{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,2]],"date-time":"2022-04-02T22:45:30Z","timestamp":1648939530547},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Hindawi Limited","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]],"date-time":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1451606400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The objective of this paper is to propose minilaparotomy hysterectomy as the suitable choice for large uterus on the basis of our experienced case of performed minilaparotomy hysterectomy to 4,500\u2009g myoma uteri and review published cases about this clinical condition. We presented a 44-year-old woman (gravida 0, virgin) who consulted our hospital because of the chief complaints of abnormal genital bleeding and hypermenorrhea. Transabdominal ultrasonography revealed that abdominal solid tumor reached over the navel. Her tumor was an indication of surgery; to do minilaparotomy hysterectomy with laparoscope was decided because her informed consent was obtained. A 6\u2009cm transverse incision (Maylard incision) was made to the skin above the pubic hairline. At the end of surgery, the length of abdominal wound was 8.5\u2009cm, operating time was 128\u2009min, weight of resected myoma uteri was 4,500\u2009g, and intraoperative blood loss was 895\u2009mL. Blood transfusion was not done; postsurgical course was not a problem without anemia. We propose that a large uterine case in which it is difficult to perform vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy should be considered in order to select minilaparotomy hysterectomy up to around 5\u2009kg weight of uterus, and the length of skin incision in minilaparotomy hysterectomy is necessarily &lt;9\u2009cm particularly in large uterus.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/6945061","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,27]],"date-time":"2016-01-27T16:07:11Z","timestamp":1453910831000},"page":"1-5","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy as a Suitable Choice of Hysterectomy for Large Myoma Uteri: Literature Review"],"prefix":"10.1155","volume":"2016","author":[{"given":"Kenichiro","family":"Sato","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoaikai Hospital, 7-21 Nakajima-cho, Hakodate-shi, Hokkaido 040-8577, Japan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yasuyoshi","family":"Fukushima","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoaikai Hospital, 7-21 Nakajima-cho, Hakodate-shi, Hokkaido 040-8577, Japan"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"98","reference":[{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.12.028"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4293\/108680810X12924466008169"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4293\/108680813X13693422521755"},{"issue":"5","key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(30)90197-4","volume":"20","year":"1930","journal-title":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"6","first-page":"41","volume":"9","year":"2005","journal-title":"The Permanente Journal"},{"issue":"4","key":"7","first-page":"417","volume":"12","year":"2008","journal-title":"Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9378(98)70358-8"},{"key":"9","first-page":"157","volume":"13","year":"2004","journal-title":"Surgical Technology International"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.07.040"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.07.039"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1755-7682-2-11"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2013.03.011"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0020-7292(01)00530-6"},{"key":"15","year":"2014"}],"container-title":["Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/criog\/2016\/6945061.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/criog\/2016\/6945061.xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/criog\/2016\/6945061.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,24]],"date-time":"2017-06-24T00:38:31Z","timestamp":1498264711000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.hindawi.com\/journals\/criog\/2016\/6945061\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"references-count":14,"alternative-id":["6945061","6945061"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2016\/6945061","relation":{},"ISSN":["2090-6684","2090-6692"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2090-6684","type":"print"},{"value":"2090-6692","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016]]}}}