{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,24]],"date-time":"2025-04-24T04:36:10Z","timestamp":1745469370901,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,23]],"date-time":"2010-12-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1293062400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,23]],"date-time":"2010-12-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1293062400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Gynecol Obstet Invest"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011]]},"abstract":"<i>Background\/Aims:<\/i> Earlier studies with radionuclide hysterosalpingography (RN-HSG) using either small or large particles have shown different results. Some studies have questioned the clinical relevance of RN-HSG. The aim of this study was to evaluate the RN-HSG method using two different sizes of radio-labelled particles during different parts of the menstrual cycle. <i>Methods:<\/i> Ten healthy women, 28\u201340 years of age (mean 34.5), with proven fertility, regular menstrual cycle, not using oral contraceptives and due to undergo laparoscopic sterilization, were randomized to RN-HSG after deposition of a solution with either small Albures or large MAASOL, <sup>99m<\/sup>Tc-radio-labelled particles into the cervix uteri. Investigations were, for every patient, performed during the follicular, peri-ovulatory and mid-luteal parts of the menstrual cycle. Transport of radioactivity from cervix to uterus and Fallopian tubes was evaluated. <i>Results:<\/i> The RN-HSG investigations could not show any difference between the two different sizes of radio-labelled particles. Transport of radioactivity to the Fallopian tube was seen only in some cases and most frequently during the peri-ovulatory period. <i>Conclusion:<\/i> We found the RN-HSG investigations inconclusive. The RN-HSG method does not seem to be a reliable tool for the investigation of Fallopian tube transport.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000321795","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,9]],"date-time":"2011-08-09T14:05:52Z","timestamp":1312898752000},"page":"20-24","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Radionuclide Hysterosalpingography Is Not a Reliable Tool for Investigation of Fallopian Tube Transport \u2013 A Controlled Randomized Study Using Particles of Two Sizes during Three Different Parts of the Menstrual Cycle"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"72","author":[{"given":"Kjell","family":"W\u00e5nggren","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"H\u00e5kan","family":"Wramsby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Staffan","family":"Bremmer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Steffan","family":"Lundberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hans","family":"Jacobsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159%2F000292590"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0001-2998%2881%2980027-X"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2Fj.ejogrb.2003.07.003"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159%2F000293037"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS1472-6483%2810%2960761-4"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093%2Fhumrep%2F12.2.275"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2897%2900467-6"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2003.12.016"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111%2Fj.1749-6632.1997.tb48550.x"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2FS0015-0282%2801%2902905-3"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016%2F0090-6980%2877%2990015-6"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093%2Fhumupd%2F4.5.667"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093%2Fhumupd%2F4.5.655"}],"container-title":["Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/321795","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/321795","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/321795","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T19:03:44Z","timestamp":1745435024000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000321795"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,23]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,8,5]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000321795","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0378-7346","1423-002X"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0378-7346"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1423-002X"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,12,23]]}}}