{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,31]],"date-time":"2026-08-31T22:44:41Z","timestamp":1788216281524,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Wiley","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]],"date-time":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1451606400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Ophthalmology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    <jats:italic>Purpose.<\/jats:italic>\n                    To evaluate the effectiveness and optical quality of 3.0% topical diquafosol versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye patients following cataract surgery.\n                    <jats:italic>Methods.<\/jats:italic>\n                    In total, 40 eyes of 40 patients newly diagnosed with dry eye syndrome 1 week after cataract surgery were randomized to receive either 3.0% diquafosol ophthalmic solution six times daily or 0.05% cyclosporine A twice daily for 3 months. Outcome measures were tear film break-up time (TBUT), results on Schirmer 1 test, ocular surface staining score, the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs). Measurements were taken at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months.\n                    <jats:italic>Results.<\/jats:italic>\n                    In the diquafosol group, TBUT showed higher outcomes than the cyclosporine A group at 1 and 3 months. Both groups showed increased scores on Schirmer 1 test. The ocular surface staining score decreased in all periods in both groups. Vertical coma and total HOAs decreased more in the cyclosporine A group than in the diquafosol group at 3 months.\n                    <jats:italic>Conclusion.<\/jats:italic>\n                    Both 3.0% diquafosol and 0.05% cyclosporine A were effective in treating dry eye after cataract surgery. Diquafosol was more effective in increasing the tear secretion, but cyclosporine A was more effective in improving optical aberrations.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/8150757","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,16]],"date-time":"2016-02-16T16:03:37Z","timestamp":1455638617000},"page":"1-7","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":25,"title":["Effectiveness and Optical Quality of Topical 3.0% Diquafosol versus 0.05% Cyclosporine A in Dry Eye Patients following Cataract Surgery"],"prefix":"10.1155","volume":"2016","author":[{"given":"Jang Hoon","family":"Lee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 05355, Republic of Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"In Seok","family":"Song","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kyoung Lae","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 05355, Republic of Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sam Young","family":"Yoon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Ophthalmology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 05355, Republic of Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"1","first-page":"274","volume":"38","year":"2002","journal-title":"Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2014.02.036"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0078657"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-015-0058-3"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s1542-0124(12)70233-1"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(02)01136-3"},{"issue":"3","key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20040501-08","volume":"20","year":"2004","journal-title":"Journal of Refractive Surgery"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.12.044"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/opth.s30261"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ico.0000000000000123"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17219\/acem\/37145"},{"key":"12","first-page":"1029","volume":"9","year":"2015","journal-title":"Clinical Ophthalmology"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2013.27.3.167"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtos.2014.12.006"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s1542-0124(12)70081-2"},{"issue":"5","key":"16","first-page":"S654","volume":"16","year":"2000","journal-title":"Journal of Refractive Surgery"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.03.004"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0161-6420(03)00100-3"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(98)80237-X"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0b013e31812f67ca"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0162-3109(00)00192-2"},{"issue":"8","key":"22","first-page":"2609","volume":"43","year":"2002","journal-title":"Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3341\/jkos.2014.55.7.978"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3341\/jkos.2012.53.8.1076"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3341\/jkos.2015.56.3.339"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/opth.s69486"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1152\/ajplung.00332.2014"}],"container-title":["Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/joph\/2016\/8150757.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/joph\/2016\/8150757.xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/joph\/2016\/8150757.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,15]],"date-time":"2020-09-15T11:31:13Z","timestamp":1600169473000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/www.hindawi.com\/journals\/joph\/2016\/8150757\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"references-count":27,"alternative-id":["8150757","8150757"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2016\/8150757","relation":{},"ISSN":["2090-004X","2090-0058"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2090-004X","type":"print"},{"value":"2090-0058","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016]]}}}