{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T16:14:04Z","timestamp":1783700044857,"version":"3.55.0"},"publisher-location":"New York, NY, USA","reference-count":26,"publisher":"ACM","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]],"date-time":"2026-06-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1782086400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/legalcode"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]]},"DOI":"10.1145\/3805029.3818268","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T15:25:06Z","timestamp":1783697106000},"page":"1-4","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Augmenting Legal Work: Artificial Intelligence in Professional Practice"],"prefix":"10.1145","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7913-9176","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Felicity","family":"Bell","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for the Future of the Legal Profession, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8372-1684","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eike","family":"Schhneiders","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6065-3730","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"V\u00e1clav","family":"Jane\u010dek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1916-4879","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dirk","family":"Hartung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2423-4963","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Erin T","family":"Solovey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5106-7692","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Niels van","family":"Berkel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7831-2632","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Benjamin","family":"Tag","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Armin Alimardani. 2024. Generative Artificial Intelligence vs. Law Students: An Empirical Study on Criminal Law Exam Performance. Law Innovation and Technology 16 2 (2024) 777\u2013819. 10.1080\/17579961.2024.2392932","DOI":"10.1080\/17579961.2024.2392932"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Felicity Bell and Justine Rogers. 2025. Becoming Doing Being: GenAI and the Promise of Professional Identity in Law. Law Technology and Humans 7 3 (Nov. 2025) 62\u201393. 10.5204\/lthj.4120","DOI":"10.5204\/lthj.4120"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Colleen\u00a0V. Chien and Miriam Kim. 2024. Generative AI and Legal Aid: Results from a Field Study and 100 Use Cases to Bridge the Access to Justice Gap. (14 March 2024). 10.2139\/ssrn.4733061UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper; forthcoming in Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4733061"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jonathan\u00a0H. Choi Kristin\u00a0E. Hickman Amy Monahan and Daniel Schwarcz. 2022. ChatGPT Goes to Law School. Journal of Legal Education 71 (2022) 387\u2013?10.2139\/ssrn.4335905Published version; earlier version available on SSRN.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4335905"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jonathan\u00a0H. Choi and Daniel Schwarcz. 2025. AI Assistance in Legal Analysis: An Empirical Study. Journal of Legal Education 73 (2025) 384\u2013?10.2139\/ssrn.4539836Published version; earlier version available on SSRN.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4539836"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sander de Jong Ville Paananen Benjamin Tag and Niels van Berkel. 2025. Cognitive Forcing for Better Decision-Making: Reducing Overreliance on AI Systems Through Partial Explanations. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9 2 Article CSCW048 (2025) 30\u00a0pages. 10.1145\/3710946","DOI":"10.1145\/3710946"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_8_2","unstructured":"Maura\u00a0R. Grossman and Gordon\u00a0V. Cormack. 2011. Technology-Assisted Review in E-Discovery Can Be More Effective and More Efficient Than Exhaustive Manual Review. Richmond Journal of Law and Technology 17 3 (2011) 11. https:\/\/scholarship.richmond.edu\/jolt\/vol17\/iss3\/5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Daniel\u00a0Martin Katz Michael\u00a0James Bommarito Shang Gao and Pablo Arredondo. 2024. GPT-4 Passes the Bar Exam. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 382 2270 (2024) 20230254. 10.1098\/rsta.2023.0254","DOI":"10.1098\/rsta.2023.0254"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Charlotta Kronblad Anna Jonsson and Frida Pemer. 2024. Generative AI Beyond the Hype\u2014New Technologies in the Face of Organizing and Organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 60 4 (2024) 623\u2013630. 10.1177\/00218863241285454","DOI":"10.1177\/00218863241285454"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713778"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michael Legg. 2024. Better Than a Bot: Instilling Ethical Judgement into the Lawyers of the Future in the Age of AI. Griffith Law Review 33 3 (2024) 273\u2013293. 10.1080\/10383441.2025.2493493","DOI":"10.1080\/10383441.2025.2493493"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5352645"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"John\u00a0Zhuang Liu and Xueyao Li. 2025. How Do Judges Use Large Language Models? Evidence from Shenzhen. Journal of Legal Analysis 16 1 (Jan. 2025) 235\u2013262. 10.1093\/jla\/laae009","DOI":"10.1093\/jla\/laae009"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aileen Nielsen Stavroula Skylaki Milda Norkute and Alexander Stremitzer. 2024. Building a Better Lawyer: Experimental Evidence that Artificial Intelligence Can Increase Legal Work Efficiency. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 21 4 (2024) 979\u20131022. 10.1111\/jels.12396","DOI":"10.1111\/jels.12396"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dana Remus and Frank\u00a0S. Levy. 2016. Can Robots Be Lawyers? Computers Lawyers and the Practice of Law. (2016). 10.2139\/ssrn.2701092SSRN working paper.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2701092"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lachlan Robb Rachel Hews Felicity Deane Michael Guihot Jonah Farry and Amanda Kennedy. 2025. \u201cIt\u2019s the End of the World as We Know It\u201d: Generative AI and the Changing Landscape of Legal Practice and Education. (1 March 2025). 10.2139\/ssrn.5311507SSRN working paper.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5311507"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ian Rodgers and Mari Sako. 2025. Prompt Engineering as Substantive and Relational Expertise: Linking Professionals\u2019 Learning Pathways to Boundary Work. (17 March 2025). 10.2139\/ssrn.5182132SSRN working paper.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5182132"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_19_2","volume-title":"Technology and Innovation in Legal Services: Final Report for the Solicitors Regulation Authority","author":"Sako Mari","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mari Sako and Richard Parnham. 2021. Technology and Innovation in Legal Services: Final Report for the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Technical Report. University of Oxford. Report commissioned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3706598.3713470"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3686038.3686043"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"David\u00a0Uriel Socol de\u00a0la Osa and Nydia Remolina. 2024. Artificial intelligence at the bench: Legal and ethical challenges of informing\u2014or misinforming\u2014judicial decision-making through generative AI. Data & Policy 6 (2024) e59. 10.1017\/dap.2024.53","DOI":"10.1017\/dap.2024.53"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3729176.3729192"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_24_2","volume-title":"Generative AI for Legal Professionals: Top Use Cases","author":"Reuters Thomson","year":"2025","unstructured":"Thomson Reuters. 2025. Generative AI for Legal Professionals: Top Use Cases. Thomson Reuters. https:\/\/legal.thomsonreuters.com\/blog\/generative-ai-for-legal-professionals-top-use-cases-tri\/ Accessed: 2026-02-05."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Julian Webb and Jeannie Paterson. 2025. The Evolution of Legal Knowledge Work in an Age of Brilliant(?) Technologies: From Robo-Lawyer to Digital Law Clerk. ANU Journal of Law and Technology 6 1 (Nov. 2025) 51\u201384.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5371536"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3379056"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_27_2","volume-title":"2024 Future Ready Lawyer Survey Report","author":"Kluwer Wolters","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wolters Kluwer. 2024. 2024 Future Ready Lawyer Survey Report. Technical Report. Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory. https:\/\/www.wolterskluwer.com\/en\/news\/future-ready-lawyer-2024-report Global survey of legal professionals on technology adoption and trends."}],"event":{"name":"CHIWORK Adjunct '26: Adjunct Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work","location":"Linz , Austria","acronym":"CHIWORK Adjunct '26"},"container-title":["Adjunct Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3805029.3818268","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T15:26:39Z","timestamp":1783697199000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3805029.3818268"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]]},"references-count":26,"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3805029.3818268","10.1145\/3805029"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3805029.3818268","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2026-07-10","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}