{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]],"date-time":"2026-01-20T11:28:19Z","timestamp":1768908499210,"version":"3.49.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":51,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,5]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3715336.3735765","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]],"date-time":"2025-07-04T10:09:55Z","timestamp":1751623795000},"page":"271-286","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Impact of Affirmative and Negating Robot Gestures on Perceived Personality, Role, and Contribution of a Human Group Member"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-2801-207X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tuan Vu","family":"Pham","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Ubiquitous Design \/ Experience & Interaction, University of Siegen, Siegen, North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany and Honda Research Institute EU GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2119-6965","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thomas H.","family":"Weisswange","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Honda Research Institute Europe GmbH, Offenbach am Main, Germany"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9798-1762","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marc","family":"Hassenzahl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Ubiquitous Design \/ Experience & Interaction, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Christiane Atzm\u00fcller and Peter\u00a0M. Steiner. 2010. Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research. Methodology 6 (1 2010) 128\u2013138. Issue 3. 10.1027\/1614-2241\/a000014","DOI":"10.1027\/1614-2241\/a000014"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-02217-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jurgen Brandstetter Peter Racz Clay Beckner Eduardo\u00a0B. Sandoval Jennifer Hay and Christoph Bartneck. 2014. A peer pressure experiment: Recreation of the Asch conformity experiment with robots. 2014 IEEE\/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 1335\u20131340. 10.1109\/IROS.2014.6942730","DOI":"10.1109\/IROS.2014.6942730"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Peter Broeder. 2021. Informed Communication in High Context and Low Context Cultures. Journal of Education Innovation and Communication 3 (6 2021) 13\u201324. Issue 1. 10.34097\/jeicom-3-1-june21-1","DOI":"10.34097\/jeicom-3-1-june21-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hoang-Long Cao Constantin Scholz Joris\u00a0De Winter Ilias\u00a0El Makrini and Bram Vanderborght. 2023. Investigating the Role of Multi-modal Social Cues in Human-Robot Collaboration in Industrial Settings. International Journal of Social Robotics 15 (7 2023) 1169\u20131179. Issue 7. 10.1007\/s12369-023-01018-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-023-01018-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"A.V. Carron W.N. Widmeyer and L.R. Brawley. 1985. The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology 7 (9 1985) 244\u2013266. Issue 3. 10.1123\/jsp.7.3.244","DOI":"10.1123\/jsp.7.3.244"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_8_2","volume-title":"Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.)","author":"Cialdini R.\u00a0B.","year":"1993","unstructured":"R.\u00a0B. Cialdini. 1993. Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). HarperCollins College Publishers."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Petru\u00a0Lucian Cur\u015feu Remus Ilies Delia V\u00eerg\u0103 Lauren\u0163iu Maricu\u0163oiu and Florin\u00a0A. Sava. 2019. Personality characteristics that are valued in teams: Not always \u201cmore is better\u201d? International Journal of Psychology 54 (10 2019) 638\u2013649. Issue 5. 10.1002\/ijop.12511","DOI":"10.1002\/ijop.12511"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_10_2","unstructured":"Abhinav Dahiya Alexander\u00a0M. Aroyo Kerstin Dautenhahn and Stephen\u00a0L. Smith. 2022. A Survey of Multi-Agent Human-Robot Interaction Systems. (12 2022). http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2212.05286"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mark\u00a0H. Davis. 1983. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (1 1983) 113\u2013126. Issue 1. 10.1037\/0022-3514.44.1.113","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.44.1.113"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Brian\u00a0R. Duffy. 2003. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42 (3 2003) 177\u2013190. Issue 3-4. 10.1016\/S0921-8890(02)00374-3","DOI":"10.1016\/S0921-8890(02)00374-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Judith D\u00f6rrenb\u00e4cher Ronda Ringfort-Felner and Marc Hassenzahl. 2023. The Intricacies of Social Robots: Secondary Analysis of Fictional Documentaries to Explore the Benefits and Challenges of Robots in Complex Social Settings. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 13. Issue 23. 10.1145\/3544548.3581526","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581526"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hadas Erel Denis Trayman Chen Levy Adi Manor Mario Mikulincer and Oren Zuckerman. 2022. Enhancing Emotional Support: The Effect of a Robotic Object on Human\u2013Human Support Quality. International Journal of Social Robotics 14 (1 2022) 257\u2013276. Issue 1. 10.1007\/S12369-021-00779-5\/TABLES\/3","DOI":"10.1007\/S12369-021-00779-5\/TABLES\/3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hadas Erel Marynel V\u00e1zquez Sarah Sebo Nicole Salomons Sarah Gillet and Brian Scassellati. 2024. RoSI: A Model for Predicting Robot Social Influence. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 13 (6 2024) 1\u201322. Issue 2. 10.1145\/3641515","DOI":"10.1145\/3641515"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Susan\u00a0T. Fiske. 1993. Social Cognition and Social Perception. Annual Review of Psychology 44 (1 1993) 155\u2013194. Issue 1. 10.1146\/annurev.ps.44.020193.001103","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.ps.44.020193.001103"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Donelson\u00a0R. Forsyth and Timothy\u00a0R. Elliott. 2004. Group dynamics and psychological well-being: The impact of groups on adjustment and dysfunction. The social psychology of emotional and behavioral problems: Interfaces of social and clinical psychology. (10 2004) 339\u2013361. 10.1037\/10320-012","DOI":"10.1037\/10320-012"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sarah Gillet Marynel V\u00e1zquez Sean Andrist Iolanda Leite and Sarah Sebo. 2024. Interaction-Shaping Robotics: Robots that Influence Interactions between Other Agents. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (2 2024). 10.1145\/3643803","DOI":"10.1145\/3643803"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ariel Gjaci Carmine\u00a0Tommaso Recchiuto and Antonio Sgorbissa. 2022. Towards Culture-Aware Co-Speech Gestures for Social Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 14 (8 2022) 1493\u20131506. Issue 6. 10.1007\/s12369-022-00893-y","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-022-00893-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lewis\u00a0R. Goldberg. 1990. An alternative \"description of personality\": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (1990) 1216\u20131229. Issue 6. 10.1037\/0022-3514.59.6.1216","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.59.6.1216"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michael\u00a0H.G. Hoffmann. 2021. Consensus Building and Its Epistemic Conditions. Topoi 40 (11 2021) 1173\u20131186. Issue 5. 10.1007\/s11245-019-09640-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-019-09640-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Janice\u00a0R. Kelly and Sigal\u00a0G. Barsade. 2001. Mood and Emotions in Small Groups and Work Teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 (9 2001) 99\u2013130. Issue 1. 10.1006\/OBHD.2001.2974","DOI":"10.1006\/OBHD.2001.2974"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"J.\u00a0Richard Landis and Gary\u00a0G. Koch. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33 (3 1977) 159. Issue 1. 10.2307\/2529310","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mandi\u00a0M. Larsen Damir Esenaliev Tilman Br\u00fcck and Klaus Boehnke. 2020. The connection between social cohesion and personality: A multilevel study in the Kyrgyz Republic. International Journal of Psychology 55 (2 2020) 42\u201351. Issue 1. 10.1002\/ijop.12551","DOI":"10.1002\/ijop.12551"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Theresa Law Meia Chita-Tegmark and Matthias Scheutz. 2021. The Interplay Between Emotional Intelligence Trust and Gender in Human\u2013Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics 13 (4 2021) 297\u2013309. Issue 2. 10.1007\/s12369-020-00624-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-020-00624-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Velvetina Lim Maki Rooksby and Emily\u00a0S. Cross. 2021. Social Robots on a Global Stage: Establishing a Role for Culture During Human\u2013Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics 13 (9 2021) 1307\u20131333. Issue 6. 10.1007\/s12369-020-00710-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-020-00710-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gabriel Lima Nina Grgi\u0107-Hla\u010da and Meeyoung Cha. 2021. Human Perceptions on Moral Responsibility of AI: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Bail Decision-Making. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1\u201317. 10.1145\/3411764.3445260","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445260"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Christoph Lutz and Aurelia Tam\u00f2-Larrieux. 2021. Do Privacy Concerns About Social Robots Affect Use Intentions? Evidence From an Experimental Vignette Study. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8 (4 2021). 10.3389\/frobt.2021.627958","DOI":"10.3389\/frobt.2021.627958"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Adi Manor Avi Parush and Hadas Erel. 2024. Attentiveness: A Key Factor in Fostering Affective and Cognitive Trust with Non-Humanoid Robots. 2024 33rd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN) 469\u2013476. 10.1109\/RO-MAN60168.2024.10731320","DOI":"10.1109\/RO-MAN60168.2024.10731320"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gabrielle\u00a0M. Maxwell Michael\u00a0W. Cook and Raymond Burr. 1985. The encoding and decoding of liking from behavioral cues in both auditory and visual channels. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 9 (1985) 239\u2013263. Issue 4. 10.1007\/BF00986883","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00986883"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"James\u00a0C. McCroskey and Thomas\u00a0A. McCain. 1974. The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs 41 (8 1974) 261\u2013266. Issue 3. 10.1080\/03637757409375845","DOI":"10.1080\/03637757409375845"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stanislava Naneva Marina\u00a0Sarda Gou Thomas\u00a0L. Webb and Tony\u00a0J. Prescott. 2020. A Systematic Review of Attitudes Anxiety Acceptance and Trust Towards Social Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 12 (12 2020) 1179\u20131201. Issue 6. 10.1007\/s12369-020-00659-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-020-00659-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1201\/9781003287445-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Richard\u00a0E. Nisbett and Timothy\u00a0D. Wilson. 1977. The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (4 1977) 250\u2013256. Issue 4. 10.1037\/0022-3514.35.4.250","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.35.4.250"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maike Paetzel Giulia Perugia and Ginevra Castellano. 2020. The Persistence of First Impressions. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM\/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 73\u201382. 10.1145\/3319502.3374786","DOI":"10.1145\/3319502.3374786"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maike Paetzel-Pr\u00fcsmann Giulia Perugia and Ginevra Castellano. 2021. The Influence of robot personality on the development of uncanny feelings. Computers in Human Behavior 120 (7 2021) 106756. 10.1016\/j.chb.2021.106756","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2021.106756"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Miranda A.\u00a0G. Peeters Christel\u00a0G. Rutte Harrie F. J.\u00a0M. van Tuijl and Isabelle M. M.\u00a0J. Reymen. 2006. The Big Five Personality Traits and Individual Satisfaction With the Team. Small Group Research 37 (4 2006) 187\u2013211. Issue 2. 10.1177\/1046496405285458","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496405285458"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tuan\u00a0Vu Pham Thomas\u00a0H. Weisswange and Marc Hassenzahl. 2024. Embodied Mediation in Group Ideation \u2013 A Gestural Robot Can Facilitate Consensus-Building. DIS \u201924: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2611\u20132632. 10.1145\/3643834.3660696","DOI":"10.1145\/3643834.3660696"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Danielle Rifinski Hadas Erel Adi Feiner Guy Hoffman and Oren Zuckerman. 2021. Human-human-robot interaction: robotic object\u2019s responsive gestures improve interpersonal evaluation in human interaction. Human\u2013Computer Interaction 36 (7 2021) 333\u2013359. Issue 4. 10.1080\/07370024.2020.1719839","DOI":"10.1080\/07370024.2020.1719839"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nicole Salomons Sarah\u00a0Strohkorb Sebo Meiying Qin and Brian Scassellati. 2021. A Minority of One against a Majority of Robots. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 10 (6 2021) 1\u201322. Issue 2. 10.1145\/3442627","DOI":"10.1145\/3442627"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781316181959.011"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Eike Schneiders EunJeong Cheon Jesper Kjeldskov Matthias Rehm and Mikael\u00a0B. Skov. 2022. Non-Dyadic Interaction: A Literature Review of 15 Years of Human-Robot Interaction Conference Publications. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 11 (6 2022) 1\u201332. Issue 2. 10.1145\/3488242","DOI":"10.1145\/3488242"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sarah Sebo Brett Stoll Brian Scassellati and Malte\u00a0F. Jung. 2020. Robots in Groups and Teams: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4 (10 2020) 36. Issue CSCW2. 10.1145\/3415247","DOI":"10.1145\/3415247"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andrew Steain Christopher\u00a0John Stanton and Catherine\u00a0J. Stevens. 2019. The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot. PLOS ONE 14 (10 2019) e0222975. Issue 10. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0222975","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0222975"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hamish Tennent Solace Shen and Malte Jung. 2019. Micbot: A Peripheral Robotic Object to Shape Conversational Dynamics and Team Performance. ACM\/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2019-March (3 2019) 133\u2013142. 10.1109\/HRI.2019.8673013","DOI":"10.1109\/HRI.2019.8673013"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Margaret\u00a0L. Traeger Sarah\u00a0Strohkorb Sebo Malte Jung Brian Scassellati and Nicholas\u00a0A. Christakis. 2020. Vulnerable robots positively shape human conversational dynamics in a human-robot team. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117 (3 2020) 6370\u20136375. Issue 12. 10.1073\/PNAS.1910402117\/SUPPLFILE\/PNAS.1910402117.SAPP.PDF","DOI":"10.1073\/PNAS.1910402117\/SUPPLFILE\/PNAS.1910402117.SAPP.PDF"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jacqueline Urakami and Katie Seaborn. 2023. Nonverbal Cues in Human\u2013Robot Interaction: A Communication Studies Perspective. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 12 (6 2023) 1\u201321. Issue 2. 10.1145\/3570169","DOI":"10.1145\/3570169"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118783665.ieicc0252"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thomas\u00a0H. Weisswange Hifza Javed Manuel Dietrich Malte\u00a0F. Jung and Nawid Jamali. 2024. Social Mediation through Robots \u2013 A Scoping Review on Improving Group Interactions through Directed Robot Action using an Extended Group Process Model. (9 2024). 10.48550\/arXiv.2409.06557","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2409.06557"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thomas\u00a0H. Weisswange Hifza Javed Manuel Dietrich Tuan\u00a0Vu Pham Maria\u00a0Teresa Parreira Michael Sack and Nawid Jamali. 2023. What Could a Social Mediator Robot Do? Lessons from Real-World Mediation Scenarios. (6 2023). 10.48550\/arXiv.2306.17379","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2306.17379"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Julika Welge and Marc Hassenzahl. 2016. Better Than Human: About the Psychological Superpowers of Robots Arvin Agah John-John Cabibihan Ayanna\u00a0M. Howard Miguel\u00a0A. Salichs and Hongsheng He (Eds.). International Conference on Social Robotics 9979 993\u20131002. 10.1007\/978-3-319-47437-397","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-47437-397"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Christopher\u00a0G Wetzel Timothy\u00a0D Wilson and James Kort. 1981. The halo effect revisited: Forewarned is not forearmed. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 17 (7 1981) 427\u2013439. Issue 4. 10.1016\/0022-1031(81)90049-4","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1031(81)90049-4"}],"event":{"name":"DIS '25: Designing Interactive Systems Conference","location":"Madeira Portugal","acronym":"DIS '25","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]],"date-time":"2025-07-04T11:23:41Z","timestamp":1751628221000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3715336.3735765"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]]},"references-count":51,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3715336.3735765","10.1145\/3715336"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3715336.3735765","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-07-04","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}