{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,30]],"date-time":"2026-01-30T03:16:27Z","timestamp":1769742987242,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Distrib. Ledger Technol."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>As Web3 technology rapidly evolves, data management efficiency has become a critical challenge because of the decentralized nature of blockchain technology, which requires extensive computational and storage resources. Existing research highlights that decentralized consensus mechanisms in blockchain, such as proof-of-work (PoW) and proof-of-stake (PoS), lead to significant data redundancy, storage limitations, and latency issues, making data management efficiency complex. Moreover, the need for security and immutability in blockchain data storage exacerbates these challenges as the system scales and unique challenges unfold in maintaining efficient data management. Using Monte Carlo simulation, we analyzed the model\u2019s behavior under various scenario by manipulating key variables such as network latency, node distribution, data block size, consensus mechanism efficiency, and storage redundancy levels. Our findings indicate that consensus mechanism efficiency has the most significant impact on overall data management performance, followed by network latency and node distribution. Interestingly, although data block size shows a moderate impact, storage redundancy levels have a relatively minor effect on efficiency. These simulation studies provide insights into optimizing consensus protocols and improving network infrastructure in enhancing the efficiency of Web3 data management.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3756328","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,29]],"date-time":"2025-07-29T13:59:14Z","timestamp":1753797554000},"page":"1-14","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Analysis of Web3 Platform Data Management Efficiency: A\u00a0Simulation\u00a0Study"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"5","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-0793-9668","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jianzheng","family":"Shi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Business School, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8322-5384","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yue","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Business School, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6292-9718","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Terence T.","family":"Ow","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"College of Business Administration, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_1_2_2","unstructured":"S. Bano A. Sonnino M. Al-Bassam S. Azouvi P. McCorry S. Meiklejohn and G. Danezis. 2017. Consensus in the age of blockchains. arXiv:1711.03936. Retrieved from https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.1711.03936"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TKDE.2023.3275220"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3471140"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_5_2","first-page":"781","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 23rd USENIX Security Symposium","author":"Ben-Sasson E.","year":"2014","unstructured":"E. Ben-Sasson, A. Chiesa, C. Garman, M. Green, I. Miers, E. Tromer, and M. Virza. 2014. Succinct non-interactive zero-knowledge for a von neumann architecture. In Proceedings of the 23rd USENIX Security Symposium. USENIX Association, 781\u2013796."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_6_2","unstructured":"J. Benet. 2014. IPFS - Content addressed versioned P2P file system. arXiv:1407.3561. Retrieved from https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1407.3561"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/343477.343502"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_8_2","volume-title":"Why Sharding Is Great: Demystifying the Technical Properties","author":"Buterin V.","year":"2021","unstructured":"V. Buterin. 2021. Why Sharding Is Great: Demystifying the Technical Properties. Ethereum Blog."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3328833.3328857"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/564585.564601"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_3_1_11_2","first-page":"424","article-title":"Network externalities, competition, and compatibility","volume":"75","author":"Katz M. L.","year":"1985","unstructured":"M. L. Katz and C. Shapiro. 1985. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review 75, 3 (1985), 424\u2013440. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/1814809","journal-title":"The American Economic Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ICTC.2018.8539529"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"C. Berger S. Schwarz-R\u00fcsch A. Vogel K. Bleeke L. Jehl H. P. Reiser and R. Kapitza. 2023. SoK: Scalability techniques for BFT consensus. arXiv:2303.11045. Retrieved from https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2303.11045","DOI":"10.1109\/ICBC56567.2023.10174976"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jnca.2018.10.019"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/su16177671"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MIC.2023.3319152"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/003355300555015"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/COMST.2016.2535718"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_19_2","unstructured":"Q. Wang R. Li Q. Wang and S. Chen. 2020. Non-fungible token (NFT): Overview evaluation opportunities and challenges. arXiv:2105.07447. Retrieved from https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2105.07447"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TSMC.2019.2895123"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_21_2","article-title":"Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger","author":"Wood G.","year":"2014","unstructured":"G. Wood. 2014. Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Project Yellow Paper. Retrieved from https:\/\/ethereum.github.io\/yellowpaper\/paper.pdf","journal-title":"Ethereum Project Yellow Paper"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TVT.2019.2895834"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_23_2","first-page":"243","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA)","author":"Xu X.","year":"2022","unstructured":"X. Xu, I. Weber, M. Staples, L. Zhu, J. Bosch, L. Bass, C. Pautasso, and P. Rimba. 2022. A taxonomy of blockchain-based systems for architecture design. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA). IEEE, 243\u2013252."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCESS.2020.3046025"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/JIOT.2024.3367249"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_26_2","author":"Wei Q.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Q. Wei, B. Li, W. Chang, Z. Jia, Z. Shen, and Z. Shao. 2021. A survey of blockchain data management systems. arXiv:2111.13683. Retrieved from https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2111.13683","journal-title":"A survey of blockchain data management systems"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/BigDataCongress.2017.85"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1504\/IJWGS.2018.095647"},{"key":"e_1_3_1_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1109\/SPW.2015.27","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops","author":"Zyskind G.","year":"2015","unstructured":"G. Zyskind, O. Nathan, and A. Pentland. 2015. Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops. IEEE, 180\u2013184."},{"key":"e_1_3_1_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCESS.2020.2965147"}],"container-title":["Distributed Ledger Technologies: Research and Practice"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3756328","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,29]],"date-time":"2026-01-29T14:02:40Z","timestamp":1769695360000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3756328"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,29]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3756328"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3756328","relation":{},"ISSN":["2769-6480","2769-6480"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2769-6480","type":"print"},{"value":"2769-6480","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-10-07","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-07-15","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-01-29","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}