{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,7]],"date-time":"2026-05-07T15:32:17Z","timestamp":1778167937568,"version":"3.51.4"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":145,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]],"date-time":"2025-04-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745539200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,26]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713958","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,28]],"date-time":"2025-04-28T14:16:17Z","timestamp":1745849777000},"page":"1-16","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Talking About the Assumption in the Room"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6469-3091","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ramaravind Kommiya","family":"Mothilal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1209-8933","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Faisal M.","family":"Lalani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2452-0687","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Syed Ishtiaque","family":"Ahmed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0073-2378","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Shion","family":"Guha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2906-7391","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sharifa","family":"Sultana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, USA"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3442188.3445888"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_3_2","unstructured":"Rohan Anil Andrew\u00a0M Dai Orhan Firat Melvin Johnson Dmitry Lepikhin Alexandre Passos Siamak Shakeri Emanuel Taropa Paige Bailey Zhifeng Chen et\u00a0al. 2023. Palm 2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2305.10403 (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-21103-9_2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_5_2","volume-title":"Human-centered data science: an introduction","author":"Aragon Cecilia","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cecilia Aragon, Shion Guha, Marina Kogan, Michael Muller, and Gina Neff. 2022. Human-centered data science: an introduction. MIT Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rob Ashmore Radu Calinescu and Colin Paterson. 2021. Assuring the machine learning lifecycle: Desiderata methods and challenges. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54 5 (2021) 1\u201339.","DOI":"10.1145\/3453444"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5555\/AAI28197321"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3600211.3604674"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_9_2","volume-title":"Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code","author":"Benjamin Ruha","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. John Wiley & Sons."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roni Berger. 2015. Now I see it now I don\u2019t: Researcher\u2019s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative research 15 2 (2015) 219\u2013234.","DOI":"10.1177\/1468794112468475"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_11_2","unstructured":"Sanford\u00a0I Berman. 2001. Opening the closed mind: Making assumptions jumping to conclusions. ETC: A Review of General Semantics 58 4 (2001) 429\u2013439."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581518"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J\u00a0Anthony Blair. 2019. Judging arguments. Studies in Critical Thinking (2019) 225\u2013247.","DOI":"10.22329\/wsia.08.2019"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J\u00a0Anthony Blair and J\u00a0Anthony Blair. 2012. Informal logic and logic. Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair (2012) 119\u2013132.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-2363-4_10"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Karen\u00a0L Boyd. 2021. Datasheets for datasets help ML engineers notice and understand ethical issues in training data. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 CSCW2 (2021) 1\u201327.","DOI":"10.1145\/3479582"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stephen Brookfield. 1992. Uncovering assumptions: The key to reflective practice. Adult learning 3 4 (1992) 13\u201318.","DOI":"10.1177\/104515959200300405"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_17_2","unstructured":"Stephen Brookfield. 1995. The getting of wisdom: What critically reflective teaching is and why it\u2019s important. Becoming a critically reflective teacher (1995) 1\u201328."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_18_2","unstructured":"Jiahao Chen Victor Storchan and Eren Kurshan. 2021. Beyond fairness metrics: Roadblocks and challenges for ethical ai in practice. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2108.06217 (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3491102.3501831"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_20_2","unstructured":"A\u00a0Feder Cooper. 2020. Where is the normative proof? assumptions and contradictions in ML fairness research. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2010.10407 (2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_21_2","unstructured":"Sam Corbett-Davies and Sharad Goel. 2018. The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness: A Critical Review of Fair Machine Learning. http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1808.00023 arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/1808.00023 [cs]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_22_2","volume-title":"Critical thinking and informal logic","author":"Crews-Anderson Timothy","year":"2007","unstructured":"Timothy Crews-Anderson. 2007. Critical thinking and informal logic. Humanities-Ebooks."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3531146.3533108"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_24_2","unstructured":"Martin Davies Ashley Barnett and Tim van Gelder. 2021. Using Computer-Aided Argument Mapping to Teach Reasoning. Studies in Critical Thinking (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P Delin P Chittleborough and C Delin. 1994. What is an assumption. Informal Logic 16 2 (1994) 115\u2013122.","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v16i2.2445"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3531146.3533113"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3514094.3534187"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3531146.3534647"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mateusz Dolata Stefan Feuerriegel and Gerhard Schwabe. 2022. A sociotechnical view of algorithmic fairness. Information Systems Journal 32 4 (2022) 754\u2013818.","DOI":"10.1111\/isj.12370"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3580771"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_31_2","unstructured":"RH EMiS. 1962. A concept of critical thinking: A proposed basis for research in the teaching and evaluation of critical thinking ability. Harvard Educational Review 32 (1962) 81\u2013111."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Robert\u00a0H Ennis. 1982. Identifying implicit assumptions. Synthese (1982) 61\u201386.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00413849"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-4938-5_10"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_34_2","volume-title":"Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor","author":"Eubanks Virginia","year":"2018","unstructured":"Virginia Eubanks. 2018. Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin\u2019s Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_35_2","unstructured":"Peter Facione. 1990. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). (1990)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3375627.3375828"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_37_2","volume-title":"Critical thinking its definition and assessment","author":"Fisher Alec","year":"1997","unstructured":"Alec Fisher and Michael Scriven. 1997. Critical thinking its definition and assessment. Centre for research in Critical Thinking."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_38_2","unstructured":"Timnit Gebru Jamie Morgenstern Briana Vecchione Jennifer\u00a0Wortman Vaughan Hanna Wallach Hal Daum\u00e9\u00a0III and Kate Crawford. 2021. Datasheets for Datasets. http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1803.09010 arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/1803.09010 [cs]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_39_2","unstructured":"Geoffrey\u00a0C Goddu. 2009. Refining Hitchcock\u2019s definition of \u2018argument\u2019. (2009)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_40_2","first-page":"339","volume-title":"Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation","volume":"2","author":"Goddu Geoffrey\u00a0C","year":"2018","unstructured":"Geoffrey\u00a0C Goddu. 2018. Against the intentional definition of argument. In Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation , Vol.\u00a02. Steve Oswald and Didier Maillat. London: College Publications, 339\u2013348."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Trudy Govier. 1992. What is a good argument? Metaphilosophy 23 4 (1992) 393\u2013409.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9973.1992.tb00551.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_42_2","volume-title":"Problems in argument analysis and evaluation","author":"Govier Trudy","year":"2018","unstructured":"Trudy Govier. 2018. Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Vol.\u00a06. University of Windsor."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_43_2","volume-title":"A practical study of argument","author":"Govier Trudy","year":"2010","unstructured":"Trudy Govier et\u00a0al. 2010. A practical study of argument. Wadsworth Belmont, CA."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_44_2","volume-title":"Proceedings of the AI for Social Good workshop at NeurIPS","volume":"17","author":"Green Ben","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ben Green. 2019. Good\u201d isn\u2019t good enough. In Proceedings of the AI for Social Good workshop at NeurIPS , Vol.\u00a017."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_45_2","volume-title":"Proceedings of the machine learning: the debates workshop","author":"Green Ben","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ben Green and Lily Hu. 2018. The myth in the methodology: Towards a recontextualization of fairness in machine learning. In Proceedings of the machine learning: the debates workshop."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leo Groarke. 2015. Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter? Argumentation 29 (2015) 133\u2013155.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-014-9336-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dale Hample and Amanda\u00a0L Irions. 2015. Arguing to display identity. Argumentation 29 (2015) 389\u2013416.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-015-9351-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maralee Harrell. 2008. No Computer Program Required: Even Pencil-and-Paper Argument Mapping Improves Critical-Thinking Skills. Teaching Philosophy 31 4 (2008) 351\u2013374.","DOI":"10.5840\/teachphil200831437"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amy\u00a0K Heger Liz\u00a0B Marquis Mihaela Vorvoreanu Hanna Wallach and Jennifer Wortman\u00a0Vaughan. 2022. Understanding Machine Learning Practitioners\u2019 Data Documentation Perceptions Needs Challenges and Desiderata. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 CSCW2 (2022) 1\u201329.","DOI":"10.1145\/3555760"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-044451541-4\/50007-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_51_2","unstructured":"David Hitchcock. 2018. Critical thinking. (2018)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_52_2","unstructured":"David Hitchcock. 2021. The concept of an argument. Studies in Critical Thinking (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3419249.3420149"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_54_2","unstructured":"Beth Innocenti. 2021. Constructing Effective Arguments. (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scott Jacobs. 2000. Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics. Argumentation 14 (2000) 261\u2013286.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007853013191"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_56_2","unstructured":"Mohammad\u00a0Hossein Jarrahi Ali Memariani and Shion Guha. 2022. The principles of data-centric ai (dcai). arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2211.14611 (2022)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ralph\u00a0H Johnson. 1999. The relation between formal and informal logic. Argumentation 13 (1999) 265\u2013274.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007789101256"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9781410606174"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ralph\u00a0H Johnson. 2012. When informal logic met critical thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 3 (2012) 5\u201314.","DOI":"10.5840\/inquiryct201227315"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_60_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.22329\/wsia.02.2014"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fred\u00a0J Kauffeld. 1998. Presumptions and the distribution of argumentative burdens in acts of proposing and accusing. Argumentation 12 (1998) 245\u2013266.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007704116379"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376219"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anna Kawakami Amanda Coston Haiyi Zhu Hoda Heidari and Kenneth Holstein. 2024. The Situate AI Guidebook: Co-Designing a Toolkit to Support Multi-Stakeholder Early-stage Deliberations Around Public Sector AI Proposals. arXiv [cs.HC] (Feb. 2024).","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642849"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_64_2","unstructured":"Roman Kern. [n. d.]. Assumptions and Bias in Data Science. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining ([n. d.])."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_65_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300322"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_66_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Niki Kilbertus. 2020. Beyond traditional assumptions in fair machine learning. (July 2020). 10.17863\/CAM.59055arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2101.12476 [cs].","DOI":"10.17863\/CAM.59055"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_67_2","unstructured":"Niki Kilbertus. 2021. Beyond traditional assumptions in fair machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2101.12476 (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_68_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Justine Kingsbury. 2002. Teaching argument construction. Informal Logic 22 1 (2002).","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v22i1.2576"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_69_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jens\u00a0E Kjeldsen. 2015. The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation 29 2 (2015) 115\u2013132.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-015-9348-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_70_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642501"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_71_2","volume-title":"Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics","author":"Korzybski Alfred","year":"1958","unstructured":"Alfred Korzybski. 1958. Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Institute of GS."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_72_2","volume-title":"Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing","author":"Kvale Steinar","year":"2009","unstructured":"Steinar Kvale. 2009. Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_73_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alexander Lavin Ciar\u00e1n\u00a0M Gilligan-Lee Alessya Visnjic Siddha Ganju Dava Newman Sujoy Ganguly Danny Lange At\u00edl\u00edm\u00a0G\u00fcne\u015f Baydin Amit Sharma Adam Gibson Stephan Zheng Eric\u00a0P Xing Chris Mattmann James Parr and Yarin Gal. 2022. Technology readiness levels for machine learning systems. Nat. Commun. 13 1 (Oct. 2022) 6039.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-022-33128-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_74_2","unstructured":"Teven Le\u00a0Scao Angela Fan Christopher Akiki Ellie Pavlick Suzana Ili\u0107 Daniel Hesslow Roman Castagn\u00e9 Alexandra\u00a0Sasha Luccioni Fran\u00e7ois Yvon Matthias Gall\u00e9 et\u00a0al. 2023. Bloom: A 176b-parameter open-access multilingual language model. (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_75_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445261"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_76_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Susan Leigh\u00a0Star. 2010. This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science technology & human values 35 5 (2010) 601\u2013617.","DOI":"10.1177\/0162243910377624"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_77_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-1850-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_78_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weixin Liang Nazneen Rajani Xinyu Yang Ezinwanne Ozoani Eric Wu Yiqun Chen Daniel\u00a0Scott Smith and James Zou. 2024. Systematic analysis of 32 111 AI model cards characterizes documentation practice in AI. Nature Machine Intelligence (2024) 1\u201310.","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-024-00857-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_79_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3630106.3659005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_80_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376445"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_81_2","unstructured":"Momin\u00a0M Malik. 2020. A hierarchy of limitations in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2002.05193 (2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_82_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"W Martin\u00a0Davies. 2009. Computer-assisted argument mapping: a rationale approach. Higher Education 58 (2009) 799\u2013820.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10734-009-9226-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_83_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642451"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_84_2","volume-title":"Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis","author":"Merriam Sharan\u00a0B","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sharan\u00a0B Merriam and Robin\u00a0S Grenier. 2019. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_85_2","unstructured":"Sally\u00a0Engle Merry. 2009. The Seductions of Quantification. (2009)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_86_2","unstructured":"Uli Meyer and Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer. 2006. Three forms of interpretative flexibility. Science Technology & Innovation Studies 2 (2006)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_87_2","unstructured":"Arthur\u00a0Holland Michel. 2023. Recalibrating assumptions on AI. (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_88_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3287560.3287596"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_89_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shira Mitchell Eric Potash Solon Barocas Alexander D\u2019Amour and Kristian Lum. 2021. Algorithmic fairness: Choices assumptions and definitions. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 8 (2021) 141\u2013163.","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-statistics-042720-125902"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_90_2","unstructured":"Brent Mittelstadt Sandra Wachter and Chris Russell. 2023. The Unfairness of Fair Machine Learning: Levelling down and strict egalitarianism by default. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2302.02404 (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_91_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3406865.3418584"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_92_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctt1pwt9w5.11"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_93_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ziad Obermeyer Brian Powers Christine Vogeli and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366 6464 (2019) 447\u2013453.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aax2342"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_94_2","volume-title":"Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy","author":"O\u2019neil Cathy","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cathy O\u2019neil. 2017. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_95_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568246"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_96_2","unstructured":"RW Paul. 1993. Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive. A Rapidly Changing World. 38rd edition revisited (1993) 97\u201398."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_97_2","unstructured":"Richard Paul A Fisher and G Nosich. 1993. Workshop on critical thinking strategies. Foundation for Critical Thinking Strategies Sonoma State University (1993)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_98_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jella Pfeiffer Julia Gutschow Christian Haas Florian M\u00f6slein Oliver Maspfuhl Frederik Borgers and Suzana Alpsancar. 2023. Algorithmic fairness in AI: an interdisciplinary view. Business & Information Systems Engineering 65 2 (2023) 209\u2013222.","DOI":"10.1007\/s12599-023-00787-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_99_2","unstructured":"Geoff Pleiss Manish Raghavan Felix Wu Jon Kleinberg and Kilian\u00a0Q Weinberger. 2017. On fairness and calibration. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_100_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gilbert Plumer. 2017. Presumptions assumptions and presuppositions of ordinary arguments. Argumentation 31 3 (2017) 469\u2013484.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-016-9419-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_101_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mahima Pushkarna Andrew Zaldivar and Oddur Kjartansson. 2022. Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AI. arXiv [cs.HC] (April 2022).","DOI":"10.1145\/3531146.3533231"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_102_2","unstructured":"PwC. 2023. Responsible AI \u2013 Maturing from theory to practice. https:\/\/www.pwc.com\/gx\/en\/issues\/data-and-analytics\/artificial-intelligence\/what-is-responsible-ai\/pwc-responsible-ai-maturing-from-theory-to-practice.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_103_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3351095.3372873"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_104_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bogdana Rakova Jingying Yang Henriette Cramer and Rumman Chowdhury. 2021. Where Responsible AI meets Reality: Practitioner Perspectives on Enablers for Shifting Organizational Practices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 CSCW1 (April 2021) 1\u201323. 10.1145\/3449081","DOI":"10.1145\/3449081"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_105_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bogdana Rakova Jingying Yang Henriette Cramer and Rumman Chowdhury. 2021. Where responsible AI meets reality: Practitioner perspectives on enablers for shifting organizational practices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 CSCW1 (2021) 1\u201323.","DOI":"10.1145\/3449081"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_106_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581407"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_107_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445748"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_108_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kevin Roy Anisa Zvonkovic Abbie Goldberg Elizabeth Sharp and Ralph LaRossa. 2015. Sampling richness and qualitative integrity: Challenges for research with families. Journal of Marriage and Family 77 1 (2015) 243\u2013260.","DOI":"10.1111\/jomf.12147"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_109_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Malak Sadek Marios Constantinides Daniele Quercia and C\u00e9line Mougenot. 2024. Guidelines for integrating value Sensitive Design in Responsible AI toolkits. arXiv [cs.HC] (Feb. 2024).","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642810"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_110_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lorenza Saitta Jean-Daniel Zucker Lorenza Saitta and Jean-Daniel Zucker. 2013. Abstraction in Machine Learning. Abstraction in Artificial Intelligence and Complex Systems (2013) 273\u2013327.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-7052-6_9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_111_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Devansh Saxena Karla Badillo-Urquiola Pamela\u00a0J Wisniewski and Shion Guha. 2021. A framework of high-stakes algorithmic decision-making for the public sector developed through a case study of child-welfare. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 CSCW2 (2021) 1\u201341.","DOI":"10.1145\/3476089"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_112_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Devansh Saxena and Shion Guha. 2024. Algorithmic harms in child welfare: Uncertainties in practice organization and street-level decision-making. ACM Journal on Responsible Computing 1 1 (2024) 1\u201332.","DOI":"10.1145\/3616473"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_113_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Devansh Saxena Erina Seh-Young Moon Aryan Chaurasia Yixin Guan and Shion Guha. 2023. Rethinking \"Risk\" in Algorithmic Systems Through A Computational Narrative Analysis of Casenotes in Child-Welfare. (2023).","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581308"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_114_2","unstructured":"Michael Scriven. 1976. Reasoning. (1976)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_115_2","volume-title":"Informal logic: The first international symposium","author":"Scriven Michael","year":"1980","unstructured":"Michael Scriven. 1980. The philosophical and pragmatic significance of informal logic. In Informal logic: The first international symposium."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_116_2","unstructured":"John\u00a0R Searle. 1975. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. (1975)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_117_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"John\u00a0R Searle. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts1. Language in society 5 1 (1976) 1\u201323.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0047404500006837"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_118_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3287560.3287598"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_119_2","unstructured":"Gaganpreet Sharma. 2017. Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International journal of applied research 3 7 (2017) 749\u2013752."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_120_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jessie\u00a0J Smith Saleema Amershi Solon Barocas Hanna Wallach and Jennifer\u00a0Wortman Vaughan. [n. d.]. REAL ML: Recognizing Exploring and Articulating Limitations of Machine Learning Research REAL ML: Recognizing Exploring and Articulating Limitations of Machine Learning Research. 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency (FAccT \u201922) June 21\u00e2\u2022\ufb0124 2022 Seoul Republic of Korea 1 1 ([n. d.]).","DOI":"10.1145\/3531146.3533122"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_121_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3292500.3330664"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_122_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-1-55860-092-8.50006-X"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_123_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3489440"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_124_2","unstructured":"Hariharan Subramonyam Jane Im Colleen Seifert and Eytan Adar. 2022. Human-AI Guidelines in Practice: Leaky Abstractions as an Enabler in Collaborative Software Teams. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2207.01749 (2022)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_125_2","unstructured":"Jared Sylvester and Edward Raff. 2018. What about applied fairness? arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/1806.05250 (2018)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_126_2","unstructured":"SE Toulmin. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_127_2","unstructured":"Hugo Touvron Louis Martin Kevin Stone Peter Albert Amjad Almahairi Yasmine Babaei Nikolay Bashlykov Soumya Batra Prajjwal Bhargava Shruti Bhosale et\u00a0al. 2023. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2307.09288 (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_128_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3580903"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_129_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_130_2","volume-title":"Informal logic: A pragmatic approach","author":"Walton Douglas","year":"2008","unstructured":"Douglas Walton. 2008. Informal logic: A pragmatic approach. Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_131_2","unstructured":"Douglas Walton. 2012. Argument mining by applying argumentation schemes. Studies in Logic 4 1 (2012) 2011."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_132_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Angelina Wang Sayash Kapoor Solon Barocas and Arvind Narayanan. 2022. Against Predictive Optimization: On the Legitimacy of Decision-Making Algorithms that Optimize Predictive Accuracy. Available at SSRN (2022).","DOI":"10.1145\/3593013.3594030"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_133_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3531146.3533101"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_134_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"April\u00a0Yi Wang Anant Mittal Christopher Brooks and Steve Oney. 2019. How data scientists use computational notebooks for real-time collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3 CSCW (2019) 1\u201330.","DOI":"10.1145\/3359141"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_135_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581278"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_136_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ruotong Wang F\u00a0Maxwell Harper and Haiyi Zhu. 2020. Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making Algorithm Outcomes Development Procedures and Individual Differences. (2020).","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376813"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_137_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mark Weinstein. 1990. Towards a research agenda for informal logic and critical thinking. Informal logic 12 3 (1990).","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v12i3.2609"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_138_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Richmond\u00a0Y Wong Michael\u00a0A Madaio and Nick Merrill. 2023. Seeing like a toolkit: How toolkits envision the work of AI ethics. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7 CSCW1 (2023) 1\u201327.","DOI":"10.1145\/3579621"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_139_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"John Woods. 2000. How philosophical is informal logic? Informal Logic 20 2 (2000).","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v20i2.2266"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_140_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3196709.3196730"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_141_2","unstructured":"Xinyu Yang Weixin Liang and James Zou. 2024. Navigating Dataset Documentations in AI: A Large-Scale Analysis of Dataset Cards on Hugging Face. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2401.13822 (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_142_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen Yanga Peng Liang and Zinan Ma. 2024. An exploratory study on automatic identification of assumptions in the development of deep learning frameworks. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2401.03653 (2024).","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4701350"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_143_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3580900"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_144_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Giacomo Zanotti Daniele Chiffi and Viola Schiaffonati. 2024. AI-Related Risk: An Epistemological Approach. Philosophy & Technology 37 2 (2024) 1\u201318.","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-024-00755-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_145_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Amy\u00a0X. Zhang Michael Muller and Dakuo Wang. 2020. How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles Workflows and Tools. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4 CSCW1 (May 2020) 1\u201323. 10.1145\/3392826","DOI":"10.1145\/3392826"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_146_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3213846.3213866"}],"event":{"name":"CHI 2025: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","location":"Yokohama Japan","acronym":"CHI '25","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3706598.3713958","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3706598.3713958","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]],"date-time":"2025-07-04T05:28:29Z","timestamp":1751606909000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3706598.3713958"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"references-count":145,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3706598.3713958","10.1145\/3706598"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3706598.3713958","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-04-25","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}