{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T15:55:29Z","timestamp":1776095729268,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":32,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,31]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3743049.3748570","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,28]],"date-time":"2025-08-28T14:03:01Z","timestamp":1756389781000},"page":"624-630","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Blue-Collar Realities in HCI: Lessons from Exoskeleton Studies in Industry and a Practical Checklist for Worker-Centered Field Research"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6670-9288","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sandra Maria","family":"Siedl","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Robopsychology Lab, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-1237-2805","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lara","family":"Bauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Robopsychology Lab, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3447-0556","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Martina","family":"Mara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Robopsychology Lab, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mark\u00a0S. Allen Davina\u00a0A. Robson and Dragos Iliescu. 2023. Face Validity: A Critical but Ignored Component of Scale Construction in Psychological Assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 39 3 (May 2023) 153\u2013156. 10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000777","DOI":"10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000777"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Antonio Baldassarre Lucrezia\u00a0Ginevra Lulli Filippo Cavallo Laura Fiorini Antonella Mariniello Nicola Mucci and Giulio Arcangeli. 2022. Industrial exoskeletons from bench to field: Human-machine interface and user experience in occupational settings and tasks. Frontiers in Public Health 10 (Nov. 2022) 1039680. 10.3389\/fpubh.2022.1039680","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2022.1039680"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ho\u00a0Kwan Cheung Mikki Hebl Eden\u00a0B. King Hannah Markell Carlos Moreno and Christy Nittrouer. 2017. Back to the Future: Methodologies That Capture Real People in the Real World. Social Psychological and Personality Science 8 5 (July 2017) 564\u2013572. 10.1177\/1948550617709113","DOI":"10.1177\/1948550617709113"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marc Dufraisse Julien Cegarra Jean-Jacques Atain\u00a0Kouadio Isabelle Clerc-Urm\u00e8s and Li\u00ean Wioland. 2025. From unknown to familiar: An exploratory longitudinal field study on occupational exoskeletons adoption. Applied Ergonomics 122 (Jan. 2025) 104393. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2024.104393","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2024.104393"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3658619.3658621"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Omar Flor-Unda Rafael Arcos-Reina Susana Nunez-Nagy and Bernardo Alarcos. 2025. Adverse Effects Due to the Use of Upper Limbs Exoskeletons in the Work Environment: A Scoping Review. Biomimetics 10 5 (May 2025) 340. 10.3390\/biomimetics10050340","DOI":"10.3390\/biomimetics10050340"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Deborah Gioia. 2009. Understanding the Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing Using an Ethnographic Approach. Qualitative Health Research 19 10 (Oct. 2009) 1495\u20131503. 10.1177\/1049732309348500","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732309348500"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nora Hampel Kai Sassenberg Annika Scholl and Matthias Reichenbach. 2022. Introducing digital technologies in the factory: determinants of blue-collar workers\u2019 attitudes towards new robotic tools. Behaviour & Information Technology 41 14 (Oct. 2022) 2973\u20132987. 10.1080\/0144929X.2021.1967448","DOI":"10.1080\/0144929X.2021.1967448"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Joseph Henrich Steven\u00a0J. Heine and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 2-3 (June 2010) 61\u201383. 10.1017\/S0140525X0999152X","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X0999152X"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guy Hoffman and Xuan Zhao. 2021. A Primer for Conducting Experiments in Human\u2013Robot Interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 10 1 (March 2021) 1\u201331. 10.1145\/3412374","DOI":"10.1145\/3412374"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"J.\u00a0Michael Innes and Ben W.\u00a0Morrison. 2021. Experimental Studies of Human\u2013Robot Interaction: Threats to Valid Interpretation from Methodological Constraints Associated with Experimental Manipulations. International Journal of Social Robotics 13 4 (July 2021) 765\u2013773. 10.1007\/s12369-020-00671-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-020-00671-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Benedikt Leichtmann Andreas Hinterreiter Christina Humer Marc Streit and Martina Mara. 2023. Explainable Artificial Intelligence Improves Human Decision-Making: Results from a Mushroom Picking Experiment at a Public Art Festival. International Journal of Human\u2013Computer Interaction 40 17 (2023) 4787\u20134804. 10.1080\/10447318.2023.2221605","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2023.2221605"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weng\u00a0Marc Lim. 2024. A typology of validity: content face convergent discriminant nomological and predictive validity. Journal of Trade Science 12 3 (Sept. 2024) 155\u2013179. 10.1108\/JTS-03-2024-0016","DOI":"10.1108\/JTS-03-2024-0016"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445488"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jon\u00a0K. Maner. 2016. Into the wild: Field research can increase both replicability and real-world impact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 66 (Sept. 2016) 100\u2013106. 10.1016\/j.jesp.2015.09.018","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2015.09.018"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411763.3445006"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Francisco\u00a0M. Olmos-Vega Ren\u00e9e\u00a0E. Stalmeijer Lara Varpio and Renate Kahlke. 2023. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher 45 3 (March 2023) 241\u2013251. 10.1080\/0142159x.2022.2057287Publisher: Informa UK Limited.","DOI":"10.1080\/0142159x.2022.2057287"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21606\/drs.2024.1015"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713436"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-16-3476-54"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-02220-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kai Sassenberg and Lara Ditrich. 2019. Research in Social Psychology Changed Between 2011 and 2016: Larger Sample Sizes More Self-Report Measures and More Online Studies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2 2 (June 2019) 107\u2013114. 10.1177\/2515245919838781","DOI":"10.1177\/2515245919838781"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3514094.3534128"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Katie Seaborn Giulia Barbareschi and Shruti Chandra. 2023. Not Only WEIRD but \u201cUncanny\u201d? A Systematic Review of Diversity in Human\u2013Robot Interaction Research. International Journal of Social Robotics 15 11 (Nov. 2023) 1841\u20131870. 10.1007\/s12369-023-00968-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-023-00968-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0M. Siedl and Martina Mara. 2021. Exoskeleton acceptance and its relationship to self-efficacy enhancement perceived usefulness and physical relief: A field study among logistics workers. Wearable Technologies 2 (2021) e10. 10.1017\/wtc.2021.10Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP).","DOI":"10.1017\/wtc.2021.10"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0Maria Siedl and Martina Mara. 2023. What Drives Acceptance of Occupational Exoskeletons? Focus Group Insights from Workers in Food Retail and Corporate Logistics. International Journal of Human\u2013Computer Interaction 39 20 (Dec. 2023) 4080\u20134089. 10.1080\/10447318.2022.2108969Publisher: Informa UK Limited.","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2022.2108969"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0Maria Siedl and Martina Mara. 2024. Am I still human? Wearing an exoskeleton impacts self-perceptions of warmth competence attractiveness and machine-likeness. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2 2 (Aug. 2024) 100073. 10.1016\/j.chbah.2024.100073Publisher: Elsevier BV.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbah.2024.100073"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0Maria Siedl Martina Mara and Barbara Stiglbauer. 2024. The Role of Social Feedback in Technology Acceptance: A One-Week Diary Study with Exoskeleton Users at the Workplace. International Journal of Human\u2013Computer Interaction 41 13 (2024) 8210\u20138223. 10.1080\/10447318.2024.2406119Publisher: Informa UK Limited.","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2024.2406119"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3434074.3447200"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sruti Subramanian Katrien De\u00a0Moor Markus Fiedler Kamil Koniuch and Lucjan Janowski. 2023. Towards enhancing ecological validity in user studies: a systematic review of guidelines and implications for QoE research. Quality and User Experience 8 1 (Dec. 2023) 6. 10.1007\/s41233-023-00059-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s41233-023-00059-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003052944-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rafa\u0142 \u0141opucki Adam Kiersztyn Grzegorz Pitucha and Ignacy Kitowski. 2022. Handling missing data in ecological studies: Ignoring gaps in the dataset can distort the inference. Ecological Modelling 468 (June 2022) 109964. 10.1016\/j.ecolmodel.2022.109964","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ecolmodel.2022.109964"}],"event":{"name":"MuC '25: Mensch und Computer 2025","location":"Chemnitz Germany","acronym":"MuC '25"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Mensch und Computer 2025"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,28]],"date-time":"2025-08-28T14:55:09Z","timestamp":1756392909000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3743049.3748570"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,30]]},"references-count":32,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3743049.3748570","10.1145\/3743049"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3743049.3748570","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-08-30","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}