{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T03:16:19Z","timestamp":1780370179304,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Hindawi Limited","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,1,1]],"date-time":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1420070400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BioMed Research International"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:italic>Introduction<\/jats:italic>. PU is an option to manage complex and\/or recurrent urethral strictures and is necessary after urethrectomy and\/or penectomy. PU is generally assumed to be the last option before abandoning the urethral outlet.<jats:italic>Methods<\/jats:italic>. Between 2001 and 2013, 51 patients underwent PU. Mean age (\u00b1 standard deviation) was<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M1\"><mml:mn>60<\/mml:mn><mml:mo>\u00b1<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>15<\/mml:mn><\/mml:math>years. Only 13 patients (25.5%) did not undergo previous urethral interventions. PU was performed according to the Johanson<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M2\"><mml:mo stretchy=\"false\">(<\/mml:mo><mml:mi>n<\/mml:mi><mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>35<\/mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy=\"false\">)<\/mml:mo><\/mml:math>or Blandy<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M3\"><mml:mo stretchy=\"false\">(<\/mml:mo><mml:mi>n<\/mml:mi><mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>16<\/mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy=\"false\">)<\/mml:mo><\/mml:math>technique and these 2 groups were compared for surgical failure, maximum urinary flow (<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M4\"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Q<\/mml:mtext><\/mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>max<\/mml:mtext><\/mml:mrow><\/mml:msub><\/mml:mrow><\/mml:math>), urinary symptoms, and quality of life (according to the International Prostate Symptom Score).<jats:italic>Results<\/jats:italic>. Both groups were similar for patient\u2019s and stricture characteristics. Only follow-up duration was significantly longer after Johanson PU (47.9 months versus 11.1 months;<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M5\"><mml:mi>P<\/mml:mi><mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>0.003<\/mml:mn><\/mml:math>). For the entire cohort, 11 patients (21.6%) were considered a failure (9 or 25.7% for Johanson group and 2 or 12.5% for Blandy group;<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M6\"><mml:mi>P<\/mml:mi><mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>0.248<\/mml:mn><\/mml:math>). There was a significant improvement of<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M7\"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Q<\/mml:mtext><\/mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>max<\/mml:mtext><\/mml:mrow><\/mml:msub><\/mml:mrow><\/mml:math>in both groups. Quality of life after PU was comparable in both groups.<jats:italic>Conclusions<\/jats:italic>. PU is associated with a 21.6% recurrence rate and the patient should be informed about this risk.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/365715","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,19]],"date-time":"2015-02-19T21:02:26Z","timestamp":1424379746000},"page":"1-6","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Perineal Urethrostomy: Surgical and Functional Evaluation of Two Techniques"],"prefix":"10.1155","volume":"2015","author":[{"given":"Nicolaas","family":"Lumen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthias","family":"Beysens","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charles","family":"Van Praet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karel","family":"Decaestecker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne-Francoise","family":"Spinoit","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Piet","family":"Hoebeke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Willem","family":"Oosterlinck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"98","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2010.01.020"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000154971.05286.81"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2042.2009.02435.x"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2010.04.013"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-006-0057-3"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2009.10.018"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2009.04.012"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.03.044"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2010.01.039"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.10.053"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.10.041"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.anuro.2007.04.005"},{"key":"13","first-page":"361","volume":"46","year":"1953","journal-title":"Zeitschrift fur Urologie"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.1968.tb09886.x"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2004.04.035"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2008.07.046"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.05.058"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2011.10.043"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.04.037"}],"container-title":["BioMed Research International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/bmri\/2015\/365715.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/bmri\/2015\/365715.xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/bmri\/2015\/365715.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2016,7,27]],"date-time":"2016-07-27T10:26:38Z","timestamp":1469615198000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.hindawi.com\/journals\/bmri\/2015\/365715\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015]]},"references-count":20,"alternative-id":["365715","365715"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2015\/365715","relation":{},"ISSN":["2314-6133","2314-6141"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2314-6133","type":"print"},{"value":"2314-6141","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015]]}}}