{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,27]],"date-time":"2026-01-27T14:21:44Z","timestamp":1769523704068,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":2,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,18]],"date-time":"2006-12-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1166400000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,18]],"date-time":"2006-12-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1166400000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ophthalmologica"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>&lt;i&gt;Purpose:&lt;\/i&gt; To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic endonasal primary conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) and revision CDCR after primary CDCR. &lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;\/i&gt; Twenty-four patients who had undergone endoscopic endonasal CDCR with a Jones tube and who were followed up for over 6 months at our hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Our analysis included success rate, operation times, and causes of failure. &lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;\/i&gt; The indications for revision CDCR were Jones tube prolapse and inadequate tube length. The initial success rate in the primary and revision groups were 78.6% (11\/14) and 100% (10\/10), respectively, and their mean operation times were 24 min (\u00b1 6.3) and 21 min (\u00b1 6.1), respectively. Main causes of failure included inaccurate tube length and abnormal tube position. &lt;i&gt;Conclusions:&lt;\/i&gt; Endoscopic endonasal CDCR appears to be a reasonable revision and primary approach, because it allows Jones tube length to be measured accurately during surgery, and an 18- to 20-mm Jones tube length was used in most cases.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000096520","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,22]],"date-time":"2006-12-22T23:18:32Z","timestamp":1166829512000},"page":"36-40","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Clinical Study of Endoscopic Endonasal Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy with Jones Tube Placement"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"221","author":[{"given":"Min Soo","family":"Park","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mi Jung","family":"Chi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Se Hyun","family":"Baek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0161-6420%2898%2996015-8"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0161-6420%2800%2900119-6"}],"container-title":["Ophthalmologica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/96520","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/96520","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,24]],"date-time":"2025-04-24T02:53:49Z","timestamp":1745463229000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000096520"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,18]]},"references-count":2,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000096520","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0030-3755","1423-0267"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0030-3755","type":"print"},{"value":"1423-0267","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,18]]}}}