{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T10:04:49Z","timestamp":1773569089035,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":69,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"1","funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["72171199"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["72171199"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003392","name":"Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["2025J01033"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2025J01033"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003392","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Negotiation-based transactional mechanisms provide flexibility and economic benefits to both sellers and buyers on online trading platforms. Although automated negotiation is a highly desired feature among online platform providers, the complexity and uncertainty of human behavior in human-to-computer (HtC) negotiation make it a problematic solution. This study proposes a design theory for a human-learning guided virtual negotiator (HLG-VN) framework that emulates human learning using multiple machine learning (ML) techniques that collectively mimic four human learning activities: didactic, feedback, observational, and analogical learning. Following the design science research methodology, we built an instantiation system for the proposed design theory and empirically tested it using experiments based on HtC negotiations. The empirical results show that our system outperformed the benchmark system in terms of both economic and some key social-psychological outcomes. Furthermore, the experiment results confirm the effectiveness and correctness of the HLG-VN framework. The proposed design theory provides a theoretical base for using ML techniques to build a virtual negotiator agent for an automated negotiation system. Thus, various agents could be designed and developed based on the theory for online trading platforms, thus improving negotiation efficiency and reducing transaction costs.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3764663","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,22]],"date-time":"2025-12-22T07:20:12Z","timestamp":1766388012000},"page":"1-26","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Proposing a Design Theory for a Human-Learning-Guided Virtual Negotiator for Online Trading Platforms"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"17","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4606-3379","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mukun","family":"Cao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Xiamen University","place":["Xiamen, China"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5026-881X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"G. Alan","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Virginia Tech","place":["Blacksburg, United States"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0187-5808","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paul Benjamin","family":"Lowry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Business Information Technology, Virginia Tech","place":["Blacksburg, United States"]}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Aamodt and E. Plaza. 1994. Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues methodological variations and system approaches. AI Communications 7 1 (1994) 39\u201359.","DOI":"10.3233\/AIC-1994-7104"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B. An K. M. Sim L. G. Tang C. Y. Miao Z. Q. Shen and D. J. Cheng. 2008. Negotiation agents' decision making using Markov chains. Rational Robust and Secure Negotiations in Multi-Agent Systems (2008) 3\u201323.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-76282-9_1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Arnold F. Elsinger and F. W. Rankin. 2021. The unintended consequences of headquarters' involvement in decentralized transfer price negotiations: experimental evidence. Management Science 67 12 (2021) 7912\u20137931.","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.2020.3843"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K. Arulkumaran M. P. Deisenroth M. Brundage and A. A. Bharath. 2017. Deep reinforcement learning: A brief survey. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 34 6 (2017) 26\u201338.","DOI":"10.1109\/MSP.2017.2743240"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Baarslag M. J. Hendrikx K. V. Hindriks and C. M. Jonker. 2016. Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: A comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 30 5 (2016) 849\u2013898.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-015-9309-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P. Bagga N. Paoletti B. Alrayes and K. Stathis. 2021. ANEGMA: An automated negotiation model for e-markets. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 35 2 (2021).","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-021-09513-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. Baskerville A. Baiyere S. Gregor A. Hevner and M. Rossi. 2018. Design science research contributions: Finding a balance between artifact and theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 19 5 (2018) 3.","DOI":"10.17705\/1jais.00495"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","unstructured":"J. M. Brett J. Ramirez-Marin and C. Galoni. 2021. Negotiation strategy: A cross-cultural meta-analytic evaluation of theory and measurement. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 14 4 (2021) 231\u2013265."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Byde M. Yearworth K.-Y. Chen and C. Bartolini. 2003. AutONA: A system for automated multiple 1-1 negotiation. IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce (2003) 59\u201367.","DOI":"10.1109\/COEC.2003.1210234"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"C. F. Camerer G. Nave and A. Smith. 2019. Dynamic unstructured bargaining with private information: Theory experiment and outcome prediction via machine learning. Management Science 65 4 (2019) 1867\u20131890.","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.2017.2965"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Cao Q. Hu M. Y. Kiang and H. Hong. 2020. A portfolio strategy design for human-computer negotiations in e-retail. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 24 3 (2020) 303\u2013337.","DOI":"10.1080\/10864415.2020.1767428"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Cao X. Luo X. R. Luo and X. Dai. 2015. Automated negotiation for e-commerce decision making: A goal deliberated agent architecture for multi-strategy selection. Decision Support Systems 73 (2015) 1\u201314.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2015.02.012"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Cao G. A. Wang and M. Y. Kiang. 2021. Modeling and prediction of human negotiation behavior in human-computer negotiation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 50 (2021) 101099.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.elerap.2021.101099"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L. H. Chen H. B. Dong and Y. Zhou. 2014. A reinforcement learning optimized negotiation method based on mediator agent. Expert Systems with Applications 41 16 (2014) 7630\u20137640.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2014.06.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. R. Curhan H. A. Elfenbein and X. Heng. 2006. What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 3 (2006) 493\u2013512.","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.91.3.493"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Dinnar C. Dede E. Johnson C. Straub and K. Korjus. 2021. Artificial intelligence and technology in teaching negotiation. Negotiation Journal 37 1 (2021) 65\u201382.","DOI":"10.1111\/nejo.12351"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E. ElShenawy. 2010. Does negotiation training improve negotiators' performance?. Journal of European Industrial Training 34 3 (2010) 192\u2013210.","DOI":"10.1108\/03090591011031719"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Fabregues and C. Sierra. 2014. HANA: a human-aware negotiation architecture. Decision Support Systems 60 4 (2014) 18\u201328.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2013.05.017"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P. Faratin C. Sierra and N. R. Jennings. 1998. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24 3 (1998) 159\u2013182.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0921-8890(98)00029-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. G. Ficici and A. Pfeffer. 2008. Modeling how humans reason about others with partial information. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.","DOI":"10.65109\/UQRW4482"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Fink and P. Gerhards. 2021. Negotiation mechanisms for the multi-agent multi-mode resource investment problem. European Journal of Operational Research 295 1 (2021) 261\u2013274.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejor.2021.02.023"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"C. Fischer R. Winter and F. Wortmann. 2010. Design theory. Business and Information Systems Engineering 2 6 (2010) 387\u2013390.","DOI":"10.1007\/s12599-010-0128-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. G. Gao M. Huang Q. Wang and X. W. Wang. 2020. Dynamic organization model of automated negotiation for 3PL providers selection. Information Sciences 531 (2020) 139\u2013158.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2020.03.086"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D. K. Gode and S. Sunder. 1993. Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: Market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. Journal of Political Economy 101 1 (1993) 119\u2013137.","DOI":"10.1086\/261868"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Gregor. 2006. The nature of theory in information systems. Mis Q 30 3 (2006) 611\u2013641.","DOI":"10.2307\/25148742"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L. Guo. 2023. Gathering information before negotiation. Management Science 69 1 (2023) 200\u2013219.","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.2022.4360"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. R. Hill E. D. Boorman and I. Fried. 2016. Observational learning computations in neurons of the human anterior cingulate cortex. Nature Communications 7 1 (2016) 12722.","DOI":"10.1038\/ncomms12722"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Jang and S. Cho. 2002. Observational learning algorithm for an ensemble of neural networks. Pattern Analysis and Applications 5 2 (2002) 154\u2013167.","DOI":"10.1007\/s100440200014"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N. R. Jennings P. Faratin A. R. Lomuscio S. Parsons M. J. Wooldridge and C. Sierra. 2001. Automated negotiation: prospects methods and challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation 10 2 (2001) 199\u2013215.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008746126376"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. Katz and S. Kraus. 2006. Efficient agents for cliff-edge environments with a large set of decision options. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 697\u2013704.","DOI":"10.1145\/1160633.1160759"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P. Kaur M. L. Goyal and J. Lu. 2017. A comparison of bidding strategies for online auctions using fuzzy reasoning and negotiation decision functions. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 25 2 (2017) 425\u2013438.","DOI":"10.1109\/TFUZZ.2016.2598297"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. T. Keane and E. M. Kenny. 2019. How case-based reasoning explains neural networks: A theoretical analysis of XAI using post-hoc explanation-by-example from a survey of ANN-CBR twin-systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. 155\u2013171.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-29249-2_11"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. E. Kersten and H. Lai. 2007. Negotiation support and e-negotiation systems: An overview. Group Decision and Negotiation 16 6 (2007) 553\u2013586.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10726-007-9095-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. O. Keskin F. Cant\u00fcrk C. Eran and R. Aydogan. 2024. Decentralized multi-agent path finding framework and strategies based on automated negotiation. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 38 1 (2024) 10.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-024-09639-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"U. Kiruthika T. S. Somasundaram and S. K. S. Raja. 2020. Lifecycle model of a negotiation agent: A survey of automated negotiation techniques. Group Decision and Negotiation 29 6 (2020) 1239\u20131262.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10726-020-09704-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"U. Kiruthika T. S. Somasundaram and S. K. S. Raja. 2020. Lifecycle model of a negotiation agent: A survey of automated negotiation techniques. Group Decision and Negotiation 29 6 (2020) 1239\u20131262.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10726-020-09704-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Kraus and D. Lehmann. 1995. Designing and building a negotiating automated agent. Computational Intelligence 11 1 (1995) 132\u2013171.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8640.1995.tb00026.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F. Lempp. 2020. A new agent-based simulation model of bilateral negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management 31 1 (2020) 115\u2013148.","DOI":"10.1108\/IJCMA-07-2019-0118"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. Lin and S. Kraus. 2010. Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans?. Communications of the ACM 53 1 (2010) 78\u201388.","DOI":"10.1145\/1629175.1629199"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_41_2","unstructured":"C. Loes and D. L. Warren. 2016. Using observational learning to teach negotiation. Journal of the Academy of Business Education 17 (winter) (2016) 296\u2013310."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Loewenstein L. Thompson and D. Gentner. 2003. Analogical learning in negotiation teams: Comparing cases promotes learning and transfer. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2 2 (2003) 119\u2013127.","DOI":"10.5465\/amle.2003.9901663"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F. Lopes M. Wooldridge and A. Q. Novais. 2008. Negotiation among autonomous computational agents: Principles analysis and challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review 29 1 (2008) 1\u201344.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10462-009-9107-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. L\u00f3pez D. McSherry D. Bridge D. Leake B. Smyth and S. Craw. 2005. Retrieval reuse revision and retention in case-based reasoning. Knowledge Engineering Review 20 3 (2005) 215\u2013240.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888906000646"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K. Mansour Y. Al-Lahham S. Tawil R. Kowalczyk and A. Al-Qerem. 2022. An effective negotiation strategy for quantitative and qualitative issues in multi-agent systems. Electronics 11 17 (2022) 2754.","DOI":"10.3390\/electronics11172754"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"V. Mnih K. Kavukcuoglu D. Silver A. A. Rusu J. Veness M. G. Bellemare A. Graves M. Riedmiller A. K. Fidjeland and G. Ostrovski. 2015. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518 7540 (2015) 529.","DOI":"10.1038\/nature14236"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Y. Mohammad. 2021. Concurrent local negotiations with a global utility function: A greedy approach. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 35 2 (2021) 28.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-021-09512-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D. C. Moosmayer A. Y. -L. Chong M. J. Liu and B. Schuppar. 2013. A neural network approach to predicting price negotiation outcomes in business-to-business contexts. Expert Systems with Applications 40 8 (2013) 3028\u20133035.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2012.12.018"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H. Movius. 2008. The effectiveness of negotiation training. Negotiation Journal 24 4 (2008) 509\u2013531.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1571-9979.2008.00201.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Nadler L. Thompson and L. V. Boven. 2003. Learning negotiation skills: Four models of knowledge creation and transfer. Management Science 49 4 (2003) 529\u2013540.","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.49.4.529.14431"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. F. Nash Jr. 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18 2 (1950) 155\u2013162.","DOI":"10.2307\/1907266"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_52_2","unstructured":"P. Oehlschl\u00e4ger S. Haggenm\u00fcller U. Herbst and M. Voeth. 2023. The future of business negotiations: How megatrends influence negotiation behavior. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research 16 1 (2023) 23\u201347."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. L. Oliver P. V. Balakrishnan and B. Barry. 1994. Outcome satisfaction in negotiation: A test of expectancy disconfirmation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60 2 (1994) 252\u2013275.","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.1994.1083"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K. Peffers T. Tuunanen M. A. Rothenberger and S. Chatterjee. 2007. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 3 (2007) 45\u201377.","DOI":"10.2753\/MIS0742-1222240302"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_55_2","unstructured":"H. Raiffa. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation (Harvard University Press Cambridge MA 1982."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Schmid and M. Schoop. 2022. Gamification of electronic negotiation training: Effects on motivation behaviour and learning. Group Decision and Negotiation 31 3 (2022) 649\u2013681.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10726-022-09777-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Silic and P. B. Lowry. 2020. Using design-science based gamification to improve organizational security training and compliance. Journal of Management Information Systems 37 1 (2020) 129\u2013161.","DOI":"10.1080\/07421222.2019.1705512"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L. Thompson. 1990. Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychol. Bull. 108 3 (1990) 515\u2013532.","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.108.3.515"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L. Thompson and T. DeHarpport. 1994. Social judgment feedback and interpersonal learning in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 58 3 (1994) 327\u2013345.","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.1994.1040"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_60_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D. Traum S. C. Marsella J. Gratch J. Lee and A. Hartholt. 2008. Multi-party multi-issue multi-strategy negotiation for multi-modal virtual agents. In: Proceedings of the Intelligent Virtual Agents. 117\u2013130.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-85483-8_12"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. Vahidov G. Kersten and R. Saade. 2014. An experimental study of software agent negotiations with humans. Decision Support Systems 66 (October 2014) 135\u2013145.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2014.06.009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. Vahidov R. Saade and B. Yu. 2017. The effects of interplay between negotiation tactics and task complexity in software agent to human negotiations. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 26 (2017) 50\u201361.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.elerap.2017.09.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. G. Walls G. R. Widmeyer and O. A. El Sawy. 1992. Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3 1 (1992) 36\u201359.","DOI":"10.1287\/isre.3.1.36"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_64_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. H. Wu Y. Sun Y. Li and X.T. Qie. 2023. A Q-learning approach to generating behavior of emotional persuasion with adaptive time belief in decision-making of agent-based negotiation. Information Sciences 642 (2023) 119158.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2023.119158"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_65_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. H. Wu T. Zhang Y. Li and G. J. Zhou. 2024. Emotion-driven reasoning model for agent-based human-computer negotiation. Expert Systems with Applications 240 (2024) 122448.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2023.122448"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_66_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Y. P. Yang S. Singhal and Y. J. Xu. 2012. Alternate strategies for a win-win seeking agent in agent-human negotiations. Journal of Management Information Systems 29 3 (2012) 223\u2013255.","DOI":"10.2753\/MIS0742-1222290307"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_67_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H. Z. Zhou J. Y. Zhan and W. J. Ma. 2024. A negotiation protocol with recommendation for multilateral negotiation in trust networks. Expert Systems with Applications 246 (2024) 123185.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2024.123185"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_68_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"X. D. Luo Y. L. Li Q. J. Huang and J. Y. Zhan. 2024. A survey of automated negotiation: Human factor learning and application. Computer Science Review 54 (2024) 100683.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cosrev.2024.100683"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_69_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P. Bagga N. Paoletti B. Alrayes and K. Stathis. 2021. A deep reinforcement learning approach to concurrent bilateral negotiation. In Proceedings of the 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 297\u2013303.","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2020\/42"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_70_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. Conroy and S. Mallapaty. 2025. How China created AI model DeepSeek and shocked the world Nature 638 8050 (2025) 300\u2013301.","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-025-00259-0"}],"container-title":["ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3764663","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,15]],"date-time":"2026-03-15T08:56:59Z","timestamp":1773565019000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3764663"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]]},"references-count":69,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3764663"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3764663","relation":{},"ISSN":["2158-656X","2158-6578"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2158-656X","type":"print"},{"value":"2158-6578","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2024-09-08","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2025-08-08","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"2026-03-10","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}