{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,31]],"date-time":"2025-12-31T07:53:21Z","timestamp":1767167601099,"version":"build-2238731810"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Wiley","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,13]],"date-time":"2022-10-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1665619200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Suzhou Industrial Park Science and Technology Project","award":["JL201706"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["JL201706"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,13]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    Objective. To explore the clinical effect of different delivery methods and the safety of vaginal delivery of second pregnancy after cesarean section and analyze the related factors. Methods. A total of 738 eligible pregnant women who underwent cesarean section from September 2018 to August 2020 were randomly selected from our hospital. Among them, 527 pregnant women successfully delivered vaginally were selected as the observation group, and 211 pregnant women who failed vaginal delivery were selected as the control group. To analyze the factors that influence the success of vaginal delivery of second pregnancy after cesarean section and compare the outcomes of mother and infant in two groups. Results. There was no significant difference in age, prenatal body mass index (BMI), and thickness of lower uterine segment between the two groups (\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <a:math xmlns:a=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M1\">\n                        <a:mi>P<\/a:mi>\n                        <a:mo>&gt;<\/a:mo>\n                        <a:mn>0.05<\/a:mn>\n                      <\/a:math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ). There were significant differences in fetal head orientation, fetal abdominal circumference, fetal biparietal diameter, uterine height, premature rupture of membranes, Bishop score, and epidural anesthesia during labor between the two groups (\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <c:math xmlns:c=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M2\">\n                        <c:mi>P<\/c:mi>\n                        <c:mo>&lt;<\/c:mo>\n                        <c:mn>0.05<\/c:mn>\n                      <\/c:math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that fetal abdominal circumference, fetal head orientation, Bishop score, and epidural anesthesia during labor were independent factors affecting the success of VBAC (\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <e:math xmlns:e=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M3\">\n                        <e:mi>P<\/e:mi>\n                        <e:mo>&lt;<\/e:mo>\n                        <e:mn>0.05<\/e:mn>\n                      <\/e:math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ). There was no significant difference in the incidence of uterine rupture between the two groups (\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <g:math xmlns:g=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M4\">\n                        <g:mi>P<\/g:mi>\n                        <g:mo>&gt;<\/g:mo>\n                        <g:mn>0.05<\/g:mn>\n                      <\/g:math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ). The amount of postpartum hemorrhage in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <i:math xmlns:i=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M5\">\n                        <i:mi>P<\/i:mi>\n                        <i:mo>&lt;<\/i:mo>\n                        <i:mn>0.05<\/i:mn>\n                      <\/i:math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ). There was no significant difference in Apgar score, asphyxia rate, and hospitalization rate between the two groups (\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <k:math xmlns:k=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M6\">\n                        <k:mi>P<\/k:mi>\n                        <k:mo>&gt;<\/k:mo>\n                        <k:mn>0.05<\/k:mn>\n                      <\/k:math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <m:math xmlns:m=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\" id=\"M7\">\n                        <m:mi>P<\/m:mi>\n                        <m:mo>&gt;<\/m:mo>\n                        <m:mn>0.05<\/m:mn>\n                      <\/m:math>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ). Conclusion. There are many factors that influence the success of vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Through prenatal comprehensive evaluation of vaginal delivery conditions, we can guide the parturient to choose a reasonable mode of delivery, reduce the incidence of complications, and improve the outcome of mother and baby.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/4243174","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,13]],"date-time":"2022-10-13T18:05:08Z","timestamp":1665684308000},"page":"1-7","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Analysis of Maternal and Infant Outcomes and Related Factors of Vaginal Delivery of Second Pregnancy after Cesarean Section"],"prefix":"10.1155","volume":"2022","author":[{"given":"Xing","family":"Pan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shuhui","family":"Sha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Gynaecology, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shuxia","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bingqing","family":"Zhan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nursing, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8400-4118","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Xue","family":"Guan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nursing, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4015-4763","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Fang","family":"Ling","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Nursing, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12553"},{"issue":"2","key":"2","first-page":"109","article-title":"Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction","volume":"19","author":"F. Gomes","year":"2006","journal-title":"Acta M\u00e9dica Portuguesa"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-11-72"},{"issue":"11","key":"5","first-page":"933","article-title":"A new formula for estimating fetal weight: the impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight","volume":"11","author":"M. Kalantari","year":"2013","journal-title":"Iranian journal of reproductive medicine"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15622"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000331.pub4"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009514.pub2"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/jp.2016.260"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD011516.pub2"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-21488-6"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-018-2018-4"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-017-1031-2"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004906.pub5"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-020-03440-7"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1331024"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-018-1788-z"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2017.04.004"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-014-0519-2"},{"key":"21","first-page":"76","article-title":"Predictors of birth outcomes related to women with a previous caesarean section: experience of a motherhood center, Bizerte","volume":"25","author":"A. Ayachi","year":"2016","journal-title":"The Pan African Medical Journal"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/695037"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007892.pub7"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X9001800305"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/6140982"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2018.04.017"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1155\/2023\/9860963","type":"retraction","label":"Retraction","source":"retraction-watch","updated":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,29]],"date-time":"2023-11-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1701216000000},"record-id":"60402"},{"DOI":"10.1155\/2023\/9860963","type":"retraction","label":"Retraction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,29]],"date-time":"2023-11-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1701216000000}}],"container-title":["Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/cmmm\/2022\/4243174.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/cmmm\/2022\/4243174.xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/cmmm\/2022\/4243174.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,13]],"date-time":"2022-10-13T18:05:17Z","timestamp":1665684317000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.hindawi.com\/journals\/cmmm\/2022\/4243174\/"}},"subtitle":[],"editor":[{"given":"Liaqat","family":"Ali","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"editor","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,13]]},"references-count":26,"alternative-id":["4243174","4243174"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2022\/4243174","relation":{},"ISSN":["1748-6718","1748-670X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1748-6718","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1748-670X","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,13]]}}}