{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T22:22:12Z","timestamp":1768342932488,"version":"3.49.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":34,"publisher":"ACM","funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000781","name":"European Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["833647"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["833647"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000781","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000780","name":"European Commission, FAIR","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["PE00000013"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["PE00000013"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000780","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3769126.3769228","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T14:50:37Z","timestamp":1768315837000},"page":"278-287","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Modelling Cause-in-Fact in Legal Cases through Defeasible Argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0230-8212","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Giuseppe","family":"Pisano","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3431-7757","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Henry","family":"Prakken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2210-0398","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Giovanni","family":"Sartor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2417-3219","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ruta","family":"Liepina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H. Andreas M. Armgardt and M. Gunther. 2023. Counterfactuals for causal responsibility in legal contexts. Artificial Intelligence and Law 31 (2023) 115\u2013132.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-021-09307-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P. Baroni M. Caminada and M. Giacomin. 2011. An introduction to argumentation semantics. The Knowledge Engineering Review 26 (2011) 365\u2013410.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888911000166"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v35i7.16772"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","series-title":"CEUR Workshop Proceedings","volume-title":"1st International Workshop on Argumentation for eXplainable AI co-located with 9th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2022), Cardiff, Wales, September 12, 2022","volume":"3209","author":"Bengel L.","year":"2022","unstructured":"L. Bengel, L. Bl\u00fcmel, T. Rienstra, and M. Thimm. 2022. Argumentation-based Causal and Counterfactual Reasoning. In 1st International Workshop on Argumentation for eXplainable AI co-located with 9th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2022), Cardiff, Wales, September 12, 2022(CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol.\u00a03209), K.\u00a0Cyras, T.\u00a0Kampik, O.\u00a0Cocarascu, and A.\u00a0Rago (Eds.). CEUR-WS.org. https:\/\/ceur-ws.org\/Vol-3209\/7343.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F.J. Bex T. Bench-Capon and K. Atkinson. 2009. Did he jump or was he pushed? Abductive practical reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (2009) 79\u201399.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-009-9074-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F.J. Bex P. van Koppen H. Prakken and B. Verheij. 2010. A hybrid formal theory of arguments stories and criminal evidence. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2010) 123\u2013152.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9092-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/12387.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","first-page":"627","volume-title":"Handbook of Formal Argumentation","author":"Bochman A.","year":"2024","unstructured":"A. Bochman, F. Cerutti, and T. Rienstra. 2024. Causation and argumentation. In Handbook of Formal Argumentation , D.\u00a0Gabbay, G.\u00a0Kern Isberner, G.\u00a0Simari, and M.\u00a0Thimm (Eds.). Vol.\u00a03. College Publications, London, 627\u2013715."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Borg and F.J. Bex. 2024. Minimality necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 168 (2024) 109143.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2024.109143"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-436-7-197"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P.M. Dung. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning logic programming and n\u2013person games. Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321\u2013357.","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v29i1.9420"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","volume-title":"ICLP Workshops","author":"Gelfond Michael","year":"2020","unstructured":"Michael Gelfond and Evgenii Balai. 2020. Causal Analysis of Events Occurring in Trajectories of Dynamic Domains. In ICLP Workshops."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/10809.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J.Y. Halpern and J. Pearl. 2005. Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach. Part I: Causes. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 56 (2005) 843\u2013887.","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/axi147"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198254744.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Lehmann and A. Gangemi. 2007. An ontology of physical causation as a basis for assessing causation in fact and attributing legal responsibility. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (2007) 301\u2013321.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-007-9035-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","first-page":"271","volume-title":"Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2020","author":"Liao B.","year":"2020","unstructured":"B. Liao and L. van\u00a0der Torre. 2020. Explanation semantics for abstract argumentation. In Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2020, H.\u00a0Prakken, S.\u00a0Bistarelli, F.\u00a0Santini, and C.\u00a0Taticchi (Eds.). IOS Press, Amsterdam etc, 271\u2013282."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3594536.3595130"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Modgil and H. Prakken. 2013. A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artificial Intelligence 195 (2013) 361\u2013397.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2012.10.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","first-page":"286","volume-title":"Handbook of Formal Argumentation","author":"Modgil S.","year":"2018","unstructured":"S. Modgil and H. Prakken. 2018. Abstract rule-based argumentation. In Handbook of Formal Argumentation , P.\u00a0Baroni, D.\u00a0Gabbay, M.\u00a0Giacomin, and L.\u00a0van\u00a0der Torre (Eds.). Vol.\u00a01. College Publications, London, 286\u2013361."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","volume-title":"The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2024 ed.)","author":"Moore M.S.","year":"2024","unstructured":"M.S. Moore. 2024. Causation in the Law. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2024 ed.), Edward\u00a0N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (Eds.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-46581-2_14"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H. Prakken. 2005. Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation 15 (2005) 1009\u20131040.","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exi046"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H. Prakken. 2010. An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument and Computation 1 (2010) 93\u2013124.","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H. Prakken. 2024. An abstract and structured account of dialectical argument strength. Artificial Intelligence 335 (2024) 104193.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2024.104193"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Shanahan. 1999. The Event Calculus explained. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1600 (1999) 409\u2013430.","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-48317-9_17"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Shanahan. 2024. Talking about large language models. Commun. ACM 67 (2024) 68\u201379.","DOI":"10.1145\/3624724"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_30_2","volume-title":"Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law","author":"Walton D.N.","year":"2005","unstructured":"D.N. Walton. 2005. Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law. Springer."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/978-1-61499-935-5-151"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. Wieten F. Bex H. Prakken and S. Renooij. 2022. Deductive and abductive argumentation based on information graphs. Argument and Computation 13 (2022) 49\u201391.","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-200539"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_33_2","first-page":"Chapter 14","volume-title":"Perspectives on Causation","author":"Wright R.W.","year":"2011","unstructured":"R.W. Wright. 2011. The NESS account of natural causation: a reponse to criticisms. In Perspectives on Causation, R.\u00a0Goldberg (Ed.). Hart Publishing, Chapter 14."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_34_2","unstructured":"R.W. Wright and I. Puppe. 2016. Causation: linguistic philosophical legal and economic. Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 91 (2016) 461."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199266487.003.0005"}],"event":{"name":"ICAIL 2025: 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law","location":"Chicago , IL , USA","acronym":"ICAIL 2025"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3769126.3769228","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T15:47:28Z","timestamp":1768319248000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3769126.3769228"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"references-count":34,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3769126.3769228","10.1145\/3769126"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3769126.3769228","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-01-13","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}