{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T10:35:10Z","timestamp":1777113310649,"version":"3.51.4"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":59,"publisher":"ACM","content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,27]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3785022.3785113","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T09:39:01Z","timestamp":1777109941000},"page":"568-577","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Marked Pedagogies: Examining Linguistic Biases in Personalized Automated Writing Feedback"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-3871-899X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mei","family":"Tan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University, Stanford, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-5937-3270","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lena","family":"Phalen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University, Stanford, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6759-9367","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dorottya","family":"Demszky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University, Stanford, USA"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hani Hamad\u00a0M Albeihi and Mary\u00a0F Rice. 2025. Generative AI and language diversity: Implications for teachers and learners. (2025).","DOI":"10.24093\/awej\/vol16no1.3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xuechunzi Bai Angelina Wang Ilia Sucholutsky and Thomas\u00a0L Griffiths. 2025. Explicitly unbiased large language models still form biased associations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122 8 (2025) e2416228122.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2416228122"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","unstructured":"Bryan\u00a0A Bardine. 1999. Students\u2019 perceptions of written teacher comments: What do they say about how we respond to them? The High School Journal 82 4 (1999) 239\u2013247."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-78270-2_12"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Matthew\u00a0L Bernacki Meghan\u00a0J Greene and Nikki\u00a0G Lobczowski. 2021. A systematic review of research on personalized learning: Personalized by whom to what how and for what purpose (s)? Educational Psychology Review 33 4 (2021) 1675\u20131715.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10648-021-09615-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrew\u00a0Thomas Bimba Norisma Idris Ahmed Al-Hunaiyyan Rohana\u00a0Binti Mahmud and Nor Liyana Bt\u00a0Mohd Shuib. 2017. Adaptive feedback in computer-based learning environments: a review. Adaptive Behavior 25 5 (2017) 217\u2013234.","DOI":"10.1177\/1059712317727590"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Benjamin\u00a0S. Bloom. 1984. The 2 Sigma problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as One-to-One tutoring. Educational Researcher 13 6 (June 1984) 4\u201316. 10.3102\/0013189x013006004","DOI":"10.3102\/0013189x013006004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wayne Brekhus. 1998. A sociology of the unmarked: Redirecting our focus. Sociological theory 16 1 (1998) 34\u201351.","DOI":"10.1111\/0735-2751.00041"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sumie Chan Noble Lo and Alan Wong. 2024. Generative AI and Essay Writing: Impacts of Automated Feedback on Revision Performance and Engagement. Reflections 31 3 (2024) 1249\u20131284.","DOI":"10.61508\/refl.v31i3.277514"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","unstructured":"Myra Cheng Esin Durmus and Dan Jurafsky. 2023. Marked personas: Using natural language prompts to measure stereotypes in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2305.18189 (2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alyssa Croft and Toni Schmader. 2012. The feedback withholding bias: Minority students do not receive critical feedback from evaluators concerned about appearing racist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48 5 (2012) 1139\u20131144.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2012.04.010"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3613904.3642336"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Phillip Dawson Michael Henderson Paige Mahoney Michael Phillips Tracii Ryan David Boud and Elizabeth Molloy. 2019. What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 1 (2019) 25\u201336.","DOI":"10.1080\/02602938.2018.1467877"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ezekiel Dixon-Rom\u00e1n T\u00a0Philip Nichols and Ama Nyame-Mensah. 2020. The racializing forces of\/in AI educational technologies. Learning Media and Technology 45 3 (2020) 236\u2013250.","DOI":"10.1080\/17439884.2020.1667825"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-27859-7_53"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anna\u00a0\u00d8sterskov Gammelgaard Casper\u00a0Gj\u00f8dvad Pedersen Emilie\u00a0Strudahl Kaspersen Marius\u00a0Risb\u00e6k Thomsen Jonathan\u00a0Kok Samson and Anne\u00a0H Fabricius. 2024. Decolonizing language resources in the human-machine era: A critical reflection on universalist ideologies and language technologies. Interventions 26 8 (2024) 1189\u20131210.","DOI":"10.1080\/1369801X.2023.2252804"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","unstructured":"Robert Gl\u00fcsing Johanna Fleckenstein Fabian Schmidt and Jens M\u00f6ller. [n. d.]. LLM feedback for academic writing: Effects on students\u2019 performance and engagement. Available at SSRN 5445319 ([n. d.])."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Camilla\u00a0Mutoni Griffiths Lisel Murdock-Perriera and Jennifer\u00a0L Eberhardt. 2023. \u201cCan you tell me more about this?\u201d: Agentic written feedback teacher expectations and student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology 73 (2023) 102145.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2022.102145"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","unstructured":"Groq Inc.2025. Groq API Documentation. https:\/\/groq.com\/developers Accessed: 2025-09-29."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kent\u00a0D Harber Jamie\u00a0L Gorman Frank\u00a0P Gengaro Samantha Butisingh William Tsang and Rebecca Ouellette. 2012. Students\u2019 race and teachers\u2019 social support affect the positive feedback bias in public schools. Journal of Educational Psychology 104 4 (2012) 1149.","DOI":"10.1037\/a0028110"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203887332"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"John Hattie and Helen Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of educational research 77 1 (2007) 81\u2013112.","DOI":"10.3102\/003465430298487"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee Jussim and Kent\u00a0D Harber. 2005. Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and social psychology review 9 2 (2005) 131\u2013155.","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327957pspr0902_3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Amanpreet Kaur and Kuljit\u00a0Kaur Chahal. 2023. A learning analytics dashboard for data-driven recommendations on influences of non-cognitive factors in introductory programming. Education and Information Technologies 29 8 (Sept. 2023) 9221\u20139256. 10.1007\/s10639-023-12125-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-023-12125-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"So\u00a0Lim Kim. 2021. A review of the literature on teachers\u2019 beliefs about English language learners. International Journal of Educational Research Open 2 (2021) 100040.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijedro.2021.100040"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alison\u00a0C. Koenka and Eric\u00a0M. Anderman. 2019. Personalized feedback as a strategy for improving motivation and performance among middle school students. Middle School Journal 50 5 (Oct. 2019) 15\u201322. 10.1080\/00940771.2019.1674768","DOI":"10.1080\/00940771.2019.1674768"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_28_2","first-page":"78","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2024)","author":"Kwako Alexander","year":"2024","unstructured":"Alexander Kwako and Christopher Ormerod. 2024. Can language models guess your identity? Analyzing demographic biases in AI essay scoring. In Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2024). 78\u201386."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zifeng Liu Wanli Xing Xinyue Jiao and Chenglu Li. 2025. Exploring Fairness and Explainability in LLM-Generated Support for Online Learning Discussion Forums. Journal of Learning Analytics 12 3 (2025) 8\u201333.","DOI":"10.18608\/jla.2025.8885"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_30_2","unstructured":"Christopher Mah Dora Demszky and Helen Higgins. 2025. How Math Teachers Are Making Decisions About Using AI. https:\/\/hai.stanford.edu\/news\/how-math-teachers-are-making-decisions-about-using-ai Stanford HAI news article."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Uwe Maier and Christian Klotz. 2022. Personalized feedback in digital learning environments: Classification framework and literature review. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence 3 (Jan. 2022) 100080. 10.1016\/j.caeai.2022.100080","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeai.2022.100080"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Uwe Maier and Christian Klotz. 2022. Personalized feedback in digital learning environments: Classification framework and literature review. Computers and education: Artificial intelligence 3 (2022) 100080.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeai.2022.100080"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Florence Martin Yan Chen Robert\u00a0L Moore and Carl\u00a0D Westine. 2020. Systematic review of adaptive learning research designs context strategies and technologies from 2009 to 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development 68 4 (2020) 1903\u20131929.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11423-020-09793-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jennifer Meyer Thorben Jansen Ronja Schiller Lucas\u00a0W Liebenow Marlene Steinbach Andrea Horbach and Johanna Fleckenstein. 2024. Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students\u2019 text revision motivation and positive emotions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 6 (2024) 100199.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.caeai.2023.100199"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burt\u00a0L Monroe Michael\u00a0P Colaresi and Kevin\u00a0M Quinn. 2008. Fightin\u2019words: Lexical feature selection and evaluation for identifying the content of political conflict. Political Analysis 16 4 (2008) 372\u2013403.","DOI":"10.1093\/pan\/mpn018"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_36_2","unstructured":"OpenAI. 2025. OpenAI API. https:\/\/platform.openai.com\/docs\/overview Accessed: 2025-09-29."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_37_2","unstructured":"Norah Rami. 2025. AI teacher tools show racial bias in suggestions for struggling students. https:\/\/www.chalkbeat.org\/2025\/08\/06\/ai-teacher-assistants-promote-racial-bias-study-finds\/ Chalkbeat news article."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heather Roberts-Mahoney Alexander\u00a0J Means and Mark\u00a0J Garrison. 2016. Netflixing human capital development: Personalized learning technology and the corporatization of K-12 education. Journal of Education Policy 31 4 (2016) 405\u2013420.","DOI":"10.1080\/02680939.2015.1132774"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Evan\u00a0TR Rosenman Santiago Olivella and Kosuke Imai. 2023. Race and ethnicity data for first middle and surnames. Scientific data 10 1 (2023) 299.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41597-023-02202-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maryam Roshanaei Hanna Olivares and Rafael\u00a0Rangel Lopez. 2023. Harnessing AI to foster equity in education: Opportunities challenges and emerging strategies. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications 15 4 (2023) 123\u2013143.","DOI":"10.4236\/jilsa.2023.154009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_41_2","volume-title":"Measuring what matters: How noncognitive skills are captured, stored, and utilized in personalized learning environments","author":"Rutledge Julia","year":"2017","unstructured":"Julia Rutledge. 2017. Measuring what matters: How noncognitive skills are captured, stored, and utilized in personalized learning environments. The University of Wisconsin-Madison."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_42_2","unstructured":"Alejandro Salinas Amit Haim and Julian Nyarko. 2024. What\u2019s in a name? Auditing large language models for race and gender bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2402.14875 (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carolin Schuster Susanne Narciss and Jessica Bilz. 2021. Well done (for someone of your gender)! Experimental evidence of teachers\u2019 stereotype-based shifting standards for test grading and elaborated feedback. Social Psychology of Education 24 3 (2021) 809\u2013834.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11218-021-09633-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dara Shifrer. 2013. Stigma of a label: Educational expectations for high school students labeled with learning disabilities. Journal of health and social behavior 54 4 (2013) 462\u2013480.","DOI":"10.1177\/0022146513503346"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-64315-6_3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Valerie\u00a0Jones Taylor and Gregory\u00a0M Walton. 2011. Stereotype threat undermines academic learning. Personality and social psychology bulletin 37 8 (2011) 1055\u20131067.","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167211406506"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_47_2","unstructured":"The Learning Agency Lab. 2024. The Persuade Dataset. https:\/\/the-learning-agency-lab.com\/learning-exchange\/persuade-dataset\/ Accessed: 2024-07-01."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maria\u00a0Ornella Treglia. 2008. Feedback on feedback: Exploring student responses to teachers\u2019 written commentary. Journal of Basic Writing (2008) 105\u2013137.","DOI":"10.37514\/JBW-J.2008.27.1.06"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gary\u00a0A Troia Allen\u00a0G Harbaugh Rebecca\u00a0K Shankland Kimberly\u00a0A Wolbers and Ann\u00a0M Lawrence. 2013. Relationships between writing motivation writing activity and writing performance: Effects of grade sex and ability. Reading and Writing 26 1 (2013) 17\u201344.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11145-012-9379-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_50_2","unstructured":"Jody\u00a0S Underwood and Alyson\u00a0P Tregidgo. 2006. Improving student writing through effective feedback: Best practices and recommendations. Journal of Teaching Writing 22 2 (2006) 73\u201398."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_51_2","volume-title":"Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations","author":"Technology U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational","year":"2023","unstructured":"U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. 2023. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations. Technical Report. U.S. Department of Education. https:\/\/www.ed.gov\/sites\/ed\/files\/documents\/ai-report\/ai-report.pdf Accessed: 2025-09-29."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yixin Wan George Pu Jiao Sun Aparna Garimella Kai-Wei Chang and Nanyun Peng. 2023. \" kelly is a warm person joseph is a role model\": Gender biases in llm-generated reference letters. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2310.09219 (2023).","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2023.findings-emnlp.243"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_53_2","unstructured":"Angelina Wang Jamie Morgenstern and John\u00a0P Dickerson. 2025. Large language models that replace human participants can harmfully misportray and flatten identity groups. Nature Machine Intelligence (2025) 1\u201312."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Linda\u00a0R Waugh. 1982. Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure. (1982).","DOI":"10.1515\/semi.1982.38.3-4.299"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_55_2","unstructured":"Iain Weissburg Sathvika Anand Sharon Levy and Haewon Jeong. 2024. Llms are biased teachers: Evaluating llm bias in personalized education. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2410.14012 (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_56_2","unstructured":"Jessica Whitley. 2010. Modelling the Influence of Teacher Characteristics on Student Achievement for Canadian Students with and without Learning Disabilities. International journal of special education 25 3 (2010) 88\u201397."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grant Wiggins. 2012. Seven keys to effective feedback. Feedback 70 1 (2012) 10\u201316.","DOI":"10.12968\/prtu.2012.1.6.8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_58_2","unstructured":"Siyu Wu Yang Cao Jiajun Cui Runze Li Hong Qian Bo Jiang and Wei Zhang. 2024. A comprehensive exploration of personalized learning in smart education: From student modeling to personalized recommendations. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2402.01666 (2024)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhiwen You HaeJin Lee Shubhanshu Mishra Sullam Jeoung Apratim Mishra Jinseok Kim and Jana Diesner. 2024. Beyond binary gender labels: Revealing gender biases in LLMs through gender-neutral name predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:https:\/\/arXiv.org\/abs\/2407.05271 (2024).","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2024.gebnlp-1.16"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_60_2","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2025). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. To appear","author":"Zhou Yiqiu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Yiqiu Zhou, Maciej Pankiewicz, Luc Paquette, and Ryan\u00a0S Baker. 2025. Impact of LLM Feedback on Learner Persistence in Programming. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2025). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. To appear."}],"event":{"name":"LAK 2026: LAK26: 16th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference","location":"Bergen Norway","acronym":"LAK 2026"},"container-title":["Proceedings of the LAK26: 16th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T09:43:33Z","timestamp":1777110213000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3785022.3785113"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]]},"references-count":59,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3785022.3785113","10.1145\/3785022"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3785022.3785113","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-04-26","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}