{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T22:26:53Z","timestamp":1768343213549,"version":"3.49.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":57,"publisher":"ACM","funder":[{"name":"EUSAiR \u201cEU Regulatory Sandboxes for AI\u201d","award":["101195535"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["101195535"]}]},{"name":"CN1 \u201cNational Centre for HPC, Big Data and Quantum Computing\u201d","award":["J33C22001170001"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["J33C22001170001"]}]},{"name":"PE01 \u201cFuture Artificial Intelligence Research\u201d FAIR","award":["J33C22002830006"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["J33C22002830006"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3769126.3769242","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T14:50:37Z","timestamp":1768315837000},"page":"288-297","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Rule-based Deontic Case-based Reasoning"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5265-0660","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Antonino","family":"Rotolo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department Legal Studies and Alma AI, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8927-7414","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cecilia","family":"Di Florio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department Legal Studies and Alma AI, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9878-2762","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Guido","family":"Governatori","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","volume-title":"A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification","author":"Alexy Robert","year":"1989","unstructured":"Robert Alexy. 1989. A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Clarendon."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-18843-5_3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","first-page":"405","volume-title":"AAAI\/IAAI","author":"Antoniou Grigoris","year":"2000","unstructured":"Grigoris Antoniou, David Billington, Guido Governatori, and Michael\u00a0J Maher. 2000. A flexible framework for defeasible logics. In AAAI\/IAAI. 405\u2013410."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Grigoris Antoniou David Billington Guido Governatori and Michael\u00a0J. Maher. 2001. Representation results for defeasible logic. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 2 2 (2001) 255\u2013287. 10.1145\/371316.371517","DOI":"10.1145\/371316.371517"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","volume-title":"Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals","author":"Ashley Kevin\u00a0D.","year":"1990","unstructured":"Kevin\u00a0D. Ashley. 1990. Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. MIT."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Katie Atkinson Trevor Bench-Capon and Danushka Bollegala. 2020. Explanation in AI and law: Past present and future. Artificial Intelligence 289 (2020) 103387. 10.1016\/j.artint.2020.103387","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2020.103387"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466062"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Trevor J.\u00a0M. Bench-Capon and Giovanni Sartor. 2003. A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artif. Intell. 150 1-2 (2003) 97\u2013143. 10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00108-5","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(03)00108-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3462757.3466069"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","first-page":"101","volume-title":"KI-99: Advances in Artificial Intelligence","author":"Billington D.","year":"1999","unstructured":"D. Billington, G. Antoniou, G. Governatori, and M.J. Maher. 1999. Revising nonmonotonic belief sets: The case of defeasible logic. In KI-99: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Wolfram Burgard, Thomas Christaller, and Armin\u00a0B. Cremers (Eds.). Springer, 101\u2013112."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"L.\u00a0Karl Branting. 1993. A computational model of ratio decidendi. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (03 1993) 1\u201331. 10.1007\/BF00871744","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00871744"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA220445"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3514094.3534182"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","first-page":"475\u2013\u2013479","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence","author":"Dalal Mukesh","year":"1988","unstructured":"Mukesh Dalal. 1988. Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: preliminary report. In Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 475\u2013\u2013479."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA241232"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","volume-title":"Logics for AI and Law (LAIL-23)","author":"Di\u00a0Florio Cecilia","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cecilia Di\u00a0Florio, Xinghan Liu, Emiliano Lorini, Antonino Rotolo, and Giovanni Sartor. 2023. Finding Factors in Legal Case-Based Reasoning. In Logics for AI and Law (LAIL-23). College Publications."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA230942"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA241233"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-72407-7_8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-43619-2_9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Leilei Gan Kun Kuang Yi Yang and Fei Wu. 2021. Judgment Prediction via Injecting Legal Knowledge into Neural Networks. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 35 14 (May 2021) 12866\u201312874. 10.1609\/aaai.v35i14.17522","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v35i14.17522"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-15707-3_19"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA220447"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guido Governatori Francesco Olivieri Antonino Rotolo and Simone Scannapieco. 2013. Computing Strong and Weak Permissions in Defeasible Logic. J. Philos. Log. 42 6 (2013) 799\u2013829. 10.1007\/s10992-013-9295-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-013-9295-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guido Governatori Francesco Olivieri Simone Scannapieco Antonino Rotolo and Matteo Cristani. 2016. The Rationale behind the Concept of Goal. Theory Pract. Log. Program. 16 3 (2016) 296\u2013324. 10.1017\/S1471068416000053","DOI":"10.1017\/S1471068416000053"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guido Governatori Vineet Padmanabhan Antonino Rotolo and Abdul Sattar. 2009. A defeasible logic for modelling policy-based intentions and motivational attitudes. Log. J. IGPL 17 3 (2009) 227\u2013265. 10.1093\/jigpal\/jzp006","DOI":"10.1093\/jigpal\/jzp006"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guido Governatori and Antonino Rotolo. 2008. BIO logical agents: Norms beliefs intentions in defeasible logic. Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst. 17 1 (2008) 36\u201369. 10.1007\/s10458-008-9030-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-008-9030-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guido Governatori and Antonino Rotolo. 2008. A computational framework for institutional agency. Artif. Intell. Law 16 1 (2008) 25\u201352. 10.1007\/S10506-007-9056-Y","DOI":"10.1007\/S10506-007-9056-Y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2514601.2514609"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_31_2","first-page":"657","volume-title":"Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems","author":"Governatori Guido","year":"2021","unstructured":"Guido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo, and Giovanni Sartor. 2021. Logic and the Law: Philosophical Foundations, Deontics, and Defeasible Reasoning. In Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. College Publications, 657\u2013764."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3086512.3086523"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"John\u00a0F. Horty. 2004. The Result Model of Precedent. Legal Theory 10 (2004) 19\u201331.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325204000151"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"John\u00a0F. Horty. 2011. Rules and reasons in the theory of precedent. Legal theory 10 (2011) 1\u201333.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1352325211000036"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"John\u00a0F. Horty. 2019. Reasoning with dimensions and magnitudes. Artif. Intell. Law 27 3 (2019) 309\u2013345. 10.1007\/s10506-019-09245-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09245-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"John\u00a0F. Horty. 2021. Modifying the reason model. Artif. Intell. Law 29 2 (2021) 271\u2013285. 10.1007\/s10506-020-09275-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-020-09275-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"John\u00a0F. Horty and Trevor J.\u00a0M. Bench-Capon. 2012. A factor-based definition of precedential constraint. Artificial intelligence and Law 20 (2012) 181\u2013214.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-012-9125-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Elias Jacob\u00a0de Menezes-Neto and Marco Bruno\u00a0Miranda Clementino. 2022. Using deep learning to predict outcomes of legal appeals better than human experts: A study with data from Brazilian federal courts. PLOS ONE 17 7 (07 2022) 1\u201320. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0272287","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0272287"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA200511"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89391-0_17"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xinghan Liu and Emiliano Lorini. 2023. A unified logical framework for explanations in classifier systems. Journal of Logic and Computation 33 2 (2023) 485\u2013515.","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/exac102"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/FAIA220451"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ronald\u00a0Prescott Loui and Jeff Norman. 1995. Rationales and Argument Moves. Artif. Intell. Law 3 3 (1995) 159\u2013189. 10.1007\/BF00872529","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00872529"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Masha Medvedeva Michel Vols and Martijn Wieling. 2020. Using Machine Learning to Predict Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 2 (2020) 237\u2013266. 10.1007\/s10506-019-09255-y","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-019-09255-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_45_2","volume-title":"Artificial Intelligence journal: Special issue on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)","author":"Miller Tim","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tim Miller, Robert Hoffman, Ofra Amir, and Andreas Holzinger (Eds.). 2022. Artificial Intelligence journal: Special issue on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_46_2","first-page":"470","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Science","volume":"3","author":"Nute Donald","year":"1987","unstructured":"Donald Nute. 1987. DEFEASIBLE REASONING. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Science , Vol.\u00a03. 470\u2013477."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3594536.3595136"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-8381-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3594536.3595164"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henry Prakken. 2021. A formal analysis of some factor\u2011 and precedent\u2011based accounts of precedential constraint. Artificial Intelligence and Law (2021).","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-021-09284-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Henry Prakken and Rosa Ratsma. 2022. A top-level model of case-based argumentation for explanation: Formalisation and experiments. Argument Comput. 13 2 (2022) 159\u2013194. 10.3233\/AAC-210009","DOI":"10.3233\/AAC-210009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sartor. 1998. Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. Artif. Intell. Law 6 2-4 (1998) 231\u2013287.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1008278309945"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Enas Quteishat. 2024. Predictive Modelling in Legal Decision-Making: Leveraging Machine Learning for Forecasting Legal Outcomes. Journal of Electrical Systems 20 (05 2024) 2060\u20132071. 10.52783\/jes.4006","DOI":"10.52783\/jes.4006"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/41735.41743"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Antonino Rotolo and Giovanni Sartor. 2023. Argumentation and explanation in the law. Frontiers Artif. Intell. 6 (2023). 10.3389\/FRAI.2023.1130559","DOI":"10.3389\/FRAI.2023.1130559"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wijnand van Woerkom Davide Grossi Henry Prakken and Bart Verheij. 2024. A Fortiori Case-Based Reasoning: From Theory to Data. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 81 (2024) 401\u2013441. 10.1613\/JAIR.1.15178","DOI":"10.1613\/JAIR.1.15178"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3594536.3595154"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yu Wen and Ping Ti. 2024. A Study of Legal Judgment Prediction Based on Deep Learning Multi-Fusion Models\u2014Data from China. SAGE Open 14 3 (2024) 21582440241257682. 10.1177\/21582440241257682 arXiv:10.1177\/21582440241257682","DOI":"10.1177\/21582440241257682"}],"event":{"name":"ICAIL 2025: 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law","location":"Chicago , IL , USA","acronym":"ICAIL 2025"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3769126.3769242","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T15:50:32Z","timestamp":1768319432000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3769126.3769242"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"references-count":57,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3769126.3769242","10.1145\/3769126"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3769126.3769242","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-01-13","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}