{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]],"date-time":"2025-07-30T15:20:21Z","timestamp":1753888821851,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,10,9]],"date-time":"2006-10-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1160352000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":281,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R01 EB004070","C06RR12463-01"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R01 EB004070","C06RR12463-01"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000002","name":"National Institutes of Health","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R01 EB004070","C06RR12463-01"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R01 EB004070","C06RR12463-01"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000002","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["International Journal of Biomedical Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>We systematically evaluated a variety of MR spiral imaging acquisition and reconstruction schemes using a computational perceptual difference model (PDM) that models the ability of humans to perceive a visual difference between a degraded \u201cfast\u201d MRI image with subsampling of<jats:italic>k<\/jats:italic>\u2010space and a \u201cgold standard\u201d image mimicking full acquisition. Human subject experiments performed using a modified double\u2010stimulus continuous\u2010quality scale (DSCQS) correlated well with PDM, over a variety of images. In a smaller set of conditions, PDM scores agreed very well with human detectability measurements of image quality. Having validated the technique, PDM was used to systematically evaluate 2016 spiral image conditions (six interleave patterns, seven sampling densities, three density compensation schemes, four reconstruction methods, and four noise levels). Voronoi (VOR) with conventional regridding gave the best reconstructions. At a fixed sampling density, more interleaves gave better results. With noise present more interleaves and samples were desirable. With PDM, conditions were determined where equivalent image quality was obtained with 50% sampling in noise\u2010free conditions. We conclude that PDM scoring provides an objective, useful tool for the assessment of fast MR image quality that can greatly aid the design of MR acquisition and signal processing strategies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1155\/ijbi\/2006\/35290","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,11,6]],"date-time":"2006-11-06T07:40:32Z","timestamp":1162798832000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Optimization of Spiral MRI Using a Perceptual Difference Model"],"prefix":"10.1155","volume":"2006","author":[{"given":"Donglai","family":"Huo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Kyle A.","family":"Salem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Yuhao","family":"Jiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"David L.","family":"Wilson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,10,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"BishopJ. E. SantyrG. E. KelczF. andPlewesD. B. Limitations of the keyhole technique for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI 1997 7 no. 4 716\u2013723.","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.1880070418"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DuerkJ. L. LewinJ. S. andWuD. H. Application of keyhole imaging to interventional MRI: a simulation study to predict sequence requirements 1996 6 no. 6 918\u2013924.","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.1880060613"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van VaalsJ. J. BrummerM. E. DixonW. T.et al. Keyhole method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake 1993 3 no. 4 671\u2013675.","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.1880030419"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"PanychL. P. JakabP. D. andJoleszF. A. Implementation of wavelet-encoded MR imaging 1993 3 no. 4 649\u2013655.","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.1880030415"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"WeaverJ. B. XuY. HealyD. M. andDriscollJ. R. Wavelet-encoded MR imaging 1992 24 no. 2 275\u2013287.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1910240209"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"ShankaranarayananA. SimonettiO. P. LaubG. LewinJ. S. andDuerkJ. L. Segmentedk-space and real-time cardiac cine MR imaging with radial trajectories 2001 221 no. 3 827\u2013836.","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2213010455"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"ShankaranarayananA. WendtM. AschoffA. J. LewinJ. S. andDuerkJ. L. Radial keyhole sequences for low field projection reconstruction interventional MRI 2001 13 no. 1 142\u2013151 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/1522-2586(200101)13:1<142::AID-JMRI1022>3.0.CO;2-G.","DOI":"10.1002\/1522-2586(200101)13:1<142::AID-JMRI1022>3.0.CO;2-G"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"MeyerC. H. HuB. S. NishimuraD. G. andMacovskiA. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging 1992 28 no. 2 202\u2013213.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1910280204"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"GatehouseP. D. FirminD. N. CollinsS. andLongmoreD. B. Real time blood flow imaging by spiral scan phase velocity mapping 1994 31 no. 5 504\u2013512.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1910310506"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"GloverG. H.andLaiS. Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot 1998 39 no. 3 361\u2013368.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1910390305"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"PruessmannK. P. WeigerM. ScheideggerM. B. andBoesigerP. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI 1999 42 no. 5 952\u2013962 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(SICI)1522-2594(199911)42:5<952::AID-MRM16>3.0.CO;2-S.","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1522-2594(199911)42:5<952::AID-MRM16>3.3.CO;2-J"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"SodicksonD. K.andManningW. J. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays 1997 38 no. 4 591\u2013603.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1910380414"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"GloverG. H.andLeeA. T. Motion artifacts in fMRI: comparison of 2DFT with PR and spiral scan methods 1995 33 no. 5 624\u2013635.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1910330507"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B\u00f6rnertP. AldefeldB. andNehrkeK. Improved 3D spiral imaging for coronary MR angiography 2001 45 no. 1 172\u2013175 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/1522-2594(200101)45:1<172::AID-MRM1024>3.0.CO;2-L.","DOI":"10.1002\/1522-2594(200101)45:1<172::AID-MRM1024>3.0.CO;2-L"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"JacksonJ. I. MeyerC. H. NishimuraD. G. andMacovskiA. Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using gridding 1991 10 no. 3 473\u2013478 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/42.97598.","DOI":"10.1109\/42.97598"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"OesterleC. MarklM. StreckerR. KraemerF. M. andHennigJ. Spiral reconstruction by regridding to a large rectilinear matrix: a practical solution for routine systems 1999 10 no. 1 84\u201392 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(SICI)1522-2586(199907)10:1<84::AID-JMRI12>3.0.CO;2-D.","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1522-2586(199907)10:1<84::AID-JMRI12>3.3.CO;2-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"RosenfeldD. An optimal and efficient new gridding algorithm using singular value decomposition 1998 40 no. 1 14\u201323.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1910400103"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"RascheV. ProksaR. SinkusR. BoernertP. andEggersH. Resampling of data between arbitrary grids using convolution interpolation 1999 18 no. 5 385\u2013392 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/42.774166.","DOI":"10.1109\/42.774166"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"HogeR. D. KwanR. K. S. andPikeG. B. Density compensation functions for spiral MRI 1997 38 no. 1 117\u2013128.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1910380117"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"SalemK. A. MoriguchiH. DuerkJ. L. andWilsonD. L. Optimization of noisy nonuniform sampling and image reconstruction for fast MRI using a human vision model 4324 82\u201390 Proceedings of SPIE.","DOI":"10.1117\/12.431176"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"SartyG. E. BennettR. andCoxR. W. Direct reconstruction of non-cartesiank-space data using a nonuniform fast fourier transform 2001 45 no. 5 908\u2013915 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/mrm.1120.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1120"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van den Branden LambrechtC. J.andVerscheureO. Perceptual quality measure using a spatiotemporal model of the human visual system 2668 450\u2013461 Proceedings of SPIE.","DOI":"10.1117\/12.235440"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1142\/9789812831200_0010","article-title":"A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation","author":"Lubin J.","year":"1995","journal-title":"Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"JacksonW. B. SaidM. R. JaredD. A. LarimerJ. O. GilleJ. L. andLubinJ. Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human observer performance 3036 64\u201373 Proceedings of SPIE.","DOI":"10.1117\/12.271312"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"JohnsonJ. P. LubinJ. KrupinskiE. A. PetersonH. A. RoehrigH. andBaysingerA. Visual discrimination model for digital mammography 3663 253\u2013263 Proceedings of SPIE.","DOI":"10.1117\/12.349650"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"OhJ. WoolleyS. I. ArvanitisT. N. andTownendJ. N. A multistage perceptual quality assessment for compressed digital angiogram images 2001 20 no. 12 1352\u20131361 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/42.974930.","DOI":"10.1109\/42.974930"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_27_2","article-title":"The visual differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity","author":"Daly S.","year":"1993","journal-title":"Digital Images and Human Vision"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"SalemK. A. LewinJ. S. AschoffA. J. DuerkJ. L. andWilsonD. L. Validation of a human vision model for image quality evaluation of fast interventional magnetic resonance imaging 2002 11 no. 2 224\u2013235 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1117\/1.1453412.","DOI":"10.1117\/1.1453412"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"SalemK. A. DuerkJ. L. WendtM. andWilsonD. L. Evaluation of keyhole MR imaging with a human visual system response model 1998 209P.","DOI":"10.1117\/12.349647"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"FlaskC. A. SalemK. A. MoriguchiH. LewinJ. S. WilsonD. L. andDuerkJ. L. Keyhole Dixon method for faster perceptually equivalent fat suppression 2003 18 no. 1 103\u2013112 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jmri.10323.","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.10323"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_31_2","unstructured":"FlaskC. A. SalemK. A. LewinJ. S. andDuerkJ. L. Keyhole Dixon method for faster fat suppression with perceptual equivalence 2002 225."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"XueP. ThomasC. W. GilmoreG. C. andWilsonD. L. An adaptive reference\/test paradigm: application to pulsed fluoroscopy perception 1998 30 no. 2 332\u2013348.","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03200663"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"JiangY.andWilsonD. L. Optimization of detector pixel size for stent visualization in x-ray fluoroscopy 2006 33 no. 3 668\u2013678 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1118\/1.2169907.","DOI":"10.1118\/1.2169907"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van de WalleR. BarrettH. H. MyersK. J.et al. Reconstruction of MR images from data acquired on a general nonregular grid by pseudoinverse calculation 2000 19 no. 12 1160\u20131167 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/42.897806.","DOI":"10.1109\/42.897806"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"KingK. F. FooT. K. F. andCrawfordC. R. Optimized gradient waveforms for spiral scanning 1995 34 156\u2013160.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1910340205"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"HardyC. H.andClineH. E. Broadband nuclear magnetic resonance pulses with two-dimensional spatial selectivity 1989 66 no. 4 1513\u20131516 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.344411.","DOI":"10.1063\/1.344411"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"MacovskiA. Noise in MRI 1996 36 no. 3 494\u2013497.","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.1910360327"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"HuoD. XuD. LiangZ.-P. andWilsonD. L. Application of perceptual difference model on regularization techniques of parallel MR imaging 2006 24 no. 2 123\u2013132 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mri.2005.10.018.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mri.2005.10.018"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"MannosJ. L.andSakrisonD. J. The effects of a visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images 1974 20 no. 4 525\u2013536 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TIT.1974.1055250.","DOI":"10.1109\/TIT.1974.1055250"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McCannJ. J. McKeeS. P. andTaylorT. H. Quantitative studies in retinex theory. A comparison between theoretical predictions and observer responses to the \u201ccolor mondrian\u201d experiments 1976 16 no. 5 445\u2013458 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0042-6989(76)90020-1.","DOI":"10.1016\/0042-6989(76)90020-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"WatsonA. B. The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images 1987 39 no. 3 311\u2013327.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0734-189X(87)80184-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"NormannR. A. BaxterB. S. RavindraH. andAndertonP. J. Photoreceptor contributions to contrast sensitivity: applications in radiological diagnosis 1983 13 no. 5 944\u2013953.","DOI":"10.1109\/TSMC.1983.6313090"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_43_2","unstructured":"ITU Recommendations ITU-R BT.500-11 Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures 2002."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"MartensJ.-B.andMeestersL. Image dissimilarity 1998 70 no. 3 155\u2013176 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0165-1684(98)00123-6.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-1684(98)00123-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"BurgessA. E. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods 1995 22 no. 5 643\u2013655 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1118\/1.597576.","DOI":"10.1118\/1.597576"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"ManjeshwarR. M.andWilsonD. L. Effect of inherent location uncertainty on detection of stationary targets in noisy image sequences 2001 18 no. 1 78\u201385.","DOI":"10.1364\/JOSAA.18.000078"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"SrinivasY.andWilsonD. L. Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy 2002 29 no. 7 1611\u20131621 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1118\/1.1487858.","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1487858"},{"volume-title":"Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics","year":"1974","author":"Green D.","key":"e_1_2_1_48_2"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"JohnsonJ. P. KirchbergK. J. andLorenzC. H. Perceptual evaluation of artifacts in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging due to partial parallel imaging 5749 549\u2013556 Proceedings of SPIE.","DOI":"10.1117\/12.596210"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Biomedical Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/downloads.hindawi.com\/journals\/ijbi\/2006\/035290.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1155\/IJBI\/2006\/35290","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,11]],"date-time":"2025-01-11T21:42:06Z","timestamp":1736631726000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1155\/IJBI\/2006\/35290"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,1]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1155\/IJBI\/2006\/35290"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/ijbi\/2006\/35290","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1687-4188","1687-4196"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1687-4188"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1687-4196"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2006-10-09","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}],"article-number":"035290"}}