{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,23]],"date-time":"2026-04-23T08:00:19Z","timestamp":1776931219637,"version":"3.51.2"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":117,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3772318.3791431","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T05:37:48Z","timestamp":1776058668000},"page":"1-19","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["What Happens When Reviewers Receive AI Feedback in Their Reviews?"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9477-2420","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Shiping","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1820-6424","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Shu","family":"Zhong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2846-2592","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Duncan P","family":"Brumby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2231-2964","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anna L","family":"Cox","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2_2","unstructured":". 2018. Recent Changes to the CHI Submission and Review Process. https:\/\/chi2019.acm.org\/authors\/papers\/papers-review-process\/recent-changes-to-the-chi-submission-and-review-process\/ [Online; accessed 2025-11-02]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_3_2","unstructured":". 2021. Moving to a Revise and Resubmit Review Process for CHI 2022. https:\/\/chi2022.acm.org\/2021\/05\/26\/moving-to-a-revise-and-resubmit-review-process-for-chi-2022\/ [Online; accessed 2025-11-23]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_4_2","unstructured":"2023. ICLR Statistics - Paper Copilot. https:\/\/papercopilot.com\/statistics\/iclr-statistics\/ [Online; accessed 2025-12-02]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_5_2","unstructured":"AAAI. 2025. AAAI Launches AI-Powered Peer Review Assessment System: Overview of the AI Review System. https:\/\/aaai.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/FAQ-for-the-AI-Assisted-Peer-Review-Process-Pilot-Program.pdf [Online; accessed 2025-11-11]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Balazs Aczel Ann-Sophie Barwich Amanda\u00a0B Diekman Ayelet Fishbach Robert\u00a0L Goldstone Pablo Gomez Odd\u00a0Erik Gundersen Paul\u00a0T von Hippel Alex\u00a0O Holcombe Stephan Lewandowsky et\u00a0al. 2025. The present and future of peer review: Ideas interventions and evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 5 (2025) e2401232121. 10.1073\/pnas.2401232121","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2401232121"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haris Aziz Evi Micha and Nisarg Shah. 2023. Group Fairness in Peer Review. 36 (2023) 64885\u201364895. https:\/\/proceedings.neurips.cc\/paper_files\/paper\/2023\/file\/ccba10dd4e80e7276054222bb95d467c-Paper-Conference.pdf","DOI":"10.52202\/075280-2831"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shraddha Barke Michael\u00a0B. James and Nadia Polikarpova. 2023. Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating Models. Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 7 OOPSLA1 Article 78 (April 2023) 27\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/3586030","DOI":"10.1145\/3586030"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"\u017deljana Ba\u0161i\u0107 Ana Banovac Ivana Kru\u017ei\u0107 and Ivan Jerkovi\u0107. 2023. ChatGPT-3.5 as writing assistance in students\u2019 essays. Humanities and social sciences communications 10 1 (2023) 1\u20135. 10.1057\/s41599-023-02269-7","DOI":"10.1057\/s41599-023-02269-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642406"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3491102.3517638"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2212776.2212422"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3581641.3584060"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613905.3650841"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 2 (2006) 77\u2013101. 10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445372"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3290605.3300733"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2022.emnlp-main.460"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alessandro Checco Lorenzo Bracciale Pierpaolo Loreti Stephen Pinfield and Giuseppe Bianchi. 2021. AI-assisted peer review. Humanities and social sciences communications 8 1 (2021) 1\u201311. 10.1057\/s41599-020-00703-8","DOI":"10.1057\/s41599-020-00703-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3729176.3729196"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_21_2","unstructured":"Robert Chew John Bollenbacher Michael Wenger Jessica Speer and Annice Kim. 2023. LLM-assisted content analysis: Using large language models to support deductive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2306.14924 (2023). https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2306.14924"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_22_2","unstructured":"CHI. 2017. CHI 2018 \u2013 Engage with CHI. https:\/\/chi2018.acm.org\/2017\/06\/27\/changes-to-the-papers-reviewing-and-submission-process\/ [Online; accessed 2025-11-01]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jennifer Chubb Peter Cowling and Darren Reed. 2022. Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process. AI & society 37 4 (2022) 1439\u20131457. 10.1007\/s00146-021-01259-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-021-01259-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3172944.3172983"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_25_2","unstructured":"CVPR. [n. d.]. CVPR 2025 Changes. https:\/\/cvpr.thecvf.com\/Conferences\/2025\/CVPRChanges [Online; accessed 2025-08-30]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2023.findings-emnlp.669"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642134"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.nlp4pi-1.17"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shai Farber. 2025. Comparing human and AI expertise in the academic peer review process: towards a hybrid approach. Higher Education Research & Development 44 4 (2025) 871\u2013885. 10.1080\/07294360.2024.2445575 arXiv:10.1080\/07294360.2024.2445575","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360.2024.2445575"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Santo Fortunato Carl\u00a0T. Bergstrom Katy B\u00f6rner James\u00a0A. Evans Dirk Helbing Sta\u0161a Milojevi\u0107 Alexander\u00a0M. Petersen Filippo Radicchi Roberta Sinatra Brian Uzzi Alessandro Vespignani Dashun Wang and Albert-L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Barab\u00e1si. 2018. Science of science. Science 359 6379 (2018) eaao0185. 10.1126\/science.aao0185","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aao0185"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3580782"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_32_2","unstructured":"Alexander Goldberg Ihsan Ullah Thanh Gia\u00a0Hieu Khuong Benedictus\u00a0Kent Rachmat Zhen Xu Isabelle Guyon and Nihar\u00a0B Shah. 2024. Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS\u201924 Experiment. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2411.03417 (2024). https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2411.03417"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dritjon Gruda. 2025. Three AI-powered steps to faster smarter peer review. Nature (2025). https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/d41586-025-00526-0","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-025-00526-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2023.findings-emnlp.684"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hilda Hadan Derrick\u00a0M Wang Reza\u00a0Hadi Mogavi Joseph Tu Leah Zhang-Kennedy and Lennart\u00a0E Nacke. 2024. The great AI witch hunt: Reviewers\u2019 perception and (Mis) conception of generative AI in research writing. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2 2 (2024) 100095. 10.1016\/j.chbah.2024.100095","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbah.2024.100095"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mark\u00a0A Hanson Pablo\u00a0G\u00f3mez Barreiro Paolo Crosetto and Dan Brockington. 2024. The strain on scientific publishing. Quantitative Science Studies 5 4 (11 2024) 823\u2013843. 10.1162\/qss_a_00327","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00327"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"John Hattie and Helen Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of educational research 77 1 (2007) 81\u2013112. 10.3102\/003465430298487","DOI":"10.3102\/003465430298487"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2858036.2858195"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3641895"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hugo Horta and Jisun Jung. 2024. The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science. Higher Education Quarterly 78 4 (2024) e12511. https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/hequ.12511","DOI":"10.1111\/hequ.12511"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yoyo Tsung-Yu Hou and Malte\u00a0F. Jung. 2021. Who is the Expert? Reconciling Algorithm Aversion and Algorithm Appreciation in AI-Supported Decision Making. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5 CSCW2 Article 477 (Oct. 2021) 25\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/3479864","DOI":"10.1145\/3479864"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706599.3716299"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang Q.\u00a0Vera Liao Su\u00a0Lin Blodgett Alexandra Olteanu and Adam Trischler. 2025. \u2019It was 80% me 20% AI\u2019: Seeking Authenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9 2 Article CSCW122 (May 2025) 41\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/3711020","DOI":"10.1145\/3711020"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_44_2","unstructured":"ICLR 2026 Program Chairs. 2025. ICLR 2026 Response to LLM-Generated Papers and Reviews. https:\/\/blog.iclr.cc\/2025\/11\/19\/iclr-2026-response-to-llm-generated-papers-and-reviews\/ [Online; accessed 2025-11-19]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_45_2","unstructured":"Daphne Ippolito Ann Yuan Andy Coenen and Sehmon Burnam. 2022. Creative Writing with an AI-Powered Writing Assistant: Perspectives from Professional Writers. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2211.05030 (2022). https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2211.05030"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3544548.3581196"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2851581.2892576"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3690712.3690720"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_49_2","unstructured":"Yixing Jiang and Andrew Ng. 2025. Tech Overview - Stanford Agentic Reviewer. (2025). https:\/\/paperreview.ai\/tech-overview"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shivani Kapania Ruiyi Wang Toby Jia-Jun Li Tianshi Li and Hong Shen. 2025. \u2019I\u2019m Categorizing LLM as a Productivity Tool\u2019: Examining Ethics of LLM Use in HCI Research Practices. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9 2 Article CSCW102 (May 2025) 26\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/3711000","DOI":"10.1145\/3711000"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2022.naacl-main.89"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohamed Khalifa and Mona Albadawy. 2024. Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update 5 (2024) 100145. 10.1016\/j.cmpbup.2024.100145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmpbup.2024.100145"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_53_2","volume-title":"Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning Position Paper Track","author":"Kim Jaeho","year":"2025","unstructured":"Jaeho Kim, Yunseok Lee, and Seulki Lee. 2025. Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards. In Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning Position Paper Track. https:\/\/openreview.net\/forum?id=l8QemUZaIA"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nils K\u00f6bis Zoe Rahwan Raluca Rilla Bramantyo\u00a0Ibrahim Supriyatno Clara Bersch Tamer Ajaj Jean-Fran\u00e7ois Bonnefon and Iyad Rahwan. 2025. Delegation to artificial intelligence can increase dishonest behaviour. Nature 646 (2025) 126\u2013134. 10.1038\/s41586-025-09505-x","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-025-09505-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3292500.3330899"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_56_2","unstructured":"Ilia Kuznetsov Osama\u00a0Mohammed Afzal Koen Dercksen Nils Dycke Alexander Goldberg Tom Hope Dirk Hovy Jonathan\u00a0K Kummerfeld Anne Lauscher Kevin Leyton-Brown et\u00a0al. 2024. What can natural language processing do for peer review? arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2405.06563 (2024). https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2405.06563"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3568813.3600138"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642697"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3491102.3502030"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_60_2","unstructured":"Mina Lee Megha Srivastava Amelia Hardy John Thickstun Esin Durmus Ashwin Paranjape Ines Gerard-Ursin Xiang\u00a0Lisa Li Faisal Ladhak Frieda Rong et\u00a0al. 2023. Evaluating human-language model interaction. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2023). https:\/\/openreview.net\/forum?id=hjDYJUn9l1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3391203.3391218"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445522"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_63_2","unstructured":"Patrick Lewis Ethan Perez Aleksandra Piktus Fabio Petroni Vladimir Karpukhin Naman Goyal Heinrich K\u00fcttler Mike Lewis Wen-tau Yih Tim Rockt\u00e4schel et\u00a0al. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020) 9459\u20139474. https:\/\/proceedings.neurips.cc\/paper_files\/paper\/2020\/file\/6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Paper.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_64_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642625"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_65_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weixin Liang Yuhui Zhang Hancheng Cao Binglu Wang Daisy\u00a0Yi Ding Xinyu Yang Kailas Vodrahalli Siyu He Daniel\u00a0Scott Smith Yian Yin et\u00a0al. 2024. Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis. NEJM AI 1 8 (2024) AIoa2400196. 10.1056\/AIoa2400196","DOI":"10.1056\/AIoa2400196"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_66_2","volume-title":"First Conference on Language Modeling","author":"Liang Weixin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Weixin Liang, Yaohui Zhang, Zhengxuan Wu, Haley Lepp, Wenlong Ji, Xuandong Zhao, Hancheng Cao, Sheng Liu, Siyu He, Zhi Huang, Diyi Yang, Christopher Potts, Christopher\u00a0D Manning, and James\u00a0Y. Zou. 2024. Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers. In First Conference on Language Modeling. https:\/\/openreview.net\/forum?id=YX7QnhxESU"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_67_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jialiang Lin Jiaxin Song Zhangping Zhou Yidong Chen and Xiaodong Shi. 2023. Automated scholarly paper review: Concepts technologies and challenges. Information Fusion 98 (2023) 101830. 10.1016\/j.inffus.2023.101830","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inffus.2023.101830"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_68_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yupeng Lin and Zhonggen Yu. 2025. Elucidating university students\u2019 intentions to seek automated writing feedback from Grammarly: toward perceptual and systemic predictors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12 7 (2025). 10.1057\/s41599-024-03861-1","DOI":"10.1057\/s41599-024-03861-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_69_2","unstructured":"Zhicheng Lin. 2025. Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2507.06185 (2025). https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2507.06185 Preprint."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_70_2","unstructured":"Ryan Liu and Nihar\u00a0B Shah. 2023. Reviewergpt? an exploratory study on using large language models for paper reviewing. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2306.00622 (2023). https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2306.00622"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_71_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gary Marchionini. 2008. Editorial: Reviewer merits and review control in an age of electronic manuscript management systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 26 4 Article 25 (Oct. 2008) 6\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/1402256.1402264","DOI":"10.1145\/1402256.1402264"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_72_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shannon Mason and Sin\u00a0Wang Chong. 2023. Bringing light to a hidden genre: the peer review report. Higher Education Research & Development 42 3 (2023) 664\u2013678. 10.1080\/07294360.2022.2073976","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360.2022.2073976"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_73_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Angela Mastrianni Hope Twede Aleksandra Sarcevic Jeremiah Wander Christina Austin-Tse Scott Saponas Heidi Rehm Ashley\u00a0Mae Conard and Amanda\u00a0K. Hall. 2025. AI-Enhanced Sensemaking: Exploring the Design of a Generative AI-Based Assistant to Support Genetic Professionals. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 15 4 Article 22 (Dec. 2025) 30\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/3756326","DOI":"10.1145\/3756326"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_74_2","unstructured":"Sven Mayer. 2025. Insights Into the Papers Track First Round Outcomes - ACM CHI 2026. https:\/\/chi2026.acm.org\/2025\/12\/12\/insights-into-the-papers-track-first-round-outcomes\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_75_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.acl-main.702"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_76_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vasiliki Mollaki. 2024. Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? The challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies. Research Ethics 20 2 (2024) 239\u2013250. 10.1177\/17470161231224552","DOI":"10.1177\/17470161231224552"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_77_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Miryam Naddaf. 2025. AI is transforming peer review\u2014and many scientists are worried. Nature 639 (2025) 852\u2013854. https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/d41586-025-00894-7","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-025-00894-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_78_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3173574.3173629"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_79_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2556420.2556828"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_80_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713668"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_81_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3742901.3742908"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_82_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Milton Pividori and Casey\u00a0S Greene. 2024. A publishing infrastructure for AI-assisted academic authoring. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 31 9 (06 2024) 2103\u20132113. 10.1093\/jamia\/ocae139","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocae139"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_83_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tess Posner and Li Fei-Fei. 2020. AI will change the world so it\u2019s time to change AI. Nature 588 (2020) S118\u2013S118. 10.1038\/d41586-020-03412-z","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-020-03412-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_84_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tribikram Pradhan Prashant Kumar and Sukomal Pal. 2021. CLAVER: An integrated framework of convolutional layer bidirectional LSTM with attention mechanism based scholarly venue recommendation. Information Sciences 559 (2021) 212\u2013235. 10.1016\/j.ins.2020.12.024","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2020.12.024"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_85_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tribikram Pradhan and Sukomal Pal. 2020. CNAVER: A content and network-based academic venue recommender system. Knowledge-Based Systems 189 (2020) 105092. 10.1016\/j.knosys.2019.105092","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knosys.2019.105092"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_86_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.acl-long.165"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_87_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vishisht\u00a0Srihari Rao Aounon Kumar Himabindu Lakkaraju and Nihar\u00a0B Shah. 2025. Detecting LLM-generated peer reviews. PLoS One 20 9 (2025) e0331871. 10.1371\/journal.pone.0331871","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0331871"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_88_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3641899"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_89_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohi Reza Jeb Thomas-Mitchell Peter Dushniku Nathan Laundry Joseph\u00a0Jay Williams and Anastasia Kuzminykh. 2025. Co-Writing with AI on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing Process. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9 7 Article CSCW385 (Oct. 2025) 37\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/3757566","DOI":"10.1145\/3757566"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_90_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nihar\u00a0B. Shah. 2022. Challenges experiments and computational solutions in peer review. Commun. ACM 65 6 (May 2022) 76\u201387. 10.1145\/3528086","DOI":"10.1145\/3528086"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_91_2","unstructured":"SIGCHI. 2015. Changes to the Submission and Review Process for CHI2016. https:\/\/sigchi.tumblr.com\/post\/108282241520\/changes-to-the-submission-and-review-process-for [Online; accessed 2025-11-01]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_92_2","unstructured":"Tom Simonite. 2018. AI Is the Future\u2014But Where Are the Women? Wired (Aug. 2018). https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/artificial-intelligence-researchers-gender-imbalance Accessed: 2025-09-09."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_93_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Linda Snell and John Spencer. 2005. Reviewers\u2019 perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal. Medical education 39 1 (2005) 90\u201397. 10.1111\/j.1365-2929.2004.02026.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2929.2004.02026.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_94_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lisa Sperber Marit MacArthur Sophia Minnillo Nicholas Stillman and Carl Whithaus. 2025. Peer and AI Review+ Reflection (PAIRR): A human-centered approach to formative assessment. Computers and Composition 76 (2025) 102921. 10.1016\/j.compcom.2025.102921","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compcom.2025.102921"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_95_2","series-title":"Proceedings of Machine Learning Research","first-page":"828","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory","volume":"98","author":"Stelmakh Ivan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ivan Stelmakh, Nihar\u00a0B. Shah, and Aarti Singh. 2019. PeerReview4All: Fair and accurate reviewer assignment in peer review. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory(Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol.\u00a098), Aur\u00e9lien Garivier and Satyen Kale (Eds.). PMLR, 828\u2013856. https:\/\/proceedings.mlr.press\/v98\/stelmakh19a.html"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_96_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3640543.3645159"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_97_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lu Sun Stone Tao Junjie Hu and Steven\u00a0P. Dow. 2024. MetaWriter: Exploring the Potential and Perils of AI Writing Support in Scientific Peer Review. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 8 CSCW1 Article 94 (April 2024) 32\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/3637371","DOI":"10.1145\/3637371"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_98_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3715336.3735679"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_99_2","unstructured":"Nitya Thakkar Mert Yuksekgonul Jake Silberg Animesh Garg Nanyun Peng Fei Sha Rose Yu Carl Vondrick and James Zou. 2025. Can llm feedback enhance review quality? a randomized study of 20k reviews at iclr 2025. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2504.09737 (2025). https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2504.09737"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_100_2","volume-title":"Nudge: The final edition","author":"Thaler Richard\u00a0H","year":"2021","unstructured":"Richard\u00a0H Thaler and Cass\u00a0R Sunstein. 2021. Nudge: The final edition. Penguin."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_101_2","unstructured":"Joseph Tu Hilda Hadan Derrick\u00a0M Wang Sabrina\u00a0A Sgandurra Reza\u00a0Hadi Mogavi and Lennart\u00a0E Nacke. 2024. Augmenting the author: Exploring the potential of AI collaboration in academic writing. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2404.16071 (2024). https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2404.16071"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_102_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 4481 (1981) 453\u2013458. 10.1126\/science.7455683","DOI":"10.1126\/science.7455683"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_103_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3491101.3519665"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_104_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3678884.3689131"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_105_2","unstructured":"Carl Vondrick. 2024. Assisting ICLR 2025 reviewers with feedback \u2013 ICLR Blog. https:\/\/blog.iclr.cc\/2024\/10\/09\/iclr2025-assisting-reviewers\/ [Online; accessed 2025-11-11]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_106_2","unstructured":"Carl Vondrick. 2025. Leveraging LLM feedback to enhance review quality \u2013 ICLR Blog. https:\/\/blog.iclr.cc\/2025\/04\/15\/leveraging-llm-feedback-to-enhance-review-quality\/ [Online; accessed 2025-11-22]."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_107_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2022.findings-emnlp.349"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_108_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gerit Wagner Roman Lukyanenko and Guy Par\u00e9. 2022. Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews. Journal of Information Technology 37 2 (2022) 209\u2013226. 10.1177\/02683962211048201 arXiv:10.1177\/02683962211048201","DOI":"10.1177\/02683962211048201"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_109_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Qian Wan Siying Hu Yu Zhang Piaohong Wang Bo Wen and Zhicong Lu. 2024. \"It Felt Like Having a Second Mind\": Investigating Human-AI Co-creativity in Prewriting with Large Language Models. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 8 CSCW1 Article 84 (April 2024) 26\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/3637361","DOI":"10.1145\/3637361"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_110_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dakuo Wang Justin\u00a0D. Weisz Michael Muller Parikshit Ram Werner Geyer Casey Dugan Yla Tausczik Horst Samulowitz and Alexander Gray. 2019. Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists\u2019 Perceptions of Automated AI. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3 CSCW Article 211 (Nov. 2019) 24\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/3359313","DOI":"10.1145\/3359313"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_111_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2020.inlg-1.44"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_112_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642700"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_113_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3707640.3731913"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_114_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v36i10.21418"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_115_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weizhe Yuan Pengfei Liu and Graham Neubig. 2022. Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing? Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 75 (2022) 171\u2013212. 10.1613\/jair.1.12862","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.1.12862"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_116_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713337"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_117_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Qi Zeng Mankeerat Sidhu Ansel Blume Hou\u00a0Pong Chan Lu Wang and Heng Ji. 2024. Scientific Opinion Summarization: Paper Meta-review Generation Dataset Methods and Evaluation. 10.1007\/978-981-97-9536-9_2 arxiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2305.14647\u00a0[cs.CL]","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-97-9536-9_2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_118_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.63317\/48d359hjdvog"}],"event":{"name":"CHI 2026: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","location":"Barcelona Spain","acronym":"CHI '26","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3772318.3791431","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T07:43:14Z","timestamp":1776066194000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3772318.3791431"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"references-count":117,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3772318.3791431","10.1145\/3772318"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3772318.3791431","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-13","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}