{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T23:13:06Z","timestamp":1790896386242,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":7,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,18]],"date-time":"2006-12-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1166400000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,18]],"date-time":"2006-12-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1166400000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Gynecol Obstet Invest"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>&lt;i&gt;Aims:&lt;\/i&gt; To compare the recurrence rates after anterior colporrhaphy for cystocele using three different surgical techniques: standard plicating, purse-string, and rolling anterior colporrhaphy. &lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;\/i&gt; A retrospective chart review of women undergoing anterior colporrhaphy for cystocele with or without concomitant operations between 1988 and 2000 was conducted. Women were assessed by vaginal examination pre- and postoperatively at 6 weeks and over 2 years. Grades of cystocele were assessed by Baden-Walker halfway grading system. \u03c7&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;\/sup&gt; tests and ANOVAs were performed for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Cox regressions were used to calculate recurrent rates. &lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;\/i&gt; Among the studied 363 women, 296, 33, and 34 underwent standard plicating, purse-string and rolling techniques, respectively. There was no significant difference in age, parity, menopausal status, or mean length of follow-up among the three groups. The purse-string group revealed a significantly higher risk of recurrence than the standard plicating group (hazard ratio: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.05\u20136.08). The severity of cystocele was another key role of determining the prognosis for recurrences (grades 3 &amp;#38; 4 relative to grade 1, hazard ratio: 3.35; 95% CI: 1.34\u20138.38). &lt;i&gt;Conclusion:&lt;\/i&gt; Our study showed that standard plicating and rolling technique provided similar anatomic cure rates. However, the purse-string technique was less effective in restoring vaginal anatomy than standard plicating anterior colporrhaphy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000098116","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,22]],"date-time":"2006-12-22T23:18:32Z","timestamp":1166829512000},"page":"214-221","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Comparison of Recurrence Rates after Anterior Colporrhaphy for Cystocele Using Three Different Surgical Techniques"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"63","author":[{"given":"Chi-Hau","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wen-Yih","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bor-Ching","family":"Sheu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Song-Nan","family":"Chow","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ho-Hsiung","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136%2Fbmj.2.3339.1185"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0029-7844%2896%2900322-5"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067%2Fmob.2001.119081"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097%2F00003081-197212000-00020"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0002-9378%2896%2970243-0"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111%2Fj.1471-0528.2000.tb13276.x"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007%2Fs00192-005-1296-3"}],"container-title":["Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/98116","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/98116","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,24]],"date-time":"2025-04-24T02:28:04Z","timestamp":1745461684000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000098116"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,18]]},"references-count":7,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2007,5,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000098116","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0378-7346","1423-002X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0378-7346","type":"print"},{"value":"1423-002X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,12,18]]}}}