{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,9]],"date-time":"2026-01-09T01:21:33Z","timestamp":1767921693582,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":5,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,23]],"date-time":"2014-07-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1406073600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/3.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,23]],"date-time":"2014-07-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1406073600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/3.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Case Rep Oncol"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Cutaneous metastatic implantation of non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma via urine is a rare finding, and only few cases have been reported in the literature. Here, we present a case of metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the prepuce and glans penis, which was suspected to be an implantation of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer via urine. The patient had pseudophimosis of the penis, and contact with urine containing urothelial carcinoma cells was considered to be the cause of the metastatic implantation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000365749","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,23]],"date-time":"2014-07-23T06:53:12Z","timestamp":1406098392000},"page":"509-512","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma of the Prepuce and Glans Penis: Suspected Implantation of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer via Urine"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Tomoyuki","family":"Makino","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yasuhide","family":"Kitagawa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mikio","family":"Namiki","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2004.01.014"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)67658-6"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)67634-1"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)66169-X"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-2042.2006.01565.x"}],"container-title":["Case Reports in Oncology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/365749","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/365749","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T18:01:39Z","timestamp":1745431299000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000365749"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,23]]},"references-count":5,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,8,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000365749","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1662-6575"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1662-6575","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,7,23]]}}}