{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T00:08:41Z","timestamp":1792282121746,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"American Physiological Society","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Applied Physiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,3]]},"abstract":"The goal of this study was to compare treadmill walking with overground walking in healthy subjects with no known gait disorders. Nineteen subjects were tested, where each subject walked on a split-belt instrumented treadmill as well as over a smooth, flat surface. Comparisons between walking conditions were made for temporal gait parameters such as step length and cadence, leg kinematics, joint moments and powers, and muscle activity. Overall, very few differences were found in temporal gait parameters or leg kinematics between treadmill and overground walking. Conversely, sagittal plane joint moments were found to be quite different, where during treadmill walking trials, subjects demonstrated less dorsiflexor moments, less knee extensor moments, and greater hip extensor moments. Joint powers in the sagittal plane were found to be similar at the ankle but quite different at the knee and hip joints. Differences in muscle activity were observed between the two walking modalities, particularly in the tibialis anterior throughout stance, and in the hamstrings, vastus medialis and adductor longus during swing. While differences were observed in muscle activation patterns, joint moments and joint powers between the two walking modalities, the overall patterns in these behaviors were quite similar. From a therapeutic perspective, this suggests that training individuals with neurological injuries on a treadmill appears to be justified.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1152\/japplphysiol.01380.2006","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,29]],"date-time":"2007-11-29T20:59:47Z","timestamp":1196369987000},"page":"747-755","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":491,"title":["Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals"],"prefix":"10.1152","volume":"104","author":[{"given":"Song Joo","family":"Lee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph","family":"Hidler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"24","reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0268-0033(98)00012-6"},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00140138608968301"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0021-9290(00)00125-1"},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/35039000"},{"key":"R5","unstructured":"Boda WL\n , Tapp W, Findley TF.\n Biomechanical comparison of treadmill and overground walking.\n Eighth Biennial Conf, Canadian Soc for Biomechanics, Calgary\n , 1994, p. 88\u201389."},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1047-9651(02)00029-3"},{"key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/nn1010"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dingwell JB\n , Cusumano JP, Cavanagh PR, Sternad D.\n Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking.\n J Biomed Eng\n 123\n : 27\u201332, 2001.","DOI":"10.1115\/1.1336798"},{"key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1212\/01.wnl.0000202600.72018.39"},{"key":"R10","unstructured":"Field-Fote EC\n .\n Spinal cord control of movement: implications for locomotor rehabilitation following spinal cord injury.\n Phys Ther\n 80\n : 477\u2013484, 2000."},{"key":"R11","unstructured":"Harris GF\n , Smith PA.\n Human Motion Analysis: Current Applications and Future Directions\n . Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 1996."},{"key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0003-9993(94)90083-3"},{"key":"R13","unstructured":"Hesse S\n , Helm B, Krajnik MS, Gregoric M, Mauritz KH.\n Treadmill training with partial body weight support: Influence of body weight release on the gait of hemiparetic patients.\n J Neurol Rehabil\n 11\n : 15\u201320, 1997."},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.016"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0966-6362(95)01057-2"},{"key":"R16","unstructured":"Inman VT\n , Ralston HJ, Todd F.\n Introduction in Human Walking\n . Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1981."},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1113\/jphysiol.2003.057174"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1073858406287987"},{"key":"R19","unstructured":"Kenney JF\n , Keeping ES.\n Root mean square In:\n Mathematics of Statistics.\n Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1962, pt. 1, p. 59\u201360."},{"key":"R20","unstructured":"Kennedy PA\n .\n Guide to Econometrics\n (4th ed.), Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998."},{"key":"R21","unstructured":"Kirtley C\n .\n Clinical Gait Analysis: Theory and Practice\n . London: Churchill Livingston, 2006."},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1152\/jappl.1998.85.2.764"},{"key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1152\/japplphysiol.00393.2004"},{"key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1152\/jappl.1985.59.1.87"},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2004.05.0059"},{"key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pearce ME\n , Cunningham DA, Donner AP, Rechnitzer PA, Fullerton GM, Howard JH.\n Energy cost of treadmill and floor walking at self-selected paces.\n Eur J Phys\n 52\n : 115\u2013119, 1983.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00429037"},{"key":"R27","unstructured":"Perry J\n .\n Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function.\n Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 1992."},{"key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Regnaux JP\n , Robertson J, Smail DB, Daniel O, Bussel B.\n Human treadmill walking needs attention.\n J Neuroeng Rehabil\n 3\n : 2006.","DOI":"10.1186\/1743-0003-3-19"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Riley PO\n , Paolini G, Croce UD, Paylo KW, Kerrigan DC.\n A Kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects.\n Gait\n Posture 2006;doi:10.1016\/j.gaitpost.2006.07.003.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gaitpost.2006.07.003"},{"key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0966-6362(97)00023-4"},{"key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1249\/00005768-198024000-00005"},{"key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/84054"},{"key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005768-199810000-00011"},{"key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00222895.1983.10735302"},{"key":"R35","unstructured":"Winter DA\n .\n The Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Gait: Normal,Elderly, and Pathological.\n Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo Press, 1991."},{"key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1962.10480664"}],"container-title":["Journal of Applied Physiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.physiology.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1152\/japplphysiol.01380.2006","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,8]],"date-time":"2019-09-08T18:12:48Z","timestamp":1567966368000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.physiology.org\/doi\/10.1152\/japplphysiol.01380.2006"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,3]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1152\/japplphysiol.01380.2006"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1152\/japplphysiol.01380.2006","relation":{},"ISSN":["8750-7587","1522-1601"],"issn-type":[{"value":"8750-7587","type":"print"},{"value":"1522-1601","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,3]]}}}