3327385"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bongshin Lee Eun\u00a0Kyoung Choe Petra Isenberg Kim Marriott and John Stasko. 2020. Reaching Broader Audiences With Data Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 40 2 (2020) 82\u201390. 10.1109\/MCG.2020.2968244","DOI":"10.1109\/MCG.2020.2968244"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sukwon Lee Sung-Hee Kim Ya-Hsin Hung Heidi Lam Youn-Ah Kang and Ji\u00a0Soo Yi. 2016. How do People Make Sense of Unfamiliar Visualizations?: A Grounded Model of Novice\u2019s Information Visualization Sensemaking. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22 1 (2016) 499\u2013508. 10.1109\/TVCG.2015.2467195","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2015.2467195"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sukwon Lee Sung-Hee Kim and Bum\u00a0Chul Kwon. 2017. VLAT: Development of a Visualization Literacy Assessment Test. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23 1 (2017) 551\u2013560. 10.1109\/TVCG.2016.2598920","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2016.2598920"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"E. Lee-Robbins and E. Adar. 2023. Affective Learning Objectives for Communicative Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29 01 (2023) 1\u201311. 10.1109\/TVCG.2022.3209500","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2022.3209500"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-90235-3_2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sharon Lin Julie Fortuna Chinmay Kulkarni Maureen Stone and Jeffrey Heer. 2013. Selecting Semantically-Resonant Colors for Data Visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 32 3pt4 (2013) 401\u2013410. 10.1111\/cgf.12127","DOI":"10.1111\/cgf.12127"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alan Lundgard and Arvind Satyanarayan. 2022. Accessible Visualization via Natural Language Descriptions: A Four-Level Model of Semantic Content. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28 1 (2022) 1073\u20131083. 10.1109\/TVCG.2021.3114770","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2021.3114770"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Narges Mahyar and Melanie Tory. 2014. Supporting Communication and Coordination in Collaborative Sensemaking. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20 12 (2014) 1633\u20131642. 10.1109\/TVCG.2014.2346573","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2014.2346573"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"A.P. Massey and W.A. Wallace. 1991. Focus groups as a knowledge elicitation technique: an exploratory study. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 3 2 (1991) 193\u2013200. 10.1109\/69.87999","DOI":"10.1109\/69.87999"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2312\/trvis.20191187"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tamara Munzner. 2009. A Nested Model for Visualization Design and Validation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15 6 (2009) 921\u2013928. 10.1109\/TVCG.2009.111","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2009.111"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_43_2","volume-title":"The Design of Everyday Things","author":"Norman Donald\u00a0A.","year":"1998","unstructured":"Donald\u00a0A. Norman. 1998. The Design of Everyday Things. The MIT Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"C. North. 2006. Toward measuring visualization insight. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26 3 (2006) 6\u20139. 10.1109\/MCG.2006.70","DOI":"10.1109\/MCG.2006.70"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Saugat Pandey and Alvitta Ottley. 2023. Mini-VLAT: A Short and Effective Measure of Visualization Literacy. Computer Graphics Forum 42 3 (2023) 1\u201311. 10.1111\/cgf.14809","DOI":"10.1111\/cgf.14809"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Paul Parsons. 2022. Understanding Data Visualization Design Practice. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28 01 (2022) 665\u2013675. 10.1109\/TVCG.2021.3114959","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2021.3114959"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1718918.1718976"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300474"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"William\u00a0A. Pike John Stasko Remco Chang and Theresa\u00a0A. O\u2019Connell. 2009. The Science of Interaction. Information Visualization 8 4 (2009) 263\u2013274. 10.1057\/ivs.2009.22","DOI":"10.1057\/ivs.2009.22"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Margit Pohl and Johanna Doppler\u00a0Haider. 2017. Sense-making Strategies for the Interpretation of Visualizations\u2014Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 1 3 (2017). 10.3390\/mti1030016","DOI":"10.3390\/mti1030016"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hana Pokojn\u00e1 Tobias Isenberg Stefan Bruckner Barbora Kozl\u00edkov\u00e1 and Laura Garrison. 2025. The Language of Infographics: Toward Understanding Conceptual Metaphor Use in Scientific Storytelling. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 31 1 (2025) 371\u2013381. 10.1109\/TVCG.2024.3456327","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2024.3456327"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Margaux\u00a0M Price Jessica\u00a0J Crumley-Branyon William\u00a0R Leidheiser and Richard Pak. 2016. Effects of Information Visualization on Older Adults\u2019 Decision-Making Performance in a Medicare Plan Selection Task: A Comparative Usability Study. JMIR Hum Factors 3 1 (2016) e16. 10.2196\/humanfactors.5106","DOI":"10.2196\/humanfactors.5106"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/INFVIS.2005.1532152"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_54_2","unstructured":"Christian Rohrer. 2022. When to Use Which User-Experience Research Methods. https:\/\/www.nngroup.com\/articles\/which-ux-research-methods\/. Accessed on Sep 5 2023."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michael Sedlmair Miriah Meyer and Tamara Munzner. 2012. Design Study Methodology: Reflections from the Trenches and the Stacks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18 12 (2012) 2431\u20132440. 10.1109\/TVCG.2012.213","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2012.213"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mara Solen. 2022. Scoping the Future of Visualization Literacy: A Review. 10.31219\/osf.io\/eypgm","DOI":"10.31219\/osf.io\/eypgm"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chase Stokes Vidya Setlur Bridget Cogley Arvind Satyanarayan and Marti\u00a0A. Hearst. 2023. Striking a Balance: Reader Takeaways and Preferences when Integrating Text and Charts. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29 1 (2023) 1233\u20131243. 10.1109\/TVCG.2022.3209383","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2022.3209383"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Justin Talbot Vidya Setlur and Anushka Anand. 2014. Four Experiments on the Perception of Bar Charts. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20 12 (2014) 2152\u20132160. 10.1109\/TVCG.2014.2346320","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2014.2346320"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-7485-216"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_60_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"M. Tory and T. Moller. 2005. Evaluating visualizations: do expert reviews work? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25 5 (2005) 8\u201311. 10.1109\/MCG.2005.102","DOI":"10.1109\/MCG.2005.102"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Barbara Tversky. 2011. Visualizing Thought. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 3 (2011) 499\u2013535. 10.1111\/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/VIS47514.2020.00053"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Niels van Berkel Benjamin Tag Rune\u00a0M\u00f8berg Jacobsen Daniel Russo Helen\u00a0C. Purchase and Daniel Buschek. 2024. Impact of interaction technique in interactive data visualisations: A study on lookup comparison and relation-seeking tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 192 (2024) 103359. 10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2024.103359","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2024.103359"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_64_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zack While R.\u00a0Jordan Crouser and Ali Sarvghad. 2024. GerontoVis: Data Visualization at the Confluence of Aging. Computer Graphics Forum 43 3 (2024) e15101. 10.1111\/cgf.15101","DOI":"10.1111\/cgf.15101"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_65_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/CESI.2013.6618471"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_66_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jessica\u00a0K. Witt Benjamin\u00a0A. Clegg Lisa\u00a0D. Blalock and Amelia\u00a0C. Warden. 2021. The Impact of Familiarity on Visualizations of Spatial Uncertainty. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 65 1 (2021) 596\u2013600. 10.1177\/1071181321651208","DOI":"10.1177\/1071181321651208"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_67_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jeff Zacks and Barbara Tversky. 1999. Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory & cognition 27 (1999) 1073\u20139. 10.3758\/BF03201236","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03201236"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_68_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1168149.1168162"}],"event":{"name":"CHI 2025: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","location":"Yokohama Japan","acronym":"CHI '25","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3706598.3713413","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3706598.3713413","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]],"date-time":"2025-07-04T05:03:04Z","timestamp":1751605384000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3706598.3713413"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"references-count":67,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3706598.3713413","10.1145\/3706598"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3706598.3713413","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-04-25","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}