{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,3]],"date-time":"2026-07-03T03:05:06Z","timestamp":1783047906117,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,1,1]],"date-time":"2013-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1356998400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,1,1]],"date-time":"2013-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1356998400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Urol Int"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013]]},"abstract":"<b><i>Objective:<\/i><\/b> Tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty is performed by many pediatric urologists and has been widely accepted for repair of distal and mid-shaft hypospadias. However, the role of urethral catheter placement in TIP repair remains controversial. In this study, the surgical outcomes of indwelling urethral catheter and non-catheter TIP repairs in boys with hypospadias were compared. <b><i>Methods:<\/i><\/b> A total of 254 patients with primary distal and mid-shaft hypospadias underwent TIP repair and were evaluated retrospectively. A urethral catheter was placed in 103 patients (group A) and non-catheter repair was performed in 151 patients (group B). Information obtained included age, toilet training, chordee, type of hypospadias, presence or absence of a catheter, and postoperative complications. The complications recorded included wound infection, urinary tract infection, bladder spasm, urinary retention, urinary extravasation, meatal stenosis, urethral stricture, and urethrocutaneous fistula. <b><i>Results:<\/i><\/b> There was no statistical difference in age, toilet training, chordee, hypospadias site, or performing surgeon between the two groups. The median follow-up time was 22 and 24 months for groups A and B, respectively. The rate of bladder spasms (10.7 vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and urinary tract infection (9.7 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.034) was significantly higher for group A than group B. Although the rate of urinary retention was higher in group B than in group A (4.0 vs. 0%), there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.084). Likewise, the incidence of urethrocutaneous fistula and meatal stenosis was not significantly different. <b><i>Conclusion:<\/i><\/b> Non-catheter TIP repair is feasible and positive outcomes can be achieved with minimal complications and less patient discomfort.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000347127","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,19]],"date-time":"2013-03-19T08:18:36Z","timestamp":1363681116000},"page":"354-357","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Outcome Analysis of Tubularized Incised Plate Repair in Hypospadias: Is a Catheter Necessary?"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"90","author":[{"given":"Ning","family":"Xu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xue-Yi","family":"Xue","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yong","family":"Wei","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiao-Dong","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qing-Shui","family":"Zheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tao","family":"Jiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jin-Bei","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000315495"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MOU.0b013e32833e4c80"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2009.09.010"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.08.031"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1270457"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2004.04.021"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpurol.2009.02.204"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2003.04513.x"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2008-1039198"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jpsu.2001.28853"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)68143-8"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410X.2003.03084.x"}],"container-title":["Urologia Internationalis"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/347127","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/347127","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T18:52:56Z","timestamp":1745434376000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000347127"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4,18]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000347127","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0042-1138","1423-0399"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0042-1138","type":"print"},{"value":"1423-0399","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013]]}}}