{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,6]],"date-time":"2025-10-06T17:13:25Z","timestamp":1759770805418,"version":"build-2065373602"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":24,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,7]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3746175.3746208","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,6]],"date-time":"2025-10-06T16:36:38Z","timestamp":1759768598000},"page":"1-5","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Does ChatGPT know what robots are thinking? - Evaluation of human-created vs. AI-generated scientific ideas"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-9636-9342","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Vera","family":"Eymann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6901-5935","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thomas","family":"Lachmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-5166-5318","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Felix","family":"Hekele","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics ITWM Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-1346-0629","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ashita","family":"Ashok","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9080-1404","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Karsten","family":"Berns","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0922-9920","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniela","family":"Czernochowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_2_2","unstructured":"Josh Achiam Steven Adler Sandhini Agarwal Lama Ahmad Ilge Akkaya Florencia\u00a0Leoni Aleman Diogo Almeida Janko Altenschmidt Sam Altman Shyamal Anadkat et\u00a0al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2303.08774 (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roger Beaty Robert\u00a0A Cortes Simone Luchini John\u00a0D Patterson Boris Forthmann Brendan\u00a0S Baker Baptiste Barbot Mariale Hardiman and Adam Green. 2024. The scientific creative thinking test (SCTT): Reliability validity and automated scoring. PsyArxiv Preprints (2024).","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/y5fbs"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5555\/940309"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Domenic\u00a0V Cicchetti. 1994. Guidelines criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological assessment 6 4 (1994) 284.","DOI":"10.1037\/\/1040-3590.6.4.284"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mirko Farina Witold Pedrycz and Andrea Lavazza. 2024. Towards a mixed human\u2013machine creativity. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 8 2 (2024) 151\u2013165.","DOI":"10.1007\/s41809-024-00146-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paul Formosa Sarah Bankins Rita Matulionyte and Omid Ghasemi. 2024. Can ChatGPT be an author? Generative AI creative writing assistance and perceptions of authorship creatorship responsibility and disclosure. AI & SOCIETY (2024) 1\u201313.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5029670"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alireza Ghafarollahi and Markus\u00a0J Buehler. 2024. Sciagents: Automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2409.05556 (2024).","DOI":"10.1002\/adma.202413523"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_9_2","unstructured":"Brewster Ghiselin. 1952. The creative process Berkeley and los-angeles."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Karan Girotra Lennart Meincke Christian Terwiesch and Karl\u00a0T Ulrich. 2023. Ideas are dimes a dozen: Large language models for idea generation in innovation. The Wharton School Research Paper Forthcoming (2023).","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4526071"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_11_2","unstructured":"Joy\u00a0Paul Guilford. 1967. The nature of human intelligence. (1967)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Erik\u00a0E Guzik Christian Byrge and Christian Gilde. 2023. The originality of machines: AI takes the Torrance Test. Journal of Creativity 33 3 (2023) 100065.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.yjoc.2023.100065"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_13_2","unstructured":"Jingshan Huang and Ming Tan. 2023. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. American journal of cancer research 13 4 (2023) 1148."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kent\u00a0F Hubert Kim\u00a0N Awa and Darya\u00a0L Zabelina. 2024. The current state of artificial intelligence generative language models is more creative than humans on divergent thinking tasks. Scientific Reports 14 1 (2024) 3440.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-53303-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hiroaki Kitano. 2021. Nobel Turing Challenge: creating the engine for scientific discovery. NPJ systems biology and applications 7 1 (2021) 29.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41540-021-00189-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_16_2","unstructured":"Kati Koponen. 2023. Acceptance of generative AI in knowledge work. Ph.\u00a0D. Dissertation. Tampere University Information and Knowledge Management Finland."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/6090.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Douglas\u00a0B Lenat and John\u00a0Seely Brown. 1984. Why AM and EURISKO appear to work. Artificial intelligence 23 3 (1984) 269\u2013294.","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(84)90016-X"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deborah Mateja and Armin Heinzl. 2021. Towards machine learning as an enabler of computational creativity. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence 2 6 (2021) 460\u2013475.","DOI":"10.1109\/TAI.2021.3100456"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"William Orwig Emma\u00a0R Edenbaum Joshua\u00a0D Greene and Daniel\u00a0L Schacter. 2024. The language of creativity: Evidence from humans and large language models. The Journal of creative behavior 58 1 (2024) 128\u2013136.","DOI":"10.1002\/jocb.636"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_21_2","unstructured":"HANS Raj and DR Saxena. 2016. Scientific creativity: A review of researches. European Academic Research 4 2 (2016) 1122\u20131138."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_22_2","unstructured":"Chenglei Si Diyi Yang and Tatsunori Hashimoto. 2024. Can llms generate novel research ideas? a large-scale human study with 100+ nlp researchers. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2409.04109 (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Robert\u00a0J Sternberg and Todd\u00a0I Lubart. 1996. Investing in creativity. American psychologist 51 7 (1996) 677.","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0003-066X.51.7.677"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Florent Vinchon Valentin Gironnay and Todd Lubart. 2024. GenAI Creativity in Narrative Tasks: Exploring New Forms of Creativity. Journal of Intelligence 12 12 (2024) 125.","DOI":"10.3390\/jintelligence12120125"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hanchen Wang Tianfan Fu Yuanqi Du Wenhao Gao Kexin Huang Ziming Liu Payal Chandak Shengchao Liu Peter Van\u00a0Katwyk Andreea Deac et\u00a0al. 2023. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature 620 7972 (2023) 47\u201360.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-023-06221-2"}],"event":{"name":"ECCE 2025: 36th Annual Conference of the European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics","location":"Tallinn Estonia","acronym":"ECCE 2025"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,6]],"date-time":"2025-10-06T16:38:17Z","timestamp":1759768697000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3746175.3746208"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,6]]},"references-count":24,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3746175.3746208","10.1145\/3746175"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3746175.3746208","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-10-06","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}