{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,17]],"date-time":"2025-09-17T15:55:28Z","timestamp":1758124528256,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2003,1,1]],"date-time":"2003-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1041379200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2003,1,1]],"date-time":"2003-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1041379200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Gynecol Obstet Invest"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>We present a case of a septate uterus with duplication of the cervix and a vaginal septum, which challenges the embryologic concept of unidirectional caudad to cephalad m\u00fcllerian ducts fusion. This unique case is, to the best of our knowledge, the seventh reported case of this m\u00fcllerian anomaly. It challenges the classic theory of unidirectional caudad to cephalad fusion of the m\u00fcllerian ducts, and might be additional evidence to support the hypothesis suggested by Musset et al. Accurate diagnosis and reports of such cases are important not only for the benefit of treatment, but to reflect the true incidence of this anomaly, and consolidate the embryologic concept.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000071535","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,7,29]],"date-time":"2003-07-29T09:18:09Z","timestamp":1059470289000},"page":"186-188","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Septate Uterus with Cervical Duplication: Rethinking the Development of M\u00fcllerian Anomalies"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"55","author":[{"given":"Mohammad","family":"Fatum","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nathan","family":"Rojansky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Asher","family":"Shushan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2003,7,18]]},"container-title":["Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/71535","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/71535","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,24]],"date-time":"2025-04-24T03:31:11Z","timestamp":1745465471000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000071535"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2003]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2003,7,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000071535","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0378-7346","1423-002X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0378-7346"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1423-002X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2003]]}}}