{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,6]],"date-time":"2025-11-06T20:16:56Z","timestamp":1762460216531,"version":"build-2065373602"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":58,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3769994.3770034","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,6]],"date-time":"2025-11-06T16:35:41Z","timestamp":1762446941000},"page":"1-12","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Student Engagement with GenAI's Tutoring Feedback: A Mixed Methods Study"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-5079-7941","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sven","family":"Jacobs","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-3763-5976","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jan","family":"Haas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6843-2729","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Natalie","family":"Kiesler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Nuremberg Tech, Nuremberg, Germany"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,10]]},"reference":[{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_2_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3649217.3653594"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_3_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3545945.3569759"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_4_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3699538.3699556"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clive\u00a0Roland Boddy. 2016. Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative market research: An international journal 19 4 (2016) 426\u2013432.","key":"e_1_3_3_1_5_2","DOI":"10.1108\/QMR-06-2016-0053"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Robert\u00a0L. Brennan and Dale\u00a0J. Prediger. 1981. Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses Misuses and Alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement 41 3 (1981) 687\u2013699. 10.1177\/001316448104100307","key":"e_1_3_3_1_6_2","DOI":"10.1177\/001316448104100307"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_7_2","DOI":"10.1145\/2632320.2632344"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Deborah\u00a0L. Butler and Philip\u00a0H. Winne. 1995. Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis. Review of Educational Research 65 3 (1995) 245\u2013281. 10.3102\/00346543065003245","key":"e_1_3_3_1_8_2","DOI":"10.3102\/00346543065003245"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"David Carless and David Boud. 2018. The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 8 (2018) 1315\u20131325. 10.1080\/02602938.2018.1463354","key":"e_1_3_3_1_9_2","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2018.1463354"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_10_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3649217.3653595"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_11_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3657604.3662040"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"John Hattie and Helen Timperley. 2007. The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 1 (2007) 81\u2013112. 10.3102\/003465430298487","key":"e_1_3_3_1_12_2","DOI":"10.3102\/003465430298487"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_13_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3568813.3600139"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sven Jacobs. 2025. Data: Student Engagement with GenAI\u2019s Tutoring Feedback: A Mixed Methods Study. 10.17605\/OSF.IO\/XDG34","key":"e_1_3_3_1_14_2","DOI":"10.17605\/OSF.IO\/XDG34"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_15_2","DOI":"10.1109\/EDUCON60312.2024.10578838"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_16_2","DOI":"10.1109\/CSEET62301.2024.10663001"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_17_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3754508.3754512"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_18_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3769994.3770001"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_19_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3724363.3729089"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Majeed Kazemitabaar Runlong Ye Xiaoning Wang Austin\u00a0Z. Henley Paul Denny Michelle Craig and Tovi Grossman. 2024. CodeAid: Evaluating a Classroom Deployment of an LLM-based Programming Assistant that Balances Student and Educator Needs. http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2401.11314","key":"e_1_3_3_1_20_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642773"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hieke Keuning Johan Jeuring and Bastiaan Heeren. 2019. A Systematic Literature Review of Automated Feedback Generation for Programming Exercises. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 19 (2019) 1\u201343. 10.1145\/3231711","key":"e_1_3_3_1_21_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3231711"},{"unstructured":"Natalie Kiesler. 2022. Kompetenzf\u00f6rderung in der Programmierausbildung durch Modellierung von Kompetenzen und informativem Feedback. Ph.\u00a0D. Dissertation.","key":"e_1_3_3_1_22_2"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_23_2","DOI":"10.1109\/IEEECONF56852.2023.10104622"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_24_2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-47148-3"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Charles Koutcheme Nicola Dainese Arto Hellas Sami Sarsa Juho Leinonen Syed Ashraf and Paul Denny. 2024. Evaluating Language Models for Generating and Judging Programming Feedback. 10.48550\/arXiv.2407.04873","key":"e_1_3_3_1_25_2","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2407.04873"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_26_2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-15671-8"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_27_2","DOI":"10.1109\/TALE56641.2023.10398393"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"J.\u00a0Richard Landis and Gary\u00a0G. Koch. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33 1 (1977) 159\u2013174. 10.2307\/2529310","key":"e_1_3_3_1_28_2","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anastasiya\u00a0A. Lipnevich and Jeffrey\u00a0K. Smith. 2022. Student \u2013 Feedback Interaction Model: Revised. Studies in Educational Evaluation 75 (2022) 101208. 10.1016\/j.stueduc.2022.101208","key":"e_1_3_3_1_29_2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.stueduc.2022.101208"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_30_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3626252.3630938"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_31_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3641554.3701945"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dominic Lohr Hieke Keuning and Natalie Kiesler. 2025. You\u2019re (Not) My Type- Can LLMs Generate Feedback of Specific Types for Introductory Programming Tasks? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 41 1 (2025) e13107. 10.1111\/jcal.13107","key":"e_1_3_3_1_32_2","DOI":"10.1111\/jcal.13107"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Luke Mandouit and John Hattie. 2023. Revisiting \u201cThe Power of Feedback\u201d from the perspective of the learner. Learning and Instruction 84 (2023) 101718. 10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2022.101718","key":"e_1_3_3_1_33_2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2022.101718"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marcus Messer Neil C.\u00a0C. Brown Michael K\u00f6lling and Miaojing Shi. 2024. Automated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming Education: A Systematic Review. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 24 1 (2024). 10.1145\/3636515","key":"e_1_3_3_1_34_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3636515"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_35_2","volume-title":"Informatives tutorielles Feedback. Entwicklungs- und Evaluationsprinzipien auf der Basis instruktionspsychologischer Erkenntnisse.","author":"Narciss Susanne","year":"2006","unstructured":"Susanne Narciss. 2006. Informatives tutorielles Feedback. Entwicklungs- und Evaluationsprinzipien auf der Basis instruktionspsychologischer Erkenntnisse.Waxmann, M\u00fcnster."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_36_2","first-page":"125","volume-title":"Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology","author":"Narciss Susanne","year":"2008","unstructured":"Susanne Narciss. 2008. Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Michael Spector, David Merill, Jeroen Van\u00a0Merrienboer, and Marcy Driscoll (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, USA, 125\u2013144."},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_37_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3626252.3630960"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_38_2","DOI":"10.1145\/2168556.2168625"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_39_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3568812.3603476"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_40_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3623762.3633499"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_41_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3689187.3709614"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Margaret Price Handley Karen and Jill Millar. 2011. Feedback: focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education 36 8 (2011) 879\u2013896. 10.1080\/03075079.2010.483513","key":"e_1_3_3_1_42_2","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2010.483513"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yizhou Qian and James Lehman. 2018. Students\u2019 Misconceptions and Other Difficulties in Introductory Programming: A Literature Review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 18 1 (2018) 1\u201324. 10.1145\/3077618","key":"e_1_3_3_1_43_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3077618"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alec Radford Jong\u00a0Wook Kim Tao Xu Greg Brockman Christine McLeavey and Ilya Sutskever. 2022. Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision. 10.48550\/arXiv.2212.04356","key":"e_1_3_3_1_44_2","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2212.04356"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_45_2","volume-title":"Management and the Worker","author":"Roethlisberger Fritz\u00a0Jules","year":"1939","unstructured":"Fritz\u00a0Jules Roethlisberger and William\u00a0J. Dickson. 1939. Management and the Worker. Harvard University Press, Cambridge."},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_46_2","DOI":"10.1109\/FIE61694.2024.10893442"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andreas Scholl and Natalie Kiesler. 2025. Students\u2019 Feedback Requests and Interactions with the SCRIPT Chatbot: Do They Get What They Ask For?10.48550\/arXiv.2507.17258PPIG 2025 Workshop.","key":"e_1_3_3_1_47_2","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2507.17258"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_48_2","DOI":"10.18420\/delfi202405"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zohreh Sharafi Bonita Sharif Yann-Ga\u00ebl Gu\u00e9h\u00e9neuc Andrew Begel Roman Bednarik and Martha Crosby. 2020. A practical guide on conducting eye tracking studies in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 25 5 (2020) 3128\u20133174. 10.1007\/s10664-020-09829-4","key":"e_1_3_3_1_49_2","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-020-09829-4"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Valerie\u00a0J Shute. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research 78 1 (2008) 153\u2013189.","key":"e_1_3_3_1_50_2","DOI":"10.3102\/0034654307313795"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lorenzo\u00a0Lee Solano Charles Koutcheme Juho Leinonen Alexandra Vassar and Jake Renzella. 2025. Narrowing the Gap: Supervised Fine-Tuning of Open-Source LLMs as a Viable Alternative to Proprietary Models for Pedagogical Tools. 10.48550\/arXiv.2507.05305","key":"e_1_3_3_1_51_2","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2507.05305"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_52_2","DOI":"10.1016\/0306-4573(95)90031-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_53_2","first-page":"269","volume-title":"Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena","author":"Spangler Patricia\u00a0T.","year":"2012","unstructured":"Patricia\u00a0T. Spangler, Jingqing Liu, and Clara\u00a0E. Hill. 2012. Consensual qualitative research for simple qualitative data: An introduction to CQR-M. In Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 269\u2013283."},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_54_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3689535.3689553"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fabienne\u00a0M. Van\u00a0der Kleij and Anastasiya\u00a0A. Lipnevich. 2021. Student perceptions of assessment feedback: a critical scoping review and call for research. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability 33 2 (2021) 345\u2013373. 10.1007\/s11092-020-09331-x","key":"e_1_3_3_1_55_2","DOI":"10.1007\/s11092-020-09331-x"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Naomi\u00a0E. Winstone Nash Robert\u00a0A. Parker Michael and James Rowntree. 2017. Supporting Learners\u2019 Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educational Psychologist 52 1 (2017) 17\u201337. 10.1080\/00461520.2016.1207538","key":"e_1_3_3_1_56_2","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2016.1207538"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_57_2","DOI":"10.4324\/9781351115940"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_58_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3613905.3650937"},{"doi-asserted-by":"publisher","key":"e_1_3_3_1_59_2","DOI":"10.1145\/3724363.3729063"}],"event":{"acronym":"Koli Calling '25","name":"Koli Calling '25: 25th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","location":"Koli Finland"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 25th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,6]],"date-time":"2025-11-06T17:04:57Z","timestamp":1762448697000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3769994.3770034"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,10]]},"references-count":58,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3769994.3770034","10.1145\/3769994"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3769994.3770034","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2025-11-10","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}