{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,30]],"date-time":"2026-01-30T04:28:58Z","timestamp":1769747338504,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,1,1]],"date-time":"2010-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1262304000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pages\/terms-and-conditions"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,1,1]],"date-time":"2010-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1262304000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pages\/terms-and-conditions"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Urol Int"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective: The current study investigates the effect of bladder neck (BN) preservation on postoperative continence and positive surgical margins (+SMs). Patients and Methods: 150 patients (group 1) who underwent BN-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) and 90 patients treated with EERPE and BN resection (group 2) were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Both groups were similar for age, prostate-specific antigen and prostate size. There was no significant difference in operative time, mean blood loss or transfusion rate. Mean catheterization time was similar. The overall +SM rates were very similar at 10.7% for group 1 and 10.0% for group 2 (group 1, pT2 = 5.1% and pT3 = 30.3%; group 2, pT2 = 2.9% and pT3 = 33.3%). One of 16 patients in group 1 and 1 of 9 in group 2 had a +SM at BN. Statistically significant differences in continence were observed 24 h after catheter removal and 3 months postoperatively between both groups. Conclusion: BN preservation proved to have an impact on postoperative early continence of patients undergoing EERPE. Continence of patients who underwent BN preservation was improved after catheter removal and at the 3-month follow-up in comparison to those without BN preservation, but +SMs were not affected by the BN-sparing surgery.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000314842","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,22]],"date-time":"2010-09-22T07:45:15Z","timestamp":1285141515000},"page":"135-138","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Effect of Bladder Neck Preservation during Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy on Urinary Continence"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"85","author":[{"given":"Jens-Uwe","family":"Stolzenburg","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Panagiotis","family":"Kallidonis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"James","family":"Hicks","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Minh","family":"Do","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anja","family":"Dietel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"George","family":"Sakellaropoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Abdulrahman","family":"Al-Aown","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Evangelos","family":"Liatsikos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,5,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1089%2Fend.2009.0336"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159%2F000282596"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159%2F000127331"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2897%2900463-9"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0022-5347%2805%2968003-2"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2896%2900324-X"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0090-4295%2802%2901956-8"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2F0090-4295%2893%2990534-H"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0302-2838%2803%2900103-9"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097%2F01.ju.0000055141.36916.be"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2Fj.eururo.2008.10.036"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2Fj.eururo.2009.01.036"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0022-5347%2805%2966534-2"}],"container-title":["Urologia Internationalis"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/uin\/article-pdf\/85\/2\/135\/3903994\/000314842.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/uin\/article-pdf\/85\/2\/135\/3903994\/000314842.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T19:25:04Z","timestamp":1745436304000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000314842"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,21]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000314842","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0042-1138","1423-0399"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0042-1138","type":"print"},{"value":"1423-0399","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010]]}}}