{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,23]],"date-time":"2026-04-23T07:55:44Z","timestamp":1776930944361,"version":"3.51.2"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":94,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2027,4,13]],"date-time":"2027-04-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1807574400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":365,"URL":"http:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"funder":[{"name":"NSF","award":["2138654"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2138654"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3772318.3790794","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T09:47:11Z","timestamp":1776073631000},"page":"1-19","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Re-Examining the Examiners: Changes in Privacy and Security Perceptions of Exam Proctoring"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-0824-8969","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adryana","family":"Hutchinson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Computer Science, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-8266-4131","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elaine","family":"Ly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Computer Science, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1987-1685","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Collins W.","family":"Munyendo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Computer Science, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3792-2485","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Adam J","family":"Aviv","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Computer Science, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_2_2","unstructured":"Lawrence Abrams. 2020. ProctorU confirms data breach after database leaked online. Retrieved December 2 2023 from https:\/\/www.bleepingcomputer.com\/news\/security\/proctoru-confirms-data-breach-after-database-leaked-online\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_3_2","first-page":"5089","volume-title":"33rd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 24)","author":"Akgul Omer","year":"2024","unstructured":"Omer Akgul, Sai\u00a0Teja Peddinti, Nina Taft, Michelle\u00a0L. Mazurek, Hamza Harkous, Animesh Srivastava, and Benoit Seguin. 2024. A Decade of Privacy-Relevant Android App Reviews: Large Scale Trends. In 33rd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 24). USENIX Association, Philadelphia, PA, 5089\u20135106. https:\/\/www.usenix.org\/conference\/usenixsecurity24\/presentation\/akgul"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Helaine\u00a0M Alessio Nancy Malay Karsten Maurer A.\u00a0John Bailer and Beth Rubin. 2018. Interaction of Proctoring and Student Major on Online Test Performance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19 5 (Nov. 2018). doi:10.19173\/irrodl.v19i5.3698","DOI":"10.19173\/irrodl.v19i5.3698"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Helaine\u00a0Mary Alessio Nancy\u00a0J. Malay Karsten Maurer A.\u00a0John Bailer and Beth Rubin. 2017. Examining the Effect of Proctoring on Online Test Scores. Online Learning 21 1 (March 2017). doi:10.24059\/olj.v21i1.885","DOI":"10.24059\/olj.v21i1.885"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Helaine\u00a0Mary Alessio and Jeff\u00a0D. Messinger. 2021. Faculty and Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity in Technology-Assisted Learning and Testing. Frontiers in Education 6 (April 2021) 629220. doi:10.3389\/feduc.2021.629220","DOI":"10.3389\/feduc.2021.629220"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maite Alguacil Noem\u00ed Herranz-Zarzoso Jos\u00e9\u00a0C. Pern\u00edas and Gerardo Sabater-Grande. 2023. Academic dishonesty and monitoring in online exams: a randomized field experiment. J. Comput. High. Educ. 36 (2023) 835\u2013851. https:\/\/api.semanticscholar.org\/CorpusID:260072845","DOI":"10.1007\/s12528-023-09378-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-29407-6_36"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_9_2","first-page":"633","volume-title":"Seventeenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2021)","author":"Balash David\u00a0G.","year":"2021","unstructured":"David\u00a0G. Balash, Dongkun Kim, Darika Shaibekova, Rahel\u00a0A. Fainchtein, Micah Sherr, and Adam\u00a0J. Aviv. 2021. Examining the Examiners: Students\u2019 Privacy and Security Perceptions of Online Proctoring Services. In Seventeenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2021). USENIX Association, New York, NY, USA, 633\u2013652. https:\/\/www.usenix.org\/conference\/soups2021\/presentation\/balash"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_10_2","first-page":"5091","volume-title":"32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23)","author":"Balash David\u00a0G.","year":"2023","unstructured":"David\u00a0G. Balash, Elena Korkes, Miles Grant, Adam\u00a0J. Aviv, Rahel\u00a0A. Fainchtein, and Micah Sherr. 2023. Educators\u2019 Perspectives of Using (or Not Using) Online Exam Proctoring. In 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). USENIX Association, Anaheim, CA, 5091\u20135108. https:\/\/www.usenix.org\/conference\/usenixsecurity23\/presentation\/balash"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_11_2","unstructured":"Blackboard. [n. d.]. Blackboard Proctoring Services. Blackboard. https:\/\/help.blackboard.com\/Learn\/Instructor\/Ultra\/Tests_Pools_Surveys\/Proctoring_Services."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_12_2","unstructured":"Lydia Brown. 2020. How Automated Test Proctoring Software Discriminates Against Disabled Students. https:\/\/cdt.org\/insights\/how-automated-test-proctoring-software-discriminates-against-disabled-students\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_13_2","first-page":"77","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency","author":"Buolamwini Joy","year":"2018","unstructured":"Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 77\u201391. https:\/\/proceedings.mlr.press\/v81\/buolamwini18a.html ISSN: 2640-3498."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_14_2","first-page":"571","volume-title":"31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22)","author":"Burgess Ben","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ben Burgess, Avi Ginsberg, Edward\u00a0W. Felten, and Shaanan Cohney. 2022. Watching the watchers: bias and vulnerability in remote proctoring software. In 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22). USENIX Association, Boston, MA, 571\u2013588. https:\/\/www.usenix.org\/conference\/usenixsecurity22\/presentation\/burgess"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_15_2","unstructured":"Erin Carter. 2024. Attitudes When Taking Assessments Using Proctoring Software and Academic Honesty Between Students with Disabilities and General Population Students. Education Doctorate Dissertations (Sept. 2024). https:\/\/openriver.winona.edu\/educationedddissertations\/22"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3580777"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_17_2","first-page":"2023","volume-title":"USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS).","author":"Chaudhry Kazma","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kazma Chaudhry, Ashi Mann, Hala Assal, and Sonia Chiasson. 2022. \u201cI didn\u2019t even want to turn my head because I was so scared of the prof.\u201d: Student Perceptions of e-Proctoring Software. In USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS). , Vol.\u00a030. 2023."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3386527.3405925"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_19_2","first-page":"7282","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)","author":"Clark Elizabeth","year":"2021","unstructured":"Elizabeth Clark, Tal August, Sofia Serrano, Nikita Haduong, Suchin Gururangan, and Noah\u00a0A. Smith. 2021. All That\u2019s \u2018Human\u2019 Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Text. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 7282\u20137296. doi:10.18653\/v1\/2021.acl-long.565"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simon Coghlan Tim Miller and Jeannie Paterson. 2021. Good Proctor or \u201cBig Brother\u201d? Ethics of Online Exam Supervision Technologies. Philosophy & Technology 34 4 (Dec. 2021) 1581\u20131606. doi:10.1007\/s13347-021-00476-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-021-00476-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_21_2","first-page":"653","volume-title":"Seventeenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2021)","author":"Cohney Shaanan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shaanan Cohney, Ross Teixeira, Anne Kohlbrenner, Arvind Narayanan, Mihir Kshirsagar, Yan Shvartzshnaider, and Madelyn Sanfilippo. 2021. Virtual Classrooms and Real Harms: Remote Learning at U.S. Universities. In Seventeenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2021). USENIX Association, 653\u2013674. https:\/\/www.usenix.org\/conference\/soups2021\/presentation\/cohney"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_22_2","unstructured":"ConductExam. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Create share & analyze exams with the best online exam software. https:\/\/www.conductexam.com."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rianne Conijn Ad Kleingeld Uwe Matzat and Chris Snijders. 2022. The fear of big brother: The potential negative side-effects of proctored exams. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38 6 (2022) 1521\u20131534. doi:10.1111\/jcal.12651 arXiv:https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/jcal.12651","DOI":"10.1111\/jcal.12651"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee\u00a0William Daffin\u00a0Jr. and Ashley\u00a0Anne Jones. 2018. Comparing Student Performance on Proctored and Non-Proctored Exams in Online Psychology Courses. Online Learning 22 1 (March 2018). doi:10.24059\/olj.v22i1.1079","DOI":"10.24059\/olj.v22i1.1079"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seife Dendir and R.\u00a0Stockton Maxwell. 2020. Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 2 (2020) 100033. doi:10.1016\/j.chbr.2020.100033","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbr.2020.100033"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_26_2","unstructured":"Edusynch. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. EduSynch E-Proctoring uses AI & human invigilators to ensure exam integrity and prevent students from going down the path of academic dishonesty. https:\/\/edusynch.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_27_2","unstructured":"Examod. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Examod: Digital Exam & Assessment Platform. https:\/\/examod.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_28_2","unstructured":"ExamSoft. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. The World\u2019s Most Advanced Assessment Platform. https:\/\/examsoft.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_29_2","unstructured":"Google. [n. d.]. Google Chrome Web Store. https:\/\/chromewebstore.google.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_30_2","volume-title":"EDUCAUSE COVID-19 QuickPoll Results: Grading and Proctoring","author":"Grajek Susan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Susan Grajek. 2020. EDUCAUSE COVID-19 QuickPoll Results: Grading and Proctoring. EDUCAUSE Research Notes. Educause Review."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_31_2","unstructured":"Therese\u00a0C Grijalva Joe Kerkvliet and Clifford Nowell. 2006. Academic honesty and online courses. College Student Journal 40 1 (2006)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.6028\/NIST.IR.8280"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sandra Gudi\u00f1o\u00a0Paredes Felipe De\u00a0Jes\u00fas Jasso\u00a0Pe\u00f1a and Juana\u00a0Mar\u00eda De\u00a0La Fuente\u00a0Alcazar. 2021. Remote proctored exams: Integrity assurance in online education? Distance Education 42 2 (April 2021) 200\u2013218. doi:10.1080\/01587919.2021.1910495","DOI":"10.1080\/01587919.2021.1910495"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_34_2","unstructured":"Drew Harwell. 2020. Mass School Closures in the Wake of the Coronavirus are Driving a New Wave of Student Surveillance. The Washington Post. https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/technology\/2020\/04\/01\/online-proctoring-college-exams-coronavirus\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rakibul Hasan. 2023. Understanding EdTech\u2019s Privacy and Security Issues: Understanding the Perception and Awareness of Education Technologies\u2019 Privacy and Security Issues. Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. 2023 (2023) 269\u2013286. https:\/\/api.semanticscholar.org\/CorpusID:260528072","DOI":"10.56553\/popets-2023-0110"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kimberly\u00a0K. Hollister and Mark\u00a0L. Berenson. 2009. Proctored Versus Unproctored Online Exams: Studying the Impact of Exam Environment on Student Performance. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 7 1 (2009) 271\u2013294. doi:10.1111\/j.1540-4609.2008.00220.x arXiv:https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/j.1540-4609.2008.00220.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-4609.2008.00220.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_37_2","unstructured":"Amanda Holpuch and April Rubin. 2022. Remote Scan of Student\u2019s Room Before Test Violated His Privacy Judge Rules. The New York Times (Aug 2022). https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2022\/08\/25\/us\/remote-testing-student-home-scan-privacy.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_38_2","unstructured":"Honorlock. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Online Exam Proctoring with a Human Touch. https:\/\/honorlock.com."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_39_2","unstructured":"Shawn Hubler. 2020. Keeping Online Testing Honest? Or an Orwellian Overreach? The New York Times. https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/05\/10\/us\/online-testing-cheating-universities-coronavirus.html."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kenrie Hylton Yair Levy and Laurie\u00a0P. Dringus. 2016. Utilizing webcam-based proctoring to deter misconduct in online exams. Computers & Education 92-93 (2016) 53\u201363. doi:10.1016\/j.compedu.2015.10.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2015.10.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_41_2","unstructured":"IRIS Invigilation. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Assess with integrity. https:\/\/www.irisinvigilation.com."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_42_2","unstructured":"James Moffatt. [n. d.]. Zoom Statistics & Usage: Most Recent Stats Trends and Data. https:\/\/www.usebubbles.com\/blog\/zoom-statistics."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Michael\u00a0N Karim Samuel\u00a0E Kaminsky and Tara\u00a0S Behrend. 2014. Cheating reactions and performance in remotely proctored testing: An exploratory experimental study. Journal of Business and Psychology 29 (2014) 555\u2013572.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10869-014-9343-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_44_2","unstructured":"Mark Keierleber. 2024. Are your kids being spied on? The rise of anti-cheating software in US schools. The Guardian (April 2024). https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/education\/2024\/apr\/18\/us-schools-anti-cheating-software-proctorio"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_45_2","unstructured":"Jason Kelley. 2022. Schools and EdTech Need to Study Up On Student Privacy: 2022 in Review. https:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2022\/03\/stop-invasive-remote-proctoring-pass-californias-student-test-taker-privacy. Electronic Frontier Foundation (Dec 2022)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1572532.1572538"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3658644.3690353"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Faten\u00a0F Kharbat and Ajayeb S\u00a0Abu Daabes. 2021. E-proctored Exams During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Close Understanding. Education and Information Technologies (2021) 1\u201317.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-021-10458-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_49_2","unstructured":"Sean Lawson. 2020. Are Schools Forcing Students To Install Spyware That Invades Their Privacy As A Result Of The Coronavirus Lockdown? Forbes (April 2020). https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/seanlawson\/2020\/04\/24\/are-schools-forcing-students-to-install-spyware-that-invades-their-privacy-as-a-result-of-the-coronavirus-lockdown\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kyungmee Lee and Mik Fanguy. 2022. Online exam proctoring technologies: Educational innovation or deterioration? British Journal of Educational Technology 53 3 (2022) 475\u2013490. doi:10.1111\/bjet.13182_eprint: https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1111\/bjet.13182.","DOI":"10.1111\/bjet.13182"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Naresh\u00a0K. Malhotra Sung\u00a0S. Kim and James Agarwal. 2004. Internet users\u2019 information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct the scale and a causal model. Info. Sys. Research 15 4 (Dec. 2004) 336\u2013355.","DOI":"10.1287\/isre.1040.0032"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ninareh Mehrabi Fred Morstatter Nripsuta Saxena Kristina Lerman and Aram Galstyan. 2022. A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. Comput. Surveys 54 6 (July 2022) 1\u201335. doi:10.1145\/3457607","DOI":"10.1145\/3457607"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_53_2","unstructured":"Mercer Mettl. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Conduct Extremely Secure Scalable And Cost-Effective Online Proctored Exams With One Click. https:\/\/mettl.com."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anna\u00a0S. Milhone Angela\u00a0M. Cortese Rebecca\u00a0L. Balestrieri and Amy\u00a0L. Pittenger. 2017. The impact of proctored online exams on the educational experience. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 9 1 (2017) 108\u2013114. doi:10.1016\/j.cptl.2016.08.037","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cptl.2016.08.037"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_55_2","unstructured":"Hussein\u00a0Mahmood Mohammed and Qutaiba\u00a0Ibrahem Ali. 2022. E-Proctoring Systems: A Review on Designing Techinques Features and Ablities Agaisnt Threats and Attacks. Quantum Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 3 2 (July 2022) 14\u201330. https:\/\/www.qjoest.com\/index.php\/qjoest\/article\/view\/66 Number: 2."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3688459.3688474"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Philip Newton and Maira Xiromeriti. 2024. ChatGPT performance on multiple choice question examinations in higher education. A pragmatic scoping review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 49 6 (2024) 781\u2013798. doi:10.1080\/02602938.2023.2299059","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2023.2299059"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aditya Nigam Rhitvik Pasricha Tarishi Singh and Prathamesh Churi. 2021. A Systematic Review on AI-based Proctoring Systems: Past Present and Future. Education and Information Technologies 26 (09 2021). doi:10.1007\/s10639-021-10597-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-021-10597-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_59_2","unstructured":"Helen Nissenbaum. 2004. Privacy as Contextual Integrity. Washington Law Review 79 (2004)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_60_2","volume-title":"Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy","author":"O\u2019Neil Cathy","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cathy O\u2019Neil. 2017. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_61_2","first-page":"435","volume-title":"Twenty-First Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2025)","author":"Ortloff Anna-Marie","year":"2025","unstructured":"Anna-Marie Ortloff, Jenny Tang, Arthi Arumugam, Daniel Huschina, Lisa Geierhaas, Florin Martius, Luisa Jansen, Kolja von\u00a0der Twer, Lilly Jungbluth, and Matthew Smith. 2025. Replication:{ \u201cNo} one can hack my { mind\u201d} -10 years later: An update and outlook on { experts\u2019} and { non-experts\u2019} security practices and advice. In Twenty-First Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2025). 435\u2013454."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cliodhna O\u2019Connor and Helene Joffe. 2020. Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19 (2020) 1609406919899220. doi:10.1177\/1609406919899220","DOI":"10.1177\/1609406919899220"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smadar Patael Julia Shamir Tal Soffer Eynat Livne Haya Fogel-Grinvald and Liat Kishon-Rabin. 2022. Remote proctoring: Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic effect on the large scale on-line assessment at Tel Aviv University. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38 6 (2022) 1554\u20131573.","DOI":"10.1111\/jcal.12746"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_64_2","unstructured":"Anushka Patil and Jonah\u00a0Engel Bromwich. 2020. How It Feels When Software Watches You Take Tests. The New York Times. https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/09\/29\/style\/testing-schools-proctorio.html."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_65_2","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Eighteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2022)","author":"Pfeffer Katharina","year":"2022","unstructured":"Katharina Pfeffer, Alexandra Mai, Edgar Weippl, Emilee Rader, and Katharina Krombholz. 2022. Replication: Stories as informal lessons about security. In Eighteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2022). 1\u201318."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_66_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Annika Pokorny Cissy\u00a0J. Ballen Abby\u00a0Grace Drake Emily\u00a0P. Driessen Sheritta Fagbodun Brian Gibbens Jeremiah\u00a0A. Henning Sophie\u00a0J. McCoy Seth\u00a0K. Thompson Charles\u00a0G. Willis and A.\u00a0Kelly Lane. 2023. \u201cOut of my control\u201d: science undergraduates report mental health concerns and inconsistent conditions when using remote proctoring software. International Journal for Educational Integrity 19 1 (Nov. 2023) 22. doi:10.1007\/s40979-023-00141-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s40979-023-00141-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_67_2","unstructured":"ProctorExam. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Online Proctoring Services. https:\/\/proctorexam.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_68_2","unstructured":"Proctorio. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. A Comprehensive Learning Integrity Platform. https:\/\/proctorio.com."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_69_2","unstructured":"Proctortrack. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Proctortrack leverages advanced ID verification Live Proctoring Automated Proctoring In-Classroom Exam Security and Proctor Do-It-Yourself Live solutions to deliver innovation quality and price leadership at scale. https:\/\/proctortrack.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_70_2","unstructured":"ProctorU. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Online Proctoring to Advance your Learning and Testing Program. https:\/\/www.proctoru.com."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_71_2","unstructured":"Prolific. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Prolific. https:\/\/www.prolific.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_72_2","unstructured":"Proview. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Enhanced Exam Security with Our AI-Powered Online Proctoring Software. https:\/\/www.proview.io\/en."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_73_2","unstructured":"PSI Online. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Where People Meet Potential. https:\/\/www.psionline.com."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_74_2","unstructured":"Respondus. Last Accessed 2026\/01\/29 12:32:18. Assessment Tools for Learning Systems. https:\/\/web.respondus.com."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_75_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joseph\u00a0A. Rios and Ou\u00a0Lydia Liu. 2017. Online Proctored Versus Unproctored Low-Stakes Internet Test Administration: Is There Differential Test-Taking Behavior and Performance? American Journal of Distance Education (Feb. 2017) 1\u201314. doi:10.1080\/08923647.2017.1258628","DOI":"10.1080\/08923647.2017.1258628"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_76_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445293"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_77_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3287560.3287598"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_78_2","volume-title":"Online Exam Proctoring Services: Students\u2019 Perceptions of Privacy and Equity","author":"Serhan Derar","year":"2023","unstructured":"Derar Serhan and Natalie Welcome. 2023. Online Exam Proctoring Services: Students\u2019 Perceptions of Privacy and Equity. Technical Report. International Society for Technology, Education, and Science. https:\/\/eric.ed.gov\/?id=ED656117"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_79_2","first-page":"18","volume-title":"2025 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","author":"Shioji Elisa","year":"2024","unstructured":"Elisa Shioji, Ani Meliksetyan, Lucy Simko, Ryan Watkins, Adam Aviv, and Shaanan Cohney. 2024. \u201cIt\u2019s been lovely watching you\u201d: Institutional Decision-Making on Online Proctoring Software. In 2025 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE Computer Society, 18\u201318."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_80_2","volume-title":"ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS)","author":"Simko Lucy","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lucy Simko, Adryana Hutchinson, Alvin Isaac, Evan Fries, Micah Sherr, and Adam\u00a0J Aviv. 2024. \u201cModern Problems Require Modern Solutions\u201d: Community-Developed Techniques for Online Exam Proctoring Evasion. In ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_81_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316850350"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_82_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ludwig Slusky. 2020. Cybersecurity of Online Proctoring Systems. Journal of International Technology and Information Management 29 1 (Jan. 2020) 56\u201383. doi:10.58729\/1941-6679.1445","DOI":"10.58729\/1941-6679.1445"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_83_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Teo Susnjak and Timothy\u00a0R. McIntosh. 2024. ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? Education Sciences 14 6 (2024). doi:10.3390\/educsci14060656","DOI":"10.3390\/educsci14060656"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_84_2","unstructured":"Shea Swauger. 2020. Software that Monitors Students During Tests Perpetuates Inequality and Violates their Privacy. MIT Technology Review (August 2020)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_85_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581181"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_86_2","first-page":"798","volume-title":"Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference","author":"Watson George","year":"2008","unstructured":"George Watson and James Sottile. 2008. Cheating in the Digital Age: Do students cheat more in on-line courses?. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 798\u2013803."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_87_2","unstructured":"James Welsh. 2025. Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College. ChatGPT has unraveled the entire academic project. New York Magazine (May 2025). https:\/\/nymag.com\/intelligencer\/article\/openai-chatgpt-ai-cheating-education-college-students-school.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_88_2","unstructured":"Meredith Whittaker Meryl Alper Cynthia\u00a0L Bennett Sara Hendren Liz Kaziunas Mara Mills Meredith\u00a0Ringel Morris Joy Rankin Emily Rogers Marcel Salas et\u00a0al. 2019. Disability bias and AI. AI Now Institute 8 (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_89_2","unstructured":"Daniel Woldeab and Thomas Brothen. 2019. 21st Century assessment: Online proctoring test anxiety and student performance. International Journal of E-Learning &; Distance Education 34 1 (Aug. 2019). https:\/\/www.ijede.ca\/index.php\/jde\/article\/view\/1106"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_90_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3394231.3397900"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_91_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3593013.3594119"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_92_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rattaphon Wuthisatian. 2020. Student exam performance in different proctored environments: Evidence from an online economics course. International Review of Economics Education 35 (2020) 100196.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.iree.2020.100196"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_93_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3689943.3695050"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_94_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deborah\u00a0R. Yoder-Himes Alina Asif Kaelin Kinney Tiffany\u00a0J. Brandt Rhiannon\u00a0E. Cecil Paul\u00a0R. Himes Cara Cashon Rachel M.\u00a0P. Hopp and Edna Ross. 2022. Racial skin tone and sex disparities in automated proctoring software. Frontiers in Education 7 (Sept. 2022). doi:10.3389\/feduc.2022.881449Publisher: Frontiers.","DOI":"10.3389\/feduc.2022.881449"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_95_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li Zhao Junjie Peng Shiqi Ke and Kang Lee. 2024. Effectiveness of Unproctored vs. Teacher-Proctored Exams in Reducing Students\u2019 Cheating: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Field Experimental Study. Educational Psychology Review 36 4 (Dec. 2024) 126. doi:10.1007\/s10648-024-09965-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s10648-024-09965-z"}],"event":{"name":"CHI 2026: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","location":"Barcelona Spain","acronym":"CHI '26","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3772318.3790794","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3772318.3790794","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,15]],"date-time":"2026-04-15T10:45:26Z","timestamp":1776249926000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3772318.3790794"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"references-count":94,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3772318.3790794","10.1145\/3772318"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3772318.3790794","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-13","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}