{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,7]],"date-time":"2026-04-07T15:39:20Z","timestamp":1775576360895,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Med Princ Pract"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Objective:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 2-week levofloxacin-containing triple therapy, levofloxacin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy, and standard bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as a first-line regimen for the eradication of &lt;i&gt;Helicobacter pylori.&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; A total of 329 patients with &lt;i&gt;H. pylori &lt;\/i&gt;infection were randomly divided into 3 groups to receive one of the following regimens: (a) levofloxacin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy, RBAL (rabeprazole 20 mg, b.i.d., bismuth subsalicylate 562 mg, b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g, b.i.d, levofloxacin 500 mg, once daily), (b) standard bismuth quadruple therapy, RBMT (rabeprazole 20 mg, b.i.d, subsalicylate 562 mg, b.i.d., metronidazole 500 mg, t.i.d, tetracycline 500 mg, q.i.d), or (c) levofloxacin-containing triple therapy, RAL (rabeprazole 20 mg, b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g, b.i.d, levofloxacin 500 mg, once daily). The primary outcome was the eradication rate in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; The eradication rates of the above 3 groups using ITT analysis were RBAL 83.8%, RBMT 88.3%, and RAL 74.8% compared with 91.2, 92.5, and 79.2%, respectively, using PP analysis. The eradication rate using RBMT was significantly higher than that of RAL (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;\/i&gt; = 0.029 in ITT analysis and &lt;i&gt;p&lt;\/i&gt; = 0.017 in PP analysis). Several side effects occurred in 156 patients (54.1%) in the RBAL group, 215 (52.3%) in the RBMT group, and 56 (26.2%) in the RAL group (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;\/i&gt; &gt; 0.05, RBAL vs. RBMT; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;\/i&gt; &lt; 0.001, RBMT vs. RAL; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;\/i&gt; &lt; 0.001, RBAL vs. RAL). &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conclusion:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; All bismuth-containing quadruple therapies had acceptable eradication rates, but levofloxacin-containing triple therapy was not as good as quadruple therapies. Hence, quadruple therapies should be considered the preferred first-line therapy for &lt;i&gt;H. pylori&lt;\/i&gt; infections.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000484930","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,3]],"date-time":"2017-11-03T22:01:35Z","timestamp":1509746495000},"page":"523-529","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Comparison of Helicobacter pylori Eradication Rates of 2-Week Levofloxacin-Containing Triple Therapy, Levofloxacin-Containing Bismuth Quadruple Therapy, and Standard Bismuth Quadruple Therapy as a First-Line Regimen"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Evrim","family":"Kahramano\u011flu Aksoy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ferdane","family":"Pirin\u00e7ci Sapmaz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zeynep","family":"G\u00f6kta\u015f","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Metin","family":"Uzman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ya\u015far","family":"Nazl\u0131g\u00fcl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,11,3]]},"container-title":["Medical Principles and Practice"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/484930","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/484930","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T16:20:29Z","timestamp":1745425229000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000484930"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,22]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,2,26]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000484930","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1011-7571","1423-0151"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1011-7571","type":"print"},{"value":"1423-0151","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}}}