{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T19:40:59Z","timestamp":1793389259809,"version":"4.5.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":88,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3772318.3791185","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T06:44:11Z","timestamp":1776062651000},"page":"1-28","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Partnering with Generative AI: Experimental Evaluation of Model-Led and Human-Led Interaction in Human-AI Co-Creation"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-6526-3403","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sebastian","family":"Maier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"LMU Munich, Munich, Germany and Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Munich, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-4126-1586","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Manuel","family":"Schneider","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Innovation and Entrepreneurship Center, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7856-8729","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stefan","family":"Feuerriegel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"LMU Munich, Munich, Germany and Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Munich, Germany"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2023.bea-1.57"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Teresa\u00a0M Amabile. 1982. Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of personality and social psychology 43 5 (1982) 997.","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.43.5.997"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613905.3651088"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3635636.3656204"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"John Baer. 2015. The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review 37 3 (July 2015) 165\u2013178. 10.1080\/02783193.2015.1047480","DOI":"10.1080\/02783193.2015.1047480"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hamsa Bastani Osbert Bastani Alp Sungu Haosen Ge \u00d6zge Kabakc\u0131 and Rei Mariman. 2025. Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: evidence from high school mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 26 (2025) e2422633122. 10.1073\/pnas.2422633122","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2422633122"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roger\u00a0E Beaty and Dan\u00a0R Johnson. 2021. Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance. Behavior research methods 53 2 (2021) 757\u2013780. Publisher: Springer.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-020-01453-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Justin Berg and Alisa Yu. 2021. Getting the picture too late: handoffs and the effectiveness of idea implementation in creative work. Academy of Management Journal 64 4 (2021) 1191\u20131212. 10.5465\/amj.2019.1330","DOI":"10.5465\/amj.2019.1330"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642731"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Domenic Cicchetti. 1994. Guidelines criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment 6 4 (1994) 284\u2013290. 10.1037\/1040-3590.6.4.284","DOI":"10.1037\/1040-3590.6.4.284"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203771587"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Katherine\u00a0M Collins Ilia Sucholutsky Umang Bhatt Kartik Chandra Lionel Wong Mina Lee Cedegao\u00a0E Zhang Tan Zhi-Xuan Mark Ho Vikash Mansinghka and others. 2024. Building machines that learn and think with people. Nature human behaviour 8 10 (2024) 1851\u20131863. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group UK London.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-024-01991-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nathan Crilly. 2019. Creativity and fixation in the real world: a literature review of case study research. Design Studies 64 (2019) 154\u2013168. 10.1016\/j.destud.2019.07.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.destud.2019.07.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Darren\u00a0W Dahl and Page Moreau. 2002. The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research 39 1 (2002) 47\u201360.","DOI":"10.1509\/jmkr.39.1.47.18930"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3580969"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Michael Diehl and Wolfgang Stroebe. 1987. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 3 (1987) 497\u2013509.","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.53.3.497"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3591196.3593516"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anil Doshi and Oliver Hauser. 2024. Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances 10 28 (2024). 10.1126\/sciadv.adn5290","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.adn5290"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fiona Draxler Anna Werner Florian Lehmann Matthias Hoppe Albrecht Schmidt Daniel Buschek and Robin Welsch. 2024. The AI ghostwriter effect: when users do not perceive ownership of AI-generated text but self-declare as authors. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 31 2 (2024) Article 25. 10.1145\/3637875","DOI":"10.1145\/3637875"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Denis Dumas Peter Organisciak and Michael Doherty. 2021. Measuring divergent thinking originality with human raters and text-mining models: A psychometric comparison of methods. Psychology of aesthetics creativity and the arts 15 4 (2021) 645. Publisher: Educational Publishing Foundation.","DOI":"10.1037\/aca0000319"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_22_2","unstructured":"Thomas\u00a0F. Eisenmann Andres Karjus Mar\u00a0Canet Sola Levin Brinkmann Bramantyo\u00a0Ibrahim Supriyatno and Iyad Rahwan. 2025. Expertise elevates AI usage: experimental evidence comparing laypeople and professional artists. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2501.12374 _eprint: 2501.12374."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohamed Ez-Zaouia and Rubiela Carrillo. 2024. The group folding effect: the role of collaborative process structuring and social interaction in group work. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 31 31 2 (2024). 10.1145\/3622783","DOI":"10.1145\/3622783"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stefan Feuerriegel Jochen Hartmann Christian Janiesch and Patrick Zschech. 2024. Generative ai. Business & Information Systems Engineering 66 1 (2024) 111\u2013126. Publisher: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/s12599-023-00834-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stefan Feuerriegel Abdurahman Maarouf Dominik B\u00e4r Dominique Geissler Jonas Schweisthal Nicolas Pr\u00f6llochs Claire\u00a0E Robertson Steve Rathje Jochen Hartmann Saif\u00a0M Mohammad and others. 2025. Using natural language processing to analyse text data in behavioural science. Nature Reviews Psychology 4 2 (2025) 96\u2013111.","DOI":"10.1038\/s44159-024-00392-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300619"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/642611.642653"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3173574.3173695"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Karan Girotra Lennart Meincke Christian Terwiesch and Karl\u00a0T. Ulrich. 2023. Ideas are Dimes a Dozen: Large Language Models for Idea Generation in Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal (2023). 10.2139\/ssrn.4526071","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4526071"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3715336.3735785"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steven\u00a0M Gray Andrew\u00a0P Knight and Markus Baer. 2020. On the emergence of collective psychological ownership in new creative teams. Organization Science 31 1 (2020) 141\u2013164.","DOI":"10.1287\/orsc.2019.1307"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_32_2","unstructured":"Joy\u00a0Paul Guilford. 1967. The nature of human intelligence. (1967). Publisher: McGraw-Hill."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sandra\u00a0G. Hart. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50 9 (2006) 904\u2013908. 10.1177\/154193120605000909","DOI":"10.1177\/154193120605000909"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_34_2","unstructured":"Sture Holm. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 2 (1979) 65\u201370. http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/4615733"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_35_2","unstructured":"Niklas Holzner Sebastian Maier and Stefan Feuerriegel. 2025. Generative AI and creativity: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2505.17241"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hsiu-Fang Hsieh and Sarah\u00a0E Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research 15 9 (2005) 1277\u20131288.","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732305276687"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kent Hubert Kim Awa and Darya Zabelina. 2024. The current state of artificial intelligence generative language models is more creative than humans on divergent thinking tasks. Scientific Reports 14 1 (2024) 3440. 10.1038\/s41598-024-53303-w","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-53303-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Isa Inuwa-Dutse Alice Toniolo Adrian Weller and Umang Bhatt. 2023. Algorithmic loafing and mitigation strategies in human-AI teams. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 1 2 (2023). 10.1016\/j.chbah.2023.100024","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbah.2023.100024"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nan Jia Xueming Luo Zheng Fang and Chengcheng Liao. 2024. When and How Artificial Intelligence Augments Employee Creativity. Academy of Management Journal 67 1 (Feb. 2024) 5\u201332. 10.5465\/amj.2022.0426","DOI":"10.5465\/amj.2022.0426"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3719160.3736608"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642650"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steven Karau and Kipling Williams. 1993. Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 4 (1993) 681\u2013701.","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.65.4.681"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316979839"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713818"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nicholas\u00a0W Kohn and Steven\u00a0M Smith. 2011. Collaborative fixation: effects of others\u2019 ideas on brainstorming. Applied Cognitive Psychology 25 3 (2011) 359\u2013371.","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.1699"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mika Koivisto and Simone Grassini. 2023. Best humans still outperform artificial intelligence in a creative divergent thinking task. Scientific Reports 13 1 (2023) 13601. 10.1038\/s41598-023-40858-3","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-40858-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Laura\u00a0J. Kornish and Karl\u00a0T. Ulrich. 2014. The Importance of the Raw Idea in Innovation: Testing the Sow\u2019s Ear Hypothesis. Journal of Marketing Research 51 1 (Feb. 2014) 14\u201326. 10.1509\/jmr.12.0401Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.","DOI":"10.1509\/jmr.12.0401"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713750"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3714198"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bibb Latan\u00e9 Kipling Williams and Stephen Harkins. 1979. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 6 (1979) 822\u2013832.","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.37.6.822"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3563657.3595977"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Byung\u00a0Cheol Lee and Jaeyeon Chung. 2024. An empirical investigation of the impact of ChatGPT on creativity. Nature Human Behaviour 8 10 (Aug. 2024) 1906\u20131914. 10.1038\/s41562-024-01953-1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-024-01953-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713778"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_54_2","unstructured":"Russell Lenth. 2025. emmeans: estimated marginal means aka least-squares means. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=emmeans"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642625"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen-Ju Lin and Ci-Rong Li. 2022. Differential effects of team level expertise diversity and individual level expertise dissimilarity on creativity: the moderating role of member social skills and leader social behavior. Current Psychology 41 5 (2022) 2927\u20132937. Publisher: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/s12144-020-00813-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Steven Maier and Martin Seligman. 1976. Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 105 1 (1976) 3\u201346. 10.1037\/0096-3445.105.1.3","DOI":"10.1037\/0096-3445.105.1.3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jack McGuire David De\u00a0Cremer and Tim Van De\u00a0Cruys. 2024. Establishing the importance of co-creation and self-efficacy in creative collaboration with artificial intelligence. Scientific Reports 14 1 (2024) 18525. 10.1038\/s41598-024-69423-2","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-69423-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Peidong Mei Deborah\u00a0N. Brewis Fortune Nwaiwu Deshan Sumanathilaka Fernando Alva-Manchego and Joanna Demaree-Cotton. 2025. If ChatGPT can do it where is my creativity? {Generative} AI boosts performance but diminishes experience in creative writing. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 4 (2025) 100140. 10.1016\/j.chbah.2025.100140","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbah.2025.100140"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_60_2","unstructured":"Lennart Meincke Karan Girotra Gideon Nave Christian Terwiesch and Karl\u00a0T Ulrich. 2024. Using large language models for idea generation in innovation. SSRN working paper 9 (2024) 2024."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lennart Meincke Ethan\u00a0R Mollick and Christian Terwiesch. 2024. Prompting Diverse Ideas: Increasing AI Idea Variance. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2402.01727 (Jan. 2024).","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4708466"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lennart Meincke Gideon Nave and Christian Terwiesch. 2025. ChatGPT decreases idea diversity in brainstorming. Nature Human Behaviour 9 6 (2025) 1107\u20131109. 10.1038\/s41562-025-02173-x","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-025-02173-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581225"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_64_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ryosuke Nakadai Yo Nakawake and Shota Shibasaki. 2023. AI language tools risk scientific diversity and innovation. Nature Human Behaviour 7 11 (2023) 1804\u20131805. 10.1038\/s41562-023-01652-3","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-023-01652-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_65_2","unstructured":"OpenAI. 2024. GPT-4.1 prompting guide. https:\/\/cookbook.openai.com\/examples\/gpt4-1_prompting_guide"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_66_2","first-page":"35","volume-title":"Handbook of creativity.","author":"Plucker Jonathan","year":"1999","unstructured":"Jonathan Plucker and Joseph Renzulli. 1999. Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In Handbook of creativity., Robert Sternberg (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US, 35\u201361."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_67_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713146"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_68_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Janet Rafner Roger\u00a0E. Beaty James\u00a0C. Kaufman Todd Lubart and Jacob Sherson. 2023. Creativity in the age of generative AI. Nature Human Behaviour 7 11 (2023) 1836\u20131838. 10.1038\/s41562-023-01751-1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-023-01751-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_69_2","unstructured":"Mitchel Resnick Brad Myers Kumiyo Nakakoji Ben Shneiderman Randy Pausch Ted Selker and Mike Eisenberg. 2005. Design principles for tools to support creative thinking. (2005). Publisher: Carnegie Mellon University."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_70_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jeba Rezwana and Mary\u00a0Lou Maher. 2023. Designing creative AI partners with COFI: a framework for modeling interaction in human-AI co-creative systems. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 30 5 (2023). 10.1145\/3519026","DOI":"10.1145\/3519026"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_71_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mark\u00a0A Runco Jody\u00a0J Illies and Russell Eisenman. 2005. Creativity originality and appropriateness: what do explicit instructions tell us about their relationships? The Journal of Creative Behavior 39 2 (2005) 137\u2013148. 10.1002\/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01255.x","DOI":"10.1002\/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01255.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_72_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316979839.028"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_73_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Julian Senoner Simon Schallmoser Bernhard Kratzwald Stefan Feuerriegel and Torbj\u00f8rn Netland. 2024. Explainable AI improves task performance in human\u2013AI collaboration. Scientific Reports 14 1 (2024) 31150.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-82501-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_74_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642414"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_75_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ben Shneiderman. 2002. Creativity support tools. Commun. ACM 45 10 (2002) 116\u2013120.","DOI":"10.1145\/570907.570945"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_76_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ut\u00a0Na Sio Kenneth Kotovsky and Jonathan Cagan. 2015. Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies 39 (2015) 70\u201399. 10.1016\/j.destud.2015.04.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.destud.2015.04.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_77_2","unstructured":"Keith Stenning Alexander Schmoelz Heather Wren Elias Stouraitis Theodore Scaltsas Konstantinos Alexopoulos and Amelie Aichhorn. 2016. Socratic dialogue as a teaching and research method for co-creativity? Digital Culture and Education 8 2 (2016) 154\u2013168."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_78_2","first-page":"3","volume-title":"Handbook of creativity.","author":"Sternberg Robert","year":"1999","unstructured":"Robert Sternberg and Lubart Todd. 1999. The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In Handbook of creativity.Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 3\u201315."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_79_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642902"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_80_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pamela Tierney and Steven Farmer. 2002. Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance. Academy of Management Journal 45 6 (Dec. 2002) 1137\u20131148. 10.2307\/3069429","DOI":"10.2307\/3069429"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_81_2","volume-title":"Torrance tests of creative thinking","author":"Torrance Ellis","year":"1966","unstructured":"Ellis Torrance. 1966. Torrance tests of creative thinking. Personnel Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_82_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Michelle Vaccaro Abdullah Almaatouq and Thomas Malone. 2024. When combinations of humans and AI are useful: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Human Behaviour 8 12 (2024) 2293\u20132303.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-024-02024-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_83_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Linn Van\u00a0Dyne and Jon\u00a0L. Pierce. 2004. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior 25 4 (2004) 439\u2013459. 10.1002\/job.249","DOI":"10.1002\/job.249"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_84_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Viswanath Venkatesh James Thong and Xin Xu. 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly 36 1 (2012) 157\u2013178. 10.2307\/41410412","DOI":"10.2307\/41410412"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_85_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642919"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_86_2","volume-title":"The art of thought","author":"Wallas Graham","year":"1926","unstructured":"Graham Wallas. 1926. The art of thought. Harcourt, Brace."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_87_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376781"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_88_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3670947.3670974"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_89_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642812"}],"event":{"name":"CHI 2026: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","location":"Barcelona Spain","acronym":"CHI '26","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3772318.3791185","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T08:19:07Z","timestamp":1776068347000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3772318.3791185"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"references-count":88,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3772318.3791185","10.1145\/3772318"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3772318.3791185","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-13","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}