{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,5]],"date-time":"2026-05-05T02:13:14Z","timestamp":1777947194880,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1997,1,20]],"date-time":"1997-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":853718400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pages\/terms-and-conditions"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[1997,1,20]],"date-time":"1997-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":853718400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pages\/terms-and-conditions"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Stereotact Funct Neurosurg"],"abstract":"<jats:p>We report three patients who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery for benign tumors (meningioma, neurinoma and hemangioblastoma), in whom an \u2018unchanged tumor volume\u2019 demonstrated by postirradiation follow-up neuro-imaging could be regarded as a successful treatment results, as compared with preradiosurgery tumor growth. It is our view that unless significant tumor growth has been observed before radiosurgery, \u2018unchanged in size\u2019 after radiosurgery cannot be regarded as a successful treatment result. Because relatively few hemangioblastoma patients have been treated radiosurgically, this report emphasizes the course of one case with hemangioblastoma.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000099815","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,2,14]],"date-time":"2007-02-14T12:26:36Z","timestamp":1171455996000},"page":"231-239","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Is Unchanged Tumor Volume after Radiosurgery a Measure of Outcome?"],"prefix":"10.1159","author":[{"given":"M.","family":"Yamamoto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Jimbo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M.","family":"Ide","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Y.","family":"Umebara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Hagiwara","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Takakura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Hirai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1997,1,20]]},"container-title":["Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/99815","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article-pdf\/doi\/10.1159\/000099815","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,2]],"date-time":"2026-05-02T22:32:09Z","timestamp":1777761129000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000099815"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1997,1,20]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000099815","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1011-6125","1423-0372"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1011-6125","type":"print"},{"value":"1423-0372","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1997,1,20]]}}}