{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T10:52:18Z","timestamp":1777891938965,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,2]],"date-time":"2010-03-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1267488000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pages\/terms-and-conditions"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,2]],"date-time":"2010-03-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1267488000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pages\/terms-and-conditions"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Gynecol Obstet Invest"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Thirty-four women with genuine stress incontinence and low urethral closure pressure were studied pre-and postoperatively. A modified Burch retropubic urethropexy was performed in 29 patients with a cure rate of 78 %, improvement in 7%, and failure in 15%. The modified Stamey procedure was performed in 5 patients with significant pelvic floor relaxation with a cure rate of 40% and improvement in 60%. If urethral mobility is present, traditional anti-incontinence procedures appear to be a reasonable alternative in patients with low urethral pressure.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000293112","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,3]],"date-time":"2010-03-03T03:02:01Z","timestamp":1267585321000},"page":"106-109","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Surgical Management of Stress Incontinence in Patients with Low Urethral Pressure"],"prefix":"10.1159","author":[{"given":"David A.","family":"Richardson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alfida","family":"Ramahi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eva","family":"Chalas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,2]]},"container-title":["Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article-pdf\/doi\/10.1159\/000293112","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T06:14:33Z","timestamp":1777616073000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000293112"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,2]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000293112","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0378-7346","1423-002X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0378-7346","type":"print"},{"value":"1423-002X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,3,2]]}}}