{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,24]],"date-time":"2025-09-24T10:29:57Z","timestamp":1758709797235,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Wiley","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Ophthalmology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:italic>Purpose<\/jats:italic>. To evaluate the effect of cap-lenticule diameter difference (CLDD) on the visual outcome and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). <jats:italic>Methods<\/jats:italic>. A total of 132 patients who had bilateral SMILE for myopia or myopic astigmatism were included. The CLDD was 0.4\u2009mm in 54 patients (group 1) and 1.0\u2009mm in 78 patients (group 2). The refractive parameters, uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and HOAs were determined preoperatively and during six months follow-up. <jats:italic>Results<\/jats:italic>. Group 1 had better CDVA (in logMAR) compared to group 2 at day 1 (\u22120.07\u2009\u00b1\u20090.07 versus 0.04\u2009\u00b1\u20090.07, resp.; <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M1\"><mml:mi>p<\/mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001<\/mml:mn><\/mml:math>) and week 1 (\u22120.07\u2009\u00b1\u20090.07 versus \u20130.04\u2009\u00b1\u20090.07, resp.; <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M2\"><mml:mi>p<\/mml:mi><mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001<\/mml:mn><\/mml:math>). The visual acuity improved more in group 1 than in group 2. The UDVA (in logMAR) was 0.07\u2009\u00b1\u20090.07 and 0.29\u2009\u00b1\u20090.09 at day 1 (<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M3\"><mml:mi>p<\/mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>0.001<\/mml:mn><\/mml:math>) and \u22120.08\u2009\u00b1\u20090.07 and \u22120.06\u2009\u00b1\u20090.06 at six months (<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M4\"><mml:mi>p<\/mml:mi><mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>0.038<\/mml:mn><\/mml:math>) in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Group 1 was associated with significantly less induction of HOAs (0.24\u2009\u00b1\u20090.08\u2009<jats:italic>\u03bc<\/jats:italic>m and 0.32\u2009\u00b1\u20090.26\u2009<jats:italic>\u03bc<\/jats:italic>m, resp.; <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M5\"><mml:mi>p<\/mml:mi><mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>0.002<\/mml:mn><\/mml:math>). <jats:italic>Conclusions<\/jats:italic>. In SMILE, 0.4\u2009mm CLDD is associated with better visual outcome and less induction of HOAs than 1.0\u2009mm. Narrow CLDD should be considered in SMILE to increase the visual acuity particularly in the early postoperative period.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/8259546","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,15]],"date-time":"2017-11-15T18:33:30Z","timestamp":1510770810000},"page":"1-7","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Effect of Cap-Lenticule Diameter Difference on the Visual Outcome and Higher-Order Aberrations in SMILE: 0.4\u2009mm versus 1.0\u2009mm"],"prefix":"10.1155","volume":"2017","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5492-4087","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Banu","family":"Torun Acar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Bati Goz Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Suphi","family":"Acar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Bati Goz Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000292"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/apo.0000000000000237"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/opth.s80412"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.05.033"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000000707"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s40662-015-0024-4"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s40662-014-0003-1"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20151111-06"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/8702162"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18240\/ijo.2017.04.21"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.07.033"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.03.056"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.2012.02406.x"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2015-306717"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/02713683.2016.1168848"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0163259"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2017.05.005"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20160602-01"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2009.174284"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2015.02.006"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.06.052"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008268"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/265012"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000323814"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20150820-02"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-18530-9"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2013.08.011"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(02)01028-X"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.07.004"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2008.04.010"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3980\/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.04.17"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20140814-02"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20140320-03"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-017-0431-5"}],"container-title":["Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/joph\/2017\/8259546.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/joph\/2017\/8259546.xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/joph\/2017\/8259546.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,15]],"date-time":"2017-11-15T18:33:33Z","timestamp":1510770813000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.hindawi.com\/journals\/joph\/2017\/8259546\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"references-count":34,"alternative-id":["8259546","8259546"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2017\/8259546","relation":{},"ISSN":["2090-004X","2090-0058"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2090-004X"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2090-0058"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}}}