{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T06:51:14Z","timestamp":1782802274030,"version":"3.54.5"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":163,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,23]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3715275.3732015","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,23]],"date-time":"2025-06-23T17:01:18Z","timestamp":1750698078000},"page":"181-194","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Formalising Anti-Discrimination Law in Automated Decision Systems"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3482-7789","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Holli","family":"Sargeant","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0296-2719","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"M\u00e5ns","family":"Magnusson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","volume-title":"The Law of Artificial Intelligence (2 ed.)","author":"Adams-Bhatti Sophia","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sophia Adams-Bhatti and Holli Sargeant. 2024. Algorithms in the Justice System: Current Practices, Legal and Ethical Challenges. In The Law of Artificial Intelligence (2 ed.), Matt Hervey and Matthew Lavy (Eds.). Sweet & Maxwell, London."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jeremias Adams-Prassl Reuben Binns and Aislinn Kelly-Lyth. 2022. Directly Discriminatory Algorithms. The Modern Law Review 86 1 (2022) 144\u2013175.","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-2230.12759"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nikita Aggarwal. 2021. The Norms of Algorithmic Credit Scoring. Cambridge Law Journal 80 1 (2021) 42\u201373.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0008197321000015"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","unstructured":"AHRC. 2014. A Quick Guide to Australian Discrimination Laws. https:\/\/humanrights.gov.au\/node\/11975"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","first-page":"267","volume-title":"Second International Symposium on Information Theory","author":"Akaike Hirotsugu","year":"1973","unstructured":"Hirotsugu Akaike. 1973. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. In Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Springer, New York, 267\u2013281."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3617694.3623222"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","first-page":"3","volume-title":"Discrimination in Labor Markets","author":"Arrow Kenneth","year":"1971","unstructured":"Kenneth Arrow. 1971. The Theory of Discrimination. In Discrimination in Labor Markets. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 3\u201333."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","volume-title":"Sex Discrimination Act 1984","author":"Parliament Australian","year":"1984","unstructured":"Australian Parliament. 1984. Sex Discrimination Act 1984."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","volume-title":"Anti-Discrimination Bill 2022","author":"Parliament Bangladesh","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bangladesh Parliament. 2022. Anti-Discrimination Bill 2022."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Solon Barocas and Andrew Selbst. 2016. Big Data\u2019s Disparate Impact. California Law Review 104 3 (2016) 671\u2013732.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2477899"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","volume-title":"The Economics of Discrimination","author":"Becker Gary","year":"1957","unstructured":"Gary Becker. 1957. The Economics of Discrimination. University of Chicago Press, Chicago."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ruben Becker Gianlorenzo D\u2019Angelo and Sajjad Ghobadi. 2023. On the Cost of Demographic Parity in Influence Maximization. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 37 12 (2023) 14110\u201314118.","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v37i12.26651"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-4286-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-02272-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470316870"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","volume-title":"Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence","author":"Biden J.\u00a0R.","year":"2023","unstructured":"J.\u00a0R. Biden. 2023. Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. The White House. Executive Order 14110."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","unstructured":"Reuben Binns. 2018. Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 81 (2018) 149\u2013159."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3351095.3372864"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","unstructured":"Emily Black John\u00a0Logan Koepke Pauline Kim Solon Barocas and Mingwei Hsu. 2024. Less Discriminatory Algorithms. Georgetown Law Journal 113 1 (2024) 53\u2013119."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","unstructured":"Harold Black Robert\u00a0L. Schweitzer and Lewis Mandell. 1978. Discrimination in Mortgage Lending. The American Economic Review 68 2 (1978) 186\u2013191."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","volume-title":"Explainability & Fairness in Machine Learning for Credit Underwriting: Policy & Empirical Findings Overview","author":"Blattner Laura","year":"2023","unstructured":"Laura Blattner and Jann Spiess. 2023. Explainability & Fairness in Machine Learning for Credit Underwriting: Policy & Empirical Findings Overview. Empirical White Paper. FinRegLab. https:\/\/perma.cc\/G78V-FQP3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","unstructured":"Margarita Boyarskaya Solon Barocas Hanna Wallach and Michael Carl\u00a0Tschantz. 2022. What Is a Proxy and Why Is It a Problem?https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Qb0Q0HWBo1I Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","volume-title":"Human Rights Act","author":"Parliament Canadian","year":"1985","unstructured":"Canadian Parliament. 1985. Human Rights Act. R.S.C. (c.H-6)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alycia\u00a0N. Carey and Xintao Wu. 2022. The Causal Fairness Field Guide: Perspectives From Social and Formal Sciences. Frontiers in Big Data 5 (2022) 892837.","DOI":"10.3389\/fdata.2022.892837"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alycia\u00a0N. Carey and Xintao Wu. 2023. The Fairness Field Guide: Perspectives from Social and Formal Sciences. AI and Ethics 3 1 (2023) 1\u201323.","DOI":"10.1007\/s43681-022-00183-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alessandro Castelnovo Riccardo Crupi Greta Greco Daniele Regoli Ilaria\u00a0Giuseppina Penco and Andrea\u00a0Claudio Cosentini. 2022. A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscape. Scientific Reports 12 1 (2022) 4209.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-07939-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simon Caton and Christian Haas. 2023. Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey. Comput. Surveys 56 7 (2023) 1\u201338.","DOI":"10.1145\/3616865"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Silvia Chiappa. 2019. Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairness. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 33 01 (2019) 7801\u20137808.","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v33i01.33017801"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_30_2","unstructured":"CIA. 2024. Legal System The World Factbook. https:\/\/www.cia.gov\/the-world-factbook\/field\/legal-system\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_31_2","unstructured":"Sam Corbett-Davies Johann\u00a0D. Gaebler Hamed Nilforoshan Ravi Shroff and Sharad Goel. 2023. The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness. Journal of Machine Learning Research 24 312 (2023) 1\u2013117."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3097983.3098095"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_33_2","volume-title":"Optimal Statistical Decisions","author":"DeGroot Morris","year":"1970","unstructured":"Morris DeGroot. 1970. Optimal Statistical Decisions. McGraw-Hill, London, UK."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_34_2","volume-title":"Report on Apple Card Investigation","year":"2021","unstructured":"DFS. 2021. Report on Apple Card Investigation. New York State Department of Financial Services, New York, USA. https:\/\/perma.cc\/F62F-6CWC"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2090236.2090255"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Elizabeth Emens. 2009. Intimate Discrimination: The State\u2019s Role in the Accidents of Sex and Love. Harvard Law Review 22 5 (2009) 1307\u20131402.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.1694174"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_37_2","volume-title":"Igen ltd v Wong","author":"Appeal England and Wales Court of","year":"2005","unstructured":"England and Wales Court of Appeal. 2005. Igen ltd v Wong. [2005] EWCA Civ 142; (2005) IRLR 258."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_38_2","volume-title":"Secretary of State for Defence v Elias","author":"Appeal England and Wales Court of","year":"2006","unstructured":"England and Wales Court of Appeal. 2006. Secretary of State for Defence v Elias. [2006] EWCA Civ 1293; (2006) IRLR 934."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5555\/3208509"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_40_2","volume-title":"C-170\/84, Bilka Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz","author":"Justice European Court of","year":"1986","unstructured":"European Court of Justice. 1986. C-170\/84, Bilka Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz. ECLI:EU:C:1986:204."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_41_2","volume-title":"C-177\/88, Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker v Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV-Centrum) Plus","author":"Justice European Court of","year":"1990","unstructured":"European Court of Justice. 1990. C-177\/88, Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker v Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV-Centrum) Plus. ECLI: EU:C:1990:383."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_42_2","volume-title":"C-267\/06, Tadao Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen B\u00fchnen","author":"Justice European Court of","year":"2008","unstructured":"European Court of Justice. 2008. C-267\/06, Tadao Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen B\u00fchnen. ECLI:EU:C:2008:179."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_43_2","volume-title":"C-267\/12, Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Hay v. Cr\u00e9dit agricole mutuel de Charente-Maritime et des Deux-S\u00e8vres","author":"Justice European Court of","year":"2008","unstructured":"European Court of Justice. 2008. C-267\/12, Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Hay v. Cr\u00e9dit agricole mutuel de Charente-Maritime et des Deux-S\u00e8vres. ECLI:EU:C:2013:823."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_44_2","volume-title":"C-236\/09, Association belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL v Conseil des ministres","author":"Justice European Court of","year":"2011","unstructured":"European Court of Justice. 2011. C-236\/09, Association belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL v Conseil des ministres. ECLI:EU:C:2011:100."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_45_2","volume-title":"C-83\/14, CHEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria AD v Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia","author":"Justice European Court of","year":"2015","unstructured":"European Court of Justice. 2015. C-83\/14, CHEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria AD v Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia. ECLI:EU:C:2015:480."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_46_2","volume-title":"Directive 2002\/73\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76\/207\/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions","author":"Parliament European","year":"2002","unstructured":"European Parliament. 2002. Directive 2002\/73\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76\/207\/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions. OJ L 269."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_47_2","volume-title":"Regulation (EU) 2024\/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300\/2008, (EU) No 167\/2013, (EU) No 168\/2013, (EU) 2018\/858, (EU) 2018\/1139 and (EU) 2019\/2144 and Directives 2014\/90\/EU, (EU) 2016\/797 and (EU) 2020\/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act)","author":"Parliament European","year":"2024","unstructured":"European Parliament. 2024. Regulation (EU) 2024\/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300\/2008, (EU) No 167\/2013, (EU) No 168\/2013, (EU) 2018\/858, (EU) 2018\/1139 and (EU) 2019\/2144 and Directives 2014\/90\/EU, (EU) 2016\/797 and (EU) 2020\/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act). OJ L 2024\/1289."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_48_2","volume-title":"Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union","author":"Union European","year":"2009","unstructured":"European Union. 2009. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. OJ C 2012\/326."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2783258.2783311"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_50_2","volume-title":"Government Porposal for the Equality Act and Related Laws HE 19\/2014 vp (Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle yhdenvertaisuuslaiksi ja er\u00e4iksi siihen liittyviksi laeiksi)","author":"Justice Finland Ministry of","year":"2014","unstructured":"Finland Ministry of Justice. 2014. Government Porposal for the Equality Act and Related Laws HE 19\/2014 vp (Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle yhdenvertaisuuslaiksi ja er\u00e4iksi siihen liittyviksi laeiksi)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_51_2","volume-title":"Non-Discrimination Act (Yhdenvertaisuuslaki) (1325\/2014)","author":"Justice Finland Ministry of","year":"2014","unstructured":"Finland Ministry of Justice. 2014. Non-Discrimination Act (Yhdenvertaisuuslaki) (1325\/2014)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_52_2","volume-title":"Decision 216\/2017","author":"Tribunal Finland National Non-Discrimination and Equality","year":"2018","unstructured":"Finland National Non-Discrimination and Equality Tribunal. 2018. Decision 216\/2017."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.55317\/9781784135324"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_54_2","unstructured":"Gabriel Geiger Sascha Granberg Justin-Casimir Braun Anna Tiberg Eva Constantaras and Daniel Howden. 2024. How we investigated Sweden\u2019s Suspicion Machine. https:\/\/www.lighthousereports.com\/methodology\/sweden-ai-methodology\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_55_2","unstructured":"Talia Gillis. 2022. The Input Fallacy. Minnesota Law Review 106 (2022) 1175."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_56_2","first-page":"377","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","author":"Gillis Talia\u00a0B","year":"2024","unstructured":"Talia\u00a0B Gillis, Vitaly Meursault, and Berk Ustun. 2024. Operationalizing the Search for Less Discriminatory Alternatives in Fair Lending. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). ACM, New York, USA, 377\u2013387."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_57_2","first-page":"1905","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","author":"Grabowicz Przemyslaw","year":"2022","unstructured":"Przemyslaw Grabowicz, Nicholas Perello, and Aarshee Mishra. 2022. Marrying Fairness and Explainability in Supervised Learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea). ACM, New York, USA, 1905\u20131916."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Philipp Hacker. 2018. Teaching Fairness to Artificial Intelligence: Existing and Novel Strategies Against Algorithmic Discrimination Under EU Law. Common Market Law Review 55 4 (2018) 1143\u20131185.","DOI":"10.54648\/COLA2018095"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_59_2","volume-title":"Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems","author":"Hardt Moritz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nathan Srebro. 2016. Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, D.\u00a0Lee, M.\u00a0Sugiyama, U.\u00a0Luxburg, I.\u00a0Guyon, and R.\u00a0Garnett (Eds.), Vol.\u00a029. Curran Associates, Inc., New York, USA. https:\/\/proceedings.neurips.cc\/paper_files\/paper\/2016\/file\/9d2682367c3935defcb1f9e247a97c0d-Paper.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_60_2","unstructured":"Zach Harned and Hanna Wallach. 2020. Stretching Human Laws to Apply to Machines: The Dangers of a Stretching Human Laws to Apply to Machines: The Dangers of a \"Colorblind\" Computer. Florida State University Law Review 47 3 (2020) 617\u2013648."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3287560.3287584"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_62_2","unstructured":"Deborah Hellman. 2020. Measuring Algorithmic Fairness. Virginia Law Review 106 4 (2020) 811\u2013866."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003172840"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_64_2","first-page":"747","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","author":"Hertweck Corinna","year":"2021","unstructured":"Corinna Hertweck, Christoph Heitz, and Michele Loi. 2021. On the Moral Justification of Statistical Parity. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, New York, USA, 747\u2013757."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_65_2","unstructured":"Daniel Ho and Alice Xiang. 2020. Affirmative algorithms: The legal grounds for fairness as awareness. University of Chicago Law Review Online (2020) 134\u2013154."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_66_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3351095.3375674"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_67_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eyke H\u00fcllermeier and Willem Waegeman. 2021. Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methods. Machine Learning 110 3 (2021) 457\u2013506.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10994-021-05946-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_68_2","unstructured":"Mikella Hurley and Julius Adebayo. 2017. Credit Scoring in the Era of Big Data. Yale Journal of Law and Technology 18 1 (2017) 148\u2013216."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_69_2","volume-title":"Constitution of India","author":"Parliament Indian","year":"1950","unstructured":"Indian Parliament. 1950. Constitution of India."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_70_2","first-page":"375","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","author":"Jacobs Abigail","year":"2021","unstructured":"Abigail Jacobs and Hanna Wallach. 2021. Measurement and Fairness. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Virtual Event). ACM, New York, USA, 375\u2013385."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_71_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"James Johndrow and Kristian Lum. 2019. An Algorithm For Removing Sensitive Information: Application To Race-independent Recidivism Prediction. The Annals of Applied Statistics 13 1 (2019) 189\u2013220.","DOI":"10.1214\/18-AOAS1201"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_72_2","first-page":"576","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","author":"Kasy Maximilian","year":"2021","unstructured":"Maximilian Kasy and Rediet Abebe. 2021. Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, New York, USA, 576\u2013586."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_73_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aislinn Kelly-Lyth. 2021. Challenging Biased Hiring Algorithms. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 41 4 (2021) 899\u2013928.","DOI":"10.1093\/ojls\/gqab006"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_74_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199656967.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_75_2","first-page":"196","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","author":"Khani Fereshte","year":"2021","unstructured":"Fereshte Khani and Percy Liang. 2021. Removing Spurious Features Can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, New York, USA, 196\u2013205."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_76_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Elif Kiesow\u00a0Cortez and Nestor Maslej. 2023. Adjudication of Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision-Making Cases in Europe and the USA. European Journal of Risk Regulation 14 3 (2023) 457\u2013475.","DOI":"10.1017\/err.2023.61"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_77_2","series-title":"(Proceedings of Machine Learning Research)","first-page":"2630","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning","author":"Kilbertus Niki","year":"2018","unstructured":"Niki Kilbertus, Adria Gascon, Matt Kusner, Michael Veale, Krishna Gummadi, and Adrian Weller. 2018. Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributes. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (Stockholm, Sweden) (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research). PMLR, New York, USA, 2630\u20132639."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_78_2","first-page":"656","volume-title":"Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems","author":"Kilbertus Niki","year":"2017","unstructured":"Niki Kilbertus, Mateo Rojas-Carulla, Giambattista Parascandolo, Moritz Hardt, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Sch\u00f6lkopf. 2017. Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol.\u00a030. Curran Associates, Inc., New York, USA, 656\u2013666."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_79_2","unstructured":"Pauline Kim. 2017. Auditing Algorithms for Discrimination. University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online 166 1 (2017) 189."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_80_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barbara Kiviat. 2023. The Moral Affordances of Construing People as Cases: How Algorithms and the Data They Depend on Obscure Narrative and Noncomparative Justice. Sociological Theory 41 3 (2023) 175\u2013200.","DOI":"10.1177\/07352751231186797"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_81_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jon Kleinberg Jens Ludwig Sendhil Mullainathan and Cass Sunstein. 2019. Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms. Journal of Legal Analysis 10 (2019) 113\u2013174.","DOI":"10.1093\/jla\/laz001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_82_2","unstructured":"Matt\u00a0J Kusner Joshua Loftus Chris Russell and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counterfactual Fairness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017) 4069\u20134079."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_83_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jackie Lane and Rachel Ingleby. 2018. Indirect Discrimination Justification and Proportionality: Are UK Claimants at a Disadvantage? Industrial Law Journal 47 4 (2018) 531\u2013552.","DOI":"10.1093\/indlaw\/dwx009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_84_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Katja Langenbucher. 2023. Consumer Credit in The Age of AI Beyond Anti-Discrimination Law. https:\/\/www.ssrn.com\/abstract=4275723","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4275723"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_85_2","volume-title":"Using Artificial Intelligence to Make Decisions: Addressing the Problem of Algorithmic Bias","author":"Lattimore Finn","year":"2020","unstructured":"Finn Lattimore, Simon O\u2019Callaghan, Zoe Paleologos, Alistair Reid, Edward Santow, Holli Sargeant, and Andrew Thomsen. 2020. Using Artificial Intelligence to Make Decisions: Addressing the Problem of Algorithmic Bias. Technical Paper. Australian Human Rights Commission."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_86_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tai Le\u00a0Quy Arjun Roy Vasileios Iosifidis Wenbin Zhang and Eirini Ntoutsi. 2022. A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learning. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 12 3 (2022) e1452.","DOI":"10.1002\/widm.1452"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_87_2","unstructured":"Zachary Lipton Julian McAuley and Alexandra Chouldechova. 2018. Does Mitigating ML\u2019s Impact Disparity Require Treatment Disparity? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (2018)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_88_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Charles\u00a0F. Manski. 2022. Patient\u2010centered appraisal of race\u2010free clinical risk assessment. Health Economics 31 10 (2022) 2109\u20132114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/hec.4569","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.4569"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_89_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Charles\u00a0F. Manski John Mullahy and Atheendar\u00a0S. Venkataramani. 2023. Using measures of race to make clinical predictions: Decision making patient health and fairness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 35 (2023) e2303370120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.2303370120","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2303370120"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_90_2","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0G. Mayson. 2019. Bias In Bias Out. Yale Law Journal 128 8 (2019) 2122\u20132473."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_91_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ninareh Mehrabi Fred Morstatter Nripsuta Saxena Kristina Lerman and Aram Galstyan. 2021. A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. ACM Computing Surveys 54 6 (2021) 1\u201335.","DOI":"10.1145\/3457607"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_92_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jonas\u00a0M Mikhaeil Andrew Gelman and Philip Greengard. 2024. Hierarchical Bayesian models to mitigate systematic disparities in prediction with proxy outcomes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society 0 0 (2024) 1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jrsssa\/qnae142","DOI":"10.1093\/jrsssa\/qnae142"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_93_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shira Mitchell Eric Potash Solon Barocas Alexander D\u2019Amour and Kristian Lum. 2021. Algorithmic Fairness: Choices Assumptions and Definitions. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 8 1 (2021) 141\u2013163.","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-statistics-042720-125902"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_94_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3359221"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_95_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jakob M\u00f6kander. 2023. Auditing of AI: Legal Ethical and Technical Approaches. Digital Society 2 3 (2023) 49.","DOI":"10.1007\/s44206-023-00074-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_96_2","unstructured":"Arvind Narayanan. 2018. Tutorial: 21 Fairness Definition and their Politics. (2018). https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=jIXIuYdnyyk Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_97_2","volume-title":"Human Rights Act","author":"Parliament New Zealand","year":"1993","unstructured":"New Zealand Parliament. 1993. Human Rights Act."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_98_2","series-title":"(Proceedings of Machine Learning Research)","first-page":"16848","volume-title":"International Conference on Machine Learning","author":"Nilforoshan Hamed","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hamed Nilforoshan, Johann\u00a0D Gaebler, Ravi Shroff, and Sharad Goel. 2022. Causal Conceptions of Fairness and Their Consequences. In International Conference on Machine Learning(Proceedings of Machine Learning Research). PMLR, New York, USA, 16848\u201316887."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_99_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ziad Obermeyer Brian Powers Christine Vogeli and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366 6464 (2019) 447\u2013453. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aax2342","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aax2342"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_100_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tony O\u2019Hagan. 2004. Dicing with the Unknown. Significance 1 3 (2004) 132\u2013133.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1740-9713.2004.00050.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_101_2","volume-title":"Banning Discrimination on Grounds of Socioeconomic Disadvantage: An Essential Tool in the Fight Against Poverty","year":"2022","unstructured":"OHCHR. 2022. Banning Discrimination on Grounds of Socioeconomic Disadvantage: An Essential Tool in the Fight Against Poverty. Thematic Report A\/77\/157. Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_102_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cathy O\u2019Neil Holli Sargeant and Jacob Appel. 2024. Explainable Fairness in Regulatory Algorithmic Auditing. West Virginia Law Review 127 1 (2024) 79\u2013133.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4756637"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_103_2","volume-title":"Automating Immigration and Asylum: The Uses of New Technologies in Migration and Asylum Governance in Europe","author":"Ozkul Derya","year":"2023","unstructured":"Derya Ozkul. 2023. Automating Immigration and Asylum: The Uses of New Technologies in Migration and Asylum Governance in Europe. Technical Report. Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_104_2","volume-title":"Decision Theory","author":"Parmigiani Giovanni","year":"2010","unstructured":"Giovanni Parmigiani and Lurdes Inoue. 2010. Decision Theory. Wiley, London, UK."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_105_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Judea Pearl. 2010. An Introduction to Causal Inference. The International Journal of Biostatistics 6 2 Article 7 (2010) 59\u00a0pages.","DOI":"10.2202\/1557-4679.1203"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_106_2","unstructured":"Edmund Phelps. 1972. The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism. The American Economic Review 62 4 (1972) 659\u2013661."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_107_2","unstructured":"Anya Prince and Daniel Schwarcz. 2020. Proxy Discrimination in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data. Iowa Law Review 105 (2020) 1257."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_108_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3351095.3372873"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_109_2","unstructured":"Lisa Rice and Deidre Swesnik. 2013. Discriminatory Effects of Credit Scoring on Communities of Color. Suffolk University Law Review 46 935 (2013) 935\u2013966."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_110_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrea Romei and Salvatore Ruggieri. 2014. A Multidisciplinary Survey on Discrimination Analysis. The Knowledge Engineering Review 29 5 (2014) 582\u2013638.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888913000039"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_111_2","first-page":"6417","volume-title":"Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems","author":"Russell Chris","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chris Russell, Matt\u00a0J Kusner, Joshua Loftus, and Ricardo Silva. 2017. When Worlds Collide: Integrating Different Counterfactual Assumptions in Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol.\u00a030. Curran Associates, Inc., New York, USA, 6417\u20136426."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_112_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3351095.3372849"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_113_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holli Sargeant. 2023. Algorithmic Decision-making in Financial Services: Economic and Normative Outcomes in Consumer Credit. AI and Ethics 3 4 (2023) 1295\u20131311.","DOI":"10.1007\/s43681-022-00236-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_114_2","unstructured":"Holli Sargeant. 2025. Machine Learning in Consumer Credit: Legal Economic Ethical & Policy Implications. Ph.\u00a0D. Dissertation. University of Cambridge."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_115_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leonard Savage. 1956. The Foundations of Statistics. Operations Research 4 2 (1956) 254\u2013258.","DOI":"10.1177\/001654925600200411"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_116_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jun Shao. 1993. Linear model selection by cross-validation. Journal of the American statistical Association 88 422 (1993) 486\u2013494.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1993.10476299"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_117_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199664313.003.0009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_118_2","volume-title":"Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act","author":"Parliament South African","year":"2000","unstructured":"South African Parliament. 2000. Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_119_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3219819.3220046"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_120_2","unstructured":"Adrien S\u00e9n\u00e9cat. 2023. The use of opaque algorithms facilitates abuses within public services. https:\/\/perma.cc\/VSX5-JQY9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_121_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3583780.3614875"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_122_2","first-page":"1993","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","author":"Tschantz Michael\u00a0Carl","year":"2022","unstructured":"Michael\u00a0Carl Tschantz. 2022. What is Proxy Discrimination?. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea). ACM, New York, USA, 1993\u20132003."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_123_2","volume-title":"Southern Pacific Mortgage Ltd v Green","author":"(Bristol) United Kingdom County Court","year":"2015","unstructured":"United Kingdom County Court (Bristol). 2015. Southern Pacific Mortgage Ltd v Green. [2015] 11 WLUK 495."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_124_2","volume-title":"O\u2019Neil v Governors of St Thomas More Roman Catholic School","author":"Tribunal United Kingdom Employment Appeals","year":"1996","unstructured":"United Kingdom Employment Appeals Tribunal. 1996. O\u2019Neil v Governors of St Thomas More Roman Catholic School. [1996] UKEAT 1180\/94\/2405; (1996) IRLR 372."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_125_2","volume-title":"Dziedziak v Future Electronics Ltd","author":"Tribunal United Kingdom Employment Appeals","year":"2012","unstructured":"United Kingdom Employment Appeals Tribunal. 2012. Dziedziak v Future Electronics Ltd. [2012] UKEAT 0270\/11\/2802."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_126_2","volume-title":"Equal Opportunities Commission, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council","author":"Lords United Kingdom House of","year":"1989","unstructured":"United Kingdom House of Lords. 1989. Equal Opportunities Commission, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council. [1989] UKHL 8; (1989) IRLR 173."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_127_2","volume-title":"James v Eastleigh Borough Council","author":"Lords United Kingdom House of","year":"1990","unstructured":"United Kingdom House of Lords. 1990. James v Eastleigh Borough Council. [1990] UKHL 6; (1990) IRLR 288."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_128_2","volume-title":"Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No. 2)","author":"Lords United Kingdom House of","year":"1995","unstructured":"United Kingdom House of Lords. 1995. Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No. 2). [1995] UKHL 13; (1995) IRLR 645."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_129_2","volume-title":"R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex parte Seymour-Smith","author":"Lords United Kingdom House of","year":"2000","unstructured":"United Kingdom House of Lords. 2000. R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex parte Seymour-Smith. [2000] UKHL 12; (2000) 1 All ER 857."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_130_2","volume-title":"Equality Act 2010","author":"Parliament United Kingdom","year":"2010","unstructured":"United Kingdom Parliament. 2010. Equality Act 2010."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_131_2","volume-title":"Explanatory Memorandum to the Equality Act 2010 (Age Exceptions Order)","author":"Parliament United Kingdom","year":"2012","unstructured":"United Kingdom Parliament. 2012. Explanatory Memorandum to the Equality Act 2010 (Age Exceptions Order)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_132_2","volume-title":"The Equality Act 2010 (Amendment) Regulations 2012)","author":"Parliament United Kingdom","year":"2012","unstructured":"United Kingdom Parliament. 2012. The Equality Act 2010 (Amendment) Regulations 2012)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_133_2","volume-title":"Data Protection Act 2018","author":"Parliament United Kingdom","year":"2018","unstructured":"United Kingdom Parliament. 2018. Data Protection Act 2018."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_134_2","volume-title":"R (on the application of E) v JFS Governing Body","author":"Court United Kingdom Supreme","year":"2009","unstructured":"United Kingdom Supreme Court. 2009. R (on the application of E) v JFS Governing Body. [2009] UKSC 1; (2009) 1 WLR 2353."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_135_2","volume-title":"Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police","author":"Court United Kingdom Supreme","year":"2012","unstructured":"United Kingdom Supreme Court. 2012. Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police. [2012] UKSC 15; (2012) IRLR 601."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_136_2","volume-title":"Bull and another v Hall and another","author":"Court United Kingdom Supreme","year":"2017","unstructured":"United Kingdom Supreme Court. 2017. Bull and another v Hall and another. [2013] UKSC 73; (2013) 1 WLR 3741."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_137_2","volume-title":"Essop & Ors v Home Office (UK Border Agency)","author":"Court United Kingdom Supreme","year":"2017","unstructured":"United Kingdom Supreme Court. 2017. Essop & Ors v Home Office (UK Border Agency). [2017] UKSC 27; (2017) IRLR 558."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_138_2","volume-title":"R (on the application of Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice","author":"Court United Kingdom Supreme","year":"2017","unstructured":"United Kingdom Supreme Court. 2017. R (on the application of Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice. [2017] UKSC 40; (2018) 1 WLR 2093."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_139_2","volume-title":"Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd and others","author":"Court United Kingdom Supreme","year":"2018","unstructured":"United Kingdom Supreme Court. 2018. Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd and others. [2018] UKSC 49; (2018) IRLR 1116."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_140_2","volume-title":"Select Issues: Assessing Adverse Impact in Software, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence Used in Employment Selection Procedures Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964","author":"Government United States","year":"2023","unstructured":"United States Government. 2023. Select Issues: Assessing Adverse Impact in Software, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence Used in Employment Selection Procedures Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington DC, USA. EEOC-NVTA-2023-2."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_141_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aki Vehtari Andrew Gelman and Jonah Gabry. 2017. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing 27 (2017) 1413\u20131432.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11222-016-9696-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_142_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aki Vehtari and Jouko Lampinen. 2002. Bayesian model assessment and comparison using cross-validation predictive densities. Neural Computation 14 10 (2002) 2439\u20132468.","DOI":"10.1162\/08997660260293292"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_143_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aki Vehtari and Janne Ojanen. 2012. A survey of Bayesian predictive methods for model assessment selection and comparison. Statistics Surveys 6 (2012) 142 \u2013 228.","DOI":"10.1214\/12-SS102"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_144_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3194770.3194776"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_145_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marc\u00a0De Vos. 2020. The European Court of Justice and the March Towards Substantive Equality in European Union Anti-Discrimination Law. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 20 1 (2020) 62\u201387.","DOI":"10.1177\/1358229120927947"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_146_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sandra Wachter Brent Mittelstadt and Chris Russell. 2021. Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-discrimination Law and AI. Computer Law & Security Review 41 (2021) 105567.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clsr.2021.105567"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_147_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sandra Wachter Brent\u00a0Daniel Mittelstadt and Chris Russell. 2021. Bias Preservation in Machine Learning: The Legality of Fairness Metrics Under EU Non-Discrimination Law. West Virginia Law Review 123 3 (2021) 735\u2013790.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3792772"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_148_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Angelina Wang Sayash Kapoor Solon Barocas and Arvind Narayanan. 2024. Against Predictive Optimization: On the Legitimacy of Decision-making Algorithms That Optimize Predictive Accuracy. Journal on Responsible Computing 1 1 Article 9 (March 2024) 45\u00a0pages. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3636509","DOI":"10.1145\/3636509"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_149_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3630106.3658938"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_150_2","first-page":"805","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","author":"Weerts Hilde","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hilde Weerts, Rapha\u00eble Xenidis, Fabien Tarissan, Henrik\u00a0Palmer Olsen, and Mykola Pechenizkiy. 2023. Algorithmic Unfairness through the Lens of EU Non-Discrimination Law: Or Why the Law is not a Decision Tree. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Chicago, USA). ACM, New York, USA, 805\u2013816."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_151_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Halbert White. 1982. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Sodels. Econometrica 50 1 (1982) 1\u201325.","DOI":"10.2307\/1912526"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_152_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Betsy Williams Catherine Brooks and Yotam Shmargad. 2018. How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges Solutions and Policy Implications. Journal of Information Policy 8 (2018) 78.","DOI":"10.5325\/jinfopoli.8.2018.0078"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_153_2","first-page":"3404","volume-title":"Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems","author":"Wu Yongkai","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yongkai Wu, Lu Zhang, Xintao Wu, and Hanghang Tong. 2019. PC-Fairness: A Unified Framework for Measuring Causality-based Fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol.\u00a032. Curran Associates, Inc., New York, USA, 3404\u20133414."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_154_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rapha\u00eble Xenidis. 2020. Tuning EU equality law to algorithmic discrimination: Three pathways to resilience. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 27 6 (2020) 736\u2013758.","DOI":"10.1177\/1023263X20982173"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_155_2","unstructured":"Alice Xiang. 2021. Reconciling Legal and Technical Approaches to Algorithmic Bias. Tennessee Law Review 88 3 (2021) 649."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_156_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3394486.3403263"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_157_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Crystal Yang and Will Dobbie. 2020. Equal Protection Under Algorithms: A New Statistical and Legal Framework. Michigan Law Review 119 (2020) 291.","DOI":"10.36644\/mlr.119.2.equal"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_158_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3038912.3052660"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_159_2","unstructured":"Muhammad\u00a0Bilal Zafar Isabel Valera Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez and Krishna\u00a0P. Gummadi. 2019. Fairness Constraints: A Flexible Approach for Fair Classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research 20 75 (2019) 1\u201342."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_160_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michael Zanger-Tishler Julian Nyarko and Sharad Goel. 2024. Risk scores label bias and everything but the kitchen sink. Science Advances 10 13 (2024) eadi8411. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.adi8411","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.adi8411"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_161_2","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence","volume":"3","author":"Zhang Junzhe","year":"2018","unstructured":"Junzhe Zhang and Elias Bareinboim. 2018. Fairness in Decision-Making \u2014 The Causal Explanation Formula. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (New Orleans, USA), Vol.\u00a03. AAAI Press, Washington DC, USA, 9\u00a0pages."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_162_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/549"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_163_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3514094.3534200"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_164_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frederik\u00a0J. Zuiderveen\u00a0Borgesius. 2020. Strengthening legal protection against discrimination by algorithms and artificial intelligence. The International Journal of Human Rights 24 10 (2020) 1572\u20131593.","DOI":"10.1080\/13642987.2020.1743976"}],"event":{"name":"FAccT '25: The 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency","location":"Athens Greece","acronym":"FAccT '25"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3715275.3732015","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,24]],"date-time":"2025-06-24T11:21:41Z","timestamp":1750764101000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3715275.3732015"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,23]]},"references-count":163,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3715275.3732015","10.1145\/3715275"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3715275.3732015","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-06-23","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}