{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T10:34:46Z","timestamp":1777113286406,"version":"3.51.4"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":21,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2027,4,26]],"date-time":"2027-04-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1808697600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":365,"URL":"http:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000001","name":"National Science Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["2112532"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2112532"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000001","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,27]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3785022.3785082","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T09:39:01Z","timestamp":1777109941000},"page":"876-882","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Effects of AI Feedback on College Students\u2019 Reading and Writing Performance in an Intelligent Text Framework"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-2948-3875","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Siqi","family":"Shen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4043-6808","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alyssa Friend","family":"Wise","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6316-6479","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wesley","family":"Morris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4338-4609","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Langdon","family":"Holmes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7351-5521","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Scott R.","family":"Hinze","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Middle Georgia State University, Macon, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5148-0273","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Scott","family":"Crossley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_2_2","unstructured":"Ryan Baker Jason Walonoski Neil Heffernan Ido Roll Albert Corbett and Kenneth Koedinger. 2008. Why students engage in \u201cgaming the system\u201d behavior in interactive learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 19 2 (2008) 185\u2013224."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Martin Barker and Michelle Pinard. 2014. Closing the feedback loop? Iterative feedback between tutor and student in coursework assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 8 (2014) 899\u2013915.","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2013.875985"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marsha Bensoussan and Isabelle Kreindler. 1990. Improving advanced reading comprehension in a foreign language: Summaries vs. short-answer questions. Journal of Research in Reading 13 1 (1990) 55\u201368.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9817.1990.tb00322.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_5_2","unstructured":"Victoria\u00a0C. Brower. 2025. Interactive textbooks: A study on the effects on learning gains and course grades among community college minority students. Ph.\u00a0D. Dissertation. Liberty University."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"N\u00faria Castells Marta Minguela and Esther Nadal. 2023. Writing a synthesis versus reading: Strategies involved and impact on comprehension. Reading and Writing 36 4 (2023) 849\u2013880.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11145-022-10341-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Michelene T.\u00a0H. Chi and Ruth Wylie. 2014. The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist 49 4 (2014) 219\u2013243.","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2014.965823"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_8_2","first-page":"1","volume-title":"8th Educational Data Mining in Computer Science Education","author":"Crossley Scott","year":"2024","unstructured":"Scott Crossley, Joon\u00a0Suh Choi, and Wesley Morris. 2024. Using intelligent texts in a computer science classroom: Findings from an iTELL deployment. In 8th Educational Data Mining in Computer Science Education. Atlanta, USA, 1\u20138."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_9_2","first-page":"17","volume-title":"iTextbooks\u201925: Sixth Workshop on Intelligent Textbooks","author":"Crossley Scott","year":"2025","unstructured":"Scott Crossley, Joon\u00a0Suh Choi, Wesley Morris, Langdon Holmes, and David Joyner. 2025. AI enhanced intelligent texts and learning gains. In iTextbooks\u201925: Sixth Workshop on Intelligent Textbooks. Palermo, Italy, 17\u201324."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3698205.3729548"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198863564.003.0005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steve Graham and Michael Hebert. 2011. Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review 81 4 (2011) 710\u2013744.","DOI":"10.17763\/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_13_2","unstructured":"Gwo-Jen Hwang and Nian-Shing Chen. 2023. Exploring the potential of generative artificial intelligence in Education: Applications challenges and future research directions. Educational Technology & Society 26 2 (2023) 1\u201319."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marta\u00a0M. Ko\u0107-Januchta Konrad\u00a0J. Sch\u00f6nborn Lena A.\u00a0E. Tibell Vinay\u00a0K. Chaudhri and H.\u00a0Craig Heller. 2020. Engaging with biology by asking questions: Investigating students\u2019 interaction and learning with an artificial intelligence-enriched textbook. Journal of Educational Computing Research 58 6 (2020) 1190\u20131224.","DOI":"10.1177\/0735633120921581"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kathryn\u00a0S. McCarthy and Scott\u00a0R. Hinze. 2025. Stage 2 Registered Report\u2014You\u2019ve got some explaining to do: Effects of explanation prompts on science text comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology 39 4 (2025) e70093.","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.70093"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Muhsin Menekse Glenda\u00a0S. Stump Stephen Krause and Michelene T.\u00a0H. Chi. 2013. Differentiated overt learning activities for effective instruction in engineering classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 102 3 (2013) 346\u2013374.","DOI":"10.1002\/jee.20021"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_17_2","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Educational Data Mining","author":"Morris Wesley","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wesley Morris, Joon\u00a0Suh Choi, Langdon Holmes, Vaibhav Gupta, and Scott Crossley. 2024. Automatic question generation and constructed response scoring in intelligent texts. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. Atlanta, USA, 1\u201310."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wesley Morris Scott Crossley Langdon Holmes Chaohua Ou Mihai Dascalu and Danielle McNamara. 2024. Formative feedback on student-authored summaries in intelligent textbooks using large language models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2024).","DOI":"10.1007\/s40593-024-00395-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ignacio M\u00e1\u00f1ez Eduardo Vidal-Abarca Panayiota Kendeou and Tom\u00e1s Mart\u00ednez. 2019. How do students process complex formative feedback in question-answering tasks? A think-aloud study. Metacognition Learning 14 1 (2019) 65\u201387.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11409-019-09192-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mark\u00a0D. Shermis. 2015. Contrasting state-of-the-art in the machine scoring of short-form constructed responses. Educational Assessment 20 1 (2015) 46\u201365.","DOI":"10.1080\/10627197.2015.997617"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fabienne van\u00a0der Kleij Theodorus Johannes Hendrikus\u00a0Maria Eggen C.\u00a0F. Timmers and Bernard\u00a0P. Veldkamp. 2012. Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning. Computers & Education 58 1 (2012) 263\u2013272.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2011.07.020"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_1_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4018\/978-1-6684-9893-4.ch002"}],"event":{"name":"LAK 2026: LAK26: 16th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","location":"Bergen Norway","acronym":"LAK 2026"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the LAK26: 16th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1145\/3785022.3785082","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T09:42:07Z","timestamp":1777110127000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3785022.3785082"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]]},"references-count":21,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3785022.3785082","10.1145\/3785022"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3785022.3785082","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-26","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}