{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,23]],"date-time":"2026-06-23T03:05:51Z","timestamp":1782183951707,"version":"3.54.5"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":29,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3772363.3799300","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T01:55:28Z","timestamp":1776045328000},"page":"1-9","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["ArgueMate: Designing an Arguing Agent with Maximised Disagreement to Support Student Peer-Argumentation Exercise"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9449-6953","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chenyang","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"CHILI Lab, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-5717-8240","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Filippo","family":"Forte","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"CHILI Lab, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-5068-7007","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"L\u00e9ane","family":"Wettstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"HAIS Lab, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9455-5119","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pierre","family":"Dillenbourg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"CHILI Lab, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7440-9357","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thiemo","family":"Wambsganss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"HAIS Lab, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christa\u00a0SC Asterhan and Baruch\u00a0B Schwarz. 2016. Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist 51 2 (2016) 164\u2013187.","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2016.1155458"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_3_2","unstructured":"Michael Baker and Jerry Andriessen. 2022. Arguing to learn. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (3rd Edition) (2022)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 2 (Jan. 2006) 77\u2013101. 10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_5_2","unstructured":"William Cai Joshua Grossman Zhiyuan Lin Hao Sheng Johnny Tian Zheng Wei Joseph\u00a0Jay Williams and Sharad Goel. 2019. MathBot: a personalized conversational agent for learning math. Published to ACM (2019)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_6_2","volume-title":"User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development","author":"Cohn Mike","year":"2004","unstructured":"Mike Cohn. 2004. User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., USA."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-90179-0_35"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Richard\u00a0A Duschl and Jonathan Osborne. 2002. Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. (2002).","DOI":"10.1080\/03057260208560187"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kai Guo Jian Wang and Samuel Kai\u00a0Wah Chu. 2022. Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students\u2019 argumentative writing. Assessing Writing 54 (2022) 100666.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asw.2022.100666"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kai Guo Yuchun Zhong Danling Li and Samuel Kai\u00a0Wah Chu. 2024. Investigating students\u2019 engagement in chatbot-supported classroom debates. Interactive Learning Environments 32 9 (2024) 4917\u20134933.","DOI":"10.1080\/10494820.2023.2207181"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"David Hitchcock. 2005. Good reasoning on the Toulmin model. Argumentation 19 3 (2005) 373\u2013391.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-005-4422-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kalypso Iordanou Deanna Kuhn Flora Matos Yuchen Shi and Laura Hemberger. 2019. Learning by arguing. Learning and instruction 63 (2019) 101207.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2019.05.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/1150240.1150273"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"David\u00a0H Jonassen and Bosung Kim. 2010. Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development 58 4 (2010) 439\u2013457.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11423-009-9143-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sukjin Kang Lawrence\u00a0C Scharmann and Taehee Noh. 2004. Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in science education 34 1 (2004) 71\u201396.","DOI":"10.1023\/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deanna Kuhn and Wendy Moore. 2015. Argumentation as core curriculum. Learning: Research and practice 1 1 (2015) 66\u201378.","DOI":"10.1080\/23735082.2015.994254"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marjan Laal Mozhgan Laal and Zhina Khattami\u00a0Kermanshahi. 2012. 21st Century Learning; Learning in Collaboration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 47 (2012) 1696\u20131701. 10.1016\/j.sbspro.2012.06.885","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sbspro.2012.06.885"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613905.3651008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_19_2","unstructured":"M. Moritz T. Redlich and J. Wulfsberg. 2016. Collaborative Competition or Competitive Collaboration? Exploring the User Behavior Paradox in Community-based Innovation Contests."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_20_2","first-page":"012072","volume-title":"IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering","volume":"335","author":"Mufit Fatni","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fatni Mufit, Fauzan Festiyed, A Fauzan, and L Lufri. 2018. Impact of learning model based on cognitive conflict toward student\u2019s conceptual understanding. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering , Vol.\u00a0335. IOP Publishing, 012072."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2024.findings-emnlp.661"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"E.\u00a0Michael Nussbaum. 2008. Collaborative discourse argumentation and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33 3 (jul 2008) 345\u2013359. 10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613905.3636268"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_24_2","volume-title":"Competitive and Cooperative Approaches to Conflict","author":"Spangler Brad","year":"2003","unstructured":"Brad Spangler. 2003. Competitive and Cooperative Approaches to Conflict. Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. http:\/\/www.beyondintractability.org\/essay\/competitive-cooperative-frames"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"G.\u00a0A. S\u00e1nchez\u00a0Prieto M.\u00a0J. Mart\u00edn\u00a0Rodrigo and A. Rua\u00a0Vieites. 2021. Competitive Debate as Innovation in Gamification and Training for Adult Learners: A Conceptual Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (dec 2021). 10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.666871","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.666871"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642513"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_27_2","unstructured":"Kenneth\u00a0W Thomas. 2008. Thomas-kilmann conflict mode. TKI Profile and Interpretive Report 1 11 (2008) 1\u201311."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3411764.3445781"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706599.3719863"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Habeeb Yusuf Arthur Money and Damon Daylamani-Zad. 2025. Pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education: a conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art. Educational technology research and development 73 2 (2025) 815\u2013874.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11423-025-10447-4"}],"event":{"name":"CHI EA '26: Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","location":"Barcelona , Spain","acronym":"CHI EA '26","sponsor":["SIGCHI ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3772363.3799300","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T03:24:30Z","timestamp":1776050670000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3772363.3799300"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"references-count":29,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3772363.3799300","10.1145\/3772363"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3772363.3799300","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-13","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}