{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,19]],"date-time":"2026-10-19T23:00:31Z","timestamp":1792450831775,"version":"4.5.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":114,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1776038400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode"}],"funder":[{"name":"German Research Foundation","award":["Grant: 543018872"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Grant: 543018872"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3772318.3790428","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T04:12:21Z","timestamp":1776053541000},"page":"1-45","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Designing Effective Digital Literacy Interventions for Boosting Deepfake Discernment"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0911-8745","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dominique","family":"Geissler","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"LMU Munich, Munich, Germany and Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Munich, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8403-6358","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Claire","family":"Robertson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Psychology Department, Colby College, Waterville, Maine, USA and New York University, New York, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7856-8729","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stefan","family":"Feuerriegel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"LMU Munich, Munich, Germany and Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Munich, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Ali and I.\u00a0A. Qazi. 2023. Countering misinformation on social media through educational interventions: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Pakistan. Journal of Development Economics 163 (2023) 103108.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdeveco.2023.103108"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A.\u00a0M. Almars. 2021. Deepfakes detection techniques using deep learning: A survey. Journal of Computer and Communications 9 6 (2021) 20\u201335.","DOI":"10.4236\/jcc.2021.95003"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Altay A. de Angelis and E. Hoes. 2024. Media literacy tips promoting reliable news improve discernment and enhance trust in traditional media. Communications Psychology 2 (2024) 74.","DOI":"10.1038\/s44271-024-00121-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F. Aprin I.\u00a0A. Chounta and H.\u00a0U. Hoppe. 2022. \u201cSee the image in different contexts\u201d: Using reverse image search to support the identification of fake news in Instagram-like social media. Intelligent Tutoring Systems International Conference 13284 (2022).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-09680-8_25"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O.\u00a0D. Apuke B. Omar and E. Asude Tunca. 2023. Literacy concepts as an intervention strategy for improving fake news knowledge detection skills and curtailing the tendency to share fake news in Nigeria. Child & Youth Services 44 1 (2023) 88\u2013103.","DOI":"10.1080\/0145935X.2021.2024758"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A.\u00a0A. Arechar J. Allen A.\u00a0J. Berinsky R. Cole Z. Epstein K. Garimella A. Gully J.\u00a0G. Lu R.\u00a0M. Ross M.\u00a0N. Stagnaro Y. Zhang G. Pennycook and D.\u00a0G. Rand. 2023. Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents. Nature Human Behaviour 7 9 (2023) 1502\u20131513.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-023-01641-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Badrinathan. 2021. Educative interventions to combat misinformation: Evidence from a field experiment in India. American Political Science Review 115 4 (2021) 1325\u20131341.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0003055421000459"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Bashardoust S. Feuerriegel and Y.\u00a0R. Shrestha. 2024. Comparing the willingness to share for human-generated vs. AI-generated fake news. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2024).","DOI":"10.1145\/3687028"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Basol J. Roozenbeek and S. van der Linden. 2020. Good news about bad news: Gamified inoculation boosts confidence and cognitive immunity against fake news. Journal of Cognition 3 1 (2020) 2.","DOI":"10.5334\/joc.91"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","unstructured":"BBC. 2023. Fake Trump arrest photos: How to spot an AI-generated image. https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/world-us-canada-65069316"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","unstructured":"J. Bennett. 2021. Improving the way we categorize family income. https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/decoded\/2021\/06\/04\/improving-the-way-wecategorize-family-income\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H.\u00a0J. Cao H.\u00a0R. Lee and W. Peng. 2025. Empowering adults with AI literacy: Using short videos to transform understanding and harness fear for critical thinking. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2025).","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713254"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","unstructured":"Center for Countering Digital Hate. 2024. Fake image factories: How AI image generators threaten election integrity and democracy. https:\/\/counterhate.com\/research\/fake-image-factories\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J.\u00a0M. Chein S.\u00a0A. Martinez and A.\u00a0R. Barone. 2024. Human intelligence can safeguard against artificial intelligence: Individual differences in the discernment of human from AI texts. Scientific Reports 14 1 (2024) 25989.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-76218-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E. Chen H. Seo M. Ruffin D. Lee G. Wang and A. Xiong. 2025. A study of training strategies on enhancing human detection of AI-synthesized faces. International Conference on Web and Social Media (2025).","DOI":"10.1609\/icwsm.v19i1.35821"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E. Clark T. August S. Serrano N. Haduong S. Gururangan and N.\u00a0A. Smith. 2021. All that\u2019s human is not gold: Evaluating human evaluation of generated text. Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (2021).","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2021.acl-long.565"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","volume-title":"E-learning and the science of instructions: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning","author":"Clark R.\u00a0C.","year":"2023","unstructured":"R.\u00a0C. Clark and R.\u00a0E. Mayer. 2023. E-learning and the science of instructions: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons Inc."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","volume-title":"Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.)","author":"Cohen J.","year":"1988","unstructured":"J. Cohen. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T.\u00a0H. Costello G. Pennycook and D.\u00a0G. Rand. 2024. Durably reducing conspiracy beliefs through dialogues with AI. Science 385 (2024) 6714.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.adq1814"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"V. Dan and R. Coleman. 2025. \u201cI\u2019ll change my beliefs when I see it\u201d: Video fact checks outperform text fact checks in correcting misperceptions among those holding false or uncertain pre-existing beliefs. Communication Research 52 6 (2025) 778\u2013802.","DOI":"10.1177\/00936502241287870"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"V. Dan B. Paris J. Donovan M. Eleers J. Roozenbeek S. van der Linden and C. von Sikorski. 2021. Visual mis- and disinformation social media and democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 98 3 (2021) 641\u2013664.","DOI":"10.1177\/10776990211035395"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N. Diakopoulos and D. Johnson. 2021. Anticipating and addressing the ethical implications of deepfakes in the context of elections. New Media & Society 23 7 (2021) 2072\u20132098.","DOI":"10.1177\/1461444820925811"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Diel T. Lalgi I.\u00a0C. Schr\u00f6ter K.\u00a0F. MacDorman M. Teufel and A. B\u00e4uerle. 2024. Human performance in detecting deepfakes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 56 papers. Computers in Human Behaviours Reports 16 (2024) 100538.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbr.2024.100538"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. DiResta and J.\u00a0A. Goldstein. 2024. How spammers and scammers leverage AI-generated images on Facebook for audience growth. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 5 (2024) 4.","DOI":"10.37016\/mr-2020-151"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Dobber N. Metoui D. Trilling N. Helberger and C. de Vreese. 2019. Do (microtargeted) deepfakes have real effects on political attitudes? The International Journal of Press\/Politics 26 1 (2019) 69\u201391.","DOI":"10.1177\/1940161220944364"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"U.\u00a0K.\u00a0H. Ecker S. Lewandowsky and D.\u00a0T.\u00a0W. Tang. 2010. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition 38 8 (2010) 1087\u20131100.","DOI":"10.3758\/MC.38.8.1087"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Z. Epstein A.\u00a0J. Berinsky R. Cole A. Gully G. Pennycook and D.\u00a0G. Rand. 2021. Developing an accuracy-prompt toolkit to reduce COVID-19 misinformation online. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review (2021).","DOI":"10.37016\/mr-2020-71"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_29_2","unstructured":"EU. 2025. Artifical Intelligence Act Article 3 (60)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Feuerriegel R. DiResta J.\u00a0A. Goldstein S. Kumar P. Lorenz-Spreen M. Tomz and N. Pr\u00f6llochs. 2023. Research can help to tackle AI-generated disinformation. Nature Human Behaviour 7 (2023) 1818\u20131821.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-023-01726-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_31_2","volume-title":"Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do","author":"Fogg B.\u00a0J.","year":"2002","unstructured":"B.\u00a0J. Fogg. 2002. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_32_2","unstructured":"Forbes. 2023. Why did \u2018Balenciaga Pope\u2019 go viral?https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/danidiplacido\/2023\/03\/27\/why-did-balenciaga-pope-go-viral\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Frank F. Herbert J. Ricker L. Sch\u00f6nherr T. Eisenhofer A. Fischer M. D\u00fcrmuth and T. Holz. 2024. A representative study on human detection of artificially generated media across countries. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2024) 55\u201373.","DOI":"10.1109\/SP54263.2024.00159"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Frederick. 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspective 19 4 (2005) 25\u201342.","DOI":"10.1257\/089533005775196732"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"I.\u00a0O. Gallegos C. Shani W. Shi F. Bianchi I. Gainsburg D. Jurafsky and R. Willer. 2025. Labeling messages as AI-generated does not reduce their persuasive effects. arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2504.09865 (2025).","DOI":"10.1093\/pnasnexus\/pgag008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D. Geissler D. B\u00e4r N. Pr\u00f6llochs and S. Feuerriegel. 2023. Russian propaganda on social media during the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. EPJ Data Science 12 1 (2023).","DOI":"10.1140\/epjds\/s13688-023-00414-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J.\u00a0A. Goldstein J. Chao S. Grossman A. Stamos and M. Tomz. 2024. How persuasive is AI-generated propaganda? PNAS Nexus 3 2 (2024) pgae034.","DOI":"10.1093\/pnasnexus\/pgae034"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_38_2","unstructured":"J.\u00a0A. Goldstein G. Sastry M. Musser R. DiResta M. Gentzel and K. Sedova. 2023. Generative language models and automated influence operations: Emerging threats and potential mitigations. arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2301.04246 (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"P.\u00a0C. Gordon and K.\u00a0J. Holyoak. 1983. Implicit learning and generalization of the \"mere exposure\" effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 3 (1983) 492\u2013500.","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.45.3.492"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N. Grinberg K. Joseph L. Friedland B. Swire-Thompson and D.\u00a0M.\u00a0J. Lazer. 2019. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science 363 (2019) 374\u2013378.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aau2706"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Groh Z. Epstein C. Firestone and R. Picard. 2022. Deepfake detection by human crowds machines and machine-informed crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 1 (2022).","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2110013119"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Groh A. Sankaranarayanan N. Singh D.\u00a0Y. Kim A. Lippman and R. Picard. 2024. Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts audio and video. Nature Communications 15 1 (2024) 7629.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-024-51998-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A.\u00a0M. Guess M. Lerner B. Lyons J.\u00a0M. Montgomery B. Nyhan J. Reifler and N. Sircar. 2020. A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 27 (2020) 15536\u201315545.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1920498117"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Guo B. Swire-Thompson and X. Hu. 2025. Specific media literacy tips improve AI-generated visual misinformation discernment. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 10 (2025) 38.","DOI":"10.1186\/s41235-025-00648-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Z.\u00a0T. Haile. 2023. Power analysis and exploratory research. Journal of Human Lactation 39 4 (2023) 579\u2013583.","DOI":"10.1177\/08903344231195625"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Hamari and J. Koivisto. 2014. Does Gamification Work? \u2013 A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2014).","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2014.377"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Hameleers T.\u00a0E. Powell T.\u00a0G. L.\u00a0A. van der Meer and L. Bos. 2020. A picture paints a thousand lies? The effects and mechanisms of multimodal disinformation and rebuttals disseminated via social media. Political Communication 37 2 (2020) 281\u2013301.","DOI":"10.1080\/10584609.2019.1674979"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J.\u00a0T. Hancock and J.\u00a0N. Bailenson. 2021. The social impact of deepfakes. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking 24 3 (2021) 149\u2013152.","DOI":"10.1089\/cyber.2021.29208.jth"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K. Hartwig T. Biselli F. Schneider and C. Reuter. 2024. From adolescents\u2019 eyes: Assessing an indicator-based intervention to combat misinformation on TikTok. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2024).","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642264"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Hattie and H. Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 1 (2007) 81\u2013112.","DOI":"10.3102\/003465430298487"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"E. Hoes B. Aitken J. Zhang T. Gackowski and M. Wojcieszak. 2024. Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase skepticism. Nature Human Behaviour 8 (2024) 1545\u20131553.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-024-01884-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B. Hu X.-D. Ju H.-H. Liu H.-Q. Wu C. Bi and C. Lu. 2023. Game-based inoculation versus graphic-based inoculation to combat misinformation: a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 8 (2023) 49.","DOI":"10.1186\/s41235-023-00505-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. Huang W. Jia and W. Yu. 2024. Media literacy interventions improve resilience to misinformation: A meta-analytic investigation of overall effect and moderating factors. Communication Research (2024).","DOI":"10.1177\/00936502241288103"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Y. Hwang Ji\u00a0Y. Ryu and S.-H. Jeong. 2021. Effects of disinformation using deepfake: The protective effect of media literacy education. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking 24 3 (2021) 188\u2013193.","DOI":"10.1089\/cyber.2020.0174"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Jakesch M. French X. Ma J.\u00a0T. Hancock and M. Naaman. 2019. AI-mediated communication: How the perception that profile text was written by AI affects trustworthiness. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019).","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300469"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Jakesch J.\u00a0T. Hancock and M. Naaman. 2023. Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 11 (2023) e2208839120.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2208839120"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S.-H. Jeong H. Cho and Y. Hwang. 2012. Media literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication 62 3 (2012) 454\u2013472.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-2466.2012.01643.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_58_2","unstructured":"X. Jin G. Wang Z. Zhang W. Zhou N. Yu B. Gao and S. Gao. 2025. Identifying individual differences in deepfake discernment: The effects of cognitive disposition and visual literacy. Information Communication & Society (2025) 1\u201320."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M.\u00a0K. Johnson S. Hashtroudi and D.\u00a0S. Lindsay. 1993. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 114 1 (1993) 3\u201328.","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.114.1.3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_60_2","unstructured":"N. Kamali K. Nakamura A. Chatzimparmpas J. Hullman and M. Groh. 2024. How to distinguish AI-generated images from authentic photographs. arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2406.08651 (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Kasra C. Shen and A.\u00a0F. O\u2019Brien. 2018. Seeing Is believing: How people fail to identify fake images on the web. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018).","DOI":"10.1145\/3170427.3188604"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_62_2","unstructured":"G. Kiryakova N. Angelova and L. Yordanova. 2014. Gamification in education. International Balkan Education and Science Conference (2014)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N. K\u00f6bis and L.\u00a0D. Mossink. 2021. Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry. Computers in Human Behavior 114 (2021) 106553.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2020.106553"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_64_2","unstructured":"P. Korshunov and S. Marcel. 2018. Deepfakes: A new threat to face recognition? Assessment and detection. arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/1812.08685 (2018)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_65_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Kozyreva P. Lorenz-Spreen Stefan\u00a0M. Herzog U.\u00a0K.\u00a0H. Ecker S. Lewandowsky R. Hertwig A. Ali J.\u00a0B. Bak-Coleman S. Barzilai M. Basol A.\u00a0J. Berinsky C. Betsch J. Cook L. Fazio M. Geers A.\u00a0M. Guess H. Huang H. Larreguy R. Maertens F. Panizza G. Pennycook D.\u00a0G. Rand S. Rathje J. Reifler P. Schmid M. Smith B. Swire-Thompson P. Szewach S. van der Linden and S. Wineburg. 2024. Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation. Nature Human Behaviour 8 (2024) 1044\u20131052.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-024-01881-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_66_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K. Kupferschmidt. 2024. A field\u2019s dilemmas: Misinformation research has exploded. But scientists are still grappling with fundamental challenges. Science 386 6721 (2024) 478\u2013482.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.adu2100"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_67_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. \u0141abuz and C. Nehring. 2024. On the way to deep fake democracy? Deep fakes in election campaigns in 2023. European Political Science 23 4 (2024) 454\u2013473.","DOI":"10.1057\/s41304-024-00482-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_68_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D. Lakens A.\u00a0M. Scheel and P.\u00a0M. Isager. 2018. Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (2018) 259\u2013269.","DOI":"10.1177\/2515245918770963"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_69_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A.\u00a0Y. Lee R.\u00a0C. Moore and J.\u00a0T. Hancock. 2024. Building resilience to misinformation in communities of color: Results from two studies of tailored digital media literacy interventions. New Media & Society 27 6 (2024) 3545\u20133576.","DOI":"10.1177\/14614448241227841"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_70_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D. Long and B. Bagerko. 2020. What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020).","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376727"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_71_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Q. Ma A. Jain J. Kim M. Chai and G. Kaufman. 2025. ImaginAItion: Promoting Generative AI literacy through game-based learning. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2025).","DOI":"10.1145\/3706599.3719844"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_72_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. Maertens J. Roozenbeek J.\u00a0S. Simons S. Lewandowsky V. Maturo B. Goldberg R. Xu and S. van der Linden. 2025. Psychological booster shots targeting memory increase long-term resistance against misinformation. Nature Communications 16 (2025) 2062.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-025-57205-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_73_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A. Markus J. Pfister A. Carolus A. Hotho and C. Wienrich. 2024. Effects of AI understanding-training on AI literacy usage self-determined interactions and anthropomorphization with voice assistants. Computers and Education Open 6 (2024) 100176.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeo.2024.100176"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_74_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R.\u00a0E. Mayer. 2002. Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 41 (2002) 85\u2013139.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0079-7421(02)80005-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_75_2","unstructured":"Midjourney. [n. d.]. Discord channel. https:\/\/discord.com\/channels\/662267976984297473\/999550150705954856"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_76_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Y. Mirsky and W. Lee. 2021. The creation and detection of deepfakes: A survey. Comput. Surveys 54 1 (2021) 1\u201341.","DOI":"10.1145\/3425780"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_77_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K.\u00a0J. Mitchell M.\u00a0K. Johnson and M. Mather. 2003. Source monitoring and suggestibility to misinformation: Adult age-related differences. Applied Cognitive Psychology 17 (2003) 107\u2013119.","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.857"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_78_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R.\u00a0C. Moore and J.\u00a0T. Hancock. 2022. A digital media literacy intervention for older adults improves resilience to fake news. Scientific Reports 12 1 (2022) 6008.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-08437-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_79_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R. Moreno and R.\u00a0E. Mayer. 1999. Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology 91 2 (1999) 358\u2013368.","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-0663.91.2.358"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_80_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R.\u00a0A. Nash. 2018. Changing beliefs about past public events with believable and unbelievable doctored photographs. Memory 26 4 (2018) 439\u2013450.","DOI":"10.1080\/09658211.2017.1364393"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_81_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"U. Neisser and R. Becklen. 1975. Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology 7 4 (1975) 480\u2013494.","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-0285(75)90019-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_82_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S.\u00a0J. Nightingale and H. Farid. 2022. AI-synthesized faces are indistinguishable from real faces and more trustworthy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 8 (2022) e2120481119.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2120481119"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_83_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S.\u00a0J. Nightingale and K.\u00a0A. Wade. 2022. Identifying and minimising the impact of fake visual media: Current and future directions. Memory Mind & Media 1 (2022) e15.","DOI":"10.1017\/mem.2022.8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_84_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S.\u00a0J. Nightingale K.\u00a0A. Wade H. Farid and D.\u00a0G. Watson. 2019. Can people detect errors in shadows and reflections? Attention Perception & Psychophysics 81 8 (2019) 2917\u20132943.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13414-019-01773-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_85_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S.\u00a0J. Nightingale K.\u00a0A. Wade and D.\u00a0G. Watson. 2017. Can people identify original and manipulated photos of real-world scenes? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2 1 (2017) 30.","DOI":"10.1186\/s41235-017-0067-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_86_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S.\u00a0J. Nightingale K.\u00a0A. Wade and D.\u00a0G. Watson. 2022. Investigating age-related differences in ability to distinguish between original and manipulated images. Psychology and Aging 37 3 (2022) 326\u2013337.","DOI":"10.1037\/pag0000682"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_87_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R.\u00a0M. O\u2019brien. 2007. A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors. Quality & Quantity 41 (2007) 673\u2013690.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11135-006-9018-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_88_2","unstructured":"OpenAI. 2023. DALL-E 3: Generative image model. https:\/\/openai.com\/dall-e"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_89_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195066661.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_90_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F. Panizza P. Ronzani C. Martini S. Mattavelli T. Morisseau and M. Motterlini. 2022. Lateral reading and monetary incentives to spot disinformation about science. Scientific Reports 12 1 (2022) 5678.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-09168-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_91_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. Pennycook Z. Epstein M. Mosleh A.\u00a0A. Arechar D. Eckles and D.\u00a0G. Rand. 2021. Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature 592 (2021) 590\u2013595.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-021-03344-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_92_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. Pennycook J. McPhetres Y. Zhang J.\u00a0G. Lu and D.\u00a0G. Rand. 2020. Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science 31 7 (2020) 770\u2013780.","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797620939054"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_93_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. Pennycook and D.\u00a0G. Rand. 2019. Lazy not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188 (2019) 39\u201350.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2018.06.011"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_94_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. Pennycook and D.\u00a0G. Rand. 2021. The psychology of fake news. Trends in cognitive sciences 25 5 (2021) 388\u2013402.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2021.02.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_95_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. Pennycook and D.\u00a0G. Rand. 2022. Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation. Nature Communications 13 1 (2022) 2333.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-022-30073-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_96_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Qian C. Shen and J. Zhang. 2022. Fighting cheapfakes: Using a digital media literacy intervention to motivate reverse search of out-of-context visual misinformation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 28 1 (2022) zmac024.","DOI":"10.1093\/jcmc\/zmac024"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_97_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R.\u00a0A. Rensink J.\u00a0K. O\u2019Regan and J.\u00a0J. Clark. 1997. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science 8 5 (1997) 368\u2013373.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_98_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F. Romero Moreno. 2024. Generative AI and deepfakes: A human rights approach to tackling harmful content. International Review of Law Computers & Technology 38 3 (2024) 297\u2013326.","DOI":"10.1080\/13600869.2024.2324540"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_99_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Roozenbeek A.\u00a0L.\u00a0J. Freeman and S. van der Linden. 2021. How accurate are accuracy-nudge interventions? A preregistered direct replication of Pennycook et al. (2020). Psychological Science 32 7 (2021) 1169\u20131178.","DOI":"10.1177\/09567976211024535"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_100_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Roozenbeek R. Maertens S.\u00a0M. Herzog M. Geers R. Kurvers M. Sultan and S. van der Linden. 2022. Susceptibility to misinformation is consistent across question framings and response modes and better explained by myside bias and partisanship than analytical thinking. Judgment and Decision Making 17 3 (2022) 547\u2013573.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500003570"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_101_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Roozenbeek and S. van der Linden. 2019. Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Communications 5 1 (2019) 65.","DOI":"10.1057\/s41599-019-0279-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_102_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M. Ruffin G. Wang and K. Levchenko. 2023. Explaining why fake photos are fake: Does it work? Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7 (2023) 1\u201322.","DOI":"10.1145\/3567558"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_103_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K. Shiohara and T. Yamasaki. 2022. Detecting deepfakes with self-blended images. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2022).","DOI":"10.1109\/CVPR52688.2022.01816"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_104_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D.\u00a0J. Simons and C.\u00a0F. Chabris. 1999. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28 9 (1999) 1059\u20131074.","DOI":"10.1068\/p281059"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_105_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Spampatti U.\u00a0J.\u00a0J. Hahnel E. Trutnevyte and T. Brosch. 2024. Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries. Nature Human Behaviour 8 2 (2024) 380\u2013398.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-023-01736-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_106_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G. Spitale N. Biller-Andorno and F. Germani. 2023. AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humans. Science Advances 9 26 (2023) eadh1850.","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.adh1850"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_107_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K. Subbian B.\u00a0A. Prakash and L. Adamic. 2017. Detecting large reshare cascades in social networks. The Web Conference (2017).","DOI":"10.1145\/3038912.3052718"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_108_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Sweller. 2011. CHAPTER TWO - Cognitive Load Theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 55 (2011) 37\u201376.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_109_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Ternovski J. Kalla and P. Aronow. 2022. Negative consequences of informing voters about deepfakes: Evidence from two survey experiments. Journal of Online Trust and Safety 1 (2022) 2.","DOI":"10.54501\/jots.v1i2.28"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_110_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"C. Vaccari and A. Chadwick. 2020. Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception uncertainty and trust in news. Social Media + Society 6 1 (2020) 205630512090340.","DOI":"10.1177\/2056305120903408"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_111_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S. Vosoughi D. Roy and S. Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359 6380 (2018) 1146\u20131151.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aap9559"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_112_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Walker G. Thuermer J. Vicens and E. Simperl. 2023. AI art and misinformation: Approaches and strategies for media literacy and fact checking. Conference on AI Ethics and Society (2023).","DOI":"10.1145\/3600211.3604715"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_113_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"T. Wikum and J. Wijayanayake. 2024. A systematic literature review of deepfake literacy societal impacts and AI-driven prevention strategies for platform-specific vulnerabilities. International Conference on Advances in Technology and Computing (2024).","DOI":"10.1109\/ICATC64549.2024.11025231"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_114_2","unstructured":"W. Zhong J.\u00a0A. Tucker and Z. Sanderson. 2024. The effect of AI labeling on perceptions of images. osf.io\/zjhd4 (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_115_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J. Zhou. 2023. Synthetic lies: Understanding AI-generated misinformation and evaluating algorithmic and human solutions. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2023).","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581318"}],"event":{"name":"CHI 2026: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","location":"Barcelona Spain","acronym":"CHI '26","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3772318.3790428","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,25]],"date-time":"2026-06-25T05:53:18Z","timestamp":1782366798000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3772318.3790428"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"references-count":114,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3772318.3790428","10.1145\/3772318"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3772318.3790428","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-13","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}