{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,7]],"date-time":"2025-06-07T20:27:21Z","timestamp":1749328041170,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]],"date-time":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1451606400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]],"date-time":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1451606400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ophthalmologica"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Purpose:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; To determine the prevalence of vitreomacular interface (VMI) pathology, using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; VMI status was classified into macular posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), focal vitreomacular adhesion (VMA; \u22641,500 \u03bcm), broad VMA (&gt;1,500 \u03bcm), focal vitreomacular traction (VMT; \u22641,500 \u03bcm), broad VMT (&gt;1,500 \u03bcm), full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) with the presence of VMT, and FTMH without the presence of VMT. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; A total of 1,976 eyes were included. A nonpathologic VMI was observed in 1,875 eyes (94.8%), including 1,050 (53.1%) with PVD, 120 (6.1%) with focal VMA and 705 (35.6%) with broad VMA. A pathologic state of the VMI was diagnosed in 101 eyes (5.1%). Thirty-three eyes (1.7%) were classified as focal VMT, 29 (1.4%) as broad VMT, 39 (1.9%) as FTMH, resulting in 6 small, 12 medium and 21 large FTMHs, six eyes had VMT associated to FTMH. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conclusions:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; Even in a tertiary care, retinal referral practice, VMI pathology is a relatively rare condition. There was a higher prevalence in a tertiary hospital study compared to population-based studies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000443937","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,17]],"date-time":"2016-02-17T22:02:18Z","timestamp":1455746538000},"page":"179-183","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["The Prevalence of Vitreomacular Interface Pathology in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"235","author":[{"given":"Ignacio","family":"Flores-Moreno","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luis","family":"Arias-Barquet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mar\u00eda","family":"Vidal-Mart\u00ed","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alex","family":"Mu\u00f1oz-Blanco","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marcos J.","family":"Rubio-Caso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jos\u00e9 Maria","family":"Ruiz-Moreno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jay S.","family":"Duker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Josep M.","family":"Caminal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,2,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/809640"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1110823"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.07.042"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0b013e328352404c"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2009.11.016"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2014-304961"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IAE.0000000000000016"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IAE.0b013e3182993ef8"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2014.07.045"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2014.10.014"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IAE.0b013e31829232fd"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2009.01.052"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2005.10.021"}],"container-title":["Ophthalmologica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/443937","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/443937","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/443937","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T17:42:34Z","timestamp":1745430154000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000443937"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,4,5]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000443937","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0030-3755","1423-0267"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0030-3755"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1423-0267"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016]]}}}