{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T10:34:48Z","timestamp":1777113288257,"version":"3.51.4"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":54,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,27]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3785022.3785086","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T09:39:01Z","timestamp":1777109941000},"page":"898-904","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Unveiling Teaching Practices in Higher Education: Leveraging Open-Ended Student Comments in Learning Analytics"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-0721-9043","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gabriel","family":"Astudillo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Computer Science Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5270-7655","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Isabel","family":"Hilliger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6280-5619","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jorge A.","family":"Baier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Computer Science Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Terry\u00a0A Ackerman Mark\u00a0J Gierl and Cindy\u00a0M Walker. 2003. Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate educational and psychological tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 22 3 (2003) 37\u201351. 10.1111\/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00136.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00136.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Atezaz Ahmad Jan Schneider Dai Griffiths Daniel Biedermann Daniel Schiffner Wolfgang Greller and Hendrik Drachsler. 2024. Connecting the dots\u2013A literature review on learning analytics indicators from a learning design perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 40 6 (2024) 2432\u20132470. 10.1111\/jcal.12716","DOI":"10.1111\/jcal.12716"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Muhammad\u00a0Rashid Ali Badar\u00a0Nadeem Ashraf and Chuanmin Shuai. 2019. Teachers\u2019 Conflict-Inducing Attitudes and Their Repercussions on Students\u2019 Psychological Health and Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 14 (2019). 10.3390\/ijerph16142534","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph16142534"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_5_2","volume-title":"How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching.","author":"Ambrose S.\u00a0A","year":"2010","unstructured":"S.\u00a0A Ambrose, M.\u00a0W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M.\u00a0C. Lovett, and M.\u00a0K. Norman. 2010. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching.John Wiley & Sons."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ron Artstein and Massimo Poesio. 2008. Survey Article: Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics. Computational Linguistics 34 4 (2008) 555\u2013596. 10.1162\/coli.07-034-R2","DOI":"10.1162\/coli.07-034-R2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_7_2","first-page":"39","volume-title":"A theoretical perspective on ineffective interventions: Malfunctions in teaching","author":"Astleitner Hermann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hermann Astleitner. 2020. A theoretical perspective on ineffective interventions: Malfunctions in teaching. Waxmann, 39\u201361."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ann\u00a0E. Austin. 2002. Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty. The Journal of Higher Education 73 1 (2002) 94\u2013122. arXiv:10.1080\/00221546.2002.11777132","DOI":"10.1080\/00221546.2002.11777132"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Donald\u00a0R. Bacon Carol\u00a0J. Johnson and Kim\u00a0A. Stewart. 2016. Nonresponse Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching. Marketing Education Review 26 (5 2016) 93\u2013104. Issue 2. 10.1080\/10528008.2016.1166442","DOI":"10.1080\/10528008.2016.1166442"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guy\u00a0A. Boysen. 2016. Using student evaluations to improve teaching: Evidence-based recommendations. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 2 (2016) 273\u2013284. Issue 4. 10.1037\/stl0000069","DOI":"10.1037\/stl0000069"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"David Caldwell Chris Johnson Madison Moore Alex Moore Madeline Poush and Amy\u00a0M Franks. 2024. Teaching Through the Student Lens: Qualitative Exploration of Student Evaluations of Teaching. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 88 3 (2024) 100672.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2024.100672"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315456539-14"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yayra Dzakadzie and Frank Quansah. 2023. Modeling unit non-response and validity of online teaching evaluation in higher education using generalizability theory approach. Frontiers in Psychology 14 (9 2023). 10.3389\/fpsyg.2023.1202896","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2023.1202896"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"N. Elangovan and E. Sundaravel. 2021. Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts. MethodsX 8 (2021) 101326. 10.1016\/j.mex.2021.101326","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mex.2021.101326"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jonas Flod\u00e9n. 2017. The impact of student feedback on teaching in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (10 2017) 1054\u20131068. Issue 7. 10.1080\/02602938.2016.1224997","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2016.1224997"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andreas Frey and Nicki-Nils Seitz. 2009. Multidimensional adaptive testing in educational and psychological measurement: Current state and future challenges. Studies in Educational Evaluation 35 2 (2009) 89\u201394. 10.1016\/j.stueduc.2009.10.007Assessment of Competencies.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.stueduc.2009.10.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dragan Ga\u0161evi\u0107 Shane Dawson and George Siemens. 2015. Let\u2019s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends 59 1 (2015) 64\u201371. 10.1007\/s11528-014-0822-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s11528-014-0822-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Katharine Gelber Katie Brennan David Duriesmith and Ellyse Fenton. 2022. Gendered mundanities: gender bias in student evaluations of teaching in political science. Australian Journal of Political Science 57 (4 2022) 199\u2013220. Issue 2. 10.1080\/10361146.2022.2043241","DOI":"10.1080\/10361146.2022.2043241"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maarten Goos and Anna Salomons. 2017. Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations. Research in Higher Education 58 (6 2017) 341\u2013364. Issue 4. 10.1007\/s11162-016-9429-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s11162-016-9429-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kari\u00a0Stamland Gusfre Janne St\u00f8en and Hildegunn Fandrem. 2023. Bullying by teachers towards students\u2014A scoping review. International journal of bullying prevention 5 4 (2023) 331\u2013347.","DOI":"10.1007\/s42380-022-00131-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Reema Harrison Lois Meyer Patrick Rawstorne Husna Razee Upma Chitkara Steven Mears and Chinthaka Balasooriya. 2022. Evaluating and enhancing quality in higher education teaching practice: a meta- review. Studies in Higher Education 47 1 (2022) 80\u201396. arXiv:10.1080\/03075079.2020.1730315","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2020.1730315"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203887332"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Troy Heffernan. 2022. Sexism racism prejudice and bias: a literature review and synthesis of research surrounding student evaluations of courses and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 1 (2022) 144\u2013154. arXiv:10.1080\/02602938.2021.1888075","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2021.1888075"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_24_2","first-page":"2042","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference","author":"Herath Missaka","year":"2022","unstructured":"Missaka Herath, Kushan Chamindu, Hashan Maduwantha, and Surangika Ranathunga. 2022. Dataset and Baseline for Automatic Student Feedback Analysis. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Nicoletta Calzolari, Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric B\u00e9chet, Philippe Blache, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Hitoshi Isahara, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Mazo, Jan Odijk, and Stelios Piperidis (Eds.). European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France, 2042\u20132049. https:\/\/aclanthology.org\/2022.lrec-1.219\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Li\u2010tze Hu and Peter\u00a0M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1 1999) 1\u201355. Issue 1. 10.1080\/10705519909540118","DOI":"10.1080\/10705519909540118"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maija Hujala Antti Knutas Timo Hynninen and Heli Arminen. 2020. Improving the quality of teaching by utilising written student feedback: A streamlined process. Computers & Education 157 (11 2020) 103965. 10.1016\/j.compedu.2020.103965","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2020.103965"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rebecca\u00a0J. Kreitzer and Jennie Sweet-Cushman. 2022. Evaluating Student Evaluations of Teaching: a Review of Measurement and Equity Bias in SETs and Recommendations for Ethical Reform. Journal of Academic Ethics 20 (3 2022) 73\u201384. Issue 1. 10.1007\/s10805-021-09400-w","DOI":"10.1007\/s10805-021-09400-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Luke Mandouit. 2018. Using student feedback to improve teaching. Educational Action Research 26 (10 2018) 755\u2013769. Issue 5. 10.1080\/09650792.2018.1426470","DOI":"10.1080\/09650792.2018.1426470"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Herbert\u00a0W. Marsh Jiesi Guo Theresa Dicke Philip\u00a0D. Parker and Rhonda\u00a0G. Craven. 2020. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony. Multivariate Behavioral Research 55 (1 2020) 102\u2013119. Issue 1. 10.1080\/00273171.2019.1602503","DOI":"10.1080\/00273171.2019.1602503"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Herbert\u00a0W. Marsh and Lawrence Roche. 1993. The Use of Students\u2019 Evaluations and an Individually Structured Intervention to Enhance University Teaching Effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal 30 (3 1993) 217\u2013251. Issue 1. 10.3102\/00028312030001217","DOI":"10.3102\/00028312030001217"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tesia Marshik Adam Driscoll Alysa Remsburg Alder Yu Nabamita Dutta and Jennifer Klein. 2023. New frontiers in student evaluations of teaching: university efforts to design and test a new instrument for student feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (11 2023) 1164\u20131177. Issue 8. 10.1080\/02602938.2023.2190060","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2023.2190060"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alberto Maydeu-Olivares. 2013. Goodness-of-Fit Assessment of Item Response Theory Models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 11 3 (2013) 71\u2013101. arXiv:10.1080\/15366367.2013.831680","DOI":"10.1080\/15366367.2013.831680"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Raheel Nawaz Quanbin Sun Matthew Shardlow Georgios Kontonatsios Naif\u00a0R. Aljohani Anna Visvizi and Saeed-Ul Hassan. 2022. Leveraging AI and Machine Learning for National Student Survey: Actionable Insights from Textual Feedback to Enhance Quality of Teaching and Learning in UK\u2019s Higher Education. Applied Sciences 12 (1 2022) 514. Issue 1. 10.3390\/app12010514","DOI":"10.3390\/app12010514"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.46254\/AP01.20210122"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/NICS.2018.8606837"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Philip Osteen. 2010. An Introduction to Using Multidimensional Item Response Theory to Assess Latent Factor Structures. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research 1 2 (2010) 66\u201382. arXiv:10.5243\/jsswr.2010.6","DOI":"10.5243\/jsswr.2010.6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Richard O\u2019Donovan. 2024. Missing the forest for the trees: investigating factors influencing student evaluations of teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 49 (5 2024) 453\u2013470. Issue 4. 10.1080\/02602938.2023.2266862","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2023.2266862"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Eun-Jun Park and Hyunwook Kang. 2021. Experiences of undergraduate nursing students with faculty incivility in nursing classrooms: A meta-aggregation of qualitative studies. Nurse Education in Practice 52 (2021) 103002. 10.1016\/j.nepr.2021.103002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nepr.2021.103002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michael\u00a0J. Parker Caitlin Anderson Claire Stone and YeaRim Oh. 2024. A Large Language Model Approach to Educational Survey Feedback Analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (6 2024). 10.1007\/s40593-024-00414-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s40593-024-00414-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"David\u00a0M. Quinn. 2020. Experimental Evidence on Teachers\u2019 Racial Bias in Student Evaluation: The Role of Grading Scales. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 42 (9 2020) 375\u2013392. Issue 3. 10.3102\/0162373720932188","DOI":"10.3102\/0162373720932188"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0169-7161(06)26018-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jeanette Samuelsen Weiqin Chen and Barbara Wasson. 2019. Integrating multiple data sources for learning analytics\u2014review of literature. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 14 1 (2019) 11. 10.1186\/s41039-019-0105-4","DOI":"10.1186\/s41039-019-0105-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Victoria Savalei. 2011. What to Do About Zero Frequency Cells When Estimating Polychoric Correlations. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 18 2 (2011) 253\u2013273. arXiv:10.1080\/10705511.2011.557339","DOI":"10.1080\/10705511.2011.557339"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jaap Scheerens. 2015. Theories on educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 26 1 (2015) 10\u201331. arXiv:10.1080\/09243453.2013.858754","DOI":"10.1080\/09243453.2013.858754"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michael Schneider and Franzis Preckel. 2017. Variables Associated With Achievement in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses. Psychological Bulletin 143 (2017) 565\u2013600. Issue 6. 10.1037\/bul0000098.supp","DOI":"10.1037\/bul0000098.supp"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mahsood Shah and Anja Pabel. 2019. Making the student voice count: using qualitative student feedback to enhance the student experience. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 12 (7 2019) 194\u2013209. Issue 2. 10.1108\/JARHE-02-2019-0030","DOI":"10.1108\/JARHE-02-2019-0030"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Noora Shrestha. 2021. Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics 9 (1 2021) 4\u201311. Issue 1. 10.12691\/ajams-9-1-2","DOI":"10.12691\/ajams-9-1-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_48_2","unstructured":"George Siemens and Dragan Gasevic. 2012. Guest editorial-learning and knowledge analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 15 3 (2012) 1\u20132."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Calvin\u00a0D. Smith and Chi Baik. 2021. High-impact teaching practices in higher education: a best evidence review. Studies in Higher Education 46 (2021) 1696\u20131713. Issue 8. 10.1080\/03075079.2019.1698539","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2019.1698539"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pieter Spooren Bert Brockx and Dimitri Mortelmans. 2013. On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching. Review of Educational Research 83 (12 2013) 598\u2013642. Issue 4. 10.3102\/0034654313496870","DOI":"10.3102\/0034654313496870"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/obo\/9780199756810-0108"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ayse\u00a0Saliha Sunar and Md\u00a0Saifuddin Khalid. 2024. Natural Language Processing of Student\u2019s Feedback to Instructors: A Systematic Review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 17 (2024) 741\u2013753. 10.1109\/TLT.2023.3330531","DOI":"10.1109\/TLT.2023.3330531"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118133880.hop202023"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jiapei Xia Shuting\u00a0(Alice) Sun and Xuesong\u00a0(Andy) Gao. 2025. The other side of PhD education: A systematic review of research on PhD students\u2019 development as university teachers. Review of Education 13 1 (2025) e70024. arXiv:https:\/\/bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1002\/rev3.7002410.1002\/rev3.70024e70024 RoE-2024-04-1250.R2.","DOI":"10.1002\/rev3.70024"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Muhamad Saiful\u00a0Bahri Yusoff. 2019. ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation. Education in Medicine Journal 11 (6 2019) 49\u201354. Issue 2. 10.21315\/eimj2019.11.2.6","DOI":"10.21315\/eimj2019.11.2.6"}],"event":{"name":"LAK 2026: LAK26: 16th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","location":"Bergen Norway","acronym":"LAK 2026"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the LAK26: 16th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T09:42:17Z","timestamp":1777110137000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3785022.3785086"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]]},"references-count":54,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3785022.3785086","10.1145\/3785022"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3785022.3785086","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-26","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}