{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T22:22:19Z","timestamp":1768342939487,"version":"3.49.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":25,"publisher":"ACM","funder":[{"name":"R&D Hub Aimed at Ensuring Transparency and Reliability of Generative AI Models","award":["JP22H00543"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["JP22H00543"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3769126.3769226","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T14:50:37Z","timestamp":1768315837000},"page":"72-82","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["DeCoRA: Definition and Context Reasoning in Argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-8525-6238","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ngoc-Duy","family":"Mai","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"VNU University of Engineering and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam and National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-1527-7174","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Xuan-Bach","family":"Le","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"VNU University of Engineering and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8019-7178","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thi-Hai-Yen","family":"Vuong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"VNU University of Engineering and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2794-7010","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ha-Thanh","family":"Nguyen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Juris-Informatics, ROIS-DS, Tokyo, Japan and Research and Development Center for Large Language Models, NII, Tokyo, Japan"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9946-4037","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kostas","family":"Stathis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Computer Science, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, United Kingdom"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9309-4602","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ken","family":"Satoh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Juris-Informatics, ROIS-DS, Tokyo, Japan"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","unstructured":"Michelle\u00a0E Boardman. 2005. Contra proferentem: The allure of ambiguous boilerplate. Mich. L. Rev. 104 (2005) 1105."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gerhard Brewka and Thomas Eiter. 2009. Argumentation Context Systems: A Framework for Abstract Group Argumentation. 44\u201357. 10.1007\/978-3-642-04238-67","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-04238-67"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Federico Castagna Nadin K\u00f6kciyan Isabel Sassoon Simon Parsons and Elizabeth Sklar. 2024. Computational argumentation-based chatbots: a survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 80 (2024) 1271\u20131310.","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1.15407"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2006.31"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Daniel\u00a0L Chen. 2024. Is ambiguity aversion a preference? Ambiguity aversion without asymmetric information. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 111 (2024) 102218.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socec.2024.102218"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Phan\u00a0Minh Dung. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77 2 (1995) 321\u2013357. 10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.27"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thomas\u00a0F. Gordon. 1993. The Pleadings Game. Artif. Intell. Law 2 4 (Dec. 1993) 239\u2013292.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871972"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/IJCNN60899.2024.10649936"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","unstructured":"A Handbook. 2003. From Contract Drafting to Software Specification: Linguistic Sources of Ambiguity. (2003)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pawe\u0142 Koniak and Wojciech Cwalina. 2022. Does it pay to avoid speaking straight about controversial issues? Impact of argumentative ambiguity on the perception of the speaker. Journal of Communication Management 26 1 (2022) 84\u201397.","DOI":"10.1108\/JCOM-11-2020-0154"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sanjay Modgil and Henry Prakken. 2014. The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial. Argument Comput. 5 (2014) 31\u201362. https:\/\/api.semanticscholar.org\/CorpusID:1103454","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2013.869766"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-57267-8_16"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2024)","author":"Ojha Atul\u00a0Kr.","year":"2024","unstructured":"Atul\u00a0Kr. Ojha, A.\u00a0Seza Do\u011fru\u00f6z, Harish Tayyar\u00a0Madabushi, Giovanni Da\u00a0San\u00a0Martino, Sara Rosenthal, and Aiala Ros\u00e1 (Eds.). 2024. Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2024). Association for Computational Linguistics, Mexico City, Mexico. https:\/\/aclanthology.org\/2024.semeval-1.0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ralf Poscher. 2011. Ambiguity and vagueness in legal interpretation. (2011).","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199572120.013.0010"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","unstructured":"Zachary Price. 2003. The rule of lenity as a rule of structure. Fordham L. Rev. 72 (2003) 885."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lamb\u00e8r Royakkers. 2000. Henry Prakken Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. Journal of Logic Language and Information 9 (07 2000) 379\u2013387. 10.1023\/A:1008311419377","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008311419377"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","unstructured":"T.\u00a0Y. S.\u00a0S Santosh Kevin\u00a0D. Ashley Katie Atkinson and Matthias Grabmair. 2024. Towards Supporting Legal Argumentation with NLP: Is More Data Really All You Need? arxiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2406.10974\u00a0[cs.CL] https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2406.10974"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-37422-7_6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jan\u00a0Albert Van\u00a0Laar. 2010. Ambiguity in argument. Argument & Computation 1 2 (2010) 125\u2013146.","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2010.486480"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","unstructured":"Anne Wagner Wouter Werner Deborah Cao and Moshe Azar. 2007. Transforming ambiguity into vagueness in legal interpretation. Interpretation law and the construction of meaning: Collected papers on legal interpretation in theory adjudication and political practice (2007) 121\u2013137."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.acl-main.280"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","volume-title":"CMNA@COMMA","author":"Yu Zhe","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhe Yu. 2020. A Context-based Argumentation Framework with Values. In CMNA@COMMA. https:\/\/api.semanticscholar.org\/CorpusID:221902958"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","unstructured":"Zhe Yu and Yiwei Lu. 2022. An argumentation-based legal reasoning approach for DL-ontology. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2209.03070 (2022)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5555\/3237383.3237862"}],"event":{"name":"ICAIL 2025: 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law","location":"Chicago , IL , USA","acronym":"ICAIL 2025"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3769126.3769226","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T15:47:43Z","timestamp":1768319263000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3769126.3769226"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"references-count":25,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3769126.3769226","10.1145\/3769126"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3769126.3769226","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-01-13","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}