{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T21:03:22Z","timestamp":1776114202436,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":72,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,23]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3729176.3729196","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,21]],"date-time":"2025-06-21T11:30:16Z","timestamp":1750505416000},"page":"1-18","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Envisioning the Future of Peer Review: Investigating LLM-Assisted Reviewing Using ChatGPT as a Case Study"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9477-2420","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Shiping","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2846-2592","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Duncan","family":"Brumby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2231-2964","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna","family":"Cox","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","volume-title":"The NIPS experiment","year":"2014","unstructured":"2014. The NIPS experiment. Retrieved November 23, 2021 from http:\/\/blog.mrtz.org\/2014\/12\/15\/the-nips-experiment.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","volume-title":"Peer-review crisis creates problems for journals and scholars","year":"2022","unstructured":"2022. Peer-review crisis creates problems for journals and scholars. Retrieved December 2, 2022 from https:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/news\/2022\/06\/13\/peer-review-crisis-creates-problems-journals-and-scholars"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","volume-title":"CHI 2024 \u2014 Papers track, post-round one outcomes report","year":"2023","unstructured":"2023. CHI 2024 \u2014 Papers track, post-round one outcomes report. Retrieved January 15, 2024 from https:\/\/chi2024.acm.org\/2023\/12\/15\/chi-2024-papers-track-post-round-one-outcomes-report-2\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613905.3636301"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"William\u00a0G Baxt Joseph\u00a0F Waeckerle Jesse\u00a0A Berlin and Michael\u00a0L Callaham. 1998. Who reviews the reviewers? Feasibility of using a fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance. Annals of emergency medicine 32 3 (1998) 310\u2013317.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-0644(98)70006-X"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642406"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1145\/2212776.2212422","volume-title":"CHI\u201912 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems","author":"Bernstein Michael","year":"2012","unstructured":"Michael Bernstein, Dan Cosley, Carl DiSalvo, Sanjay Kairam, David Karger, Travis Kriplean, Cliff Lampe, Wendy Mackay, Loren Terveen, Jacob Wobbrock, et\u00a0al. 2012. Reject me: peer review and SIGCHI. In CHI\u201912 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 1197\u20131200."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lutz Bornmann R\u00fcdiger Mutz and Hans-Dieter Daniel. 2007. Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis. Journal of Informetrics 1 3 (2007) 226\u2013238.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2007.03.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","series-title":"(CHI EA \u201924)","volume-title":"Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","author":"Brachman Michelle","year":"2024","unstructured":"Michelle Brachman, Amina El-Ashry, Casey Dugan, and Werner Geyer. 2024. How Knowledge Workers Use and Want to Use LLMs in an Enterprise Context. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA \u201924). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 189, 8\u00a0pages. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3613905.3650841"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3 2 (2006) 77\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amber\u00a0E Budden Tom Tregenza Lonnie\u00a0W Aarssen Julia Koricheva Roosa Leimu and Christopher\u00a0J Lortie. 2008. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in ecology & evolution 23 1 (2008) 4\u20136.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tree.2007.07.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"David Byrne. 2022. A worked example of Braun and Clarke\u2019s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & quantity 56 3 (2022) 1391\u20131412.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11135-021-01182-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Michael\u00a0L Callaham and David\u00a0L Schriger. 2002. Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers. Annals of emergency medicine 40 3 (2002) 323\u2013328.","DOI":"10.1067\/mem.2002.127121"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3173574.3173868"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stephen\u00a0J Ceci and Wendy\u00a0M Williams. 2011. Understanding current causes of women\u2019s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 8 (2011) 3157\u20133162.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1014871108"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alessandro Checco Lorenzo Bracciale Pierpaolo Loreti Stephen Pinfield and Giuseppe Bianchi. 2021. AI-assisted peer review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8 1 (2021) 1\u201311.","DOI":"10.1057\/s41599-020-00703-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2851581.2892410"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anil\u00a0R Doshi and Oliver Hauser. 2023. Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity. Available at SSRN (2023).","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4535536"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642782"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holly Else. 2024. \u2019Getting paid to review is justice\u2019: journal pays peer reviewers in cryptocurrency. Nature (2024).","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-024-04027-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Luciano Floridi and Massimo Chiriatti. 2020. GPT-3: Its nature scope limits and consequences. Minds and Machines 30 (2020) 681\u2013694.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-020-09548-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Daniel Garc\u0131a-Costa Flaminio Squazzoni Bahar Mehmani and Francisco Grimaldo. 2021. Measuring the Developmental Function of Peer Review: A Multi-Dimensional Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Peer Review Reports from 740 Academic Journals. Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of Peer Review Reports from 740 (2021).","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3912607"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fiona Godlee Catharine\u00a0R Gale and Christopher\u00a0N Martyn. 1998. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 280 3 (1998) 237\u2013240.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.280.3.237"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","series-title":"(CHI EA \u201924)","volume-title":"Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","author":"Gould Sandy J.\u00a0J.","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sandy J.\u00a0J. Gould, Duncan\u00a0P. Brumby, and Anna\u00a0L. Cox. 2024. ChatTL;DR \u2013 You Really Ought to Check What the LLM Said on Your Behalf. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA \u201924). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 552, 7\u00a0pages. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3613905.3644062"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hilda Hadan Derrick\u00a0M Wang Reza\u00a0Hadi Mogavi Joseph Tu Leah Zhang-Kennedy and Lennart\u00a0E Nacke. 2024. The great AI witch hunt: Reviewers\u2019 perception and (Mis) conception of generative AI in research writing. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2 2 (2024) 100095.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbah.2024.100095"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"SG Hart. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human mental workload\/Elsevier (1988).","DOI":"10.1016\/S0166-4115(08)62386-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2724660.2728693"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heather Holden and Roy Rada. 2011. Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers\u2019 technology acceptance. Journal of research on technology in education 43 4 (2011) 343\u2013367.","DOI":"10.1080\/15391523.2011.10782576"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Debra Houry Steven Green and Michael Callaham. 2012. Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial. BMC Medical Education 12 1 (2012) 1\u20137.","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6920-12-83"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Juhani Iivari. 2016. How to improve the quality of peer reviews? Three suggestions for system-level changes. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 38 1 (2016) 12.","DOI":"10.17705\/1CAIS.03812"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tom Jefferson Richard Smith Yunni Yee Mike Drummond Mark Pratt and Rajendra Gale. 1998. Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions: prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and The Lancet. Jama 280 3 (1998) 275\u2013277.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.280.3.275"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_33_2","unstructured":"Jacalyn Kelly Tara Sadeghieh and Khosrow Adeli. 2014. Peer review in scientific publications: benefits critiques & a survival guide. Ejifcc 25 3 (2014) 227."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Artur Klingbeil Cassandra Gr\u00fctzner and Philipp Schreck. 2024. Trust and reliance on AI\u2014An experimental study on the extent and costs of overreliance on AI. Computers in Human Behavior 160 (2024) 108352.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2024.108352"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_35_2","volume-title":"Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology","author":"Krippendorff Klaus","year":"2018","unstructured":"Klaus Krippendorff. 2018. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carole\u00a0J Lee Cassidy\u00a0R Sugimoto Guo Zhang and Blaise Cronin. 2013. Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 1 (2013) 2\u201317.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22784"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_37_2","unstructured":"Hao-Ping\u00a0Hank Lee Advait Sarkar Lev Tankelevitch Ian Drosos Sean Rintel Richard Banks and Nicholas Wilson. 2025. The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers. (2025)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3391203.3391218"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pengyuan Li Xiangying Jiang and Hagit Shatkay. 2019. Figure and caption extraction from biomedical documents. Bioinformatics 35 21 (2019) 4381\u20134388.","DOI":"10.1093\/bioinformatics\/btz228"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weixin Liang Yuhui Zhang Hancheng Cao Binglu Wang Daisy\u00a0Yi Ding Xinyu Yang Kailas Vodrahalli Siyu He Daniel\u00a0Scott Smith Yian Yin et\u00a0al. 2024. Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis. NEJM AI 1 8 (2024) AIoa2400196.","DOI":"10.1056\/AIoa2400196"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weixin Liang Yuhui Zhang Hancheng Cao Binglu Wang Daisy\u00a0Yi Ding Xinyu Yang Kailas Vodrahalli Siyu He Daniel\u00a0Scott Smith Yian Yin et\u00a0al. 2024. Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis. NEJM AI 1 8 (2024) AIoa2400196.","DOI":"10.1056\/AIoa2400196"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_42_2","unstructured":"Ryan Liu and Nihar\u00a0B Shah. 2023. Reviewergpt? an exploratory study on using large language models for paper reviewing. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2306.00622 (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_43_2","first-page":"473","volume-title":"International conference on theory and practice of digital libraries","author":"Lopez Patrice","year":"2009","unstructured":"Patrice Lopez. 2009. GROBID: Combining automatic bibliographic data recognition and term extraction for scholarship publications. In International conference on theory and practice of digital libraries. Springer, 473\u2013474."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mersiha Mahmi\u0107-Kaknjo Ana Utrobi\u010di\u0107 and Ana Maru\u0161i\u0107. 2021. Motivations for performing scholarly prepublication peer review: a scoping review. Accountability in Research 28 5 (2021) 297\u2013329.","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2020.1822170"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_45_2","first-page":"2045","volume-title":"CHI\u201905 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","author":"Newman William","year":"2005","unstructured":"William Newman, Robin Jeffries, and MC Schraefel. 2005. Do CHI papers work for you? addressing concerns of authors, audiences and reviewers. In CHI\u201905 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2045\u20132046."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2556420.2556828"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Syavash Nobarany Kellogg\u00a0S Booth and Gary Hsieh. 2016. What motivates people to review articles? The case of the human-computer interaction community. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 6 (2016) 1358\u20131371.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23469"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shakked Noy and Whitney Zhang. 2023. Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381 6654 (2023) 187\u2013192.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.adh2586"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Magne Nylenna Povl Riis and Yngve Karlsson. 1994. Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts: effects of referee characteristics and publication language. JAMA 272 2 (1994) 149\u2013151.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1994.03520020075021"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yutaka Okuzaki Shoko Nakamura and Masahiro Nakaoka. 2019. Toward more rapid and efficient peer review: A case study on publication in Ecological Research. ecological research 34 5 (2019) 563\u2013574.","DOI":"10.1111\/1440-1703.12037"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Milton Pividori and Casey\u00a0S Greene. 2024. A publishing infrastructure for Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted academic authoring. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 31 9 (2024) 2103\u20132113.","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocae139"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_52_2","unstructured":"James\u00a0M Provenzale and Robert\u00a0J Stanley. 2006. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. Journal of nuclear medicine technology 34 2 (2006) 92\u201399."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_53_2","series-title":"(CHI \u201924)","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","author":"Rae Irene","year":"2024","unstructured":"Irene Rae. 2024. The Effects of Perceived AI Use On Content Perceptions. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI \u201924). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 978, 14\u00a0pages. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3613904.3642076"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Azzurra Ragone Katsiaryna Mirylenka Fabio Casati and Maurizio Marchese. 2013. On peer review in computer science: Analysis of its effectiveness and suggestions for improvement. Scientometrics 97 2 (2013) 317\u2013356.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-013-1002-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paul Ralph. 2016. Practical suggestions for improving scholarly peer review quality and reducing cycle times. Communications of the association for information systems 38 1 (2016) 13.","DOI":"10.17705\/1CAIS.03813"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_56_2","unstructured":"Partha\u00a0Pratim Ray. 2023. ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background applications key challenges bias ethics limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_57_2","first-page":"793","volume-title":"CHI\u201914 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","author":"Rughini\u015f R\u0103zvan","year":"2014","unstructured":"R\u0103zvan Rughini\u015f, Cosima Rughini\u015f, and Alina\u00a0Petra Marinescu\u00a0Nenciu. 2014. Quantification in Alt. CHI open review: liking and ticking on a likert scale. In CHI\u201914 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 793\u2013804."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sara Schroter Nick Black Stephen Evans James Carpenter Fiona Godlee and Richard Smith. 2004. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial. Bmj 328 7441 (2004) 673.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38023.700775.AE"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_59_2","unstructured":"Nihar\u00a0B Shah Behzad Tabibian Krikamol Muandet Isabelle Guyon and Ulrike Von\u00a0Luxburg. 2018. Design and analysis of the NIPS 2016 review process. Journal of machine learning research (2018)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_60_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chun Shao Seungahn Nah Heidi Makady and Jasmine McNealy. 2024. Understanding User Attitudes Towards AI-Enabled Technologies: An Integrated Model of Self-Efficacy TAM and AI Ethics. International Journal of Human\u2013Computer Interaction (2024) 1\u201313.","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2024.2331858"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Richard Smith. 2006. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the royal society of medicine 99 4 (2006) 178\u2013182.","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680609900414"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_62_2","volume-title":"AAAI","author":"Stelmakh Ivan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar\u00a0B. Shah, Aarti Singh, and Hal Daum\u2019e. 2021. A Novice-Reviewer Experiment to Address Scarcity of Qualified Reviewers in Large Conferences. In AAAI."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chris Street and Kerry\u00a0W Ward. 2019. Cognitive bias in the peer review process: Understanding a source of friction between reviewers and researchers. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 50 4 (2019) 52\u201370.","DOI":"10.1145\/3371041.3371046"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_64_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lu Sun Aaron Chan Yun\u00a0Seo Chang and Steven\u00a0P Dow. 2024. ReviewFlow: Intelligent Scaffolding to Support Academic Peer Reviewing. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2402.03530 (2024).","DOI":"10.1145\/3640543.3645159"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_65_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lu Sun Stone Tao Junjie Hu and Steven\u00a0P Dow. 2024. Metawriter: Exploring the potential and perils of ai writing support in scientific peer review. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8 CSCW1 (2024) 1\u201332.","DOI":"10.1145\/3637371"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_66_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3334480.3381066"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_67_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Susan Van\u00a0Rooyen Nick Black and Fiona Godlee. 1999. Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts. Journal of clinical epidemiology 52 7 (1999) 625\u2013629.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0895-4356(99)00047-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_68_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Qingyun Wang Qi Zeng Lifu Huang Kevin Knight Heng Ji and Nazneen\u00a0Fatema Rajani. 2020. ReviewRobot: Explainable paper review generation based on knowledge synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2010.06119 (2020).","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.inlg-1.44"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_69_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christine Wenner\u00e5s and Agnes Wold. 1997. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. nature 387 6631 (1997) 341.","DOI":"10.1038\/387341a0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_70_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613905.3650732"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_71_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weizhe Yuan Pengfei Liu and Graham Neubig. 2022. Can we automate scientific reviewing? Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 75 (2022) 171\u2013212.","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1.12862"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_72_2","volume-title":"CHI 2025 \u2014 Papers Track, post-review report (Round 1)","author":"Zagermann Johannes","year":"2024","unstructured":"Johannes Zagermann. 2024. CHI 2025 \u2014 Papers Track, post-review report (Round 1). Retrieved Feburary 24, 2025 from https:\/\/chi2025.acm.org\/chi-2025-papers-track-post-review-report-round-1\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_73_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abdelhak Zoubir. 2014. Peer reviews: What would be the best model?[From the Editor]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 31 2 (2014) 4\u20134.","DOI":"10.1109\/MSP.2013.2295043"}],"event":{"name":"CHIWORK '25: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work","location":"Amsterdam Netherlands","acronym":"CHIWORK '25"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,21]],"date-time":"2025-06-21T11:32:29Z","timestamp":1750505549000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3729176.3729196"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,22]]},"references-count":72,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3729176.3729196","10.1145\/3729176"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3729176.3729196","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-06-22","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}