{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,30]],"date-time":"2025-08-30T14:40:07Z","timestamp":1756564807855,"version":"3.44.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":56,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,4]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3754508.3754511","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,30]],"date-time":"2025-08-30T13:58:20Z","timestamp":1756562300000},"page":"1-7","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Enhancing MarkEd with Peer Feedback Functionality with LLM Support"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-5287-2535","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tomas","family":"Maillo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Edinburgh, School of Informatics, Edinburgh, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7738-6955","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cristina Adriana","family":"Alexandru","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Edinburgh, School of Informatics, Edinburgh, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5352-5300","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aurora","family":"Constantin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Edinburgh, School of Informatics, Edinburgh, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_2_2","unstructured":"2025. ArtificialAnalaysis Intelligence Index. https:\/\/artificialanalysis.ai\/methodology\/intelligence-benchmarking"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_3_2","unstructured":"2025. Class Companion. https:\/\/classcompanion.com\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_4_2","unstructured":"2025. FeedbackFruits. https:\/\/feedbackfruits.com\/solutions\/peer-review"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_5_2","unstructured":"2025. The Full Stack. https:\/\/fullstackdeeplearning.com\/llm-bootcamp\/spring-2023\/ux-for-luis\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_6_2","unstructured":"2025. Gradescope. https:\/\/www.gradescope.com\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_7_2","unstructured":"2025. Kritik. https:\/\/www.kritik.io\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_8_2","unstructured":"2025. Microsoft Forms. https:\/\/forms.office.com\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_9_2","unstructured":"2025. Peerceptiv. https:\/\/peerceptiv.com\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_10_2","unstructured":"2025. Turnitin. https:\/\/www.turnitin.co.uk\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_11_2","unstructured":"2025. Turnitin PeerMark. https:\/\/guides.turnitin.com\/hc\/en-us\/articles\/23974126126093"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rohan Ajwani Shashidhar\u00a0Reddy Javaji Frank Rudzicz and Zining Zhu. 2024. LLM-Generated Black-box Explanations Can Be Adversarially Helpful. 10.48550\/arXiv.2405.06800arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2405.06800 [cs].","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2405.06800"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3573260.3573261"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Monika Bader Tony Burner Sarah Hoem\u00a0Iversen and Zoltan Varga. 2019. Student perspectives on formative feedback as part of writing portfolios. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 7 (Oct. 2019) 1017\u20131028. 10.1080\/02602938.2018.1564811Publisher: SRHE Website _eprint: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2018.1564811.","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2018.1564811"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"David Boud. 1990. Assessment and the Promotion of Academic Values. (1990).","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079012331377621"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_16_2","unstructured":"John Brooke. [n. d.]. SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. ([n. d.])."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"David Carless and David Boud. 2018. The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 8 (Nov. 2018) 1315\u20131325. 10.1080\/02602938.2018.1463354","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2018.1463354"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kwangsu Cho and Charles MacArthur. 2010. Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction 20 4 (Aug. 2010) 328\u2013338. 10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dennis\u00a0M. Docheff. 1990. The Feedback Sandwich. Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance 61 9 (Dec. 1990) 17\u201318. 10.1080\/07303084.1990.10604618","DOI":"10.1080\/07303084.1990.10604618"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_20_2","unstructured":"Gonca\u00a0YANGIN Ek. 2012. Peer Review versus Teacher Feedback in Process Writing: How Effective? (2012)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sabit Ekin. 2023. Prompt Engineering For ChatGPT: A Quick Guide To Techniques Tips And Best Practices. 10.36227\/techrxiv.22683919.v1","DOI":"10.36227\/techrxiv.22683919.v1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Peggy\u00a0A. Ertmer Jennifer\u00a0C. Richardson Brian Belland Denise Camin Patrick Connolly Glen Coulthard Kimfong Lei and Christopher Mong. 2007. Using Peer Feedback to Enhance the Quality of Student Online Postings: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 2 (Jan. 2007) 412\u2013433. 10.1111\/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_23_2","unstructured":"Charles\u00a0E Fernandez. 2007. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH IN ACTION. (2007)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"J.\u00a0W. Gaynor. 2020. Peer review in the classroom: student perceptions peer feedback quality and the role of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 5 (July 2020) 758\u2013775. 10.1080\/02602938.2019.1697424","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2019.1697424"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sarah Gielen Elien Peeters Filip Dochy Patrick Onghena and Katrien Struyven. 2010. Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction 20 4 (Aug. 2010) 304\u2013315. 10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rasmus Hansen Christopher\u00a0Neil Prilop Tobias Alsted\u00a0Nielsen Karen\u00a0Louise M\u00f8ller Rikke Fr\u00f8hlich\u00a0Hougaard and Annika B\u00fcchert\u00a0Lindberg. 2025. The effects of an AI feedback coach on students\u2019 peer feedback quality composition and feedback experience. Tidsskriftet L\u00e6ring og Medier (LOM) 17 31 (Feb. 2025). 10.7146\/lom.v17i31.148831","DOI":"10.7146\/lom.v17i31.148831"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"John Hattie and Helen Timperley. 2007. The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 1 (March 2007) 81\u2013112. 10.3102\/003465430298487","DOI":"10.3102\/003465430298487"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-25112-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_29_2","unstructured":"Dai Hounsell. [n. d.]. Marking and Commenting on Essays. ([n. d.])."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dai Hounsell Velda McCune Jenny Hounsell and Judith Litjens. 2008. The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development 27 1 (March 2008) 55\u201367. 10.1080\/07294360701658765","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360701658765"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Craig\u00a0D. Howard Andrew\u00a0F. Barrett and Theodore\u00a0W. Frick. 2010. Anonymity to Promote Peer Feedback: Pre-Service Teachers\u2019 Comments in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research 43 1 (July 2010) 89\u2013112. 10.2190\/EC.43.1.f","DOI":"10.2190\/EC.43.1.f"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/9781108635547.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Theresia\u00a0Devi Indriasari Andrew Luxton-Reilly and Paul Denny. 2020. A Review of Peer Code Review in Higher Education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 20 3 (Sept. 2020) 1\u201325. 10.1145\/3403935","DOI":"10.1145\/3403935"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Georgiou Konstantinos. 2024. Thematic analysis: A practical guide: by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke Los Angeles USA Sage Publications 2022 376 pp. $ 27.59 (paperback) ISBN-13: 978-1473953246. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling 26 3-4 (Oct. 2024) 461\u2013464. 10.1080\/13642537.2024.2391666","DOI":"10.1080\/13642537.2024.2391666"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_35_2","unstructured":"Nelson\u00a0F Liu Kevin Lin John Hewitt Ashwin Paranjape Michele Bevilacqua Fabio Petroni and Percy Liang. 2024. Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts. (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kristi Lundstrom and Wendy Baker. 2009. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer\u2019s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18 1 (March 2009) 30\u201343. 10.1016\/j.jslw.2008.06.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jslw.2008.06.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ann\u00a0Rosnida Md.\u00a0Deni and Zainor\u00a0Izat Zainal. 2011. Peer-editing Practice in the Writing Classroom: Benefits and Drawbacks. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 2 1 (Jan. 2011) 92\u2013107. 10.7575\/aiac.alls.v.2n.1p.92","DOI":"10.7575\/aiac.alls.v.2n.1p.92"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jennifer Meyer Thorben Jansen Ronja Schiller Lucas\u00a0W. Liebenow Marlene Steinbach Andrea Horbach and Johanna Fleckenstein. 2024. Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students\u2019 text revision motivation and positive emotions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 6 (June 2024) 100199. 10.1016\/j.caeai.2023.100199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeai.2023.100199"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hui-Tzu Min. 2006. The effects of trained peer review on EFL students\u2019 revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 15 2 (June 2006) 118\u2013141. 10.1016\/j.jslw.2006.01.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jslw.2006.01.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Raoul\u00a0A Mulder Jon\u00a0M Pearce and Chi Baik. 2014. Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation. Active Learning in Higher Education 15 2 (July 2014) 157\u2013171. 10.1177\/1469787414527391","DOI":"10.1177\/1469787414527391"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"David Nicol Avril Thomson and Caroline Breslin. 2014. Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 1 (Jan. 2014) 102\u2013122. 10.1080\/02602938.2013.795518","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2013.795518"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/259963.260531"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Linda\u00a0B. Nilson. 2003. Improving Student Peer Feedback. College Teaching 51 1 (Jan. 2003) 34\u201338. 10.1080\/87567550309596408","DOI":"10.1080\/87567550309596408"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bertram Opitz Nicola\u00a0K. Ferdinand and Axel Mecklinger. 2011. Timing Matters: The Impact of Immediate and Delayed Feedback on Artificial Language Learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5 (2011). 10.3389\/fnhum.2011.00008","DOI":"10.3389\/fnhum.2011.00008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ernesto Panadero and Maryam Alqassab. 2019. An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment peer feedback peer review peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 8 (Nov. 2019) 1253\u20131278. 10.1080\/02602938.2019.1600186","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2019.1600186"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Melissa\u00a0M. Patchan Christian\u00a0D. Schunn and Richard\u00a0J. Correnti. 2016. The nature of feedback: How peer feedback features affect students\u2019 implementation rate and quality of revisions. Journal of Educational Psychology 108 8 (Nov. 2016) 1098\u20131120. 10.1037\/edu0000103","DOI":"10.1037\/edu0000103"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carlos\u00a0Alberto Pel\u00e1ez Andr\u00e9s Solano Johann\u00a0A. Ospina Juan\u00a0C. Espinosa Ana\u00a0S. Monta\u00f1o Paola\u00a0A. Castillo Juan\u00a0Sebasti\u00e1n Duque David\u00a0A. Castro Juan\u00a0M. Nu\u00f1ez\u00a0Velasco and Fernando De\u00a0La\u00a0Prieta. 2025. Toolkit for Inclusion of User Experience Design Guidelines in the Development of Assistants Based on Generative Artificial Intelligence. Informatics 12 1 (Jan. 2025) 10. 10.3390\/informatics12010010","DOI":"10.3390\/informatics12010010"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Les Perelman. 2014. When \u201cthe state of the art\u201d is counting words. Assessing Writing 21 (July 2014) 104\u2013111. 10.1016\/j.asw.2014.05.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2014.05.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Robert\u00a0S. Rubin. 2006. The Academic Journal Review Process as a Framework for Student Developmental Peer Feedback. Journal of Management Education 30 2 (April 2006) 378\u2013398. 10.1177\/1052562905277185","DOI":"10.1177\/1052562905277185"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Valerie\u00a0J. Shute. 2008. Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research 78 1 (March 2008) 153\u2013189. 10.3102\/0034654307313795","DOI":"10.3102\/0034654307313795"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Keith Topping. 1998. Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities. (1998).","DOI":"10.2307\/1170598"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Susanne Voelkel Tunde Varga\u2010Atkins and Luciane\u00a0V. Mello. 2020. Students tell us what good written feedback looks like. FEBS Open Bio 10 5 (May 2020) 692\u2013706. 10.1002\/2211-5463.12841","DOI":"10.1002\/2211-5463.12841"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jiayin Wang Weizhi Ma Peijie Sun Min Zhang and Jian-Yun Nie. 2024. Understanding User Experience in Large Language Model Interactions. 10.48550\/arXiv.2401.08329arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2401.08329 [cs].","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2401.08329"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jules White Quchen Fu Sam Hays Michael Sandborn Carlos Olea Henry Gilbert Ashraf Elnashar Jesse Spencer-Smith and Douglas\u00a0C. Schmidt. 2023. A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT. 10.48550\/arXiv.2302.11382arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2302.11382 [cs].","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2302.11382"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhengtao Xu Tianqi Song and Yi-Chieh Lee. 2025. Confronting verbalized uncertainty: Understanding how LLM\u2019s verbalized uncertainty influences users in AI-assisted decision-making. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 197 (March 2025) 103455. 10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2025.103455","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2025.103455"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Daniel Yang Yao-Hung\u00a0Hubert Tsai and Makoto Yamada. 2024. On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMs. 10.48550\/arXiv.2412.14737arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2412.14737 [cs].","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2412.14737"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jia-Yu Yao Kun-Peng Ning Zhen-Hui Liu Mu-Nan Ning Yu-Yang Liu and Li Yuan. 2024. LLM Lies: Hallucinations are not Bugs but Features as Adversarial Examples. 10.48550\/arXiv.2310.01469arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2310.01469 [cs].","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2310.01469"}],"event":{"name":"UKICER 2025: UK and Ireland Computing Education Research Conference","acronym":"UKICER 2025","location":"Edinburgh United Kingdom"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on UK and Ireland Computing Education Research"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,30]],"date-time":"2025-08-30T13:58:25Z","timestamp":1756562305000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3754508.3754511"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,3]]},"references-count":56,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3754508.3754511","10.1145\/3754508"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3754508.3754511","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-09-03","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}