{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]],"date-time":"2026-05-22T20:09:09Z","timestamp":1779480549447,"version":"3.53.1"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":70,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]],"date-time":"2026-03-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772496000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode"}],"funder":[{"name":"Princeton University Language+Intelligence Seed Grant","award":["N\/A"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["N\/A"]}]},{"name":"Schmidt Sciences Humanities and AI Virtual Institute","award":["N\/A"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["N\/A"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3788646.3789536","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]],"date-time":"2026-05-22T19:48:12Z","timestamp":1779479292000},"page":"136-172","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["AI-Assisted Moot Courts: Simulating Justice-Specific Questioning in Oral Arguments"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-7418-5725","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kylie","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-0334-1798","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nimra","family":"Nadeem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8602-0007","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lucia","family":"Zheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1631-3020","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dominik","family":"Stammbach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3938-0541","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Peter","family":"Henderson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_1_1","first-page":"5","volume":"121","year":"2008","unstructured":"2008. Harvard Law Review 121, 5 (Mar 2008), 1431\u20131438. https:\/\/harvardlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/02\/justice_thomas.pdf","journal-title":"Harvard Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abdelrahman Abdallah Bhawna Piryani and Adam Jatowt. 2023. Exploring the state of the art in Legal QA Systems. https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40537-023-00802-8","DOI":"10.1186\/s40537-023-00802-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"Rania Abdelghani H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Sauz\u00e9on and Pierre-Yves Oudeyer. 2023. Generative AI in the Classroom: Can Students Remain Active Learners? https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2310.03192"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_4_1","unstructured":"Rohan Bhambhoria Samuel Dahan Jonathan Li and Xiaodan Zhu. 2024. Evaluating AI for Law: Bridging the Gap with Open-Source Solutions. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2404.12349"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_5_1","volume-title":"Vaughan","author":"Bowman Brooke J.","year":"2018","unstructured":"Brooke J. Bowman, Kirsten K. Davis, Lance N. Long, Jason S. Palmer, and Stephanie A. Vaughan. 2018. Oral Argument: The Essential Guide. Stetson University College of Law, Institute for the Advancement of Legal Communication. https:\/\/www.stetson.edu\/law\/alc\/media\/Stetson-oral-advocacy-guide-.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_6_1","unstructured":"Walker Boyle. 2024. US Supreme Court Annotated Transcripts. https:\/\/github.com\/walkerdb\/supreme_court_transcripts"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_7_1","volume-title":"Shaw","author":"Calabresi Steven G.","year":"2018","unstructured":"Steven G. Calabresi and Todd W. Shaw. 2018. https:\/\/www.gwlr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/87-Geo.-Wash.-L.-Rev.-507.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_8_1","volume-title":"Daniel Martin Katz, and Nikolaos Aletras","author":"Chalkidis Ilias","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ilias Chalkidis, Abhik Jana, Dirk Hartung, Michael Bommarito, Ion Androutsopoulos, Daniel Martin Katz, and Nikolaos Aletras. 2022. LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2110.00976"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guhong Chen Liyang Fan Zihan Gong Nan Xie Zixuan Li Ziqiang Liu Chengming Li Qiang Qu Hamid Alinejad-Rokny Shiwen Ni and Min Yang. 2025. AgentCourt: Simulating Court with Adversarial Evolvable Lawyer Agents. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2408.08089","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.findings-acl.304"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_10_1","unstructured":"Inyoung Cheong Patty Liu Dominik Stammbach and Peter Henderson. 2025. How Can AI Augment Access to Justice? Public Defenders' Perspectives on AI Adoption. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2510.22933"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2024.nllp-1.22"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_12_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Natural Logic Meets Machine Learning (NALOMA), Lasha Abzianidze and Valeria de Paiva (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics","author":"Chu Yu Ying","year":"2025","unstructured":"Yu Ying Chu, Sieh-chuen Huang, and Hsuan-Lei Shao. 2025. Unpacking Legal Reasoning in LLMs: Chain-of-Thought as a Key to Human-Machine Alignment in Essay-Based NLU Tasks. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Natural Logic Meets Machine Learning (NALOMA), Lasha Abzianidze and Valeria de Paiva (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Bochum, Germany, 1\u20137. https:\/\/aclanthology.org\/2025.naloma-1.1\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_13_1","volume-title":"Griffiths","author":"Collins Katherine M.","year":"2024","unstructured":"Katherine M. Collins, Ilia Sucholutsky, Umang Bhatt, Kartik Chandra, Lionel Wong, Mina Lee, Cedegao E. Zhang, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Mark Ho, Vikash Mansinghka, Adrian Weller, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Thomas L. Griffiths. 2024. Building Machines that Learn and Think with People. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2408.03943"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_14_1","unstructured":"Michael Burke Craighead. 2022. https:\/\/baylor-ir.tdl.org\/server\/api\/core\/bitstreams\/b3ca3a87-1b53-4751-8fce-776689f56b82\/content"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_15_1","unstructured":"Junyun Cui Xiaoyu Shen Feiping Nie Zheng Wang Jinglong Wang and Yulong Chen. 2022. A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets Metrics Models and Challenges. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2204.04859"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_16_1","unstructured":"Gregory M. Dickinson. 2023. A Computational Analysis of Oral Argument in the Supreme Court. arXiv:2306.05373 [cs.CY] https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2306.05373"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2405.12205"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_18_1","unstructured":"Lauren DiMartino. 2020. https:\/\/scholar.law.colorado.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=lawreview_forum"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_19_1","unstructured":"Duke University School of Law. 2025. Moot Court Tips. https:\/\/law.duke.edu\/life\/mootcourt\/tips"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/651511"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_21_1","unstructured":"Georgetown University Law Center. 2019. May It Please the Court: The Oral Argument Component of Your Legal Practice Course. Technical Report. https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/May-It-Please-the-Court-The-Oral-Argument-Component-of-Your-Legal-Practice-Course.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Neel Guha Julian Nyarko Daniel Ho Christopher R\u00e9 Adam Chilton Aditya K Alex Chohlas-Wood Austin Peters Brandon Waldon Daniel Rockmore Diego Zambrano Dmitry Talisman Enam Hoque Faiz Surani Frank Fagan Galit Sarfaty Gregory Dickinson Haggai Porat Jason Hegland Jessica Wu Joe Nudell Joel Niklaus John Nay Jonathan Choi Kevin Tobia Margaret Hagan Megan Ma Michael Livermore Nikon Rasumov-Rahe Nils Holzenberger Noam Kolt Peter Henderson Sean Rehaag Sharad Goel Shang Gao Spencer Williams Sunny Gandhi Tom Zur Varun Iyer and Zehua Li. 2023. LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (Dec. 2023) 44123\u201344279. https:\/\/proceedings.neurips.cc\/paper_files\/paper\/2023\/hash\/89e44582fd28ddfealea4dcb0ebbf4b0-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.html","DOI":"10.52202\/075280-1915"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.acl-long.1517"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_24_1","first-page":"1431","article-title":"Justice Thomas's Inconsistent Originalism: Book Note on *My Grandfather's Son: A Memoir* by Clarence Thomas","volume":"121","author":"Review Harvard Law","year":"2008","unstructured":"Harvard Law Review. 2008. Justice Thomas's Inconsistent Originalism: Book Note on *My Grandfather's Son: A Memoir* by Clarence Thomas. Harvard Law Review 121 (2008), 1431\u20131438. https:\/\/harvardlawreview.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/02\/justice_thomas.pdf","journal-title":"Harvard Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_25_1","volume-title":"CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Review. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 1).","author":"Hendrycks Dan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Anya Chen, and Spencer Ball. 2021. CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Review. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 1)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_26_1","volume-title":"Thomas","author":"Henning Anna C.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Anna C. Henning and Kenneth R. Thomas. 2009. https:\/\/sgp.fas.org\/crs\/misc\/R40649.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_27_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop 2020 co-located with the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD","author":"Holzenberger Nils","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nils Holzenberger, Andrew Blair-Stanek, and Benjamin Van Durme. 2020. A Dataset for Statutory Reasoning in Tax Law Entailment and Question Answering. In Proceedings of the Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop 2020 co-located with the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD 2020), Virtual Workshop, August 24, 2020 (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2645), Nikolaos Aletras, Ion Androutsopoulos, Leslie Barrett, Adam Meyers, and Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro (Eds.). CEUR-WS.org, 31\u201338. https:\/\/ceur-ws.org\/Vol-2645\/paper5.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2025.findings-naacl.441"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_29_1","first-page":"1161","article-title":"The New Oral Argument: Justices as Advocates","volume":"94","author":"Jacobi Tonja","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag. 2019. The New Oral Argument: Justices as Advocates. Notre Dame L. Rev. 94, 3 (2019), 1161\u20131253. https:\/\/scholarship.law.nd.edu\/ndlr\/vol94\/iss3\/4","journal-title":"Notre Dame L. Rev."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag. 2023. Supreme Court Interruptions and interventions: The changing role of the chief justice. https:\/\/scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu\/faculty-articles\/171\/","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4381566"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1353\/sch.2005.0017","article-title":"Oral Advocacy and the Re-emergence of the Supreme Court Bar","volume":"30","author":"Roberts John G.","year":"2005","unstructured":"John G. Roberts, Jr. 2005. Oral Advocacy and the Re-emergence of the Supreme Court Bar. Journal of Supreme Court History 30, 1 (2005), 68\u201381.","journal-title":"Journal of Supreme Court History"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_32_1","first-page":"241","article-title":"Inquiring Minds Want to Know: Do Justices Tip Their Hands with Questions at Oral Argument in the U.S. Supreme Court","volume":"29","author":"Johnson Timothy R.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Timothy R. Johnson, Ryan C. Black, Jerry Goldman, and Sarah A. Treul. 2009. Inquiring Minds Want to Know: Do Justices Tip Their Hands with Questions at Oral Argument in the U.S. Supreme Court? Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 29, 1 (2009), 241\u2013261.","journal-title":"Washington University Journal of Law & Policy"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0003055406062034"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_34_1","unstructured":"Irina Jurenka Markus Kunesch Kevin R. McKee Daniel Gillick Shaojian Zhu Sara Wiltberger Shubham Milind Phal Katherine Hermann Daniel Kasenberg Avishkar Bhoopchand Ankit Anand Miruna P\u00eeslar Stephanie Chan Lisa Wang Jennifer She Parsa Mahmoudieh Aliya Rysbek Wei-Jen Ko Andrea Huber Brett Wiltshire Gal Elidan Roni Rabin Jasmin Rubinovitz Amit Pitaru Mac McAllister Julia Wilkowski David Choi Roee Engelberg Lidan Hackmon Adva Levin Rachel Griffin Michael Sears Filip Bar Mia Mesar Mana Jabbour Arslan Chaudhry James Cohan Sridhar Thiagarajan Nir Levine Ben Brown Dilan Gorur Svetlana Grant Rachel Hashimshoni Laura Weidinger Jieru Hu Dawn Chen Kuba Dolecki Canfer Akbulut Maxwell Bileschi Laura Culp Wen-Xin Dong Nahema Marchal Kelsie Van Deman Hema Bajaj Misra Michael Duah Moran Ambar Avi Caciularu Sandra Lefdal Chris Summerfield James An Pierre-Alexandre Kamienny Abhinit Mohdi Theofilos Strinopoulous Annie Hale Wayne Anderson Luis C. Cobo Niv Efron Muktha Ananda Shakir Mohamed Maureen Heymans Zoubin Ghahramani Yossi Matias Ben Gomes and Lila Ibrahim. 2025. Towards Responsible Development of Generative AI for Education: An Evaluation-Driven Approach. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2407.12687"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_35_1","article-title":"GPT-4 Passes the Bar Exam","volume":"382","author":"Katz Daniel Martin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Daniel Martin Katz, Michael James Bommarito, Shang Gao, and Pablo Arredondo. 2024. GPT-4 Passes the Bar Exam. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 382, 2270 (2024), 20230254.","journal-title":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_36_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 2019 Workshop on Widening NLP, Amittai Axelrod, Diyi Yang, Rossana Cunha, Samira Shaikh, and Zeerak Waseem (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics","author":"Lepp Haley","year":"2019","unstructured":"Haley Lepp. 2019. Pardon the Interruption: Automatic Analysis of Gender and Competitive Turn-Taking in United States Supreme Court Hearings. In Proceedings of the 2019 Workshop on Widening NLP, Amittai Axelrod, Diyi Yang, Rossana Cunha, Samira Shaikh, and Zeerak Waseem (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy, 143\u2013145. https:\/\/aclanthology.org\/W19-3645"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_37_1","volume-title":"ContractEval: Benchmarking LLMs for Clause-Level Legal Risk Identification in Commercial Contracts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.03080","author":"Liu Shuang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Shuang Liu, Zelong Li, Ruoyun Ma, Haiyan Zhao, and Mengnan Du. 2025. ContractEval: Benchmarking LLMs for Clause-Level Legal Risk Identification in Commercial Contracts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.03080 (2025)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_38_1","volume-title":"Lee","author":"Loring Jason M.","year":"2025","unstructured":"Jason M. Loring and Andrew R. Lee. 2025. From Enhancement to Dependency: What the Epidemic of AI Failures in Law Means for Professionals. https:\/\/www.joneswalker.com\/en\/insights\/blogs\/ai-law-blog\/from-enhancement-to-dependency-what-the-epidemic-of-ai-failures-in-law-means-for.html?id=102l04x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_39_1","volume-title":"Juan Pablo Pacheco, Raj Sanjay Shah, Emma Brunskill, and Diyi Yang.","author":"Louie Ryan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ryan Louie, Ifdita Hasan Orney, Juan Pablo Pacheco, Raj Sanjay Shah, Emma Brunskill, and Diyi Yang. 2025. Can LLM-Simulated Practice and Feedback Upskill Human Counselors? A Randomized Study with 90+ Novice Counselors. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2505.02428"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jels.12413"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_41_1","volume-title":"FALQU: Finding Answers to Legal Questions. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2304.05611","author":"Mansouri Behrooz","year":"2023","unstructured":"Behrooz Mansouri and Ricardo Campos. 2023. FALQU: Finding Answers to Legal Questions. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2304.05611"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_42_1","first-page":"27","volume-title":"Curbing the bench-to-practice pipeline. NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy","author":"Marcum Anthony","year":"2024","unstructured":"Anthony Marcum. 2024. Curbing the bench-to-practice pipeline. NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy (2024). https:\/\/nyujlpp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/JLPP-27-2-Marcum.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cosrev.2023.100552"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_44_1","volume-title":"Tyler","author":"Meares Tracey L.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tracey L. Meares and Tom R. Tyler. 2014. Justice Sotomayor and the Jurisprudence of Procedural Justice. https:\/\/yalelawjournal.org\/forum\/justice-sotomayor-and-the-jurisprudence-of-procedural-justice"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_45_1","volume-title":"A Practical Guide to Oral Argument (1 ed.)","author":"Moss Delaney","unstructured":"Delaney Moss, Marlowe Glass, Hunter Wang, and Benjamin Gervin. 2024. A Practical Guide to Oral Argument (1 ed.). National Association of Moot Court, Washington, D.C. https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/635b1a7dcdb9bb0bddfdc122\/t\/6879460eb857a17f05f2cd52\/1752778255547\/Practical+Guide+1st+Ed+FINAL.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_46_1","unstructured":"Nicholas Pipitone and Ghita Houir Alami. 2024. LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2408.10343"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_47_1","volume-title":"The selection of disputes for litigation. The journal of legal studies 13, 1","author":"Priest George L","year":"1984","unstructured":"George L Priest and Benjamin Klein. 1984. The selection of disputes for litigation. The journal of legal studies 13, 1 (1984), 1\u201355."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_48_1","unstructured":"Abhilasha Ravichander Alan W Black Shomir Wilson Thomas Norton and Norman Sadeh. 2019. Question Answering for Privacy Policies: Combining Computational and Legal Perspectives. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1911.00841"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_49_1","unstructured":"William Rhyne. 2023. Chief justice John Roberts and the combination of conservatism and institutionalism. https:\/\/illinoislawreview.org\/uncategorized\/chief-justice-john-roberts-and-the-combination-of-conservatism-and-institutionalism\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_50_1","volume-title":"Appellate Oral Argument","author":"Sasso Gary L.","unstructured":"Gary L. Sasso. 1999. Appellate Oral Argument. In The Litigation Manual, John G. Koeltl and John S. Kiernan (Eds.). Vol. 3. American Bar Association, 316."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_51_1","volume-title":"Retrieval Augmented Generation, and the Future of Legal Practice.","author":"Schwarcz Daniel","year":"2025","unstructured":"Daniel Schwarcz, Sam Manning, Patrick Barry, David R Cleveland, JJ Prescott, and Beverly Rich. 2025. AI-powered Lawyering: AI Reasoning Models, Retrieval Augmented Generation, and the Future of Legal Practice. (2025)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_52_1","first-page":"603","article-title":"Preparing for Oral Argument in the United States Supreme Court","volume":"50","author":"Seamon Richard H.","year":"1999","unstructured":"Richard H. Seamon. 1999. Preparing for Oral Argument in the United States Supreme Court. South Carolina Law Review 50, 3 (1999), 603\u2013615. https:\/\/scholarcommons.sc.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=3536&context=sclr","journal-title":"South Carolina Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_53_1","unstructured":"Congressional Research Service. 2018. https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/crs-product\/R45269"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_54_1","unstructured":"Congressional Research Service. 2020. https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/crs-product\/R46562"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_55_1","unstructured":"Mrinank Sharma Meg Tong Tomasz Korbak David Duvenaud Amanda Askell Samuel R. Bowman Newton Cheng Esin Durmus Zac Hatfield-Dodds Scott R. Johnston Shauna Kravec Timothy Maxwell Sam McCandlish Kamal Ndousse Oliver Rausch Nicholas Schiefer Da Yan Miranda Zhang and Ethan Perez. 2025. Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2310.13548"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_56_1","first-page":"271","article-title":"The Illusion of Devil's Advocacy: How the Justices of the Supreme Court Foreshadow Their Decisions During Oral Argument","volume":"6","author":"Shullman Sarah Levien","year":"2004","unstructured":"Sarah Levien Shullman. 2004. The Illusion of Devil's Advocacy: How the Justices of the Supreme Court Foreshadow Their Decisions During Oral Argument. Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 6, 2 (2004), 271\u2013293.","journal-title":"Journal of Appellate Practice and Process"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_57_1","unstructured":"LearnLM Team Abhinit Modi Aditya Srikanth Veerubhotla Aliya Rysbek Andrea Huber Brett Wiltshire Brian Veprek Daniel Gillick Daniel Kasenberg Derek Ahmed Irina Jurenka James Cohan Jennifer She Julia Wilkowski Kaiz Alarakyia Kevin R. McKee Lisa Wang Markus Kunesch Mike Schaekermann Miruna P\u00eeslar Nikhil Joshi Parsa Mahmoudieh Paul Jhun Sara Wiltberger Shakir Mohamed Shashank Agarwal Shubham Milind Phal Sun Jae Lee Theofilos Strinopoulos Wei-Jen Ko Amy Wang Ankit Anand Avishkar Bhoopchand Dan Wild Divya Pandya Filip Bar Garth Graham Holger Winnemoeller Mahvish Nagda Prateek Kolhar Renee Schneider Shaojian Zhu Stephanie Chan Steve Yadlowsky Viknesh Sounderajah and Yannis Assael. 2025. LearnLM: Improving Gemini for Learning. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2412.16429"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosamond Thalken Edward H. Stiglitz David Mimno and Matthew Wilkens. 2023. Modeling Legal Reasoning: LM Annotation at the Edge of Human Agreement. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2310.18440","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/2023.emnlp-main.575"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_59_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5688\/ajpe777155"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_60_1","volume-title":"Iovino v","author":"United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. [n.","year":"2025","unstructured":"United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. [n. d.]. Memorandum Opinion, Iovino v. Michael Stapleton Associates, Ltd. Memorandum Opinion. https:\/\/websitedc.s3.amazonaws.com\/documents\/Iovino_v._Michael_Stapleton_Assocs._US_DC_Western_Virginia_July_24_2025.pdf Civil Action No. 5:21-cv-00064 (W.D. Va.)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_61_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michelle Vaccaro Abdullah Almaatouq and Thomas Malone. 2024. When Are Combinations of Humans and AI Useful? https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2405.06087","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2405.06087"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_62_1","volume-title":"Emory International Law Review Emory International Law Review","author":"Walton S. Ernie","unstructured":"S. Ernie Walton. 2016. Emory International Law Review Emory International Law Review Volume 30. https:\/\/scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1147&context=eilr"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rose E. Wang Ana T. Ribeiro Carly D. Robinson Susanna Loeb and Dora Demszky. 2025. Tutor CoPilot: A Human-AI Approach for Scaling Real-Time Expertise. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2410.03017","DOI":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-5363154\/v1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_64_1","unstructured":"Washington University in Saint Louis. 2025. Supreme Court Database. http:\/\/scdb.wustl.edu\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_65_1","unstructured":"Gader Wren Michael Goutsaliouk and Luke Green. 2025. The Judicial Philosophy of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson: Published in Houston Law Review. https:\/\/houstonlawreview.org\/article\/129037"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_66_1","volume-title":"Oral Arguments Before the Supreme Court: An Empirical Approach","author":"Wrightsman L.","unstructured":"L. Wrightsman. 2008. Oral Arguments Before the Supreme Court: An Empirical Approach. Oxford University Press, USA. https:\/\/books.google.com.pk\/books?id=EmxnDAAAQBAJ"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_67_1","unstructured":"Dun Zhang Panxiang Zou and Yudong Zhou. 2025. Dewey Long Context Embedding Model: A Technical Report. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2503.20376"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_68_1","unstructured":"Kaiyuan Zhang Jiaqi Li Yueyue Wu Haitao Li Cheng Luo Shaokun Zou Yujia Zhou Weihang Su Qingyao Ai and Yiqun Liu. 2025. Chinese Court Simulation with LLM-Based Agent System. https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2508.17322"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_69_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3709025.3712219"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_70_1","volume-title":"Benjamin Van Durme, and Nils Holzenberger","author":"Zou Xinrui","year":"2024","unstructured":"Xinrui Zou, Ming Zhang, Nathaniel Weir, Benjamin Van Durme, and Nils Holzenberger. 2024. Reframing tax law entailment as analogical reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06715 (2024)."}],"event":{"name":"CSLAW '26: Symposium on Computer Science and Law","location":"Berkeley CA USA","acronym":"CSLAW '26","sponsor":["ACM Association for Computing Machinery"]},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Science and Law"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3788646.3789536","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]],"date-time":"2026-05-22T19:50:35Z","timestamp":1779479435000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3788646.3789536"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]]},"references-count":70,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3788646.3789536","10.1145\/3788646"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3788646.3789536","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-05-22","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}