{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,21]],"date-time":"2025-11-21T22:49:27Z","timestamp":1763765367081,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2000,1,1]],"date-time":"2000-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":946684800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2000,1,1]],"date-time":"2000-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":946684800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Dig Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2000]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>&lt;i&gt;Background: &lt;\/i&gt;Sodium picosulphate (Picolax) is considered by most British surgeons as standard preparation for colonoscopy and elective surgery. Oral sodium phosphate may be better tolerated and more efficient as bowel preparation. &lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;\/i&gt; A randomized trial was performed to compare oral sodium phosphate (n = 76) with Picolax (n = 77) as bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. A parallel study randomized colonoscopy patients to sodium phosphate (n = 51) or Picolax (n = 52). Patient acceptability was measured for seven symptoms with a linear analogue score. Quality of preparation was graded by the surgeon and faecal residue was measured in resection specimens. During colonoscopy, bowel preparation has graded 0\u201324 using an endoscopic score. &lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;\/i&gt; Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, embarrassment, fear and fatigue did not differ significantly between the groups. Surgeons grade of quality was judged poor or awful in 5 of 76 in the sodium phosphate group (9%) compared with 13 of 73 in the Picolax group (18%, p = 0.084). Mean faecal residue in the resection specimen was 0.1\u00a0g\/cm after sodium phosphate compared with 0.45\u00a0g\/cm after Picolax (p &lt; 0.01). The endoscopic score was significantly lower using sodium phosphate (2.0 \u00b1 2.2) than picolax (3.1 \u00b1 2.9; p &lt; 0.05). &lt;i&gt;Conclusions: &lt;\/i&gt;These results suggest that oral sodium phosphate is well tolerated and superior to Picolax in elective colorectal surgery and colonoscopy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000018802","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,15]],"date-time":"2003-04-15T17:25:18Z","timestamp":1050427518000},"page":"66-70","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":55,"title":["Randomized Trial of Oral Sodium Phosphate Compared with Oral Sodium Picosulphate (Picolax) for Elective Colorectal Surgery and Colonoscopy"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"K.","family":"Yoshioka","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.B.","family":"Connolly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"O.A.","family":"Ogunbiyi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H.","family":"Hasegawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.G.","family":"Morton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.R.B.","family":"Keighley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2000,3,6]]},"container-title":["Digestive Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/18802","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/18802","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,24]],"date-time":"2025-04-24T05:02:53Z","timestamp":1745470973000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000018802"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2000]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2000,7,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000018802","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0253-4886","1421-9883"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0253-4886"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1421-9883"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2000]]}}}