{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,7]],"date-time":"2026-04-07T16:49:07Z","timestamp":1775580547639,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":150,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]],"date-time":"2025-04-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745539200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,26]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3714167","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,28]],"date-time":"2025-04-28T14:16:17Z","timestamp":1745849777000},"page":"1-17","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Can AI Model the Complexities of Human Moral Decision-making? A Qualitative Study of Kidney Allocation Decisions"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0729-7332","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vijay","family":"Keswani","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1899-7884","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vincent","family":"Conitzer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2579-9966","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Walter","family":"Sinnott-Armstrong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-4393-9070","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Breanna K.","family":"Nguyen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3710-4076","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hoda","family":"Heidari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0066-761X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jana","family":"Schaich Borg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2_2","volume-title":"Workshops at the thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence","author":"Abel David","year":"2016","unstructured":"David Abel, James MacGlashan, and Michael\u00a0L Littman. 2016. Reinforcement learning as a framework for ethical decision making. In Workshops at the thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sajid Ali Tamer Abuhmed Shaker El-Sappagh Khan Muhammad Jose\u00a0M Alonso-Moral Roberto Confalonieri Riccardo Guidotti Javier Del\u00a0Ser Natalia D\u00edaz-Rodr\u00edguez and Francisco Herrera. 2023. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Information fusion 99 (2023) 101805.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inffus.2023.101805"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_4_2","unstructured":"Nadisha-Marie Aliman and Leon Kester. 2019. Requisite variety in ethical utility functions for AI value alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/1907.00430 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jan Auernhammer. 2020. Human-centered AI: The role of Human-centered Design Research in the development of AI. (2020).","DOI":"10.21606\/drs.2020.282"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edmond Awad Sohan Dsouza Richard Kim Jonathan Schulz Joseph Henrich Azim Shariff Jean-Fran\u00e7ois Bonnefon and Iyad Rahwan. 2018. The moral machine experiment. Nature 563 7729 (2018) 59\u201364.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-018-0637-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kevin Baum Susanne Mantel Eva Schmidt and Timo Speith. 2022. From responsibility to reason-giving explainable artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology 35 1 (2022) 12.","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-022-00510-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paul Bello and Bertram\u00a0F Malle. 2023. Computational Approaches to Morality. The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Cognitive Sciences 2 (2023) 1037\u20131063.","DOI":"10.1017\/9781108755610.036"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moshe Ben-Akiva Daniel McFadden Kenneth Train et\u00a0al. 2019. Foundations of stated preference elicitation: Consumer behavior and choice-based conjoint analysis. Foundations and Trends\u00ae in Econometrics 10 1-2 (2019) 1\u2013144.","DOI":"10.1561\/0800000036"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_10_2","volume-title":"2016 AAAI Spring Symposium Series","author":"Bendel Oliver","year":"2016","unstructured":"Oliver Bendel. 2016. Annotated decision trees for simple moral machines. In 2016 AAAI Spring Symposium Series."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3551624.3555290"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_12_2","unstructured":"D Black. 2020. Absolute prohibitions under risk. Philosopher\u2019s Imprint 20 20 (2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_13_2","first-page":"156","volume-title":"Proceedings of the AAAI\/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","volume":"7","author":"Boerstler Kyle","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kyle Boerstler, Vijay Keswani, Lok Chan, Jana\u00a0Schaich Borg, Vincent Conitzer, Hoda Heidari, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2024. On the stability of moral preferences: A problem with computational elicitation methods. In Proceedings of the AAAI\/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , Vol.\u00a07. 156\u2013167."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"William\u00a0J Bolton Cosmin Badea Pantelis Georgiou Alison Holmes and Timothy\u00a0M Rawson. 2022. Developing moral AI to support decision-making about antimicrobial use. Nature Machine Intelligence 4 11 (2022) 912\u2013915.","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-022-00558-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jean-Fran\u00e7ois Bonnefon Azim Shariff and Iyad Rahwan. 2016. The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 352 6293 (2016) 1573\u20131576.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aaf2654"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ralph\u00a0Allan Bradley and Milton\u00a0E Terry. 1952. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39 3\/4 (1952) 324\u2013345.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/39.3-4.324"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3 2 (2006) 77\u2013101.","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative research in sport exercise and health 13 2 (2021) 201\u2013216.","DOI":"10.1080\/2159676X.2019.1704846"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"David Byrne. 2022. A worked example of Braun and Clarke\u2019s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & quantity 56 3 (2022) 1391\u20131412.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11135-021-01182-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christopher Cao Dina Halegoua-DeMarzio Shady Guirguis Crystal Chen Jonathan\u00a0M Fenkel and Steven Herrine. 2020. Employment and patient satisfaction after liver transplantation. Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology 8 3 (2020) 299.","DOI":"10.14218\/JCTH.2020.00010"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3580959"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Valerio Capraro and Matja\u017e Perc. 2021. Mathematical foundations of moral preferences. Journal of the Royal Society interface 18 175 (2021) 20200880.","DOI":"10.1098\/rsif.2020.0880"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lok Chan Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Jana\u00a0Schaich Borg and Vincent Conitzer. 2024. Should Responsibility Affect Who Gets a Kidney? Responsibility and Healthcare (2024) 35.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780192872234.003.0002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_24_2","unstructured":"Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2004. Survey of preference elicitation methods. (2004)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dale\u00a0J Cohen and Minwoo Ahn. 2016. A subjective utilitarian theory of moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145 10 (2016) 1359.","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000210"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_26_2","unstructured":"Vincent Conitzer. 2024. Why should we ever automate moral decision making? arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2407.07671 (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315644189-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Molly\u00a0J Crockett. 2016. How formal models can illuminate mechanisms of moral judgment and decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science 25 2 (2016) 85\u201390.","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721415624012"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Molly\u00a0J Crockett Zeb Kurth-Nelson Jenifer\u00a0Z Siegel Peter Dayan and Raymond\u00a0J Dolan. 2014. Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 48 (2014) 17320\u201317325.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1408988111"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fiery Cushman. 2013. Action outcome and value: A dual-system framework for morality. Personality and social psychology review 17 3 (2013) 273\u2013292.","DOI":"10.1177\/1088868313495594"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johan\u00a0W de Fijter. 2010. Kidney allocation: where utility and fairness meet. 1746\u20131749\u00a0pages.","DOI":"10.1093\/ndt\/gfq164"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Karl de Fine\u00a0Licht and Jenny de Fine\u00a0Licht. 2020. Artificial intelligence transparency and public decision-making: Why explanations are key when trying to produce perceived legitimacy. AI & society 35 (2020) 917\u2013926.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-020-00960-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pierpaolo Di\u00a0Cocco Obi Okoye Jorge Almario Enrico Benedetti Ivo\u00a0G Tzvetanov and Mario Spaggiari. 2020. Obesity in kidney transplantation. Transplant International 33 6 (2020) 581\u2013589.","DOI":"10.1111\/tri.13547"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bob Doherty Yaadwinder Sidhu Tony Heron Chris West Alice Seaton Jane Gulec Patricia Prado and Paulina Flores\u00a0Martinez. 2023. Citizen participation in food systems policy making: a case study of a citizens\u2019 assembly. Emerald Open Research 1 10 (2023).","DOI":"10.1108\/EOR-10-2023-0004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paolo Dragone Stefano Teso and Andrea Passerini. 2018. Constructive preference elicitation. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 4 (2018) 71.","DOI":"10.3389\/frobt.2017.00071"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445188"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411763.3441342"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3491101.3503727"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_39_2","first-page":"2603","volume-title":"International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics","author":"El-Mhamdi El-Mahdi","year":"2023","unstructured":"El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi, Sadegh Farhadkhani, Rachid Guerraoui, and L\u00ea-Nguy\u00ean Hoang. 2023. On the strategyproofness of the geometric median. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 2603\u20132640."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amir Elalouf and Joseph\u00a0S Pliskin. 2022. Balancing equity and efficiency in kidney allocation: an overview. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 31 3 (2022) 321\u2013332.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0963180121001018"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arvid Erlandsson Amanda Lindkvist Kajsa Lundqvist Per\u00a0A Andersson Stephan Dickert Paul Slovic and Daniel V\u00e4stfj\u00e4ll. 2020. Moral preferences in helping dilemmas expressed by matching and forced choice. Judgment and Decision Making 15 4 (2020) 452\u2013475.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500007427"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3551624.3555297"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jim\u00a0AC Everett David\u00a0A Pizarro and Molly\u00a0J Crockett. 2016. Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145 6 (2016) 772.","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000165"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v37i5.25739"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oriel FeldmanHall Dean Mobbs Davy Evans Lucy Hiscox Lauren Navrady and Tim Dalgleish. 2012. What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition 123 3 (2012) 434\u2013441.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2012.02.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bailey Flanigan Paul G\u00f6lz Anupam Gupta Brett Hennig and Ariel\u00a0D Procaccia. 2021. Fair algorithms for selecting citizens\u2019 assemblies. Nature 596 7873 (2021) 548\u2013552.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-021-03788-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_47_2","unstructured":"Philippa Foot. 1967. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford 5 (1967) 5\u201315."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patrick Fournier Mathieu Turgeon Andr\u00e9 Blais Joanna Everitt Elisabeth Gidengil and Neil Nevitte. 2011. Deliberation from Within: Changing One\u2019s Mind During an Interview. Political Psychology 32 5 (2011) 885\u2013919.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9221.2011.00835.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-37114-1_9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rachel Freedman Jana\u00a0Schaich Borg Walter Sinnott-Armstrong John\u00a0P Dickerson and Vincent Conitzer. 2020. Adapting a kidney exchange algorithm to align with human values. Artificial Intelligence 283 (2020) 103261.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2020.103261"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrew Fuchs Andrea Passarella and Marco Conti. 2023. Modeling replicating and predicting human behavior: a survey. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems 18 2 (2023) 1\u201347.","DOI":"10.1145\/3580492"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Iason Gabriel. 2020. Artificial intelligence values and alignment. Minds and machines 30 3 (2020) 411\u2013437.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-020-09539-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"I\u00f1igo Gallo Sanjay Sood Thomas\u00a0C Mann and Thomas Gilovich. 2017. The heart and the head: On choosing experiences intuitively and possessions deliberatively. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 30 3 (2017) 754\u2013768.","DOI":"10.1002\/bdm.1997"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tejal\u00a0K Gandhi David Classen Christine\u00a0A Sinsky David\u00a0C Rhew Nikki Vande\u00a0Garde Andrew Roberts and Frank Federico. 2023. How can artificial intelligence decrease cognitive and work burden for front line practitioners? JAMIA open 6 3 (2023) ooad079.","DOI":"10.1093\/jamiaopen\/ooad079"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beverley Garrigan Anna\u00a0LR Adlam and Peter\u00a0E Langdon. 2018. Moral decision-making and moral development: Toward an integrative framework. Developmental review 49 (2018) 80\u2013100.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dr.2018.06.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrea Gibbons Marco Cinnirella Janet Bayfield Diana Wu Heather Draper Rachel\u00a0J Johnson Charles\u00a0RV Tomson John\u00a0LR Forsythe Wendy Metcalfe Damian Fogarty et\u00a0al. 2017. Patient preferences knowledge and beliefs about kidney allocation: qualitative findings from the UK-wide ATTOM programme. BMJ open 7 1 (2017) e013896.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-013896"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_57_2","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Moral psychology","author":"Gigerenzer Gerd","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gerd Gigerenzer. 2008. Moral intuition= fast and frugal heuristics? In Moral psychology. MIT Press, 1\u201326."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alberto Giubilini and Julian Savulescu. 2018. The artificial moral advisor. The \u201cideal observer\u201d meets artificial intelligence. Philosophy & technology 31 (2018) 169\u2013188.","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-017-0285-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_59_2","unstructured":"Sophie Gloeckler Andrea Ferrario and Nikola Biller-Andorno. 2022. An Ethical Framework for Incorporating Digital Technology into Advance Directives: Promoting Informed Advance Decision Making in Healthcare. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 95 3 (2022) 349."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_60_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rachelle\u00a0K Gould Thais\u00a0Moreno Soares Paola Arias-Ar\u00e9valo Mariana Cant\u00fa-Fernandez Dana Baker Harold\u00a0N Eyster Rain Kwon Lauren Prox Julian Rode Andres Suarez et\u00a0al. 2023. The role of value (s) in theories of human behavior. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 64 (2023) 101355.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cosust.2023.101355"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Naveen\u00a0Sundar Govindarajulu Selmer Bringsjord and Matthew Peveler. 2019. On quantified modal theorem proving for modeling ethics. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/1912.12959 (2019).","DOI":"10.4204\/EPTCS.311.7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jesse Graham Peter Meindl Erica Beall Kate\u00a0M Johnson and Li Zhang. 2016. Cultural differences in moral judgment and behavior across and within societies. Current Opinion in Psychology 8 (2016) 125\u2013130.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2015.09.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joshua Greene and Jonathan Haidt. 2002. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in cognitive sciences 6 12 (2002) 517\u2013523.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1364-6613(02)02011-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_64_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joshua\u00a0D Greene R\u00a0Brian Sommerville Leigh\u00a0E Nystrom John\u00a0M Darley and Jonathan\u00a0D Cohen. 2001. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293 5537 (2001) 2105\u20132108.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1062872"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_65_2","unstructured":"Dylan Hadfield-Menell Stuart\u00a0J Russell Pieter Abbeel and Anca Dragan. 2016. Cooperative inverse reinforcement learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 29 (2016)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_66_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jonathan Haidt. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological review 108 4 (2001) 814.","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0033-295X.108.4.814"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_67_2","unstructured":"John\u00a0C Harsanyi. 1977. Morality and the theory of rational behavior. Social research (1977) 623\u2013656."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_68_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joshua Hatherley Robert Sparrow and Mark Howard. 2024. The virtues of interpretable medical AI. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 3 (2024) 323\u2013332.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0963180122000664"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_69_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Erik\u00a0G Helzer William Fleeson R\u00a0Michael Furr Peter Meindl and Maxwell Barranti. 2017. Once a utilitarian consistently a utilitarian? Examining principledness in moral judgment via the robustness of individual differences. Journal of personality 85 4 (2017) 505\u2013517.","DOI":"10.1111\/jopy.12256"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_70_2","volume-title":"Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track","author":"Hendrycks Dan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dan Hendrycks, Mantas Mazeika, Andy Zou, Sahil Patel, Christine Zhu, Jesus Navarro, Dawn Song, Bo Li, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2022. What Would Jiminy Cricket Do? Towards Agents That Behave Morally. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_71_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sumeet Hindocha and Cosmin Badea. 2022. Moral exemplars for the virtuous machine: the clinician\u2019s role in ethical artificial intelligence for healthcare. AI and Ethics 2 1 (2022) 167\u2013175.","DOI":"10.1007\/s43681-021-00089-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_72_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barry Hoffmaster and Cliff Hooker. 2013. Tragic choices and moral compromise: the ethics of allocating kidneys for transplantation. The Milbank Quarterly 91 3 (2013) 528\u2013557.","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0009.12025"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_73_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eva Hofmann Erik Hoelzl and Erich Kirchler. 2008. A comparison of models describing the impact of moral decision making on investment decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (2008) 171\u2013187.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10551-007-9570-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_74_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3630106.3658979"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_75_2","unstructured":"Jiaming Ji Tianyi Qiu Boyuan Chen Borong Zhang Hantao Lou Kaile Wang Yawen Duan Zhonghao He Jiayi Zhou Zhaowei Zhang Fanzhi Zeng Kwan\u00a0Yee Ng Juntao Dai Xuehai Pan Aidan O\u2019Gara Yingshan Lei Hua Xu Brian Tse Jie Fu Stephen McAleer Yaodong Yang Yizhou Wang Song-Chun Zhu Yike Guo and Wen Gao. 2023. AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Survey. arxiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2310.19852\u00a0[cs.AI]"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_76_2","unstructured":"Zhijing Jin Sydney Levine Fernando Gonzalez\u00a0Adauto Ojasv Kamal Maarten Sap Mrinmaya Sachan Rada Mihalcea Josh Tenenbaum and Bernhard Sch\u00f6lkopf. 2022. When to make exceptions: Exploring language models as accounts of human moral judgment. Advances in neural information processing systems 35 (2022) 28458\u201328473."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_77_2","volume-title":"Workshop on Participatory Approaches to Machine Learning","author":"Johnston Caroline\u00a0M","year":"2020","unstructured":"Caroline\u00a0M Johnston, Simon Blessenohl, and Phebe Vayanos. 2020. Preference elicitation and aggregation to aid with patient triage during the covid-19 pandemic. In Workshop on Participatory Approaches to Machine Learning."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_78_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3617694.3623254"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_79_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shelly Kagan. 1988. The additive fallacy. Ethics 99 1 (1988) 5\u201331.","DOI":"10.1086\/293033"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_80_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guy Kahane Jim\u00a0AC Everett Brian\u00a0D Earp Lucius Caviola Nadira\u00a0S Faber Molly\u00a0J Crockett and Julian Savulescu. 2018. Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology. Psychological review 125 2 (2018) 131.","DOI":"10.1037\/rev0000093"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_81_2","first-page":"711","volume-title":"Proceedings of the AAAI\/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","volume":"7","author":"Keswani Vijay","year":"2024","unstructured":"Vijay Keswani, Vincent Conitzer, Hoda Heidari, Jana\u00a0Schaich Borg, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2024. On the Pros and Cons of Active Learning for Moral Preference Elicitation. In Proceedings of the AAAI\/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society , Vol.\u00a07. 711\u2013723."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_82_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3278721.3278770"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_83_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Max Kleiman-Weiner Rebecca Saxe and Joshua\u00a0B Tenenbaum. 2017. Learning a commonsense moral theory. Cognition 167 (2017) 107\u2013123.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2017.03.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_84_2","unstructured":"Oliver Klingefjord Ryan Lowe and Joe Edelman. 2024. What are human values and how do we align AI to them? arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2404.10636 (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_85_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pius Kr\u00fctli Thomas Rosemann Kjell\u00a0Y T\u00f6rnblom and Timo Smieszek. 2016. How to fairly allocate scarce medical resources: ethical argumentation under scrutiny by health professionals and lay people. PloS one 11 7 (2016) e0159086.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0159086"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_86_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Keren Ladin and Douglas\u00a0W Hanto. 2011. Rational rationing or discrimination: balancing equity and efficiency considerations in kidney allocation. American Journal of Transplantation 11 11 (2011) 2317\u20132321.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-6143.2011.03726.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_87_2","first-page":"166","volume-title":"Artificial intelligence and statistics","author":"Lakkaraju Himabindu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Himabindu Lakkaraju and Cynthia Rudin. 2017. Learning cost-effective and interpretable treatment regimes. In Artificial intelligence and statistics. PMLR, 166\u2013175."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_88_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seth Lazar. 2017. Deontological decision theory and agent-centered options. Ethics 127 3 (2017) 579\u2013609.","DOI":"10.1086\/690069"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_89_2","unstructured":"Alexandra Lee Michelle Cardel and William\u00a0T Donahoo. 2019. Social and environmental factors influencing obesity. Endotext [Internet] (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_90_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Min\u00a0Kyung Lee Daniel Kusbit Anson Kahng Ji\u00a0Tae Kim Xinran Yuan Allissa Chan Daniel See Ritesh Noothigattu Siheon Lee Alexandros Psomas et\u00a0al. 2019. WeBuildAI: Participatory framework for algorithmic governance. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 3 CSCW (2019) 1\u201335.","DOI":"10.1145\/3359283"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_91_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bo Li Peng Qi Bo Liu Shuai Di Jingen Liu Jiquan Pei Jinfeng Yi and Bowen Zhou. 2023. Trustworthy AI: From principles to practices. Comput. Surveys 55 9 (2023) 1\u201346.","DOI":"10.1145\/3555803"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_92_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hazel Si\u00a0Min Lim and Araz Taeihagh. 2019. Algorithmic decision-making in AVs: Understanding ethical and technical concerns for smart cities. Sustainability 11 20 (2019) 5791.","DOI":"10.3390\/su11205791"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_93_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445260"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_94_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3531146.3534628"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_95_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zachary\u00a0C Lipton. 2018. The mythos of model interpretability: In machine learning the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery. Queue 16 3 (2018) 31\u201357.","DOI":"10.1145\/3236386.3241340"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_96_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bertram\u00a0F Malle. 2021. Moral judgments. Annual Review of Psychology 72 1 (2021) 293\u2013318.","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-072220-104358"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_97_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"John\u00a0A McDermid Yan Jia Zoe Porter and Ibrahim Habli. 2021. Artificial intelligence explainability: the technical and ethical dimensions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 379 2207 (2021) 20200363.","DOI":"10.1098\/rsta.2020.0363"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_98_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v35i7.16746"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_99_2","unstructured":"Philippe Mongin. 1998. Expected utility theory. (1998)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_100_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Michael\u00a0A Neblo Kevin\u00a0M Esterling Ryan\u00a0P Kennedy David\u00a0MJ Lazer and Anand\u00a0E Sokhey. 2010. Who wants to deliberate\u2014and why? American Political Science Review 104 3 (2010) 566\u2013583.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0003055410000298"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_101_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lawrence Ngo Meagan Kelly Christopher\u00a0G Coutlee R\u00a0McKell Carter Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Scott\u00a0A Huettel. 2015. Two distinct moral mechanisms for ascribing and denying intentionality. Scientific reports 5 1 (2015) 17390.","DOI":"10.1038\/srep17390"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_102_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376788"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_103_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ritesh Noothigattu Djallel Bouneffouf Nicholas Mattei Rachita Chandra Piyush Madan Kush\u00a0R Varshney Murray Campbell Moninder Singh and Francesca Rossi. 2019. Teaching AI agents ethical values using reinforcement learning and policy orchestration. IBM Journal of Research and Development 63 4\/5 (2019) 2\u20131.","DOI":"10.1147\/JRD.2019.2940428"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_104_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v32i1.11512"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_105_2","volume-title":"CogSci","author":"Oktar Kerem","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kerem Oktar and Tania Lombrozo. 2020. You Should Really Think This Through: Cross-Domain Variation in Preferences for Intuition and Deliberation.. In CogSci."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_106_2","unstructured":"OPTN. 2021. A Guide to Calculating and Interpreting the Estimated Post-Transplant Survival (EPTS) Score Used in the Kidney Allocation System (KAS). https:\/\/optn.transplant.hrsa.gov\/media\/1511\/guide_to_calculating_interpreting_epts.pdf."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_107_2","unstructured":"Steve Phelps and Rebecca Ranson. 2023. Of Models and Tin Men\u2013a behavioural economics study of principal-agent problems in AI alignment using large-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2307.11137 (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_108_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Michael\u00a0L Platt and Scott\u00a0A Huettel. 2008. Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty. Nature neuroscience 11 4 (2008) 398\u2013403.","DOI":"10.1038\/nn2062"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_109_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carolina Pletti Lorella Lotto Alessandra Tasso and Michela Sarlo. 2016. Will I regret it? Anticipated negative emotions modulate choices in moral dilemmas. Frontiers in psychology 7 (2016) 1918.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2016.01918"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_110_2","unstructured":"Douglas\u00a0W Portmore. 2022. Consequentializing. (2022)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_111_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Campbell Pryor Amy Perfors and Piers\u00a0DL Howe. 2019. Even arbitrary norms influence moral decision-making. Nature human behaviour 3 1 (2019) 57\u201362.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-018-0489-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_112_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J Rane SK Mallick O Kaya and NL Rane. 2024. Enhancing black-box models: advances in explainable artificial intelligence for ethical decision-making. Future Research Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0 and 5 2 (2024).","DOI":"10.70593\/978-81-981271-0-5_4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_113_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paul Rehren and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2023. How stable are moral judgments? Review of philosophy and psychology 14 4 (2023) 1377\u20131403.","DOI":"10.1007\/s13164-022-00649-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_114_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alvin\u00a0E Roth Tayfun S\u00f6nmez and M\u00a0Utku \u00dcnver. 2004. Kidney exchange. The Quarterly journal of economics 119 2 (2004) 457\u2013488.","DOI":"10.1162\/0033553041382157"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_115_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cynthia Rudin. 2019. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature machine intelligence 1 5 (2019) 206\u2013215.","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-019-0048-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_116_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Donald\u00a0F Sacco Mitch Brown Christopher\u00a0JN Lustgraaf and Kurt Hugenberg. 2017. The adaptive utility of deontology: Deontological moral decision-making fosters perceptions of trust and likeability. Evolutionary Psychological Science 3 (2017) 125\u2013132.","DOI":"10.1007\/s40806-016-0080-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_117_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Julian Savulescu and Hannah Maslen. 2015. Moral enhancement and artificial intelligence: moral AI? Beyond artificial intelligence: The disappearing human-machine divide (2015) 79\u201395.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-09668-1_6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_118_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Laura\u00a0D Scherer Marieke de Vries Brian\u00a0J Zikmund-Fisher Holly\u00a0O Witteman and Angela Fagerlin. 2015. Trust in deliberation: The consequences of deliberative decision strategies for medical decisions. Health Psychology 34 11 (2015) 1090.","DOI":"10.1037\/hea0000203"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_119_2","volume-title":"Experiments on decisions under risk: The expected utility hypothesis","author":"Schoemaker Paul\u00a0JH","year":"2013","unstructured":"Paul\u00a0JH Schoemaker. 2013. Experiments on decisions under risk: The expected utility hypothesis. Springer Science & Business Media."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_120_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Issac\u00a0R Schwantes and David\u00a0A Axelrod. 2021. Technology-enabled care and artificial intelligence in kidney transplantation. Current transplantation reports 8 (2021) 235\u2013240.","DOI":"10.1007\/s40472-021-00336-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_121_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA220193"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_122_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peter Singer. 2005. Ethics and intuitions. The journal of ethics 9 (2005) 331\u2013352.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10892-005-3508-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_123_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Joshua\u00a0August Skorburg et\u00a0al. 2021. How AI can AID bioethics. Journal of Practical Ethics 9 1 (2021).","DOI":"10.3998\/jpe.1175"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_124_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"JM Smith SW Biggins DG Haselby WR Kim J Wedd K Lamb B Thompson DL Segev S Gustafson R Kandaswamy et\u00a0al. 2012. Kidney pancreas and liver allocation and distribution in the United States. American Journal of Transplantation 12 12 (2012) 3191\u20133212.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-6143.2012.04259.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_125_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376624"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_126_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3292500.3330664"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_127_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445088"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_128_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Judith\u00a0Jarvis Thomson. 1984. The trolley problem. Yale LJ 94 (1984) 1395.","DOI":"10.2307\/796133"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_129_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Allison Tong Kirsten Howard Germaine Wong Alan Cass Stephen Jan Michelle Irving and Jonathan\u00a0C Craig. 2011. Nephrologists\u2019 perspectives on waitlisting and allocation of deceased donor kidneys for transplant. American journal of kidney diseases 58 5 (2011) 704\u2013716.","DOI":"10.1053\/j.ajkd.2011.05.029"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_130_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Allison Tong Stephen Jan Germaine Wong Jonathan\u00a0C Craig Michelle Irving Steve Chadban Alan Cass Niamh Marren and Kirsten Howard. 2012. Patient preferences for the allocation of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation: a mixed methods study. BMC nephrology 13 (2012) 1\u20139.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2369-13-18"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_131_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amos Tversky. 1972. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological review 79 4 (1972) 281.","DOI":"10.1037\/h0032955"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_132_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. science 185 4157 (1974) 1124\u20131131.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.185.4157.1124"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_133_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amos Tversky Shmuel Sattath and Paul Slovic. 1988. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological review 95 3 (1988) 371.","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0033-295X.95.3.371"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_134_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Giuseppe Ugazio Marcus Grueschow Rafael Polania Claus Lamm Philippe Tobler and Christian Ruff. 2022. Neuro-computational foundations of moral preferences. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 17 3 (2022) 253\u2013265.","DOI":"10.1093\/scan\/nsab100"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_135_2","unstructured":"UNOS. [n. d.]. Kidney - UNOS Transplant Living. https:\/\/transplantliving.org\/kidney\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_136_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heidi Vainio-Pekka Mamia Ori-Otse Agbese Marianna Jantunen Ville Vakkuri Tommi Mikkonen Rebekah Rousi and Pekka Abrahamsson. 2023. The role of explainable AI in the research field of AI ethics. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 13 4 (2023) 1\u201339.","DOI":"10.1145\/3599974"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_137_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niels Van\u00a0Berkel Jorge Goncalves Danula Hettiachchi Senuri Wijenayake Ryan\u00a0M Kelly and Vassilis Kostakos. 2019. Crowdsourcing perceptions of fair predictors for machine learning: A recidivism case study. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3 CSCW (2019) 1\u201321.","DOI":"10.1145\/3359130"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_138_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niels van Berkel Benjamin Tag Jorge Goncalves and Simo Hosio. 2022. Human-centred artificial intelligence: a contextual morality perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 41 3 (2022) 502\u2013518.","DOI":"10.1080\/0144929X.2020.1818828"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_139_2","unstructured":"Avish Vijayaraghavan and Cosmin Badea. 2024. Minimum levels of interpretability for artificial moral agents. AI and Ethics (2024) 1\u201317."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_140_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Warren\u00a0J Von\u00a0Eschenbach. 2021. Transparency and the black box problem: Why we do not trust AI. Philosophy & Technology 34 4 (2021) 1607\u20131622.","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-021-00477-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_141_2","unstructured":"Sachin Waikar. 2020. Evolution of an Algorithm: Lessons from the Kidney Allocation System. Stanford HAI (2020). https:\/\/hai.stanford.edu\/news\/evolution-algorithm-lessons-kidney-allocation-system."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_142_2","volume-title":"Responsibility and the moral sentiments","author":"Wallace R\u00a0Jay","year":"1994","unstructured":"R\u00a0Jay Wallace. 1994. Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Harvard University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_143_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003074991-23"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_144_2","first-page":"1013","volume-title":"Artificial intelligence and statistics","author":"Wang Fulton","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fulton Wang and Cynthia Rudin. 2015. Falling rule lists. In Artificial intelligence and statistics. PMLR, 1013\u20131022."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_145_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"David\u00a0S Watson. 2022. Conceptual challenges for interpretable machine learning. Synthese 200 2 (2022) 65.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-022-03485-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_146_2","unstructured":"Jason Wei Xuezhi Wang Dale Schuurmans Maarten Bosma Fei Xia Ed Chi Quoc\u00a0V Le Denny Zhou et\u00a0al. 2022. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems 35 (2022) 24824\u201324837."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_147_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andreas Wolkenstein. 2018. What has the Trolley Dilemma ever done for us (and what will it do in the future)? On some recent debates about the ethics of self-driving cars. Ethics and Information Technology 20 3 (2018) 163\u2013173.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-018-9456-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_148_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376301"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_149_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.semnephrol.2022.09.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_150_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hongbo Yu Jenifer\u00a0Z Siegel and Molly\u00a0J Crockett. 2019. Modeling morality in 3-D: Decision-making judgment and inference. Topics in cognitive science 11 2 (2019) 409\u2013432.","DOI":"10.1111\/tops.12382"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_151_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445102"}],"event":{"name":"CHI 2025: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","location":"Yokohama Japan","acronym":"CHI '25","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3706598.3714167","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3706598.3714167","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]],"date-time":"2025-07-04T05:23:08Z","timestamp":1751606588000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3706598.3714167"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"references-count":150,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3706598.3714167","10.1145\/3706598"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3706598.3714167","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-04-25","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}