{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,30]],"date-time":"2022-03-30T08:32:24Z","timestamp":1648629144111},"reference-count":5,"publisher":"Hindawi Limited","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,1,1]],"date-time":"2012-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1325376000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>A 77-year-old lady presented to the gynaecology outpatient clinic with vaginal extrusion (3C\/T3\/S1) six years after a transobturator suburethral sling procedure (TOT). The entire tape was spontaneously extruded vaginally and the vaginal erosion healed with conservative management. Midurethral tapes, currently the standard of care in the management of urodynamic stress incontinence (USI), are associated with a risk of erosion and extrusion of the synthetic material. The present case highlights the importance of the long-term followup after any sling procedure as erosion and\/or extrusion may arise at any time following the procedure.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/527345","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,26]],"date-time":"2012-11-26T21:08:36Z","timestamp":1353964116000},"page":"1-3","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Vaginal Extrusion of Transobturator Tape 6 Years after Procedure: How Long Should Be the Follow-Up Period after Vaginal Sling Surgeries?"],"prefix":"10.1155","volume":"2012","author":[{"given":"Chanchal","family":"Singh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Roy Ng Kwok","family":"Weng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Division of Urogynaecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"98","reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"1","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-006-0118-6"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000154941.24547.0f"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-006-0129-3"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1324-9"}],"container-title":["Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/criog\/2012\/527345.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/criog\/2012\/527345.xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/criog\/2012\/527345.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,2]],"date-time":"2016-08-02T18:51:13Z","timestamp":1470163873000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.hindawi.com\/journals\/criog\/2012\/527345\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012]]},"references-count":5,"alternative-id":["527345","527345"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2012\/527345","relation":{},"ISSN":["2090-6684","2090-6692"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2090-6684","type":"print"},{"value":"2090-6692","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012]]}}}