{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,23]],"date-time":"2026-04-23T07:57:14Z","timestamp":1776931034976,"version":"3.51.2"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":57,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2027,4,13]],"date-time":"2027-04-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1807574400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":365,"URL":"http:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000001","name":"NSF (National Science Foundation)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["2428149"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2428149"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000001","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3772318.3790969","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T04:12:21Z","timestamp":1776053541000},"page":"1-19","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Examining Interpretation Strategies for Multiple Forecast Visualizations with Two and Four Forecasts"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9251-5279","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lace M.","family":"Padilla","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Khoury College of Computer Science, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0705-9000","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Racquel","family":"Fygenson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Khoury College of Computer Science, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6936-4078","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Connor","family":"Wilson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Khoury College Data Visualization, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0916-0660","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kristi","family":"Potter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1394-0184","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Spencer C.","family":"Castro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Management of Complex Systems\/Engineering, University of California Merced, Merced, California, USA"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","volume-title":"The R packagesn: The skew-normal and related distributions such as the skew-t and the SUN (version 2.1.1).","author":"Azzalini Azzalini\u00a0A.","year":"2023","unstructured":"Azzalini\u00a0A. Azzalini. 2023. The R packagesn: The skew-normal and related distributions such as the skew-t and the SUN (version 2.1.1). Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Padova, Italia. https:\/\/cran.r-project.org\/package=sn Home page: http:\/\/azzalini.stat.unipd.it\/SN\/."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M Bacharach. 1979. Normal Bayesian dialogues. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74 (1979) 837\u2013846.","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1979.10481039"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sarah Belia Fiona Fidler Jennifer Williams and Geoff Cumming. 2005. Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. Psychological methods 10 4 (2005) 389.","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.10.4.389"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alexander\u00a0P Boone Peri Gunalp and Mary Hegarty. 2018. Explicit versus actionable knowledge: The influence of explaining graphical conventions on interpretation of hurricane forecast visualizations. Journal of experimental psychology: applied 24 3 (2018) 275.","DOI":"10.1037\/xap0000166"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","volume-title":"Designing better maps: A guide for GIS users","author":"Brewer Cynthia\u00a0A.","year":"2006","unstructured":"Cynthia\u00a0A. Brewer and ESRI Press. 2006. Designing better maps: A guide for GIS users. Taylor & Francis, Redlands, California."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"David\u00a0V Budescu and Adrian\u00a0K Rantilla. 2000. Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions. Acta psychologica 104 3 (2000) 371\u2013398.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0001-6918(00)00037-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Paul-Christian B\u00fcrkner. 2017. brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software 80 1 (2017) 1\u201328. 10.18637\/jss.v080.i01","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v080.i01"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Spencer\u00a0C Castro P\u00a0Samuel Quinan Helia Hosseinpour and Lace Padilla. 2021. Examining effort in 1D uncertainty communication using individual differences in working memory and NASA-TLX. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28 1 (2021) 411\u2013421.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2021.3114803"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Robert\u00a0T Clemen and Robert\u00a0L Winkler. 1999. Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk analysis 19 (1999) 187\u2013203.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00399.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203771587"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Michael Correll and Michael Gleicher. 2014. Error bars considered harmful: Exploring alternate encodings for mean and error. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20 12 (2014) 2142\u20132151.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2014.2346298"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stephanie Deitrick and Elizabeth\u00a0A Wentz. 2015. Developing implicit uncertainty visualization methods motivated by theories in decision science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 3 (2015) 531\u2013551.","DOI":"10.1080\/00045608.2015.1012635"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ward Edwards Ralph\u00a0F Miles and Detlof Von\u00a0Winterfeldt. 2007. Advances in decision analysis. Cambridge New York 1 1 (2007) 1\u2013638.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511611308.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3173574.3173718"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Racquel Fygenson Lace Padilla and Enrico Bertini. 2025. Cognitive Affordances in Visualization: Related Constructs Design Factors and Framework. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 31 1 (2025) 10624 \u2013 10639.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2025.3610803"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paul\u00a0H Garthwaite Joseph\u00a0B Kadane and Anthony O\u2019Hagan. 2005. Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. Journal of the American statistical Association 100 470 (2005) 680\u2013701.","DOI":"10.1198\/016214505000000105"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3173574.3174079"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Margaret Grounds Susan Joslyn and Kyoko Otsuka. 2017. Probabilistic Interval Forecasts: An Individual Differences Approach to Understanding Forecast Communication. Advances in Meteorology 2017 (09 2017) 1\u201318. 10.1155\/2017\/3932565","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/3932565"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376454"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jessica Hullman Alex Kale and Jason Hartline. 2025. Underspecified Human Decision Experiments Considered Harmful. ACM CHI 254 1 (2025) 1\u201315.","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3714063"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jessica Hullman Matthew Kay Yea-Seul Kim and Samana Shrestha. 2017. Imagining replications: Graphical prediction & discrete visualizations improve recall & estimation of effect uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24 1 (2017) 446\u2013456.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2017.2743898"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jessica Hullman Paul Resnick and Eytan Adar. 2015. Hypothetical outcome plots outperform error bars and violin plots for inferences about reliability of variable ordering. PLOS One 10 11 (2015) e0142444.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0142444"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nicole Jardine Brian\u00a0D Ondov Niklas Elmqvist and Steven Franconeri. 2019. The perceptual proxies of visual comparison. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 26 1 (2019) 1012\u20131021.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2019.2934786"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Susan Joslyn Lou Nemec and Sonia Savelli. 2013. The benefits and challenges of predictive interval forecasts and verification graphics for end users. Weather Climate and Society 5 2 (2013) 133\u2013147.","DOI":"10.1175\/WCAS-D-12-00007.1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Susan Joslyn and Sonia Savelli. 2021. Visualizing Uncertainty for Non-Expert End Users: The Challenge of the Deterministic Construal Error. Frontiers in Computer Science 2 (2021) 58. 10.3389\/fcomp.2020.590232","DOI":"10.3389\/fcomp.2020.590232"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alex Kale Matthew Kay and Jessica Hullman. 2020. Visual Reasoning Strategies for Effect Size Judgments and Decisions. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics PP (10 2020) 1\u20131. 10.1109\/TVCG.2020.3030335","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2020.3030335"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alex Kale Francis Nguyen Matthew Kay and Jessica Hullman. 2018. Hypothetical outcome plots help untrained observers judge trends in ambiguous data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25 1 (2018) 892\u2013902.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2018.2864909"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.1308151"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.3879620"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2858036.2858558"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"John\u00a0K Kruschke. 2021. Bayesian analysis reporting guidelines. Nature human behaviour 5 10 (2021) 1282\u20131291.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-021-01177-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TREX53765.2021.00009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Le Liu Alexander\u00a0P Boone Ian\u00a0T Ruginski Lace Padilla Mary Hegarty Sarah\u00a0H Creem-Regehr William\u00a0B Thompson Cem Yuksel and Donald\u00a0H House. 2016. Uncertainty visualization by representative sampling from prediction ensembles. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23 9 (2016) 2165\u20132178.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2016.2607204"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Le Liu Lace Padilla Sarah\u00a0H Creem-Regehr and Donald\u00a0H House. 2018. Visualizing uncertain tropical cyclone predictions using representative samples from ensembles of forecast tracks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25 1 (2018) 882\u2013891.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2018.2865193"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grant McKenzie Mary Hegarty Trevor Barrett and Michael Goodchild. 2016. Assessing the effectiveness of different visualizations for judgments of positional uncertainty. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 30 2 (2016) 221\u2013239.","DOI":"10.1080\/13658816.2015.1082566"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eric Newburger Michael Correll and Niklas Elmqvist. 2022. Fitting bell curves to data distributions using visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29 12 (2022) 5372\u20135383.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2022.3210763"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A O\u2019hagan and Tom Leonard. 1976. Bayes estimation subject to uncertainty about parameter constraints. Biometrika 63 1 (1976) 201\u2013203.","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/63.1.201"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yasmina Okan Eva Janssen Mirta Galesic and Erika\u00a0A Waters. 2019. Using the short graph literacy scale to predict precursors of health behavior change. Medical Decision Making 39 3 (2019) 183\u2013195.","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X19829728"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brian\u00a0D Ondov Fumeng Yang Matthew Kay Niklas Elmqvist and Steven Franconeri. 2020. Revealing perceptual proxies with adversarial examples. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 27 2 (2020) 1073\u20131083.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2020.3030429"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lace Padilla Racquel Fygenson Spencer\u00a0C Castro and Enrico Bertini. 2022. Multiple forecast visualizations (mfvs): Trade-offs in trust and performance in multiple covid-19 forecast visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29 1 (2022) 12\u201322.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2022.3209457"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lace Padilla Helia Hosseinpour Racquel Fygenson Jennifer Howell Rumi Chunara and Enrico Bertini. 2022. Impact of COVID-19 forecast visualizations on pandemic risk perceptions. Scientific reports 12 1 (2022) 1\u201314.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-05353-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118445112.stat08296"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lace Padilla P\u00a0Samuel Quinan Miriah Meyer and Sarah\u00a0H Creem-Regehr. 2017. Evaluating the impact of binning 2d scalar fields. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 23 1 (2017) 431\u2013440.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2016.2599106"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lace\u00a0M Padilla Ian\u00a0T Ruginski and Sarah\u00a0H Creem-Regehr. 2017. Effects of ensemble and summary displays on interpretations of geospatial uncertainty data. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2 1 (2017) 1\u201316.","DOI":"10.1186\/s41235-017-0076-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_46_2","volume-title":"R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing","author":"Team R Core","year":"2023","unstructured":"R Core Team. 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https:\/\/www.R-project.org\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Luke\u00a0F Rinne and Mich\u00e8le\u00a0MM Mazzocco. 2013. Inferring uncertainty from interval estimates: Effects of alpha level and numeracy. Judgment and Decision Making 8 3 (2013) 330.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500006008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ian\u00a0T Ruginski Alexander\u00a0P Boone Lace\u00a0M Padilla Le Liu Nahal Heydari Heidi\u00a0S Kramer Mary Hegarty William\u00a0B Thompson Donald\u00a0H House and Sarah\u00a0H Creem-Regehr. 2016. Non-expert interpretations of hurricane forecast uncertainty visualizations. Spatial Cognition & Computation 16 2 (2016) 154\u2013172.","DOI":"10.1080\/13875868.2015.1137577"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713725"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrew Speirs-Bridge Fiona Fidler Marissa McBride Louisa Flander Geoff Cumming and Mark Burgman. 2010. Reducing overconfidence in the interval judgments of experts. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 30 3 (2010) 512\u2013523.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1539-6924.2009.01337.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M Stone. 1961. The opinion pool. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32 (1961) 1339\u20131342.","DOI":"10.1214\/aoms\/1177704873"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xiaoqian Wang Rob\u00a0J Hyndman Feng Li and Yanfei Kang. 2023. Forecast combinations: An over 50-year review. International Journal of Forecasting 39 4 (2023) 1518\u20131547.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijforecast.2022.11.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-24277-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hadley Wickham Mara Averick Jennifer Bryan Winston Chang Lucy\u00a0D\u2019Agostino McGowan Romain Fran\u00e7ois Garrett Grolemund Alex Hayes Lionel Henry Jim Hester Max Kuhn Thomas\u00a0Lin Pedersen Evan Miller Stephan\u00a0Milton Bache Kirill M\u00fcller Jeroen Ooms David Robinson Dana\u00a0Paige Seidel Vitalie Spinu Kohske Takahashi Davis Vaughan Claus Wilke Kara Woo and Hiroaki Yutani. 2019. Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 4 43 (2019) 1686. 10.21105\/joss.01686","DOI":"10.21105\/joss.01686"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fumeng Yang Mandi Cai Chloe Mortenson Hoda Fakhari Ayse\u00a0D Lokmanoglu Jessica Hullman Steven Franconeri Nicholas Diakopoulos Erik\u00a0C Nisbet and Matthew Kay. 2023. Swaying the Public? Impacts of Election Forecast Visualizations on Emotion Trust and Intention in the 2022 US Midterms. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1 1 (2023) 23\u201333.","DOI":"10.1109\/TVCG.2023.3327356"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lei Yuan Steve Haroz and Steven Franconeri. 2019. Perceptual proxies for extracting averages in data visualizations. Psychonomic bulletin & review 26 (2019) 669\u2013676.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-018-1525-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maximilian Zellner Ali\u00a0E Abbas David\u00a0V Budescu and Aram Galstyan. 2021. A survey of human judgement and quantitative forecasting methods. Royal Society open science 8 2 (2021) 201187.","DOI":"10.1098\/rsos.201187"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445381"}],"event":{"name":"CHI 2026: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","location":"Barcelona Spain","acronym":"CHI '26","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3772318.3790969","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3772318.3790969","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T05:53:44Z","timestamp":1776059624000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3772318.3790969"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"references-count":57,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3772318.3790969","10.1145\/3772318"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3772318.3790969","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-13","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}