{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T22:23:47Z","timestamp":1788387827890,"version":"build-2803163510"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":137,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3772318.3790544","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T04:12:28Z","timestamp":1776053548000},"page":"1-18","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["What Users Like and Don\u2019t Like About Occupational Exoskeletons: Experiences and Implications From a Focus Group Study"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6670-9288","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sandra","family":"Maria Siedl","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Robopsychology Lab, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2171-1883","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lennart","family":"Ralfs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9722-4809","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Benjamin","family":"Reimeir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Institute of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-1237-2805","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lara","family":"Bauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Robopsychology Lab, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1286-4458","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert","family":"Weidner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Automated and Autonomous Systems, Freiberg, Germany and Helmut-Schmidt-University\/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Laboratory of Manufacturing Technology, Hamburg, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3447-0556","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Martina","family":"Mara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Robopsychology Lab, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jamil Ahmad Vasco Fanti Darwin\u00a0G. Caldwell and Christian Di\u00a0Natali. 2024. Framework for the adoption evaluation and impact of occupational exoskeletons at different technology readiness levels: A systematic review. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 179 (Sept. 2024) 104743. 10.1016\/j.robot.2024.104743","DOI":"10.1016\/j.robot.2024.104743"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ibrahim Adel\u00a0Khamis Ahmed Munire\u00a0Sibel Cetin Kadir Ozlem Asli Tuncay\u00a0Atalay G\u00f6khan Ince and Ozgur Atalay. 2025. From knitting technology to robotics: Untethered thermally actuated textile exoskeleton for dexterity applications. Advanced Science 12 41 (Nov. 2025) e09870. 10.1002\/advs.202509870","DOI":"10.1002\/advs.202509870"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Abiola Akanmu Akinwale Okunola Houtan Jebelli Ashtarout Ammar and Adedeji Afolabi. 2024. Cognitive load assessment of active back-support exoskeletons in construction: A case study on construction framing. Advanced Engineering Informatics 62 (Oct. 2024) 102905. 10.1016\/j.aei.2024.102905","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aei.2024.102905"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohammad\u00a0Mehdi Alemi Jack Geissinger Athulya\u00a0A. Simon S.\u00a0Emily Chang and Alan\u00a0T. Asbeck. 2019. A passive exoskeleton reduces peak and mean EMG during symmetric and asymmetric lifting. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 47 (Aug. 2019) 25\u201334. 10.1016\/j.jelekin.2019.05.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jelekin.2019.05.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohammad\u00a0Mehdi Alemi Saman Madinei Sunwook Kim Divya Srinivasan and Maury\u00a0A. Nussbaum. 2020. Effects of two passive back-support exoskeletons on muscle activity energy expenditure and subjective assessments during repetitive lifting. Human Factors 62 3 (May 2020) 458\u2013474. 10.1177\/0018720819897669","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720819897669"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Christina Andrade and Dan Nathan-Roberts. 2022. Occupational exoskeleton adoption and acceptance in construction and industrial work: A scoping review. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 66 1 (Sept. 2022) 1325\u20131329. 10.1177\/1071181322661415","DOI":"10.1177\/1071181322661415"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maxwell\u00a0Fordjour Antwi-Afari Heng Li Shahnawaz Anwer Dawei Li Yi Yu Hao-Yang Mi and Ibrahim\u00a0Yahaya Wuni. 2021. Assessment of a passive exoskeleton system on spinal biomechanics and subjective responses during manual repetitive handling tasks among construction workers. Safety Science 142 (Oct. 2021) 105382. 10.1016\/j.ssci.2021.105382","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssci.2021.105382"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_9_2","volume-title":"Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct","author":"Association American\u00a0Psychological","year":"2017","unstructured":"American\u00a0Psychological Association. 2017. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA, Washington, DC. https:\/\/www.apa.org\/ethics\/code\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"World\u00a0Medical Association. 2013. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310 20 (Nov. 2013) 2191\u20132194. 10.1001\/jama.2013.281053","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.281053"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Antonio Baldassarre Lucrezia\u00a0Ginevra Lulli Filippo Cavallo Laura Fiorini Antonella Mariniello Nicola Mucci and Giulio Arcangeli. 2022. Industrial exoskeletons from bench to field: Human-machine interface and user experience in occupational settings and tasks. Frontiers in Public Health 10 (Nov. 2022) 1039680. 10.3389\/fpubh.2022.1039680","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2022.1039680"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Saskia.\u00a0J. Baltrusch Han Houdijk Jaap\u00a0H. Van\u00a0Die\u00ebn and Jan Theodoor Cornelis\u00a0Maria de Kruif. 2021. Passive trunk exoskeleton acceptability and effects on self-efficacy in employees with low-back pain: A mixed method approach. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 31 1 (March 2021) 129\u2013141. 10.1007\/s10926-020-09891-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10926-020-09891-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Saskia.\u00a0J. Baltrusch Frank Krause Aijse\u00a0Willem De\u00a0Vries and Michiel\u00a0P. De\u00a0Looze. 2024. Arm-support exoskeleton reduces shoulder muscle activity in ceiling construction. Ergonomics 67 8 (Aug. 2024) 1051\u20131063. 10.1080\/00140139.2023.2280443","DOI":"10.1080\/00140139.2023.2280443"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Klaus Bengler Christina\u00a0M. Harbauer and Martin Fleischer. 2023. Exoskeletons: A challenge for development. Wearable Technologies 4 (2023) e1. 10.1017\/wtc.2022.28","DOI":"10.1017\/wtc.2022.28"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Blake Bequette Adam Norton Eric Jones and Leia Stirling. 2020. Physical and cognitive load effects due to a powered lower-body exoskeleton. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 62 3 (May 2020) 411\u2013423. 10.1177\/0018720820907450","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720820907450"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aurora Berni and Yuri Borgianni. 2021. From the definition of user experience to a framework to classify its applications in design. Proceedings of the Design Society 1 (Aug. 2021) 1627\u20131636. 10.1017\/pds.2021.424","DOI":"10.1017\/pds.2021.424"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shilpy Bhat James Gavin Martin Warner and Michelle Myall. 2025. Mapping the evidence on occupational exoskeleton use for the workforce in healthcare social care and industry: A systematic scoping review. Wearable Technologies 6 (2025) e53. 10.1017\/wtc.2025.10033","DOI":"10.1017\/wtc.2025.10033"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kerstin Bongard-Blanchy and Carole Bouchard. 2015. Dimensions of user experience: From the product design perspective. Journal d\u2019Interaction Personne-Syst\u00e8me 3 1 (Nov. 2015) 2418\u20131838. 10.46298\/jips.1284","DOI":"10.46298\/jips.1284"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tim Bosch Jennifer Van\u00a0Eck Karlijn Knitel and Michiel\u00a0P. De\u00a0Looze. 2016. The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. Applied Ergonomics 54 (May 2016) 212\u2013217. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2015.12.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2015.12.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mona B\u00e4r Benjamin Steinhilber Monika\u00a0A. Rieger and Tessy Luger. 2021. The influence of using exoskeletons during occupational tasks on acute physical stress and strain compared to no exoskeleton \u2013 A systematic review and meta-analysis. Applied Ergonomics 94 (July 2021) 103385. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2021.103385","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2021.103385"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Leonardo Cappello Kevin\u00a0C. Galloway Siddharth Sanan Diana\u00a0A. Wagner Rachael Granberry Sven Engelhardt Florian\u00a0L. Haufe Jeffrey\u00a0D. Peisner and Conor\u00a0J. Walsh. 2018. Exploiting textile mechanical anisotropy for fabric-based pneumatic actuators. Soft Robotics 5 5 (Oct. 2018) 662\u2013674. 10.1089\/soro.2017.0076","DOI":"10.1089\/soro.2017.0076"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jinwon Chung D.\u00a0Adam Quirk Megan Applegate Michael Rouleau Nathalie Degenhardt Ignacio Galiana Diane Dalton Louis\u00a0N. Awad and Conor\u00a0J. Walsh. 2024. Lightweight active back exosuit reduces muscular effort during an hour-long order picking task. Communications Engineering 3 1 (Feb. 2024) 35. 10.1038\/s44172-024-00180-w","DOI":"10.1038\/s44172-024-00180-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Simona Crea Philipp Beckerle Michiel\u00a0P. De\u00a0Looze Kevin De\u00a0Pauw Lorenzo Grazi Tja\u0161a Kermavnar Jawad Masood Leonard\u00a0W. O\u2019Sullivan Ilaria Pacifico Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero Nicola Vitiello Danijela Risti\u0107-Durrant and Jan Veneman. 2021. Occupational exoskeletons: A roadmap toward large-scale adoption. Methodology and challenges of bringing exoskeletons to workplaces. Wearable Technologies 2 (2021) e11. 10.1017\/wtc.2021.11","DOI":"10.1017\/wtc.2021.11"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sander De\u00a0Bock Jo Ghillebert Ren\u00e9e Govaerts Bruno Tassignon Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero Simona Crea Jan Veneman Joost Geeroms Romain Meeusen and Kevin De\u00a0Pauw. 2022. Benchmarking occupational exoskeletons: An evidence mapping systematic review. Applied Ergonomics 98 (Jan. 2022) 103582. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2021.103582","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2021.103582"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2802\/66947"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michiel\u00a0P. De\u00a0Looze Tim Bosch Frank Krause Konrad\u00a0S. Stadler and Leonard\u00a0W. O\u2019Sullivan. 2016. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics 59 5 (May 2016) 671\u2013681. 10.1080\/00140139.2015.1081988","DOI":"10.1080\/00140139.2015.1081988"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_27_2","volume-title":"Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction (1 ed.)","author":"Dourish Paul","year":"2004","unstructured":"Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction (1 ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, London."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3673805.3673837"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marc Dufraisse Jean-Jacques Atain\u00a0Kouadio Chris Hayot K\u00e9vin Desbrosses Isabelle Clerc-Urm\u00e8s Olivier Morel Olivier R\u00e9my Li\u00ean Wioland and Julien Cegarra. 2025. Embodiment of occupational exoskeletons as developing a sense of ownership and readiness-to-hand: Laboratory and field explorations. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 68 2 (Aug. 2025) 239\u2013259. 10.1177\/00187208251368269","DOI":"10.1177\/00187208251368269"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marc Dufraisse Julien Cegarra Jean-Jacques Atain\u00a0Kouadio Isabelle Clerc-Urm\u00e8s and Li\u00ean Wioland. 2025. From unknown to familiar: An exploratory longitudinal field study on occupational exoskeletons adoption. Applied Ergonomics 122 (Jan. 2025) 104393. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2024.104393","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2024.104393"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marc Dufraisse Li\u00ean Wioland Jean-Jacques Atain\u00a0Kouadio Isabelle Clerc-Urm\u00e8s and Julien Cegarra. 2025. Becoming a user: Understanding the journeys towards the adoption of occupational exoskeletons. International Journal of Human\u2013Computer Interaction (Aug. 2025) 1\u201321. 10.1080\/10447318.2025.2543996","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2025.2543996"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shirley\u00a0A. Elprama Sander\u00a0De Bock Romain Meeusen Kevin\u00a0De Pauw Bram Vanderborght and An Jacobs. 2024. Design and implementation requirements for increased acceptance of occupational exoskeletons in an industrial context: A qualitative study. International Journal of Human\u2013Computer Interaction 40 19 (Oct. 2024) 6051\u20136066. 10.1080\/10447318.2023.2247597","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2023.2247597"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ICORR58425.2023.10304781"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shirley\u00a0A. Elprama Bram Vanderborght and An Jacobs. 2022. An industrial exoskeleton user acceptance framework based on a literature review of empirical studies. Applied Ergonomics 100 (April 2022) 103615. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2021.103615","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2021.103615"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Laura\u00a0J. Elstub Shimra\u00a0J. Fine and Karl\u00a0E. Zelik. 2021. Exoskeletons and exosuits could benefit from mode-switching body interfaces that loosen\/tighten to improve thermal comfort. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 24 (Dec. 2021) 13115. 10.3390\/ijerph182413115","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph182413115"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2806\/056613"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vasco Fanti Sergio Leggieri Darwin\u00a0Gordon Caldwell and Christian Di\u00a0Natali. 2025. Workers\u2019 perception insights using an active exoskeleton: How familiarization impacts user acceptance. 10.2139\/ssrn.5381934","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5381934"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Arthur Favennec Julien Fr\u00e8re and Guillaume Mornieux. 2024. Changes in human motor behavior during the familiarization with a soft back-support occupational exoskeleton. Applied Sciences 14 3 (Jan. 2024) 1160. 10.3390\/app14031160","DOI":"10.3390\/app14031160"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stephen Fox Olli Aranko Juhani Heilala and P\u00e4ivi Vahala. 2019. Exoskeletons: Comprehensive comparative and critical analyses of their potential to improve manufacturing performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 31 6 (June 2019) 1261\u20131280. 10.1108\/JMTM-01-2019-0023","DOI":"10.1108\/JMTM-01-2019-0023"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"David\u00a0M. Frost Mohammad Abdoli-E and Joan\u00a0M. Stevenson. 2009. PLAD (personal lift assistive device) stiffness affects the lumbar flexion\/extension moment and the posterior chain EMG during symmetrical lifting tasks. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 19 6 (Dec. 2009) e403\u2013e412. 10.1016\/j.jelekin.2008.12.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jelekin.2008.12.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chiyu Fu Zhigang Xia Christopher Hurren Azadeh Nilghaz and Xungai Wang. 2022. Textiles in soft robots: Current progress and future trends. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 196 (Jan. 2022) 113690. 10.1016\/j.bios.2021.113690","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bios.2021.113690"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"St\u00e9phanie Gauttier Alexandra Lugova and Jan-Philipp Reineke. 2025. Investigating workers\u2019 attitude toward exoskeletons: The role of bodily integration. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 17 2 (June 2025) 170\u2013204. 10.17705\/1thci.00222","DOI":"10.17705\/1thci.00222"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ulrich Glitsch Ines B\u00e4uerle Lisa Hertrich Kai Heinrich and Martin Liedtke. 2020. Biomechanische Beurteilung der Wirksamkeit von rumpfunterst\u00fctzenden Exoskeletten f\u00fcr den industriellen Einsatz. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Arbeitswissenschaft 74 4 (Dec. 2020) 294\u2013305. 10.1007\/s41449-019-00184-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s41449-019-00184-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ali Golabchi Andrew Chao and Mahdi Tavakoli. 2022. A systematic review of industrial exoskeletons for injury prevention: Efficacy evaluation metrics target tasks and supported body postures. Sensors 22 7 (April 2022) 2714. 10.3390\/s22072714","DOI":"10.3390\/s22072714"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ali Golabchi Niromand Jasimi\u00a0Zindashti Linda Miller Hossein Rouhani and Mahdi Tavakoli. 2023. Performance and effectiveness of a passive back-support exoskeleton in manual material handling tasks in the construction industry. Construction Robotics 7 1 (May 2023) 77\u201388. 10.1007\/s41693-023-00097-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s41693-023-00097-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ali Golabchi Negar Riahi Mackenzie Fix Linda Miller Hossein Rouhani and Mahdi Tavakoli. 2023. A framework for evaluation and adoption of industrial exoskeletons. Applied Ergonomics 113 (Nov. 2023) 104103. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2023.104103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2023.104103"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marie Gombert-Labedens Kristine Vesterdorf Andrea Fuller Shane\u00a0K. Maloney and Fiona\u00a0C. Baker. 2025. Effects of menopause on temperature regulation. Temperature 12 2 (April 2025) 92\u2013132. 10.1080\/23328940.2025.2484499","DOI":"10.1080\/23328940.2025.2484499"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ma. Janice\u00a0J. Gumasing Yogi\u00a0Tri Prasetyo Ardvin Kester\u00a0S. Ong Satria\u00a0Fadil Persada and Reny Nadlifatin. 2023. Factors influencing the perceived usability of wearable chair exoskeleton with market segmentation: A structural equation modeling and K-Means clustering approach. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 93 (Jan. 2023) 103401. 10.1016\/j.ergon.2022.103401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ergon.2022.103401"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nancy Gutierrez Aanuoluwapo Ojelade Sunwook Kim Alan Barr Abiola Akanmu Maury\u00a0A. Nussbaum and Carisa Harris-Adamson. 2024. Perceived benefits barriers perceptions and readiness to use exoskeletons in the construction industry: Differences by demographic characteristics. Applied Ergonomics 116 (April 2024) 104199. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2023.104199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2023.104199"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ralph Hensel and Mathias Keil. 2019. Subjective evaluation of a passive industrial exoskeleton for lower-back support: A field study in the automotive sector. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors 7 3-4 (Oct. 2019) 213\u2013221. 10.1080\/24725838.2019.1573770","DOI":"10.1080\/24725838.2019.1573770"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_51_2","first-page":"24","volume-title":"Served by a cyborg: Understanding consumer responses to human enhancement technologies","author":"Hess Nicole","year":"2024","unstructured":"Nicole Hess, Martin Mende, Maura\u00a0L. Scott, Anne\u00a0L. Roggeveen, and Dhruv Grewal. 2024. Served by a cyborg: Understanding consumer responses to human enhancement technologies. Technical Report. Marketing Science Institute. 24\u2013149 pages. https:\/\/thearf-org-unified-admin.s3.amazonaws.com\/MSI_Report_24-149.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3743725"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Niclas Hoffmann Gilbert Prokop and Robert Weidner. 2022. Methodologies for evaluating exoskeletons with industrial applications. Ergonomics 65 2 (Feb. 2022) 276\u2013295. 10.1080\/00140139.2021.1970823","DOI":"10.1080\/00140139.2021.1970823"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Niclas Hoffmann Lennart Ralfs and Robert Weidner. 2024. Context-oriented design of industrial exoskeletons. Konstruktion 76 08-09 (2024) 64\u201370. 10.37544\/0720-5953-2024-08-09-64","DOI":"10.37544\/0720-5953-2024-08-09-64"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kasper Hornb\u00e6k and Morten Hertzum. 2017. Technology acceptance and user experience: A review of the experiential component in HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 24 5 (Oct. 2017) 1\u201330. 10.1145\/3127358","DOI":"10.1145\/3127358"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/11481.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kristina H\u00f6\u00f6k Anna St\u00e5hl Martin Jonsson Johanna Mercurio Anna Karlsson and Eva-Carin\u00a0Banka Johnson. 2015. Somaesthetic design. Interactions 22 4 (June 2015) 26\u201333. 10.1145\/2770888","DOI":"10.1145\/2770888"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Martina Jakob Romain Balaguier Hyunjin Park and Catherine Trask. 2023. Addressing exoskeleton implementation challenges: Case studies of non-acceptance in agriculture. Journal of Agromedicine 28 4 (Oct. 2023) 784\u2013796. 10.1080\/1059924X.2023.2236605","DOI":"10.1080\/1059924X.2023.2236605"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jasper Johns Inga Schultes Kai Heinrich Wolfgang Potthast and Ulrich Glitsch. 2024. Biomechanical analysis of different back-supporting exoskeletons regarding musculoskeletal loading during lifting and holding. Journal of Biomechanics 168 (May 2024) 112125. 10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2024.112125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2024.112125"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_60_2","volume-title":"Psychische Belastung und Beanspruchung im Berufsleben: Erkennen - gestalten (5 ed.)","author":"Joiko Karin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Karin Joiko, Gertrud Wolff, and Martin Schmauder. 2010. Psychische Belastung und Beanspruchung im Berufsleben: Erkennen - gestalten (5 ed.). Bundesanstalt f\u00fcr Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund-Dorstfeld."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Julia Katila and Tuuli Turja. 2021. Capturing the nurse\u2019s kinesthetic experience of wearing an exoskeleton: The benefits of using intercorporeal perspective to video analysis. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 4 3 (Aug. 2021). 10.7146\/si.v4i3.128149","DOI":"10.7146\/si.v4i3.128149"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tja\u0161a Kermavnar Aijse\u00a0W. De\u00a0Vries Michiel\u00a0P. De\u00a0Looze and Leonard\u00a0W. O\u2019Sullivan. 2021. Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review. Ergonomics 64 6 (June 2021) 685\u2013711. 10.1080\/00140139.2020.1870162","DOI":"10.1080\/00140139.2020.1870162"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hyun\u00a0K. Kim Muhammad Hussain Jaehyun Park Jongwon Lee and Jin\u00a0Won Lee. 2021. Analysis of active back-support exoskeleton during manual load-lifting tasks. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering 41 (Aug. 2021) 704\u2013714. 10.1007\/s40846-021-00644-w","DOI":"10.1007\/s40846-021-00644-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_64_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sunwook Kim Ryan Porto and Maury\u00a0A. Nussbaum. 2025. User experiences and adoption factors for a back-support exosuit in automotive logistics: Results from field testing up to 18 months. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors 13 3 (July 2025) 191\u2013199. 10.1080\/24725838.2025.2491485","DOI":"10.1080\/24725838.2025.2491485"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_65_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1142405.1142429"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_66_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Axel\u00a0S. Koopman Idsart Kingma Gert\u00a0S. Faber Michiel\u00a0P. De\u00a0Looze and Jaap\u00a0H. Van\u00a0Die\u00ebn. 2019. Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks. Journal of Biomechanics 83 (Jan. 2019) 97\u2013103. 10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2018.11.033","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2018.11.033"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_67_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203024102"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_68_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"\u017diga Kozinc Saskia Baltrusch Han Houdijk and Nejc \u0160arabon. 2020. Reliability of a battery of tests for functional evaluation of trunk exoskeletons. Applied Ergonomics 86 (July 2020) 103117. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2020.103117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2020.103117"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_69_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shanna\u00a0E. Kranenborg Caroline Greve Michiel\u00a0F. Reneman and Corien\u00a0C. Roossien. 2023. Side-effects and adverse events of a shoulder- and back-support exoskeleton in workers: A systematic review. Applied Ergonomics 111 (Sept. 2023) 104042. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2023.104042","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2023.104042"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_70_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pranav\u00a0Madhav Kuber and Ehsan Rashedi. 2021. Product ergonomics in industrial exoskeletons: potential enhancements for workforce efficiency and safety. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 22 6 (Nov. 2021) 729\u2013752. 10.1080\/1463922X.2020.1850905","DOI":"10.1080\/1463922X.2020.1850905"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_71_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Erik\u00a0P. Lamers Aaron\u00a0J. Yang and Karl\u00a0E. Zelik. 2018. Feasibility of a biomechanically-assistive garment to reduce low back loading during leaning and lifting. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 65 8 (Aug. 2018) 1674\u20131680. 10.1109\/TBME.2017.2761455","DOI":"10.1109\/TBME.2017.2761455"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_72_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jinwoo Lee Kangkyu Kwon Ira Soltis Jared Matthews Yoon\u00a0Jae Lee Hojoong Kim Lissette Romero Nathan Zavanelli Youngjin Kwon Shinjae Kwon Jimin Lee Yewon Na Sung\u00a0Hoon Lee Ki\u00a0Jun Yu Minoru Shinohara Frank\u00a0L. Hammond and Woon-Hong Yeo. 2024. Intelligent upper-limb exoskeleton integrated with soft bioelectronics and deep learning for intention-driven augmentation. npj Flexible Electronics 8 1 (Feb. 2024) 11. 10.1038\/s41528-024-00297-0","DOI":"10.1038\/s41528-024-00297-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_73_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"J\u00e9r\u00e9my Lefint and Ant\u00f3nio\u00a0B. Moniz. 2024. Assessment of exoskeletons for work activities: The dilemma behind the product. Applied Sciences 14 16 (Aug. 2024) 7108. 10.3390\/app14167108","DOI":"10.3390\/app14167108"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_74_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544549.3585867"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_75_2","unstructured":"Christine\u00a0M. Linnenberg. 2024. Einsatz und Entwicklung biomechanischer Methoden f\u00fcr den Entwicklungsprozess von Exoskeletten im Arbeitskontext. Ph.\u00a0D. Dissertation. University of Innsbruck Innsbruck. https:\/\/ulb-dok.uibk.ac.at\/ulbtirolhs\/content\/titleinfo\/10228879"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_76_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jing Liu Heng Zhai Jiashen Li Yi Li and Zekun Liu. 2024. Enhancing wearable electronics through thermal management innovations. Wearable Electronics 1 (Dec. 2024) 160\u2013179. 10.1016\/j.wees.2024.07.005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wees.2024.07.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_77_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3746058.3762829"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_78_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Geke D.\u00a0S. Ludden and Thomas J.\u00a0L. Van\u00a0Rompay. 2015. How does it feel? Exploring touch on different levels of product experience. Journal of Engineering Design 26 4-6 (June 2015) 157\u2013168. 10.1080\/09544828.2015.1036011","DOI":"10.1080\/09544828.2015.1036011"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_79_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tobias Luder Michael Meier Rea Neuweiler and Olivier Lambercy. 2025. Evaluation of the support provided by a soft passive exoskeleton in individuals with back pain. Applied Ergonomics 127 (Sept. 2025) 104514. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2025.104514Publisher: Elsevier BV.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2025.104514"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_80_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tessy Luger Mona B\u00e4r Robert Seibt Monika\u00a0A. Rieger and Benjamin Steinhilber. 2023. Using a back exoskeleton during industrial and functional tasks\u2014effects on muscle activity posture performance usability and wearer discomfort in a laboratory trial. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 65 1 (Feb. 2023) 5\u201321. 10.1177\/00187208211007267","DOI":"10.1177\/00187208211007267"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_81_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dilruba Mahmud Sean\u00a0T. Bennett Zhenhua Zhu Peter\u00a0G. Adamczyk Michael Wehner Dharmaraj Veeramani and Fei Dai. 2022. Identifying facilitators barriers and potential solutions of adopting exoskeletons and exosuits in construction workplaces. Sensors 22 24 (Dec. 2022) 9987. 10.3390\/s22249987","DOI":"10.3390\/s22249987"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_82_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stefano Massardi David Rodriguez-Cianca David Pinto-Fernandez Juan\u00a0C. Moreno Matteo Lancini and Diego Torricelli. 2022. Characterization and evaluation of human\u2013exoskeleton interaction dynamics: A review. Sensors 22 11 (May 2022) 3993. 10.3390\/s22113993","DOI":"10.3390\/s22113993"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_83_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Daniel\u00a0J. McFarland and Diane Hamilton. 2006. Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior 22 3 (May 2006) 427\u2013447. 10.1016\/j.chb.2004.09.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2004.09.009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_84_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tasha McFarland and Steven Fischer. 2019. Considerations for industrial use: A systematic review of the impact of active and passive upper limb exoskeletons on physical exposures. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors 7 3-4 (Oct. 2019) 322\u2013347. 10.1080\/24725838.2019.1684399","DOI":"10.1080\/24725838.2019.1684399"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_85_2","first-page":"411","volume-title":"Research Methods in Psychology (4 ed.)","author":"Millward Lynne","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lynne Millward. 2012. Focus Groups. In Research Methods in Psychology (4 ed.), Glynis\u00a0M. Breakwell, Jonathan\u00a0A. Smith, and Daniel\u00a0B. Wright (Eds.). Sage Publications, Los Angeles, Calif., 411\u2013437. https:\/\/us.sagepub.com\/sites\/default\/files\/upm-binaries\/78326_Research_Methods___Chapter_17.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_86_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lukas Mitterlehner Yasmin\u00a0Xinyue Li and Matthias Wolf. 2023. Objective and subjective evaluation of a passive low-back exoskeleton during simulated logistics tasks. Wearable Technologies 4 (2023) e24. 10.1017\/wtc.2023.19","DOI":"10.1017\/wtc.2023.19"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_87_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Leah Morris Richard\u00a0S. Diteesawat Nahian Rahman Ailie Turton Mary Cramp and Jonathan Rossiter. 2023. The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: A review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 20 1 (Jan. 2023) 18. 10.1186\/s12984-022-01122-3","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-022-01122-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_88_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713815"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_89_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Florian\u00a0\u2018Floyd\u2019 Mueller Nathan Semertzidis Josh Andres Joe Marshall Steve Benford Xiang Li Louise Matjeka and Yash Mehta. 2023. Toward understanding the design of intertwined human\u2013computer integrations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 30 5 (Oct. 2023) 1\u201345. 10.1145\/3590766","DOI":"10.1145\/3590766"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_90_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3379337.3415875"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_91_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marianna Obrist and Carlos Velasco. 2025. Multisensory experiences: Formation realization and responsibilities. Commun. ACM 68 4 (April 2025) 50\u201359. 10.1145\/3699594","DOI":"10.1145\/3699594"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_92_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2851581.2856462"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_93_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jooseok Oh Gu\u00a0Young Cho and Hyunsoo Kim. 2025. Performance analysis of wearable robotic exoskeleton in construction tasks: Productivity and motion stability assessment. Applied Sciences 15 7 (March 2025) 3808. 10.3390\/app15073808","DOI":"10.3390\/app15073808"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_94_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21606\/drs.2024.1015"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_95_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hanjun Park Alex Noll Sunwook Kim and Maury\u00a0A. Nussbaum. 2025. Passive arm-support and back-support exoskeletons have distinct phase-dependent effects on physical demands during cart pushing and pulling: An exploratory study. Applied Ergonomics 126 (July 2025) 104510. 10.1016\/j.apergo.2025.104510","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apergo.2025.104510"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_96_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Timo Partala and Timo Saari. 2015. Understanding the most influential user experiences in successful and unsuccessful technology adoptions. Computers in Human Behavior 53 (Dec. 2015) 381\u2013395. 10.1016\/j.chb.2015.07.012","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2015.07.012"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_97_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yucan Peng and Yi Cui. 2024. Thermal management with innovative fibers and textiles: manipulating heat transport storage and conversion. National Science Review 11 10 (Sept. 2024) nwae295. 10.1093\/nsr\/nwae295","DOI":"10.1093\/nsr\/nwae295"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_98_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mattia Pesenti Giovanni Invernizzi Julie Mazzella Marco Bocciolone Alessandra Pedrocchi and Marta Gandolla. 2023. IMU-based human activity recognition and payload classification for low-back exoskeletons. Scientific Reports 13 1 (Jan. 2023) 1184. 10.1038\/s41598-023-28195-x","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-28195-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_99_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-93502-2_22"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_100_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tommaso Poliero Vasco Fanti Matteo Sposito Darwin\u00a0G. Caldwell and Christian\u00a0Di Natali. 2022. Active and passive back-support exoskeletons: A comparison in static and dynamic tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7 3 (July 2022) 8463\u20138470. 10.1109\/LRA.2022.3188439","DOI":"10.1109\/LRA.2022.3188439"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_101_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Panagiotis Polygerinos Nikolaus Correll Stephen\u00a0A. Morin Bobak Mosadegh Cagdas\u00a0D. Onal Kirstin Petersen Matteo Cianchetti Michael\u00a0T. Tolley and Robert\u00a0F. Shepherd. 2017. Soft robotics: Review of fluid-driven intrinsically soft devices; Manufacturing sensing control and applications in human\u2013robot interaction. Advanced Engineering Materials 19 12 (Dec. 2017) 1700016. 10.1002\/adem.201700016","DOI":"10.1002\/adem.201700016"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_102_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1201\/9781003495109"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_103_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lennart Ralfs Niclas Hoffmann Ulrich Glitsch Kai Heinrich Jasper Johns and Robert Weidner. 2023. Insights into evaluating and using industrial exoskeletons: Summary report guideline and lessons learned from the interdisciplinary project \u201cExo@Work\u201d. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 97 (Sept. 2023) 103494. 10.1016\/j.ergon.2023.103494","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ergon.2023.103494"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_104_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lennart Ralfs Niclas Hoffmann and Robert Weidner. 2021. Method and test course for the evaluation of industrial exoskeletons. Applied Sciences 11 20 (Oct. 2021) 9614. 10.3390\/app11209614","DOI":"10.3390\/app11209614"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_105_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-74032-0_14"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_106_2","first-page":"159","volume-title":"Warehousing 5.0: Managing the transition from techno-focused to human-value-centric intralogistics (1 ed.)","author":"Ralfs Lennart","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lennart Ralfs, Niclas Hoffmann, and Robert Weidner. 2024. Exoskeletons as physical support systems in human-centered work environments. In Warehousing 5.0: Managing the transition from techno-focused to human-value-centric intralogistics (1 ed.), Christoph\u00a0H. Glock and Eric\u00a0H. Grosse (Eds.). Universit\u00e4t des Saarlandes, Saarbr\u00fccken, 159\u2013168."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_107_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Benjamin Reimeir Mait\u00e9 Calisti Ronja Mittermeier Lennart Ralfs and Robert Weidner. 2023. Effects of back-support exoskeletons with different functional mechanisms on trunk muscle activity and kinematics. Wearable Technologies 4 (2023) e12. 10.1017\/wtc.2023.5","DOI":"10.1017\/wtc.2023.5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_108_2","first-page":"150","volume-title":"Exoskeleton market size, share & trends analysis report: By mobility (mobile, fixed\/stationary), by technology (powered, non-powered), by extremity, by end use, by region, and segment forecasts, 2025\u20132030","author":"Research Grand\u00a0View","year":"2025","unstructured":"Grand\u00a0View Research. 2025. Exoskeleton market size, share & trends analysis report: By mobility (mobile, fixed\/stationary), by technology (powered, non-powered), by extremity, by end use, by region, and segment forecasts, 2025\u20132030. Technical Report GVR-1-68038-071-2. Grand View Research, San Francisco. 150 pages. https:\/\/www.grandviewresearch.com\/industry-analysis\/exoskeleton-market"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_109_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Julia Riemer and Sascha Wischniewski. 2023. Long-term effects and user acceptance of back-support exoskeletons in the workplace. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Arbeitswissenschaft 77 4 (Dec. 2023) 685\u2013691. 10.1007\/s41449-023-00381-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s41449-023-00381-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_110_2","volume-title":"Praktische Arbeitspsychologie. Formen menschlicher Arbeit (3 ed.)","author":"Rohmert Walter","year":"1983","unstructured":"Walter Rohmert. 1983. Formen menschlicher Arbeit. In Praktische Arbeitspsychologie. Formen menschlicher Arbeit (3 ed.), Walter Rhomert and Joseph Rutenfranz (Eds.). Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_111_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Konrad Rykaczewski. 2023. Thermophysiological aspects of wearable robotics: Challenges and opportunities. Temperature 10 3 (July 2023) 313\u2013325. 10.1080\/23328940.2022.2113725","DOI":"10.1080\/23328940.2022.2113725"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_112_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Eleanore\u00a0Rae Scheer Jad\u00a0A. Atweh Jessica Arora Elizabeth Thompson Jaiden Murray Elvie Sellers Divya Srinivasan and Rupa\u00a0S. Valdez. 2024. Exploring the social contexts of exoskeleton design and implementation in long-term care: A study of nurses and nurse managers with musculoskeletal disorders. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 68 1 (Sept. 2024) 535\u2013541. 10.1177\/10711813241275507","DOI":"10.1177\/10711813241275507"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_113_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781529682571"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_114_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Katie Seaborn Eduard Fosch-Villaronga Anton Fedosov and Ge\u00a0Rikaku Li. 2025. My body my exoskeleton: Co-designing intersectional visions of robotic augmentations through drawings. International Journal of Social Robotics 17 10 (Oct. 2025) 2183\u20132198. 10.1007\/s12369-025-01252-3","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-025-01252-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_115_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3654777.3676422"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_116_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3743049.3748570"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_117_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0Maria Siedl and Martina Mara. 2021. Exoskeleton acceptance and its relationship to self-efficacy enhancement perceived usefulness and physical relief: A field study among logistics workers. Wearable Technologies 2 (2021) e10. 10.1017\/wtc.2021.10Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP).","DOI":"10.1017\/wtc.2021.10"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_118_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0Maria Siedl and Martina Mara. 2023. What drives acceptance of occupational exoskeletons? Focus group insights from workers in food retail and corporate logistics. International Journal of Human\u2013Computer Interaction 39 20 (Dec. 2023) 4080\u20134089. 10.1080\/10447318.2022.2108969Publisher: Informa UK Limited.","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2022.2108969"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_119_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0Maria Siedl and Martina Mara. 2024. Am I still human? Wearing an exoskeleton impacts self-perceptions of warmth competence attractiveness and machine-likeness. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2 2 (Aug. 2024) 100073. 10.1016\/j.chbah.2024.100073Publisher: Elsevier BV.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbah.2024.100073"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_120_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0Maria Siedl Martina Mara and Barbara Stiglbauer. 2025. The role of social feedback in technology acceptance: A one-week diary study with exoskeleton users at the workplace. International Journal of Human\u2013Computer Interaction 41 13 (July 2025) 8210\u20138223. 10.1080\/10447318.2024.2406119","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2024.2406119"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_121_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3434074.3447200"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_122_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Matteo Sposito Vasco Fanti Tommaso Poliero Darwin\u00a0Gordon Caldwell and Christian Di\u00a0Natali. 2024. Field assessment of active BSE: Trends over test days of subjective indicators and self-reported fatigue for railway construction workers. Heliyon 10 12 (June 2024) e33055. 10.1016\/j.heliyon.2024.e33055","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2024.e33055"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_123_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Leia Stirling Damian Kelty-Stephen Richard Fineman Monica L.\u00a0H. Jones Byoung-Keon Daniel\u00a0Park Matthew\u00a0P. Reed Joseph Parham and Hyeg\u00a0Joo Choi. 2020. Static dynamic and cognitive fit of exosystems for the human operator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 62 3 (May 2020) 424\u2013440. 10.1177\/0018720819896898","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720819896898"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_124_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Roger\u00a0Andre S\u00f8raa and Eduard Fosch-Villaronga. 2020. Exoskeletons for all: The interplay between exoskeletons inclusion gender and intersectionality. Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics 11 1 (May 2020) 217\u2013227. 10.1515\/pjbr-2020-0036","DOI":"10.1515\/pjbr-2020-0036"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_125_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"James Tarbit Nicole Hartley and Josephine Previte. 2023. Exoskeletons at your service: A multi-disciplinary structured literature review. Journal of Services Marketing 37 3 (Feb. 2023) 313\u2013339. 10.1108\/JSM-02-2022-0045","DOI":"10.1108\/JSM-02-2022-0045"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_126_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jean Theurel and Kevin Desbrosses. 2019. Occupational exoskeletons: Overview of their benefits and limitations in preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors 7 3-4 (Oct. 2019) 264\u2013280. 10.1080\/24725838.2019.1638331","DOI":"10.1080\/24725838.2019.1638331"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_127_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Diego Torricelli Carlos Rodriguez-Guerrero Jan\u00a0F. Veneman Simona Crea Kristin Briem Bigna Lenggenhager and Philipp Beckerle. 2020. Benchmarking wearable robots: Challenges and recommendations from functional user experience and methodological perspectives. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7 (Nov. 2020) 561774. 10.3389\/frobt.2020.561774","DOI":"10.3389\/frobt.2020.561774"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_128_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stefano Toxiri Matthias\u00a0B. N\u00e4f Maria Lazzaroni Jorge Fern\u00e1ndez Matteo Sposito Tommaso Poliero Luigi Monica Sara Anastasi Darwin\u00a0G. Caldwell and Jes\u00fas Ortiz. 2019. Back-support exoskeletons for occupational use: An overview of technological advances and trends. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors 7 3-4 (Oct. 2019) 237\u2013249. 10.1080\/24725838.2019.1626303","DOI":"10.1080\/24725838.2019.1626303"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_129_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tuuli Turja Riika Saurio Julia Katila Lea Hennala Satu Pekkarinen and Helin\u00e4 Melkas. 2022. Intention to use exoskeletons in geriatric care work: Need for ergonomic and social design. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications 30 2 (April 2022) 13\u201316. 10.1177\/1064804620961577","DOI":"10.1177\/1064804620961577"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_130_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Julie Vaughan-Graham Dina Brooks Lowell Rose Goldie Nejat Jose Pons and Kara Patterson. 2020. Exoskeleton use in post-stroke gait rehabilitation: A qualitative study of the perspectives of persons post-stroke and physiotherapists. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 17 1 (Dec. 2020) 123. 10.1186\/s12984-020-00750-x","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-020-00750-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_131_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Conor Walsh. 2018. Human-in-the-loop development of soft wearable robots. Nature Reviews Materials 3 6 (May 2018) 78\u201380. 10.1038\/s41578-018-0011-1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41578-018-0011-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_132_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jilong Wang Chunhong Lu and Kun Zhang. 2020. Textile-based strain sensor for human motion detection. Energy & Environmental Materials 3 1 (March 2020) 80\u2013100. 10.1002\/eem2.12041","DOI":"10.1002\/eem2.12041"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_133_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Li\u00ean Wioland Jean-Jacques Atain\u00a0Kouadio Hugo Br\u00e9ard Isabelle Clerc-Urm\u00e8s and Benjamin Paty. 2025. The adoption of occupational exoskeletons: From acceptability to situated acceptance questionnaire surveys. International Journal of Human\u2013Computer Interaction 41 2 (Jan. 2025) 1446\u20131458. 10.1080\/10447318.2024.2314359","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2024.2314359"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_134_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kuanming Yao Qiuna Zhuang Qiang Zhang Jingkun Zhou Chun\u00a0Ki Yiu Jianpeng Zhang Denglin Ye Yawen Yang Ki\u00a0Wan Wong Lung Chow Tao Huang Yuze Qiu Shengxin Jia Zhiyuan Li Guangyao Zhao Hehua Zhang Jingyi Zhu Xingcan Huang Jian Li Yuyu Gao Huiming Wang Jiyu Li Ya Huang Dengfeng Li Binbin Zhang Jiachen Wang Zhenlin Chen Guihuan Guo Zijian Zheng and Xinge Yu. 2024. A fully integrated breathable haptic textile. Science Advances 10 42 (Oct. 2024) eadq9575. 10.1126\/sciadv.adq9575","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.adq9575"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_135_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jihwan Yoon Sumin Kim Junyoung Moon Jehyeok Kim and Giuk Lee. 2022. Minimizing misalignment and frame protrusion of shoulder exoskeleton via optimization for reducing interaction force and minimizing volume. Machines 10 12 (Dec. 2022) 1223. 10.3390\/machines10121223","DOI":"10.3390\/machines10121223"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_136_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Xiaohui Zhang Zhaokun Wang Guanghan Huang Xujiang Chao Lin Ye Jintu Fan and Dahua Shou. 2024. Soft robotic textiles for adaptive personal thermal management. Advanced Science 11 21 (June 2024) 2309605. 10.1002\/advs.202309605","DOI":"10.1002\/advs.202309605"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_137_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weibin Zhu Lung Chow Denglin Ye Yuze Qiu Jiyu Li Binbin Zhang Yuan Guo Shengxin Jia and Xinge Yu. 2025. Advances in smart textiles for personal thermal management. Med-X 3 1 (Dec. 2025) 6. 10.1007\/s44258-025-00050-w","DOI":"10.1007\/s44258-025-00050-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_138_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hanbo Zou Jiwon Choi Sang Hyeon\u00a0Kang Seulgi Kim and Sangeun Jin. 2023. Passive exoskeletons alter low back load transfer mechanism. Journal of Biomechanics 147 (Jan. 2023) 111437. 10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2023.111437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbiomech.2023.111437"}],"event":{"name":"CHI 2026: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","location":"Barcelona Spain","acronym":"CHI '26","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3772318.3790544","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,21]],"date-time":"2026-04-21T20:11:14Z","timestamp":1776802274000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3772318.3790544"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"references-count":137,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3772318.3790544","10.1145\/3772318"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3772318.3790544","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-13","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}